|
#12
| |||
| |||
| I told you...I'm not good at math. "joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message news:MKmdnXCJiYZc6g7bnZ2dnUVZ_o2vnZ2d[at]comcast.com... - quote - > markmas wrote: > > I think you've got it right. She's already entitled to 1/4 of the > > car's value so 3/4 of the car's value should be subtracted from her > > share, not the entire value of the vehicle. So, we have two ways of > > looking at this. > My original answer; > In which case $507K/4 = $126,750 per individual, three getting all cash, > one getting $119,750 plus car. > You'd prefer, $125,000 - (3*$1750) + Car ($7000), right? > 125,000-5250 = $119,750 > $119,750 + Car is what my first response was. This is not a 'second way', > just one that would take two steps. It doesn't need to be complicated, one > check per beneficiary, and the one car transfer. > JOE |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "markmas" <mastrocinquem[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1184045646.226891.191790[at]d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... - quote - > On Jul 9, 12:08 pm, "BeachBum" <bbgh...[at]yahoo.com> wrote:
any way you cut it!> > "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinq...[at]gmail.com> wrote> Perhaps someone can > > help me determine what the most equitable distribution > > > of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > > > > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > > > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > > > c.. Four heirs > > > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of > > > the > > > estate. How do we do it? > > > Give her the vehicle plus $119.75K, the other three get > > 126.75K each making a total of $507K. > > > BeachBum (Jim) > She gets $119,750 which is $126,750 minus $7000. However, isn't 1/4 > of the value of the car hers? Shouldn't she receive 1/4 of the house > minus 3/4 the value of the vehicle? She is entitled to 1/4 of the estate of $507K - that is $126.75K |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| markmas wrote: - quote - > I think you've got it right. She's already entitled to 1/4 of the
My original answer;> car's value so 3/4 of the car's value should be subtracted from her > share, not the entire value of the vehicle. So, we have two ways of > looking at this. In which case $507K/4 = $126,750 per individual, three getting all cash, one getting $119,750 plus car. You'd prefer, $125,000 - (3*$1750) + Car ($7000), right? 125,000-5250 = $119,750 $119,750 + Car is what my first response was. This is not a 'second way', just one that would take two steps. It doesn't need to be complicated, one check per beneficiary, and the one car transfer. JOE |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 9, 12:08 pm, PeterL <po.n...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Jul 9, 7:39 am, "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinq...[at]gmail.com> wrote:
I think you've got it right. She's already entitled to 1/4 of the> > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution > > of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > > c.. Four heirs > > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > > estate. How do we do it? > > It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. > She pays each of the other three $1750 and takes the car. > Am I missing something? car's value so 3/4 of the car's value should be subtracted from her share, not the entire value of the vehicle. So, we have two ways of looking at this. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 9, 12:08 pm, "BeachBum" <bbgh...[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinq...[at]gmail.com> wrote> Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution
She gets $119,750 which is $126,750 minus $7000. However, isn't 1/4> > of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > > c.. Four heirs > > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > > estate. How do we do it? > Give her the vehicle plus $119.75K, the other three get > 126.75K each making a total of $507K. > BeachBum (Jim) of the value of the car hers? Shouldn't she receive 1/4 of the house minus 3/4 the value of the vehicle? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 9, 11:56 am, joetaxpayer <joetaxpa...[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > Mark Mastrocinque wrote:
See response of PeterL> > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution > > of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > > c.. Four heirs > > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > > estate. How do we do it? > > It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. > I trust the will simply states equal shares to the 4 beneficiaries? > In which case $507K/4 = $126,750 per individual, three getting all cash, > one getting $119,750 plus car. > Am I missing something obvious? I can't think of even one alternate > method of doing this math. > JOE |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 11:08:21 -0500, Avrum Lapin <avrum223[at]verizon.netwrote: - quote - > In article <xdqki.4627$V35.180[at]trndny03> , > "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinquem[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution > > of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > > > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > > c.. Four heirs > > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > > estate. How do we do it? > > > It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. > First the heirs need to agree on how to evaluate the real value of the > vehicle (Kelly Blue Book "good" private sale or whatever). Assume that > the vehicle is worth $7000. The estate is now worth $507,000. Divide > 507,000 4 ways which comes to $126,750. Three people each get $126,750. > the 4th gets the car plus $119,750. Thry