|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Now: this does mean that
The Definitive answer is "maybe yes & maybe No"> (a) I am doubly insured (overinsured?) for disability; > both through my own plan, and my new employer. > (b) I purchased my own plan well before I joined my new employer. > I spoke to the insurance agent - he said that because of (b), this is not > a problem. i.e. if I was to get disabled, I would get the full benefits > of my own plan as well as my current employer's plan. > Is this correct? Because you OWNED the contract before your newer group contract came into play, it IS a CONTRACT, and WILL pay the benefits that they CONTRACTED for ! ! ! ! ! ! ! HOWEVER, it IS imperative that you READ (read have attorney read) BOTH contracts to determine if there is any wording in either contract that will permit the Carrier to take into consideration any other existing contract/contracts presently IN-FORCE. One or both of them may have such a clause in their contract. The worst that could happen is that you could be restricted to receiving 100% of current salary. In any event, the generally accepted thinking is to MAINTAIN the personal contract to alleviate any possibility of not having coverage in the event that the "job" peters out. |
| | |||
| |||
| On Feb 12, 12:08 am, Alexei Lalas <alexei.la...[at]nospam.hotmail.comwrote: - quote - > Hello,
My understanding is that insurers won't normally pay out more than> I had my own independent software consulting practice a few years ago, > during the technology bust. At that time, I purchased my own disability > insurance plan for income protection. The policy I obtained paid out > for "own occupation" i.e. if I couldn't do the job I was trained for. > Premiums are currently at ~$125/month. > Recently, I decided to return to the W-2 world and work for a large > company. This company provides long-term disability insurance. I > checked their plan, and it is basically a typical "2-year own occupation, > after that any occupation" type of plan. > i.e. if I was disabled, the insurance would pay my benefit for 2 years. > After that, I would have to prove I couldn't do *any* job for that plan > to continue paying me. > Now: this does mean that > (a) I am doubly insured (overinsured?) for disability; > both through my own plan, and my new employer. > (b) I purchased my own plan well before I joined my new employer. > I guess I'm trying to ensure that I'm not paying $125/month for something > that will not pay out if I get disabled, ostensibly 'cos I'm "overinsured". > I spoke to the insurance agent - he said that because of (b), this is not > a problem. i.e. if I was to get disabled, I would get the full benefits > of my own plan as well as my current employer's plan. > Is this correct? > Thanks in advance. > Alex. 65-70% of your total pre disability income. So yes you are double insured, and the total payout will be lowered. However after the 2 year period of disability, your 'own occupation' policy would be very valuable. Because your employer provided policy would require you to take any job they deemed suitable. Unless you never contemplate being self employed again, or changing employer, I would tend to keep the individual policy, costly though it is. It is a very significant protection against future disability and if your health happens to deteriorate, it will be much more expensive to get it again. ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Please trim the post to which you are responding. "Trim" means that except for a FEW lines to add context, the previous post is deleted. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hello, I had my own independent software consulting practice a few years ago, during the technology bust. At that time, I purchased my own disability insurance plan for income protection. The policy I obtained paid out for "own occupation" i.e. if I couldn't do the job I was trained for. Premiums are currently at ~$125/month. Recently, I decided to return to the W-2 world and work for a large company. This company provides long-term disability insurance. I checked their plan, and it is basically a typical "2-year own occupation, after that any occupation" type of plan. i.e. if I was disabled, the insurance would pay my benefit for 2 years. After that, I would have to prove I couldn't do *any* job for that plan to continue paying me. Now: this does mean that (a) I am doubly insured (overinsured?) for disability; both through my own plan, and my new employer. (b) I purchased my own plan well before I joined my new employer. I guess I'm trying to ensure that I'm not paying $125/month for something that will not pay out if I get disabled, ostensibly 'cos I'm "overinsured". I spoke to the insurance agent - he said that because of (b), this is not a problem. i.e. if I was to get disabled, I would get the full benefits of my own plan as well as my current employer's plan. Is this correct? Thanks in advance. Alex. |
| Tags |
| insurance |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| tax on life insurance My interest: Does life insurance have any inheritance tax associated with it? ... especiallly if the beneficiary is not a US citizen or even not a US resident?... | Taxes | 13 | 01-09-2007 02:17 AM | |
| Self-insurance Elizabeth Richardson: In the frugal health thread, someone posted that they would rather self-insure their car than their health. Please look at your under/uninsured... | Financial Planning | 19 | 12-03-2005 09:27 PM | |
| LTC Insurance Elizabeth Richardson: Sorry I didn't post the link in my first post, and now I see that it will not be allowed. Anyone interested, e-mail me privately. Part of the... | Financial Planning | 2 | 11-24-2003 03:23 PM | |
| Life insurance or credit insurance ? Tman: Hi, 30 yrs. old, married, both professionals, no kids (yet), just bought a house. DINK's. If one of us croaked, the other could _barely_ support... | Financial Planning | 4 | 07-01-2003 11:10 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |