|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 18, 11:48 am, bondguy1824 <bondguy1...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > If the Fed takes action today, you may see T-bill rates normalize
I think you hit at the heart of the matter, as did Mark above. The> with respect to other money market instruments, including CDs, CP, > BAs, etc. For now, certain CDs are providing a higher return than T- > bills. Spread your money around to different banks, either via a > brokered CD progam mentioned above, the internet (make sure of the > FDIC insurance, or on your own. Different markets have different > rates. For example, Chase is offering a 7 month CD with a 5.45% yield > in the New York area, but not nationally. treasury rate is, for lack of a better term, the national average for T-bills. The CDs that they are being compared to most likely are not. They're outliers, so to speak. For every 5.45% CD there's probably a 4% one too. I saw a local bank offering 3.85% just yesterday. On that alone should I start an inverse thread of this one? The microeconomies of local regions, the unknown business models of specific banks, variances in state taxation, etc, etc, will all affect the rate at a particular bank. As Mark sposted above, if we choose to trust bankrate's average then T-bills have NOT dropped below cd rates ON AVERAGE once taxes are taken into account. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| If the Fed takes action today, you may see T-bill rates normalize with respect to other money market instruments, including CDs, CP, BAs, etc. For now, certain CDs are providing a higher return than T- bills. Spread your money around to different banks, either via a brokered CD progam mentioned above, the internet (make sure of the FDIC insurance, or on your own. Different markets have different rates. For example, Chase is offering a 7 month CD with a 5.45% yield in the New York area, but not nationally. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Avrum Lapin <avrum223[at]verizon.net> writes: - quote - > b) Accrued interest is taxable annually even though you didn't get it in
Same is true for all the marketable treasury securities.> your pocket The exception is treasury savings bonds (ie. series I and EE), but they aren't marketable. They may be cashed in like a CD, sometimes with a penalty, but unlike marketable securities, if interest rates go down, they don't go up in value in the secondary (since it doesn't exist) market. The annual taxation of the not-in-your-pocket inflation adjustments of TIPS is one of the reasons one ought normally not own them in taxable accounts. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Avrum Lapin <avrum223[at]verizon.net> writes: - quote - > > Again, since we're talking about T-bills, we're talking about CDs under a
Not if you buy a less-than-one-year CD that pays all its> > year. For those CDs, one can defer interest until the CD matures - you > > don't get it in your pocket, and it isn't taxable until you do. And unlike > > T-bills, you often have a choice of whether to get the interest in hand, or > > have it compound within the CD. > The quoted rates assume compounding. Buy a 6 mo CD in November and you > will pay taxes before you get the compounded interest back. interest at maturity at the quoted APY rate. And they do exist (usually found through brokers, though). -- Rich Carreiro rlc-news[at]rlcarr.com |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| In article <e8BGi.34168$RX.7328[at]newssvr11.news.prodigy.net> , "Mark Freeland" <BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote: - quote - > "Avrum Lapin" <avrum223[at]verizon.net> wrote in message
I can't prove it but I think that the 1-3 mo penalty may be larger than> news:avrum223-F6761F.09314314092007[at]news.verizon.net... > > My reasons for the CD premium is that > Interesting ideas, but like most thoughts, have more than one side: > > a) CDs are not as liquid as T-Bills > Liquidity doesn't exist in a vacuum. Almost anything is immediately liquid > if you're willing to take enough of a loss on it. CDs under 1 year (to be > comparable with T-Bills) are typically redeemable with 1-3 months loss of > interest. T-bills, on the other hand, have to be sold on the open market, > with its accompanying price uncertainty and its transaction costs. > http://banking.about.com/od/cds/a/cdpenalty.htm (asserts 1-3 month penalties > common) the transaction costs if large amounts are involved - quote - > > b) Accrued interest is taxable annually even though you didn't get it in
The quoted rates assume compounding. Buy a 6 mo CD in November and you> > your pocket > Again, since we're talking about T-bills, we're talking about CDs under a > year. For those CDs, one can defer interest until the CD matures - you > don't get it in your pocket, and it isn't taxable until you do. And unlike > T-bills, you often have a choice of whether to get the interest in hand, or > have it compound within the CD. will pay taxes before you get the compounded interest back. - quote - > > c) if the issuing bank fails, the FDIC can "call" your CD before it is
My recollection of the S&L crisis was that the FDIC (the S&Ls had a> > due > Also an interesting thought. different agency) or the successor institution often "called" the CD's as of the S&L's failure. As you point out, buyer's perception may be part of the reason. Note that in most cases it is not your neighborhood bank or the large banks which offer the high rates |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Avrum Lapin" <avrum223[at]verizon.net> wrote in message news:avrum223-F6761F.09314314092007[at]news.verizon.net... - quote - > My reasons for the CD premium is that
Interesting ideas, but like most thoughts, have more than one side:- quote - > a) CDs are not as liquid as T-Bills
Liquidity doesn't exist in a vacuum. Almost anything is immediately liquidif you're willing to take enough of a loss on it. CDs under 1 year (to be comparable with T-Bills) are typically redeemable with 1-3 months loss of interest. T-bills, on the other hand, have to be sold on the open market, with its accompanying price uncertainty and its transaction costs. http://banking.about.com/od/cds/a/cdpenalty.htm (asserts 1-3 month penalties common) - quote - > b) Accrued interest is taxable annually even though you didn't get it in
Again, since we're talking about T-bills, we're talking about CDs under a> your pocket year. For those CDs, one can defer interest until the CD matures - you don't get it in your pocket, and it isn't taxable until you do. And unlike T-bills, you often have a choice of whether to get the interest in hand, or have it compound within the CD. - quote - > c) if the issuing bank fails, the FDIC can "call" your CD before it is
Also an interesting thought. Mitigated by the fact that we are talking> due about short term instruments, but the advantage here goes to the T-bill. There are other factors that one could imagine, but I don't know which (if any) explains the phenomenon. Treasuries may be sold at auction, but are bid on primarily by large investors who might not be using a bank with its "mere" $100K insurance. There is a psychological factor of people thinking that Treasuries are more secure (as sound as the dollar - wait, let me rephrase that :-). There is a single market rate for T-bills (of a given maturity) at any time, while CD rates vary. The average CD rate could still comparable to the T-bill rate (often the promotion rates you see are for new money only). According to Bloomberg, 6 month T-bill yield is 4.21%. According to bankrate.com, the average 6 month CD rate is 4.58%, similar once one considers state taxes. Mark Freeland BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > On Sep 13, 10:55 am, w...[at]talisys.com wrote:
even after considering that T Bill interest is not taxable by states a> > A consequence of the mortgage market blowup. Banks are offering higher > > rates because many of the are desperate for more money. I have always been able to find bank CDs which pay more than T-Bills - factor in CA and elsewhere My reasons for the CD premium is that a) CDs are not as liquid as T-Bills b) Accrued interest is taxable annually even though you didn't get it in your pocket c) if the issuing bank fails, the FDIC can "call" your CD before it is due |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 13, 10:55 am, w...[at]talisys.com wrote: - quote - > A consequence of the mortgage market blowup. Banks are offering higher
Agree with that part.> rates because many of the are desperate for more money. - quote - > Because if they don't, they may not meet the
Disagree. Mortgage demand is still high despite slowdown.> minimum reserve requirements and have to liquidate holdings at market > prices (which would mark their book prices down causing a cascade of > decreasing reserves). However non-bank source of money have all but dried up. Banks are borrowing to Fed, paying high interest, etc. to satisfy mortgage demand |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 13, 1:19 pm, w...[at]talisys.com wrote: - quote - > On Sep 13, 11:51 am, joeu2004 <joeu2...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
Oh, I knew that. Klunk! Just testing you <wink> . Seriously,> > a lower yield? But I did not think that the rates on T-bills and > > T-notes were set by market demand. I thought their rates were > > set by a formula based on some Federal Reserve rate. > Nope, new Treasury issues go out via auction. thanks. I didn't think I was feeling the stress of some recent personal events. But I think this brain fart proves I am <sigh> . |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 13, 11:51 am, joeu2004 <joeu2...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > a lower yield? But I did not think that the rates on T-bills and T-
Nope, new Treasury issues go out via auction.> notes were set by market demand. I thought their rates were set by a > formula based on some Federal Reserve rate. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| joeu2004 wrote: - quote - > But I did not think that the rates on T-bills and T-
The price is set at auction. Thus the yield reflect market demand.> notes were set by market demand. I thought their rates were set by a > formula based on some Federal Reserve rate. For a longer term note with a coupon (i.e. an interest payment) the treasury has to decide what coupon they will offer. If they are about to sell five year notes, they can see what the market rate is for that point on the yield curve and set the coupon accordingly, to have a goal of 100 for the auction price. A price above or below would result in a YTM (yield to maturity) higher or lower than originally targeted. JOE |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Sep 13, 9:55 am, w...[at]talisys.com wrote: - quote - > Meanwhile, investors are fleeing from mortgages
That's the explanation my Schwab broker gave me. But I still do not> and corporate bonds going into Treasuries forcing yields to go down. fully understand. That is, I would understand that theory for normal bonds. Why offer a high yield when people are willing to buy even at a lower yield? But I did not think that the rates on T-bills and T- notes were set by market demand. I thought their rates were set by a formula based on some Federal Reserve rate. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| zxcvbob wrote: - quote - > have dropped well below bank CD's. The 26-week T-bill I got today is
Looking at Schwab's brokered CD offering, I see 6mo at 5.33%, 1yr at> only paying 4.172. The bank is offering 6 month CD's at 5.1% (that's > higher than it was last week for 6 months) . Is this just an anomaly, > or should I plan on moving all my T-bill money back to the bank as they > mature? > Bob 5.15%. The yield falls going further out (to below 5%). It would stand to reason that a 1 yr t-bill will be close to a one year CD, adjusting a bit for the difference in state tax. (yes, there is a minor liquidity issue with the CDs, which for 1 year or less I find irrelevant) I am shifting new money to the CDs from T-bill coming due. Keep in mind the $100K FDIC limit, discussed here ad nauseum recently. JOE www.joetaxpayer.com |
| | |||
| |||
| On Sep 13, 6:31 am, zxcvbob <zxcv...[at]charter.net> wrote: - quote - > have dropped well below bank CD's. The 26-week T-bill I got today is
A consequence of the mortgage market blowup. Banks are offering higher> only paying 4.172. The bank is offering 6 month CD's at 5.1% (that's > higher than it was last week for 6 months) . Is this just an anomaly, > or should I plan on moving all my T-bill money back to the bank as they > mature? rates because many of the are desparate for more money. If they can't get it via bonds or commercial paper, they'll try to get it from retail bank customers. Because if they don't, they may not meet the minimum reserve requirements and have to liquidate holdings at market prices (which would mark their book prices down causing a cascade of decreasing reserves). Meanwhile, investors are fleeing from mortgages and corporate bonds going into Treasuries forcing yields to go down. Will this continue? My opinion is yes. We're no where near the end of the bad news yet from the mortgage market. As bad as it has been for mortgages, we'll have more resets Q1 2008 than all of this year. It will be a total bloodbath. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| have dropped well below bank CD's. The 26-week T-bill I got today is only paying 4.172. The bank is offering 6 month CD's at 5.1% (that's higher than it was last week for 6 months) . Is this just an anomaly, or should I plan on moving all my T-bill money back to the bank as they mature? Bob |
| Tags |
| rates, tbill |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Treasury T-Bill Rates ? nearly_blind@yahoo.com: I am very familar with all methods of interest computation and definitions of interest, annual yields, etc. , but cannot figure out (reverse... | Financial Planning | 4 | 07-25-2006 02:12 PM | |
| Annuity participation rates and cap rates Winter: I am trying to understand exactly what is meant by participation rate in an annuity. Below, at the end of my post,I have included a couple... | Financial Planning | 1 | 05-11-2005 09:50 PM | |
| How will this work: Changing bill payer from MSN Bill Pay to mybank Retired Coal Miner: My one year of MSN Bill Pay premium service, included in M03 dlx is close to expiring. So I am planning to use the service from my bank, (their... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-24-2004 02:37 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |