Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Financial Planning

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #7  
Old 02-08-2007, 06:45 PM
Tad Borek
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I bonds, the sequel

johnrichardson_us[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -

> I clouded up my last question about ibonds with a lot of data. Here's
> another try:
> What do people think about holding ibonds as a "better cash"?



I think savings bonds are a good alternative, keeping in mind that
one-year window before you can cash them in. Either EEs or I-bonds, or
perhaps a bit of both.

A big advantage of savings bonds (over T-bills or CDs) is that they are
one of the few tax-deferred ways of earning interest. You pay tax only
when you cash them in, unless you elect to pay it each year, which
nobody does. And like other government bonds they're exempt from state
income tax, so in a place like CA you may be avoiding 9.3% tax on your
interest income.

These two features can really add up to a benefit over the years,
especially considering that they typically pay rates comparable to
short-term CDs. I've seen more than one small fortune built largely on
savings bonds. The power of compound interest, and a lot of time!

-Tad

  #6  
Old 02-08-2007, 03:47 PM
zxcvbob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I bonds, the sequel

kastnna wrote:
- quote -

> zxcvbob <zxcv...[at]charter.net> wrote:
> > The inflation hedge *seems* like a good idea, but the government fudges
> > the inflation calculations to understate the actual rate of inflation.
> > (they "cook the books") So you are probably better off with EE bonds,
> > which I think pay 4%. (still not all that great)

> Why, or more importantly how, do they "cook the books"? Most reports I
> have read imply that they actually overstate inflation by about 1%.
> Technology, Quality, and substitution effects all drive the CPI
> unrealistically upward. The topic was first broached in 1996 when the
> famous "Boskin Report" was submitted to the Joint Economic Commitee.
> It explored these flaws and recommended solutions. It also estimated
> that CPI was overstated by 1.1% annually.



A simplistic and perhaps inaccurate example: if beef prices go way up
they say, "people will just buy less beef and more chicken", and factor
that in as a /decrease/ in food prices (even if chicken was also up).

Best regards,
Bob

  #5  
Old 02-08-2007, 03:33 PM
johnrichardson_us@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Savings bonds, the sequel

- quote -

> > But I like to think of the EE bond as a way for the cheap relatives to
> > give a gift that says $100, but it only cost $50.


Heh.


- quote -

> I still have some $5000 HH bonds that pay $200/yr direct deposit.

This is more along the lines how I'd like to use I Bonds. I don't
expect them to outperform VISEX.

I'm looking to add some inflation protection to my bond portfolio.
I'd really like TIPS, but can't fit them in an IRA yet. I bonds seem
like a TIPS-lite. I can hold them in a taxable account and they
adjust for the CPI-U, similar to TIPS.

I do wish the base rate was above 2.8% though.

I didn't really think about individual treasuries though. I could
swing the $1000 minimum, but then I'd be getting taxable interest and
no inflation protection.

  #4  
Old 02-08-2007, 02:23 PM
P.Schuman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Savings bonds, the sequel


"joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote in message
newsaadnd5Ai-aLoVbYnZ2dnUVZ_uuqnZ2d[at]comcast.com...
- quote -

> jIM wrote:
> > Could someone explain what an EE bond is?
> > > I-bonds are indexed to inflation (and issued by US government),

> > correct?
> > T-Bills are treasuries (issued by US government), correct?
> > EE I have seen in fund prospectus, but have not seen an explanation,
> > anyone which could comment, please feel free.

> see http://www.savingsbonds.gov
> But I like to think of the EE bond as a way for the cheap relatives to
> give a gift that says $100, but it only cost $50. The recipient then has
> to not lose the physical piece of paper for the next nearly two decades,
> at which point it will cost more in gas (to go cash it in) than half the
> interest on the bond.
> For the individual, the 'nice' thing is the minimum purchase is $50 face
> value, so only $25 cost.
> JOE

I still have some $5000 HH bonds that pay $200/yr direct deposit.

they also have a software app for tracking your bonds.
http://www.treasurydirect.gov/indiv/...d_download.htm

  #3  
Old 02-08-2007, 02:05 PM
joetaxpayer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I bonds, the sequel



jIM wrote:
- quote -

> Could someone explain what an EE bond is?
> I-bonds are indexed to inflation (and issued by US government),
> correct?
> T-Bills are treasuries (issued by US government), correct?
> EE I have seen in fund prospectus, but have not seen an explanation,
> anyone which could comment, please feel free.


see http://www.savingsbonds.gov

But I like to think of the EE bond as a way for the cheap relatives to
give a gift that says $100, but it only cost $50. The recipient then has
to not lose the physical piece of paper for the next nearly two decades,
at which point it will cost more in gas (to go cash it in) than half the
interest on the bond.

For the individual, the 'nice' thing is the minimum purchase is $50 face
value, so only $25 cost.
JOE

  #2  
Old 02-08-2007, 01:37 PM
kastnna
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I bonds, the sequel

zxcvbob <zxcv...[at]charter.net> wrote:

- quote -

> The inflation hedge *seems* like a good idea, but the government fudges
> the inflation calculations to understate the actual rate of inflation.
> (they "cook the books") So you are probably better off with EE bonds,
> which I think pay 4%. (still not all that great)


Why, or more importantly how, do they "cook the books"? Most reports I
have read imply that they actually overstate inflation by about 1%.
Technology, Quality, and substitution effects all drive the CPI
unrealistically upward. The topic was first broached in 1996 when the
famous "Boskin Report" was submitted to the Joint Economic Commitee.
It explored these flaws and recommended solutions. It also estimated
that CPI was overstated by 1.1% annually.

  #1  
Old 02-08-2007, 01:32 PM
jIM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I bonds, the sequel

On Feb 7, 10:57 pm, zxcvbob <zxcv...[at]charter.net> wrote:
- quote -

> johnrichardson...[at]yahoo.com wrote:
> > I clouded up my last question about ibonds with a lot of data. Here's
> > another try:
> > What do people think about holding ibonds as a "better cash"?
> > Since they are held outside retirement accounts, they can do triple
> > duty - for education (subject to income restrictions), as a retirement
> > fallback, and as part of an emergency fund. But are there better
> > alternatives?

> I have some I-bonds that I bought in 2000, back when they were paying
> decent interest. Their current rate is 6.76%, which is not bad. But I
> bought a few I-bonds in 2003 and they are only earning 2.61% right now.
> I don't know what the current rate is, but it's not very good. I
> think it just went up from 1% over inflation to 1.5% over, but they
> adjusted the inflation rate way down.
> The inflation hedge *seems* like a good idea, but the government fudges
> the inflation calculations to understate the actual rate of inflation.
> (they "cook the books") So you are probably better off with EE bonds,
> which I think pay 4%. (still not all that great) The one great thing
> about I and EE bonds is they can be used for educational expenses and
> the interest becomes tax free -- subject to restrictions of course. The
> other good thing about I and EE bonds is the interest is exempt from
> state taxes.
> If you can handle the $1000 increments, T-bills are a better deal. The
> maturities are much shorter, and the interest rates are much higher --
> currently about 5%. And the interest is still exempt from state taxes.
> You can buy them direct from the treasury and pay no commissions.
> If you can't swing $1000 at a pop for T-bills, bank CD's are also paying
> about 5% for 6 to 12 month notes. Money market rates should be
> competitive also, but I don't know that for certain.
> Best regards,
> Bob


Could someone explain what an EE bond is?

I-bonds are indexed to inflation (and issued by US government),
correct?
T-Bills are treasuries (issued by US government), correct?
EE I have seen in fund prospectus, but have not seen an explanation,
anyone which could comment, please feel free.

 
Old 02-08-2007, 02:57 AM
zxcvbob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: I bonds, the sequel

johnrichardson_us[at]yahoo.com wrote:
- quote -

> I clouded up my last question about ibonds with a lot of data. Here's
> another try:
> What do people think about holding ibonds as a "better cash"?
> Since they are held outside retirement accounts, they can do triple
> duty - for education (subject to income restrictions), as a retirement
> fallback, and as part of an emergency fund. But are there better
> alternatives?



I have some I-bonds that I bought in 2000, back when they were paying
decent interest. Their current rate is 6.76%, which is not bad. But I
bought a few I-bonds in 2003 and they are only earning 2.61% right now.
I don't know what the current rate is, but it's not very good. I
think it just went up from 1% over inflation to 1.5% over, but they
adjusted the inflation rate way down.

The inflation hedge *seems* like a good idea, but the government fudges
the inflation calculations to understate the actual rate of inflation.
(they "cook the books") So you are probably better off with EE bonds,
which I think pay 4%. (still not all that great) The one great thing
about I and EE bonds is they can be used for educational expenses and
the interest becomes tax free -- subject to restrictions of course. The
other good thing about I and EE bonds is the interest is exempt from
state taxes.

If you can handle the $1000 increments, T-bills are a better deal. The
maturities are much shorter, and the interest rates are much higher --
currently about 5%. And the interest is still exempt from state taxes.
You can buy them direct from the treasury and pay no commissions.

If you can't swing $1000 at a pop for T-bills, bank CD's are also paying
about 5% for 6 to 12 month notes. Money market rates should be
competitive also, but I don't know that for certain.

Best regards,
Bob

  #-1  
Old 02-08-2007, 12:19 AM
johnrichardson_us@yahoo.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default I bonds, the sequel


I clouded up my last question about ibonds with a lot of data. Here's
another try:

What do people think about holding ibonds as a "better cash"?

Since they are held outside retirement accounts, they can do triple
duty - for education (subject to income restrictions), as a retirement
fallback, and as part of an emergency fund. But are there better
alternatives?

 

Tags
bonds, sequel
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
I Bonds
Anne Brennan: I just found this group. I would like to know how the government sets its interest on the I Bonds. I understand there is a basic rate...
Financial Planning 9 04-01-2006 08:26 PM
New to bonds...
Shhhh: Hello all, Where do you folks recommend I go if I wish to learn about bonds? Both corporate and municipal... specifically what is the difference...
Financial Planning 29 03-18-2006 09:46 PM
So why bonds
Robert Ricks: My question is, considering the current interest rates, could CD's be a rational substitute for bonds? Please feel free to enlighten my logic. I...
Financial Planning 6 01-03-2005 10:57 AM
I Bonds
Jimmy Smith: "Rich Carreiro" <rlcarr@animato.arlington.ma.us> wrote in message news:uy8o7hus2.fsf@animato.arlington.ma.us... > "Jimmy Smith"...
Financial Planning 17 05-06-2004 06:55 PM
I-Bonds,
Non Intelligent: Hello, In today's market conditions, the fixed-deposit-CDs do not give more than say 1 or 1.5% or very near to this. Just read about the...
Financial Planning 18 09-25-2003 06:32 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:09 AM.