rick++ wrote:

- quote -

Agreed. So the suggestion is that if the post doesn't appear to follow
that guideline it should be rejected? I don't know that our mod is able
to add that layer of time to make the judgment. A few of these have come
through recently, I just ignore them.

JOE

People should give a hundred word summary of the hyperlink content.
No clear summary leads me to suspect a spam or malware.
The other situation of people copying long articles without
commentary is just as annoying. It takes time to read them,
not clear what the importance is and violates copyright.

Littlemonsta wrote:
- quote -

I "went to the site and did a little reading". Funny, the "Knowledge
Center" image is not clickable. Almost all the other links take you to
a registration page. I couldn't tell if the video from the founder
("about us") was real, or computer generated.

In the end, it's not very clear to me how your posting of this link
represents either a question or contribution to this newsgroup. If
there is no response, some may reasonable conclude this posting was spam.

(Note to moderators: I recall some time ago, a question about allowing
hyperlinks in postings to this group. I for one was in favor, assuming
that some degree of self-policing would occur, so please accept this
post in that spirit).

-Mark Bole

I have been trying to understand the extreme volatility on the markets
of late, watching a lot of CNBC, Fox, etc. And I still think that
there is something that the general public is missing, something is
going on behind the scenes. Then I came across this site www.basherbusters.com,
and its like somebody turned on the lights! If you are a serious
investor and want to know what is really happening with your money, go
to the site and do a little reading, you won't believe what is going
on!