to remain friends after the > division The heirs don't need to agree on anything. They get what the will states. Thumper |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thank you. The problem is I'm not good at math. "joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message news:uc-dnWFqOYkBxw_bnZ2dnUVZ_qKqnZ2d[at]comcast.com... - quote - > Mark Mastrocinque wrote: > > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable > > distribution of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as > > follows: > > > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > > c.. Four heirs > > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > > estate. How do we do it? > > > It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. > I trust the will simply states equal shares to the 4 beneficiaries? > In which case $507K/4 = $126,750 per individual, three getting all cash, > one getting $119,750 plus car. > Am I missing something obvious? I can't think of even one alternate method > of doing this math. > JOE |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| On Jul 9, 7:39 am, "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinq...[at]gmail.comwrote: - quote - > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution > of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > c.. Four heirs > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > estate. How do we do it? > It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. She pays each of the other three $1750 and takes the car. Am I missing something? |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <xdqki.4627$V35.180[at]trndny03> , "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinquem[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution
First the heirs need to agree on how to evaluate the real value of the> of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > c.. Four heirs > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > estate. How do we do it? > It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. vehicle (Kelly Blue Book "good" private sale or whatever). Assume that the vehicle is worth $7000. The estate is now worth $507,000. Divide 507,000 4 ways which comes to $126,750. Three people each get $126,750. the 4th gets the car plus $119,750. Thry to remain friends after the division |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinquem[at]gmail.com> wrote - quote - > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution
126.75K each making a total of $507K.> of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > c.. Four heirs > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > estate. How do we do it? Give her the vehicle plus $119.75K, the other three get BeachBum (Jim) |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Mark Mastrocinque wrote: - quote - > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution
I trust the will simply states equal shares to the 4 beneficiaries?> of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > c.. Four heirs > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the > estate. How do we do it? > It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. In which case $507K/4 = $126,750 per individual, three getting all cash, one getting $119,750 plus car. Am I missing something obvious? I can't think of even one alternate method of doing this math. JOE |
| | |||
| |||
| On Jul 9, 7:39 am, "Mark Mastrocinque" <mastrocinq...[at]gmail.comwrote: - quote - > Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most
Assuming that those number represent the total value of> equitable distribution of an estate would be. The hypothetical > situation is as follows: > a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale > b.. A vehicle worth $7000 > c.. Four heirs > One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her > share of the estate. How do we do it? the estate (surprised!) and assuming that those are after-tax values and assuming that your intention is to divide the estate equally.... The total estate is $507,000, so each heir should receive $126,750. Three of the heirs will receive that amount out of the $500,000. The fourth heir should receive $119,750 out of the $500,000. That is $126,750 less $7000 for the car. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Perhaps someone can help me determine what the most equitable distribution of an estate would be. The hypothetical situation is as follows: a.. $500,000 from proceeds of house sale b.. A vehicle worth $7000 c.. Four heirs One of the four heirs wishes to pay for the vehicle from her share of the estate. How do we do it? It seems simple but there are several ways of looking at it. |
| Tags |
| distribution, estate, hypothetical |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| "offset hypothetical social security" removed from disability check john14638@gmail.com: My father-in-law is on disability as a former state employee in NC. His most recent check of $1800 was reduced by $1200 by a line-item listed as... | Taxes | 4 | 06-22-2006 02:55 AM | |
| Do Loans reduce the Estate value for estate tax purpose? 0b3hks001@sneakemail.com: I know the estate value the properties at market value. But if a property has been collatorized for a loan (e.g. mortgage), is that property... | Taxes | 4 | 06-01-2005 10:04 AM | |
| Hypothetical accounts Dana: How do I set up a hypothetical account in Money? This is an account where I maintain stocks I am considering (a tracking portfolio), but have not... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-19-2004 05:07 PM | |
| hypothetical cash in cash out question KenB: Suppose John Smith is self employed and works mostly for individuals, not businesses: Nonrecurring work, rarely 1099's, no bank account, no... | Taxes | 4 | 09-11-2004 02:07 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |