marckassay[at]yahoo.com wrote:

- quote -

(sorry for the delay - I was away)
A traditional IRA may be deductible, based on participation in other
company plans, and income.
A roth has its own income restrictions.

jIM got it right as far as my approach goes:
If in 15% bracket, go Roth. If higher, go deductible IRA.
If usually in higher, (than 15%) but in 'this' year back in 15% or
lower, you may 'convert' traditional IRA money to a Roth, and pay the tax.

In the example you quote above, I propose this (if I understood your
situation); In 2007 make a traditional IRA deposit. You get $1000 tax
break on the $4000 deposit. In 2008, convert it (at 15% if that's your
bracket this year) and pay $600 in tax. This approach works great for
those who have any disruption in income, lob loss, spouse out for
newborn, etc. I'm sure I could go on about it, with more words and
examples, but I think this is pretty clear. (follow up questions are
still free)

JOE

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

marckassay[at]yahoo.com writes:

- quote -

Yes to both .

--
Rich Carreiro rlc-news[at]rlcarr.com

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

On Mar 14, 5:25*am, marckas...[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -


- quote -

YES, but first phrasing is more common way to communicate where IRA
came from.

- quote -

The question "what risk or loss resulted" confuses me.

The 401k account balance gets frozen the day the rollover application
arrives. That amount is then transferred to Fidelity. Once at
Fidelity it will be invested the way you instructed fidelity to
invest.

The risks taken will be a function of the investments chosen.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

marckassay[at]yahoo.com wrote on [Fri, 14 Mar 2008 04:25:17 -0500]:
- quote -

It's a traditional IRA with all the benefits of an IRA, however it's
called a Rollover IRA if it only contains funds that were rolled over
into it.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Thanks for the replies, its helpful!

I am a little confused about when the term "rollover" is used in the
context of an IRA. The term seems to be used as verb and a noun. For
instance, if money is rolled over into a traditional IRA account,
would this account now be considered a "rollover IRA account"? Or
would the account still be considered an IRA account that tax deferred
money (from a 401k) got "rolled over" into it?

Also PeterL mentioned about rolling over a 401k into a rollover IRA in
this thread thru Fidelity, which I also have mine in. But he never
mentioned that if this was a direct
transfer. If it wasn't a direct transfer what risk or loss if any
resulted?

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

On Mar 13, 5:05*am, marckas...[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -

A traditional IRA may or may not be deductable. In order to be
deductable you must be under certain income and meet other
requirements.

see pub 590 from IRS
http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch01.html#d0e825

and read "what new in 2007" which is quoted in my reply to another
poster on this thread below.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

On Mar 13, 10:49*am, "rick++" <rick...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

Check IRA rules on this- there was a change for tax year 2007. An IRA
can be deductable if AGI is under ~103k.

- quote -

2007, if you are covered by a retirement plan at work, your deduction
for contributions to a traditional IRA is reduced (phased out) if your
modified AGI is:

More than $83,000 but less than $103,000 for a married couple filing a
joint return or a qualifying widow(er),

More than $52,000 but less than $62,000 for a single individual or
head of household, or

Less than $10,000 for a married individual filing a separate return."

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Elizabeth Richardson wrote:

- quote -

I opened a new Roth and funded for the prior year and that year back
around 2002 or so.



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

On Mar 12, 12:32 pm, marckas...[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -

The 401K adminstrator may force you to rollover the 410K if the amount
is
too small. Saves them adminstration overhead.

- quote -

Yes. But that is often due to income eligibility constraints. In
good years
you may not qualify for the a Roth.

Furthermore, because you were covered by an employer's retirement
plan for at least one day in 2008, an IRA is not deductable if you
make
more than $62,000. A Roth has a higher limit.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

On Mar 12, 4:20*pm, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote:
- quote -

Joe is giving you excellent advice.

To elaborate- the 401k and IRA are seperate entities (I think you knew
that).

The IRA could be either traditional deductable IRA, a traditional non
deductable IRA or a Roth IRA.

If you are in 25% tax bracket and eligible for the deductable, Joe's
advice was to do that.
If you are in 15% tax bracket and eligible for the Roth Joe's advice
was to do that.

unless I misinterpreted his advice.
In general, opt for the Roth over a traditional non deductable IRA.

Rollover- a rollover IRA just keeps the tax deferred status of the
401k. It does not affect the status directly for any of the above.

I have a Roth and a rollover. Both with around 50k in them. It is
OK. I might choose to convert the Rollover to a Roth a little bit at
a time as part of tax planning each year, but that is not important to
this discussion.

Joe did mention doing a rollover to Roth conversion as tax and
investment planning going forward. Good advice, I would start simple.

Look at what taxable income is on the tax return- this established tax
bracket. Depending on if you are married or single will affect what
rate is applied to that taxable income.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Thanks everyone for the replies; my questions got answered.

[at]joetaxpayer:
To clarify let me state this first, for 2007 tax year I was in the 25%
tax bracket and I am assuming I will be employed soon.

You mentioned that if I was unemployed for some time during 2008 and
fell in the lower 15% tax bracket I would, "... convert and pay $600 in
tax. You are ahead $400." Can you elaborate that example? I am not
sure what I would be converting.

Also a "deductible IRA" is that a traditional IRA?

Thanks.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

"joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message
news:PpydnW6x_sOL6UXanZ2dnUVZ_uCinZ2d[at]comcast.com...
- quote -

I don't know about brokers - don't have any use for them. I know the big
mutual fund houses will, and if you're just starting out investing, you
probably shouldn't be buying individual issues anyway.

Elizabeth Richardson

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Elizabeth Richardson wrote:

- quote -

Well, I just searched a bit, and found that a Self-Employed 401(k) has a
deadline to open by 12/31. And Roth conversions must happen by 12/31 as
well. And RMDs for IRAs.

Here's my question back to you - will a broker open a zero balance IRA?
There are those who, even by 12/31, don't know if they can deduct the
IRA, and are inclined to wait till March to open one, or deposit to a
new one. I guess once the account is open, this discussion is moot
beyond that point. If nothing else, this continues to prove my point,
"too many retirement accounts, too many rules."
Joe

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

"joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message
news:YbmdnR5mjbwU_0XanZ2dnUVZ_rninZ2d[at]comcast.com...
- quote -

Ok, maybe they've changed it. It used to be that to make a 2007 contribution
in 2008, you had to have established the account by 12/31/07. You couldn't
open an account in 2008 and fund it for 2007 (or 2006, or some other prior
year). I know that for an already established account you can back fund it.

Elizabeth Richardson

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Elizabeth Richardson wrote:
- quote -

No, there are some plans that do require that, but IRA has tax day
deadline, whenever it falls.
Joe

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Elizabeth Richardson wrote:

- quote -

No, basically tax day.



Brian

--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

"joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message
news:wOadneJLeol5p0XanZ2dnUVZ_qWtnZ2d[at]comcast.com...
- quote -

Doesn't the IRA have to be established by 12/31/07 to make 2007
contributions?

Elizabeth Richardson

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

On Mar 12, 11:32*am, marckas...[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -


Many brokerage will help you set up a rollover IRA, easy piecey. Try
Fidelity or Schwab. I rolled my 401K into a rollover IRA acct at
Fidelity. You can have many combinations of IRA and Roth IRA in your
portfolio.

I hope you find a job real soon, if not already.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

marckassay[at]yahoo.com writes:

- quote -

Did you make any IRA contributions in 2007 already (for tax-year
2007)? (since it was possible to make a contribution in 2007
for tax-year 2006). If not, you may still make a 2007 contribution.

Were you working someplace in 2007 where
you had access to an employer-sponsored plan (ie. 401k)?
If not, then that 2007 contribution may be deductible on
your 2007 income taxes. Or you may be able to make a 2007
Roth contribution (very likely a better idea, especially
if your tax bracket in 2007 was low). But bear in mind
that you have to have earned money in 2007. Did you?

- quote -

If you're no longer with that company where you made that 401k
contribution, you may roll that money over into an IRA, or
into a Roth IRA, though if you roll into a Roth, you'll have
to pay taxes (2008 taxes - not due for a year) on that money.

- quote -

Sure - why not? There are times when one is eligible to put
money into one but not the other.

- quote -

That's actually a risk-lowering move we call "tax diversification"


--
Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed.
No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow?
http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

marckassay[at]yahoo.com wrote:

- quote -

You have two things going on;
If you had earned income in 2007, you may deposit the $4,000 into an
IRA. How much did you earn in 2007? Do you think you will find a new job
in 2008? I suggest the deductible IRA for 2007, and request a direct
transfer of the 401(k) money into that account this year.
My opinion on Roth is that people earning low incomes (15% Federal
bracket or lower) may be better off with a Roth, others should convert
based on changes in bracket. Maybe you were in the 25% bracket in 07.
$4000 will get you back $1000 in taxes. In 08, if you are not employed a
few months, you may be in the 15% bracket. You convert and pay $600 in
tax. You are ahead $400. This is a simple example, but should help
illustrate my thoughts. If you have any follow on questions, come back.
Those here are kind, knowledgeable, and wish to help.

Joe
www.blog.joetaxpayer.com

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.