On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:51:02 -0500, pixel_a_ted
<pixel_a_ted[at]yahoo.com> wrote:

- quote -

Yes there is a difference and I should have been more specific. I was
referring to a simple freeze and not fraud alerts. My understanding
is that it costs $10 per credit agency and that's it.


-HW "Skip" Weldon
Columbia, SC

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

Re. dapperdobbs comments, there is a difference between freezing the
files and having fraud alerts put on the files. The latter supposedly
require any issuers of credit to contact you before setting up any new
accounts, but my understanding is that they don't have to do it. Used
to be you could set up fraud alerts with the credit agencies and they
held for several years. Now, you can only do so for a short period of
time (a month?) and only do it longer if you are a victim or potential
victim of identity theft due to a specific incident.

joetaxpayer is right in that some companies check your credit report
as a matter of routine, even if you are not specifically applying for
credit. I guess if the files are frozen they can't do that. But I
believe that any company that currently has a relationship with you
(credit card, etc.) can still access your account for information. I
opted to have the files frozen about a year ago once my state passed
the law giving me that choice (I think it's outrageous that that isn't
the default) and I have two credit cards - so far no problems with
them. Like you I don't anticipate applying for credit and if I do, or
one of the other situations arises where a company needs to check my
file, I will ask them which credit agency they use and temporarily
open that file up. Unfortunately, there will be a $10 fee to do so
each time for me. I think if you are a certain senior citizen age,
then there is no charge.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

HW "Skip" Weldon wrote:
- quote -

I am not 100% on this; If employers, insurance, and the like use credit
reports, will they be blocked as well? I'd like my home/auto insurer to
still have access, as my scores are fine, if this block is complete,
what becomes of that? And what of the current card issuers? Can they
still check? There's the 'universal default' issue, so each of my card
issuers checks my report to see how I'm doing on the other accounts.
Just the thoughts off the top of my head.
Joe

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

On Mar 12, 9:53*am, "HW \"Skip\" Weldon"
<skip5700removet...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
- quote -

Not sure the arguments against (?) outweigh the possible benefits.
Various "identity protection" services will freeze your credit as a
matter of course (issue a fraud alert to credit agencies). The
services include other stuff as well (renewing the fraud alert as
required, periodically). The fraud alert requires anyone checking your
credit to speak with you directly at your phone number of record
before accessing your credit. If you can manage to deal with the
"Three Sisters" all on your own without raising your blood pressure (I
had to page through eight pages of useless links before I even found a
mailing address for those bloated fat fish), and perform the other
handful of services for yourself (e.g. calling all your card issuers
in the event of a bogus charge), then you can save yourself the modest
fees the ID protection services charge to do it all for you with just
one phone call (24/7) to them. (Obviously, I recommend the ID
protection services. As one such service put it, you can change your
own oil, but most find it more convenient to take it to a mechanic who
might spot some other potential trouble as well.)

Hope I got your question right (credit freeze = fraud alert) and
answered relevantly.

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.

For someone who doesn't plan to open any more credit accounts and who
is concerned about identity theft, are there any practical arguments
against freezing one's credit (so that no one can open credit in their
name)?


-HW "Skip" Weldon
Columbia, SC

------ Misc.invest.financial-plan is a moderated newsgroup where Moderators strive
to keep the conversations on-topic for financial planning. Other posting
guidelines include a request for brevity and another for trimming posts to
which we respond. For all of the other tips and suggestions, see "FROM THE
MODERATORS: Posting to misc.invest.financial-plan", a weekly post now on the
Newsgroup.