Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Financial Planning

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4  
Old 04-13-2007, 07:30 PM
Rich Carreiro
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which is a better place for income?

"nomail1983[at]hotmail.com" <nomail1983[at]hotmail.com> writes:

- quote -

> On Apr 9, 12:53 pm, "W. Wells" <o...[at]nc.rr.com> wrote:
> > Which is better for income: A CD paying 5% or a fund yielding 4.83%
> > and growing [at] an average of 5% per year?

> For my edification, please explain those terms with respect to the
> fund. I thought "yield" and "growth" were almost synonyms, except


Not in the stocks and funds world. At its simplest, yield is
dividends divided by price. Growth is increase in price.
And total return is yield plus growth. (The math's actually
a bit more complicated than that, but that states the fundamental
concepts well).

--
Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us

  #3  
Old 04-13-2007, 07:18 PM
nomail1983@hotmail.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which is a better place for income?

On Apr 9, 12:53 pm, "W. Wells" <o...[at]nc.rr.com> wrote:
- quote -

> Which is better for income: A CD paying 5% or a fund yielding 4.83%
> and growing [at] an average of 5% per year?


For my edification, please explain those terms with respect to the
fund. I thought "yield" and "growth" were almost synonyms, except
that in this context, 4.83% might be the 7-day yield, whereas 5%
might be an historical average over some (how many?) months or
years.

In any case, I could not answer the question without knowing the
volatility (std dev) of the fund growth rate, what the fund invests
in,
your tolerance for risk, and your time horizon. Also, is the CD rate
fixed or variable?

- quote -

> Would I be better off putting my money
> in the fund and drawing out 5% per year (my income) ?


The correct answer depends on individual factors that you have
not even hinted at. Obviously if you depend on 5% per year income
from these funds, the CD is not an option, no matter how the yields
compare. Most CDs do not allow you to make withdrawals (without
penalty) until maturity. (Exceptions are made for RMDs from
Traditional IRAs.) But that does not necessarily make the fund your
"best" option.

  #2  
Old 04-10-2007, 09:01 AM
Elle
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which is a better place for income?

The fund's a no brainer: Its principal keeps up with
inflation (at least, as inflation is conventionally
measured) while you still get around 5% income from it each
year.

  #1  
Old 04-09-2007, 11:11 PM
Jose Bailen
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which is a better place for income?

On Apr 9, 10:53 pm, "W. Wells" <o...[at]nc.rr.com> wrote:
- quote -

> Which is better for income: A CD paying 5% or a fund yielding 4.83% and
> growing [at] an average of 5% per year? Would I be better off putting my money
> in the fund and drawing out 5% per year (my income) ? The fund expense
> ration is .44%.
> Am I missing something here are is this a no brainer to use the fund?


Is the 4.83% yield of the fund sure, or just expected? Also, is the
4.83%yield net of expenses, or gross? If 4.83% is the net yield and
as safe as the 5% yield of the CD (i.e., you apply the same discount
rate to the two streams of income), then the net present value of the
fund is higher than the net present value of the CD if you plan to
hold both investments for 3 years or more.

 
Old 04-09-2007, 09:14 PM
PeterL
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Which is a better place for income?

On Apr 9, 1:53 pm, "W. Wells" <o...[at]nc.rr.com> wrote:
- quote -

> Which is better for income: A CD paying 5% or a fund yielding 4.83% and
> growing [at] an average of 5% per year? Would I be better off putting my money
> in the fund and drawing out 5% per year (my income) ? The fund expense
> ration is .44%.
> Am I missing something here are is this a no brainer to use the fund?




You have a fund that's yielding 4.83% a year and growing at an average
of 5% a year on top of that? What's the name of this fund?

  #-1  
Old 04-09-2007, 08:53 PM
W. Wells
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Which is a better place for income?

Which is better for income: A CD paying 5% or a fund yielding 4.83% and
growing [at] an average of 5% per year? Would I be better off putting my money
in the fund and drawing out 5% per year (my income) ? The fund expense
ration is .44%.

Am I missing something here are is this a no brainer to use the fund?

 

Tags
income, place
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
What is the best place to have an IRA ??
l0200100@yahoo.com: What is the best place to have an IRA ?? I am looking for the place with the highest yielding cash sweep, so that I can park all my retirement...
Financial Planning 1 08-23-2006 09:00 AM
Good place for tax audio CDs?
Schultz: I'm looking to get audio CD's containing discussions of federal income tax law. For example, individual tax, corporate tax, partnership tax, etc. ...
Taxes 3 08-30-2005 05:16 AM
Cheapest place to buy M2004?
Aloke Prasad: Sorry to reprieve this thread, but now that the dust has settled, where is the best place to buy M2004 Deluxe? It's for $40 (after rebates) at...
Microsoft Money 21 09-26-2003 02:01 AM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM.