|
#18
| |||
| |||
| In article <VWmPh.10665$JZ3.4248[at]newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> , "Mark Freeland" <BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net> wrote: - quote - > Likewise, Pub 590 says that "Unless one of the exceptions listed below
I read over that 100 times and still missed that wording, thanks for> applies you must pay the 10% additional tax on the *taxable part* of any > distributions that are not qualified distributions." pointing it out. - quote - > If you want to know where this comes from, you'll find it in the IRS regs,
Thanks for the reference.> 26 CFR 1.408A-6, A-5(a), which says that the "10-percent additional tax ... > will apply ... to any distribution from a Roth IRA *includible in gross > income*." > http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...cess.gpo.gov/c > fr_2006/aprqtr/26cfr1.408A-6.htm -- -Ernie- |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message news:AotPh.19767$Jl.2474[at]newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... - quote - > Note that Figure 2-1 only indicates whether a distribution /may/ be
You can't conclude this from Worksheet 2-3. The worksheet doesn't address> subject to penalty. Note: I see the IRS calls the penalty an "additional > tax" of 10% in some places. For the computation of whether the additional > tax (= penalty) may be due, see > http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch02.html#d0e10412 . > Worksheet 2-3, Line 12 and the lines around show that no tax (10% > additional or otherwise) is owed if contributions exceed distributions > blah blah. the penalty; it merely computes the amount that is taxable aside from penalty. Consider someone who has only a traditional IRA (say $10K), converts it to a Roth, and withdraws the $10K the next year. According to the IRC, this withdrawal is not taxed, but is subject to the 10% penalty. Lines 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 are all $10K (the even lines are 0). Line 10, the key line, is $10K (the amount that was taxed upon conversion). That makes line 11 $0, thus line 15 is $0, and bottom line 16 is $0. Alternatively, consider the fact that certain nonqualified distributions are exempt from the penalty (e.g. first home purchase). Since there are no lines dealing with this in the worksheet, it cannot possibly be computing the amount subject to the 10% penalty. - quote - > Unless you read very carefully and have a very sharp mind, you won't
Why, thank you :-)> extract this easily from the IRS code. Mark Freeland BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| "Ernie Klein" <ecklein[at]pacbell.net> wrote On Roth IRA withdrawals in amounts less than original contributions: - quote - > That is correct. You don't pay INCOME TAX on the return
Note that Figure 2-1 only indicates whether a distribution> of your regular > contributions but the 10% penalty is not income tax. snip > Figure 2-1 on page 64 shows 5 years AND 59 1/2. /may/ be subject to penalty. Note: I see the IRS calls the penalty an "additional tax" of 10% in some places. For the computation of whether the additional tax (= penalty) may be due, see http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch02.html#d0e10412 . Worksheet 2-3, Line 12 and the lines around show that no tax (10% additional or otherwise) is owed if contributions exceed distributions blah blah. Hence sites like http://www.fairmark.com/rothira/gendist.htm say distributions less than contributions are not taxed nor penalized, assuming blah blah. Unless you read very carefully and have a very sharp mind, you won't extract this easily from the IRS code. |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| In article <1175256518.497982.186870[at]d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> , "woessner[at]gmail.com" <woessner[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > On Mar 30, 5:01 am, Ernie Klein <eckl...[at]pacbell.net> wrote:
contributions but the 10% penalty is not income tax.> > So where does it say (in IRS publications) that you can withdraw your > > previous contribution for any reason other than one of the few > > exceptions while under the age of 59 1/2 and not have to pay a 10% > > penalty on the entire amount that you withdrew? > Pub 590, chapter 2 under "Are Distributions Taxable?": > "You do not include in your gross income qualified distributions or > distributions that are a return of your regular contributions from > your Roth IRA(s)." That is correct. You don't pay INCOME TAX on the return of your regular - quote - > The latter condition is not restricted to the return of current year
Figure 2-1 on page 64 shows 5 years AND 59 1/2.> contributions. You may always with draw your Roth contributions (and > conversions, after 5 years) penalty- and tax-free. Now... whether > it's a good idea or not is a completely different matter. -- -Ernie- |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| "Ernie Klein" <ecklein[at]pacbell.net> wrote in message news:ecklein-408172.16251529032007[at]news.newsguy.com... - quote - > I thought that also -- that the intent of an IRA was for *retirement*
Read further - "Distributions that are not taxable ... are not subject to> and not to be a substitute bank, thus the 10% penalty for *any* > withdrawal before 59 1/2 (or one of the few exceptions). > In addition Topic 558 from the IRS site says in part: > http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc558.html > [quote] > Topic 558 - Tax on Early Distributions from Retirement Plans > To discourage the use of pension funds for purposes other than normal > retirement, the law imposes an additional 10% tax on certain early > distributions of these funds. Early distributions are those you receive > from a qualified retirement plan or deferred annuity contract before > reaching age 59 1/2... > [end quote] this 10% tax." Since a distribution of post-tax money is not taxable, it is not subject to the 10% penalty. (Note that despite the wording on this page, distributions of Roth conversions in under 5 years, while not taxable, may still be subject to the 10% penalty.) Likewise, Pub 590 says that "Unless one of the exceptions listed below applies you must pay the 10% additional tax on the *taxable part* of any distributions that are not qualified distributions." (If you read the Pub, you'll see that it is much clearer on when sub-5 year Roth conversions are subject to the 10% tax, even if they are not otherwise taxable.) http://www.irs.gov/publications/p590/ch02.html#d0e10539 If you want to know where this comes from, you'll find it in the IRS regs, 26 CFR 1.408A-6, A-5(a), which says that the "10-percent additional tax ... will apply ... to any distribution from a Roth IRA *includible in gross income*." http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2...fr1.408A-6.htm Mark Freeland BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 30, 5:01 am, Ernie Klein <eckl...[at]pacbell.net> wrote: - quote - > So where does it say (in IRS publications) that you can withdraw your
Pub 590, chapter 2 under "Are Distributions Taxable?":> previous contribution for any reason other than one of the few > exceptions while under the age of 59 1/2 and not have to pay a 10% > penalty on the entire amount that you withdrew? "You do not include in your gross income qualified distributions or distributions that are a return of your regular contributions from your Roth IRA(s)." The latter condition is not restricted to the return of current year contributions. You may always with draw your Roth contributions (and conversions, after 5 years) penalty- and tax-free. Now... whether it's a good idea or not is a completely different matter. --Bill |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| In article <s4OdnbJ2b6ac-pXbnZ2dnUVZ_tyinZ2d[at]comcast.com> , joetaxpayer <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote: - quote - > Andrew Koenig wrote:
I thought that also -- that the intent of an IRA was for *retirement*> > "joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message > > news:dcGdnXMhVsWe2ZXbnZ2dnUVZ_r2onZ2d[at]comcast.com... > > > > > You deposit (or convert) to a Roth. > > > The clock starts and a withdrawal must be on deposits that have aged 5 > > > years or you will incur a penalty. If after 5 years, there is no penalty, > > > just the fact that you have depleted a retirement account. > > > > Are you sure? My impression was that you must have held the account for 5 > > years, *and* be greater than age 59.5, but that they do not track > > individual > > deposit ages. and not to be a substitute bank, thus the 10% penalty for *any* withdrawal before 59 1/2 (or one of the few exceptions). In addition Topic 558 from the IRS site says in part: http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc558.html [quote] Topic 558 - Tax on Early Distributions from Retirement Plans To discourage the use of pension funds for purposes other than normal retirement, the law imposes an additional 10% tax on certain early distributions of these funds. Early distributions are those you receive from a qualified retirement plan or deferred annuity contract before reaching age 59 1/2... [end quote] - quote - > I find the wording on some sites to be a bit ambiguous, but ever the fan
I have read here and in different threads that you can always withdraw> of Fairmark, I read this; > http://www.fairmark.com/rothira/distrib.htm > which I read to mean I am correct, with the extra warning that it's only > the deposits that come back out tax/penalty free pre-59-1/2, the > earnings are taxed/penalized. Please take a look and let me know if I am > misinterpreting their explanation. your contributions at any time and any age without penalty but I fail to find anything in PUB 590 or other IRS instructions to back that up. (I know you can withdraw your contribution without penalty in the same *tax year* that it was made but that isn't what is being questioned). Page 63 of Pub 590 says that you never have to include your contributions in your income, but that does not eliminate the 10% early withdrawal penalty, that I can see. It goes on to say (also on page 63-65 and fig 2-1 on page 64) that "qualified distributions" are not subject to the 10% penalty but to be "qualified" you must be 59 1/2 or meet one of the exceptions like being disabled or buying a 1st home. Every IRS publication, topic and FAC that I have read leads me to believe that if you are under 59 1/2 you are always subject to the 10% penalty if an execption does not apply. So where does it say (in IRS publications) that you can withdraw your previous contribution for any reason other than one of the few exceptions while under the age of 59 1/2 and not have to pay a 10% penalty on the entire amount that you withdrew? -- -Ernie- |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Ernie Klein wrote: - quote - > You are correct (see IRS PUB 590). You have to pay a 10% penalty
apparently this only applies to Roth IRAs funded with money from another IRAor 401k or such and does not apply to money I deposit from my paycheck or checks I send in during the year from after-tax money there is also no tax on the withdrawal |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| nian wrote: - quote - > joetaxpayer wrote: > > The clock starts and a withdrawal must be on deposits that have aged 5 > > years or you will incur a penalty. If after 5 years, there is no > > penalty, just the fact that you have depleted a retirement account. > ok. not sure why I thought I could take my own money out anytime, after > all, I've paid taxes and whatnot from it already. My second post in this thread had the link; http://www.fairmark.com/rothira/distrib.htm which clarified this. And Elizabeth's post as well, state that your deposits can be withdrawn any time, it's a rollover (from a regular IRA or 401(k) that must age 5 years. "My own money" if that's how a site phrases it, are deposits you made, any increase in value through appreciation, stock splits, dividends, or interest, is "earnings". Sorry for my mis-quote in first post. Actually, Elizabeth's quote, "it has been suggested in this forum that it may be wise to use a Roth for your emergency fund" was something I suggested. That if one did not have funds for both (an emergency fund and the retirement account) that putting the emergency money in the Roth would at least create some tax deffered growth, and if the emergency never occurred, a head start on the retirement savings. The downside to this, is that in such a scenario, one really doesn't have the two accounts. But I like the idea that the funds don't feel quite so easily tapped, for the fact that they are in an account that says 'retirement'. JOE |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Andrew Koenig wrote: - quote - > Are you sure? My impression was that you must have held the account for 5
what's the definition on "my own money" versus "earnings" ?> years, *and* be greater than age 59.5, but that they do not track individual > deposit ages. see this link -> http://www.fool.com/money/allaboutir...boutiras06.htm |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| In article <2JXNh.13331$f56.2888[at]bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> , "Andrew Koenig" <ark[at]acm.org> wrote: - quote - > "joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message
You are correct (see IRS PUB 590). You have to pay a 10% penalty unless> news:dcGdnXMhVsWe2ZXbnZ2dnUVZ_r2onZ2d[at]comcast.com... > > You deposit (or convert) to a Roth. > > The clock starts and a withdrawal must be on deposits that have aged 5 > > years or you will incur a penalty. If after 5 years, there is no penalty, > > just the fact that you have depleted a retirement account. > Are you sure? My impression was that you must have held the account for 5 > years, *and* be greater than age 59.5, but that they do not track individual > deposit ages. the Roth distribution is "qualified". To be qualified it has to be after the 5 year period AND you have to be 59 1/2 or older OR the distribution is because you are disabled, it is payable to a beneficiary after your death, or meets the requirements for a first home. In ADDITION to the 10% penalty you also have to pay additional tax on any portion of the distribution attributable to earnings on contributions. In other words, you don't get to have your money grow tax free if you withdraw early -- it then is no better, worse in fact because of the 10% penalty, than any other type of non-IRA account. -- -Ernie- |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Elizabeth Richardson wrote: - quote - > Yes, you can withdraw your deposits at any time without penalty.
thank you. that is how I suspected it should work |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| On Mar 26, 4:16 pm, "Andrew Koenig" <a...[at]acm.org> wrote: - quote - > "nina" <n...[at]na.zn> wrote in message
Wait a minute folks. I believe that you cannot withdraw *earnings*> news:56q24gF2afg52U1[at]mid.individual.net... > > what else to be aware of? if I fund a Roth IRA today with 2500, I can > > request a withdrawal any time for up to that amount? > I think there's a penalty unless your age is > 59.5 years and you have held > the Roth IRA account for > 5.0 years. from the account till you're 59.5 etc, but *contributions* to a ROTH are post- tax and can be removed the same day you put them in, so far as I know, without any tax consequence, but you cannot return them to the ROTH except as the new contribution is still below your yearly limit. Joe W. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| joetaxpayer wrote: - quote - > The clock starts and a withdrawal must be on deposits that have aged 5
ok. not sure why I thought I could take my own money out anytime, after all, I've paid> years or you will incur a penalty. If after 5 years, there is no > penalty, just the fact that you have depleted a retirement account. taxes and whatnot from it already. so, to recap, if I open a Roth IRA and send 100, then I can not take my own 100 until 5 years from day of it being applied? not talking about the interest or earnings from the fund it may be invested in, just my own money if I fund the Roth IRA every month with 100, total 1200 for one year, each portion must "age 5 years" before I can take my own money out or even a portion of it? thanks |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "nina" <ni[at]na.zn> wrote in message news:56q24gF2afg52U1[at]mid.individual.net... - quote - > what else to be aware of? if I fund a Roth IRA today with 2500, I can
Yes, you can withdraw your deposits at any time without penalty. In fact, itrequest a > withdrawal any time for up to that amount? has been suggested in this forum that it may be wise to use a Roth for your emergency fund, although I would rather think of any type of IRA as strictly for funding your retirement. The earnings on any deposits have limitations as others have posted. Elizabeth Richardson |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Andrew Koenig wrote: - quote - > "joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message
I find the wording on some sites to be a bit ambiguous, but ever the fan> news:dcGdnXMhVsWe2ZXbnZ2dnUVZ_r2onZ2d[at]comcast.com... > > You deposit (or convert) to a Roth. > > The clock starts and a withdrawal must be on deposits that have aged 5 > > years or you will incur a penalty. If after 5 years, there is no penalty, > > just the fact that you have depleted a retirement account. > Are you sure? My impression was that you must have held the account for 5 > years, *and* be greater than age 59.5, but that they do not track individual > deposit ages. of Fairmark, I read this; http://www.fairmark.com/rothira/distrib.htm which I read to mean I am correct, with the extra warning that it's only the deposits that come back out tax/penalty free pre-59-1/2, the earnings are taxed/penalized. Please take a look and let me know if I am misinterpreting their explanation. JOE |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message news:dcGdnXMhVsWe2ZXbnZ2dnUVZ_r2onZ2d[at]comcast.com... - quote - > You deposit (or convert) to a Roth.
Are you sure? My impression was that you must have held the account for 5> The clock starts and a withdrawal must be on deposits that have aged 5 > years or you will incur a penalty. If after 5 years, there is no penalty, > just the fact that you have depleted a retirement account. years, *and* be greater than age 59.5, but that they do not track individual deposit ages. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "nina" <ni[at]na.zn> wrote in message news:56q24gF2afg52U1[at]mid.individual.net... - quote - > what else to be aware of? if I fund a Roth IRA today with 2500, I can
I think there's a penalty unless your age is > 59.5 years and you have held> request a withdrawal any time for up to that amount? the Roth IRA account for > 5.0 years. |
| | |||
| |||
| nina wrote: - quote - > what is the usual process of taking a withdrawal from your own funds in
You deposit (or convert) to a Roth.> a Roth IRA? is it as simple as informing the institution (T Rowe Price, > Fidelity, etc) and they cut you a check in a few business days or even > deposit the amount into your checking account? > I understand that one loses out on the benefits the money would have > earned but no biggie - or is it? > what else to be aware of? if I fund a Roth IRA today with 2500, I can > request a withdrawal any time for up to that amount? The clock starts and a withdrawal must be on deposits that have aged 5 years or you will incur a penalty. If after 5 years, there is no penalty, just the fact that you have depleted a retirement account. The process turns out to be simple, some brokers let you transfer on line. I manage an account for an 80 year old woman through Schwab. On line you are able to transfer funds from the IRA (traditional or Roth) to your regular 'cash' account. So that end of it is pretty simple. You lose the benefit of years of compounding. I am caught between the suggestion that you should never touch that money, and the risk that if you feel it's untouchable, you wouldn't make the deposits in the first place. We know nothing of the rest of your situation, though. You are welcome to post more details. JOE |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| what is the usual process of taking a withdrawal from your own funds in a Roth IRA? is it as simple as informing the institution (T Rowe Price, Fidelity, etc) and they cut you a check in a few business days or even deposit the amount into your checking account? I understand that one loses out on the benefits the money would have earned but no biggie - or is it? what else to be aware of? if I fund a Roth IRA today with 2500, I can request a withdrawal any time for up to that amount? |
| Tags |
| ira, process, roth, withdrawal |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Roth IRA fund rollovers to other funds still within the Roth vehic Cassie: What are the steps needed to post this transaction? Fidelity listed it as an "exchange", but would it actually be a sell and then buy the new fund?... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 05-08-2007 01:35 AM | |
| 10% penalty for withdrawal of earnings on excess Roth IRA contribution? joeu2004@hotmail.com: IRS Pub 590 states (p.59) that you can avoid a 6% penalty on excess contributions to a Roth IRA if you remove the excess contributions before the... | Taxes | 7 | 06-02-2006 04:59 AM | |
| Does the 5-year wait period still apply in Roth conversion after age 59.5 or 70.5 and a question of how many days you have to roll from trad IRA to Roth. David Jensen: Does the 5-year holding period still apply in a traditional IRA to ROTH IRA conversion if you do so after age 59 1/2? What about if done after age... | Taxes | 1 | 03-25-2005 04:28 AM | |
| Archive Process Raghu: I am using Money 2005 (Deluxe). When I tried to archive all of my data prior to 2004, money created a file that is bigger than current file. The... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-21-2005 01:45 PM | |
| msmoney.exe process mcc: I'm running the trial version of 05 on a Xp Pro-Sp2 PC and the msmoney.exe process doesn't end when I close Money. The next time I launch Money it... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-02-2004 12:33 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |