|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:00:47 -0500, joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > Thumper wrote: > > Do they have to do this every year or only when first enrolling in > > part B? > > Thumper > A change in income due to a short list of circumstances. So something to > keep in mind, but no need to report each year unless one of the events > occurred. > JOE That's what I thought. It doesn't seem to be too much work. Thumper |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thumper wrote: - quote - > Do they have to do this every year or only when first enrolling in
A change in income due to a short list of circumstances. So something to> part B? > Thumper keep in mind, but no need to report each year unless one of the events occurred. JOE |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:33:20 -0500, joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > Dave Dodson wrote:
Do they have to do this every year or only when first enrolling in> > On Aug 10, 8:55 am, rick++ <rick...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > A financial columist (Brurns) got letters from new Medicare recipients > > > many were being charged the medicare monthly surcharge which > > > is $161 in 2007 (increases to $384 by 2009) automatically > > > subtracted from your social security check. Apparently the SSA > > > defaults your income at age 63 to determine your medicare premium, > > > when you may or may not have retired yet. > > > > > http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10162.html > > > > I'm not sure what you are whining about. > > > They use your income on the last federal income tax return available > > from the IRS. You can supply a later one if it is to your advantage. > I didn't hear whining, what I heard was that my old people need to > proactively supply numbers to the SSA each year. One more thing to add > to the list of actions I visit each year. For many of these people who > have no knowledgable planner, they may miss this altogether, and pay > more than they need to. (Like the 'donate some of your IRA RMD in > 06/07', which would have gone overlooked for those who would benefit) > JOE part B? Thumper |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Dave Dodson wrote: - quote - > On Aug 10, 8:55 am, rick++ <rick...[at]hotmail.com> wrote:
I didn't hear whining, what I heard was that my old people need to> > A financial columist (Brurns) got letters from new Medicare recipients > > many were being charged the medicare monthly surcharge which > > is $161 in 2007 (increases to $384 by 2009) automatically > > subtracted from your social security check. Apparently the SSA > > defaults your income at age 63 to determine your medicare premium, > > when you may or may not have retired yet. > > > http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10162.html > I'm not sure what you are whining about. > They use your income on the last federal income tax return available > from the IRS. You can supply a later one if it is to your advantage. proactively supply numbers to the SSA each year. One more thing to add to the list of actions I visit each year. For many of these people who have no knowledgable planner, they may miss this altogether, and pay more than they need to. (Like the 'donate some of your IRA RMD in 06/07', which would have gone overlooked for those who would benefit) JOE |
| | |||
| |||
| On Aug 10, 8:55 am, rick++ <rick...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > A financial columist (Brurns) got letters from new Medicare recipients
I'm not sure what you are whining about.> many were being charged the medicare monthly surcharge which > is $161 in 2007 (increases to $384 by 2009) automatically > subtracted from your social security check. Apparently the SSA > defaults your income at age 63 to determine your medicare premium, > when you may or may not have retired yet. > http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10162.html They use your income on the last federal income tax return available from the IRS. You can supply a later one if it is to your advantage. Only singles with modified adjusted gross income exceeding $200,000 or marrieds with modified adjusted gross incomes exceeding $400,000 on that federal income tax return will pay $161. This will be only a few percent of people applying for Medicare Part B, and the extra cost would represent less than about 0.4% of annual income. - quote - > There is a procedure to correct this in the SSA memo, but requires
Certain life events streamline the correction process. If you want to> lots of paperwork. appeal based on something else, the form is about a half page long. You might call that a lot of paperwork, but I wouldn't. Dave |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A financial columist (Brurns) got letters from new Medicare recipients many were being charged the medicare monthly surcharge which is $161 in 2007 (increases to $384 by 2009) automatically subtracted from your social security check. Apparently the SSA defaults your income at age 63 to determine your medicare premium, when you may or may not have retired yet. http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10162.html There is a procedure to correct this in the SSA memo, but requires lots of paperwork. |
| Tags |
| based, income, medicare, premium, preretirement |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Retirement Income: IRA Distributions Ron Boyd: I asked this question within the "Income from Tax-Deferred Retirement Account" thread over a month ago but received only silence. So let me try it... | Microsoft Money | 9 | 05-01-2008 05:47 AM | |
| Determing job offer based on retirement plans John Parker: I am contemplating switching jobs but because of the differences in how the retirement is handled I am having trouble determining what the new... | Financial Planning | 1 | 07-08-2004 04:36 PM | |
| Sec 179 vs Retirement Income. Drewremedy: If my modest amount of self employment income and and a good bit of my spouses income is placed into defered retirement plans like 401K, 403b,... | Taxes | 3 | 09-14-2003 10:51 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |