|
#29
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 1, 6:57 pm, "jIM" <noreplysoc...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > > Domestic Stocks 50.76% (50.4 large cap / 34.5mid cap / 15.2 small
I'd half to check the index definition, but from memory (I am anchored> > > cap) > > > Foreign Stocks 31.86% > > > Bonds 2.03% > > > Short-term 14.48% > > > Other 0.87% > > I would fill your 401k with equities although I don't think that is > > particularly tax efficient. Your asset allocation, for the long run > > is probably not too far out of whack. You are effectively overweight > > small and mid cap stocks-- in a downturn, this is likely to hurt > > (medium and small cap stocks are no longer 'cheap' on a PE basis v. > > large stocks) so you either might want to go to a total market index > > fund, or increase the weighting of large cap towards 60%. > Why do you think OP is overweight in small and mid caps? 50% large > cap, 35% mid cap and 15% small cap for an equity allocation looks good > to me. a bit here by the UK, where 60% of the index is 20 stocks) the total market index is about 70% of so SP500, 20% or so mid cap, 10% small cap. |
|
#28
| |||
| |||
| "joetaxpayer" <joetaxpayer[at]nospam.com> wrote - quote - > dan wrote:
The above is in the vein of my thoughts: Tracking so many> > What are the downsides to the overlap? snip > If the ideal timing for reallocation is annually, your > current number of funds would take twice to three times > the effort to reallocate as compared to the 12 or so funds > that can have you well diversified. funds takes so much effort, and I bet with no perceptible advantage, that it will pay to consolidate. - quote - > As others have stated, you may want to shift over time so
Remember my caveat that evidently the dividends of foreign> the higher dividend funds are in post tax accounts, along > with foreign. As Elle shared today, the foreign tax issue > winds up costing you if in a tax sheltered account. Same > with dividends which are favored in post tax accounts, but > ordinary income when coming out of the pre-tax accounts. funds or stocks held in a taxable account may not have the favorable treatment that domestic stocks and funds do. I am not selling the one stock (Honda, or HMC) that I have because someone (Japan) is taking 7% of every dividend it pays, but I am mulling it all over. 'Sides, the stock has appreciated greatly in the eight months I have held it. This, with Ford and General Motors looking more tortured everyday, always disuades one from selling /too/ quickly. |
|
#27
| |||
| |||
| dan wrote: - quote - > Thanks, I'm going to review all the allocation tools. I'm wondering
Overlap obfuscates the true allocations. Let's say the particular funds> if I should just pay someone to sort it all out as im getting a little > overwhelmed ![]() > What are the downsides to the overlap? were all just .1% expense. Would having a Fidelity and a Vanguard large cap fund be so terrible? Maybe not, but what does it gain you? Where I really wondered was on the 4 in 1 fund, and a couple others, all from Fidelity, where the overlap was enough so that you couldn't just look at funds at say "I have X% in this category". If the ideal timing for reallocation is annually, your current number of funds would take twice to three times the effort to reallocate as compared to the 12 or so funds that can have you well diversified. As others have stated, you may want to shift over time so the higher dividend funds are in post tax accounts, along with foreign. As Elle shared today, the foreign tax issue winds up costing you if in a tax sheltered account. Same with dividends which are favored in post tax accounts, but ordinary income when coming out of the pre-tax accounts. JOE |
|
#26
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 2, 1:25 pm, "dan" <dan.gos...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > Thanks, I'm going to review all the allocation tools. I'm wondering
Do you know why you own each of those 33 funds? Many of them have> if I should just pay someone to sort it all out as im getting a little > overwhelmed ![]() > What are the downsides to the overlap? similar holdings. (How many of those funds have a top 10 position in Microsoft, for example?). If you ask the right questions and are willing to read about 6 hours of material, I think you could come up with allocation yourself (and help from others). The second step of implementing can be done over time. Do you have a net "gain" or "loss" in the taxable account? IRAs and 401ks do not matter. But a large gain in the taxable account might cause some recomendations to be altered (as any sale would get taxed). questions to ask- how long do you have until retirement? how much money have you saved for retirement? how much money will you need at retirement? quick calculation- take your current salary and divide by .04. That is a crude estimate at best, but a place to start. how much stocks and bonds do you feel comfortable holding? Answers might be 100-0, 80-20, 60-40 or something else (the numbers are percentages of stocks-bonds). if you saw your account balance decrease by 10% in a quarter, what would you do? if you saw your account balance decrease by 25% in a quarter, what would you do? find a web site you like (such as http://www.troweprice.com/retailHome...ilHome,00.html) Use "Investment guides and tools link) and use "retirement planning" link. Go through the calculators or ask questions as appropriate. |
|
#25
| |||
| |||
| Thanks, I'm going to review all the allocation tools. I'm wondering if I should just pay someone to sort it all out as im getting a little overwhelmed ![]() What are the downsides to the overlap? |
|
#24
| |||
| |||
| "Jose Bailen" <jose.bailen[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1170427472.602538.216940[at]v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com... - quote - > > > DFSVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Small Value 16 521.13 M 18.90
I believe that ifa.com is the website of a financial advisor, so what you're> > > DFAVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value II Small Value 15 521.13 M 19.21 > > Available only through financial advisors. > You can buy these funds through the web, through Index Funds Advisors > (http://www.ifa.com/). You have to invest a minimum of 100K, and they > charge you a 1 percent fee though. saying doesn't contradict what I said. |
|
#23
| |||
| |||
| jIM wrote: - quote - > I do not think $50,000 is part of "cash allocation" for a short term
This may be the source of our difference of opinion, but...> need. If someone needs a $10k cash allocation, then another $50k cash > for a short term/ immediate need, I would not count the 50k as part of > the allocation model. - quote - > primary reason- if all assets for retirement are in a 401k/Roth/IRA
I think the consensus of this group is that your asset allocation should> and the short term cash is in another account type (taxable), I would > not want to mix apples with rocks. The need is short term and the 10k > being discussed is part of 401k and not the taxable account. be considered across all your assets, regardless of account type (some have extended that to include your home and even your job [human capital]). Of course, I am NOT suggesting that short term funds should be kept in a tax advantaged account. My point was that if the OP needs $10,000 to satisfy his allocation and already has $50,000 set aside in a savings account, why keep $10,000 in cash in a retirement account? It seems that if you look at his portfolio as a whole (i.e. including the $50,000 in savings), then his savings will serve as a volatility damper without adding another $10,000 lead weight to his return. When he consumes the $50,000, he could shift assets into cash in his retirement accounts. All this of course assumes that he a) has an allocation that demands a "cash" position, and b) has appropriate instruments available for that short-term cash. In other words, if he needs CD-like return for his allocation, then a CD or other vehicle of short enough duration to meet his short-term needs is available. -Will |
|
#22
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 2, 1:37 am, "Andrew Koenig" <a...[at]acm.org> wrote: - quote - > > DFSVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Small Value 16 521.13 M 18.90
You can buy these funds through the web, through Index Funds Advisors> > DFAVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value II Small Value 15 521.13 M 19.21 > Available only through financial advisors. (http://www.ifa.com/). You have to invest a minimum of 100K, and they charge you a 1 percent fee though. I created my own small/micro cap value diversified portfolio of 28 stocks of undervalued companies with relatively strong earnings record. Buying these stocks cost $224 (through Fidelity), and re- balancing periodically the portfolio may add about 100 bucks a year. The portfolio composition is available at http://groups.google.com/group/small...ap-value?hl=en (files section). |
|
#21
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 2, 7:38 am, "jIM" <noreplysoc...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > The 50% large cap, 35% mid cap and 15% small cap equity allocation
I agree jIM that international is probably an important sector(s) that> you have is good (from other threads), fewer funds would be my > recomendation. International was not discussed in those threads, so > maybe 35% Large cap, 20 % mid cap, 10% small cap 25% international > large cap and 10% international small cap might be more appropriate > for discussion purposes. has been overlooked here. The OP is diversified across the US markets, but diversification could be extended even further. The inevitable overlap of 33 funds should also be corrected. - quote - > Anything you sell in your taxable account will be a taxable event, so
All this tax talk and nobody is touting ETFs? Of course, sales in a> maybe some research into which funds are tax efficient prior to > undertaking this would save you some money. Not sure what direction > you are trying to go... but handling 33 funds is not easy. taxable account will still be subject to cap gains/losses. ETFs track a sector and/or an index so 6-8 funds could thoroughly diversify the OP. AVERAGE expenses are .09% as compared to 1.4% for mutual funds. There are brokerage transaction fees but they can be minimized in todays competitve online trading world. They trade midday (no missing out on an intraday price climb). They are usually more tax efficient than MFs as they don't spin-off capital gains. And although it probably doesn't apply here, they can be margined and/or optioned. |
|
#20
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 1, 7:37 pm, "dan" <dan.gos...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > My suggestion would be to outline which funds are where. Because some
I second Joetaxpayer- there appears to be LOTS of overlap. I would> > of suggestions made would give tax implications (for anything you sell > > in a taxable account). > Well, here we go, there's a lot so beware ![]() eliminate overlap I would backup and re-read this thread. Start with the 401k and IRA (non taxable transactions). Come up with an allocation model. The 50% large cap, 35% mid cap and 15% small cap equity allocation you have is good (from other threads), fewer funds would be my recomendation. International was not discussed in those threads, so maybe 35% Large cap, 20 % mid cap, 10% small cap 25% international large cap and 10% international small cap might be more appropriate for discussion purposes. For large cap, consider putting 50% overall into FSMKX, Fidelity Value, or some type of equity income fund. For Mid cap, consider putting 35% overall into FSTMX, Alger Mid Cap Growth or another Mid Cap fund or two. If you want sector funds, divide the 35% into the sector funds you like. For small cap, look at FSCOX, FID SM CAP INDEPEND or something else. For international, consider one broad fund (like FSIIX or FID DIVERSIFIED INTL). Anything you sell in your taxable account will be a taxable event, so maybe some research into which funds are tax efficient prior to undertaking this would save you some money. Not sure what direction you are trying to go... but handling 33 funds is not easy. |
|
#19
| |||
| |||
| dan wrote: - quote - > > My suggestion would be to outline which funds are where. Because some
Yup, that was alot. 3 stocks and 33 funds? If you owned 36 stocks, well> > of suggestions made would give tax implications (for anything you sell > > in a taxable account). > Well, here we go, there's a lot so beware ![]() chosen of course, I'd think that was about right. Well chosen would mean they are diversified among many industries as well as large cap/small cap, etc. I can't help but wonder if the funds you have are not overkill, that they overlap enough that many can be eliminated. Wouldn't international overlap with Latin America and China? Isn't Latin America an emerging market, therefore overlapping that fund? I like China. I was in the FXI ETF up 83% last year. And I continue to believe that overseas diversification is good, as does Jeremy Siegel "Stock for the long run" and "The Future for Investors" author. I'd also question including Fidelity Four-in-One Index Fund, it has "approximately 55% in spartan 500 index fund, 15% in spartan extended market index fund, 15% in spartan international index fund, and 15% fidelity U.S. bond index fund." But you already have an index, and international represented. So why this fund? I do understand the inclusion of the health or consumer funds, you feel those sectors will perform. I don't agree or disagree there. I do agree that the sector funds are a good way to approach a sector you feel will outperform. My overall observation is beware the overlap. JOE |
|
#18
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > My suggestion would be to outline which funds are where. Because some
Well, here we go, there's a lot so beware > of suggestions made would give tax implications (for anything you sell > in a taxable account). ![]() 401k: 20.12% FID DIVERSIFIED INTL 19.68% SPARTAN US EQ INDEX 10.21% FID SM CAP INDEPEND 10.09% JANUS ADV FORTY S 9.78% PNX I SM CAP VAL I 6.81% FIDELITY LOW PR STK 6.71% ALGER MIDCAP GRTH I 6.68% FID VALUE 4.95% FID CONTRAFUND 4.86% FID BLUE CHIP GROWTH 0.13% OPPHMR DEV MKTS Y IRA: CMGB CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL CRYP CRYPTOLOGIC INC FHKCX Fidelity China Region FLATX Fidelity Latin America FEMKX Fidelity Emerging Markets FFNOX Fidelity Four-in-One Index Fund VTIV INVENTIV HEALTH INC COM TAXABLE: FCASH Cash EWW ISHARES INC MSCI MEXICO FREE INDEX FD FDFAX FIDELITY SELECT CONSUMER STPLES PORT FDLSX FIDELITY SELECT LEISURE FIEUX FIDELITY EUROPE FIGRX FIDELITY INT'L DISCOVERY FIVFX FIDELITY AGGRESSIVE INTERNATIONAL FLATX FIDELITY LATIN AMERICA FLVCX FIDELITY LEVERAGED COMPANY STOCK FNCMX FIDELITY NASDAQ COMPOSITE INDEX FNMIX FIDELITY NEW MARKETS INCOME FPHAX FIDELITY SELECT PHARMACEUTICAL FSAGX FIDELITY SELECT GOLD FSCOX FIDELITY INTL SMALL CAP OPP FUND FSIIX SPARTAN INTL INDEX INVESTOR CLASS FSMKX SPARTAN 500 INDEX INVESTOR CLASS FSTMX SPRTN TOTAL MKT INDX INVESTOR CLASS PTE POWERSHARES EXCHANGED-TRADED FD TR DYNAMIC TELECOM & WIRELES WFMI WHOLE FOODS MKT INC |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| "Jose Bailen" <jose.bailen[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1170364579.183285.315230[at]m58g2000cwm.googlegroups.com... - quote - > If you use the Yahoo mutual fund screener and look for top-rated small
Available only through financial advisors.> cap value funds with a 5-yr average rate of return of at least 15% > (that's about the long-term rate of return of small cap value stocks), > you get 5 funds. Some of them may be closed to new investors, though > DFSVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Small Value 16 521.13 M 18.90 > DFAVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value II Small Value 15 521.13 M 19.21 - quote - > FRMCX Franklin MicroCap Value A Small Value 7 237.52 M 17.25
Closed to new investors.- quote - > HRTVX Heartland Value Small Value 6 414.95 M
There's a 2% redemption charge, according to Morningstar--but they don't say> 16.50 whether that's always or just for shares held for a short period. - quote - > SCMVX Schneider Small Cap Value Small Value 3 914.89 M 24.31
Closed to new investors. |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 1, 7:40 pm, "dan" <dan.gos...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > he can still find relatively cheap small caps
If you use the Yahoo mutual fund screener and look for top-rated small> > value funds, with a higher-than-average long-term rate of return, as > > shown by the data. In the long term, that makes a lot of difference. > Do you have any funds you'd recommend? I'm a bit uneducated on how to > properly research and compare stocks/mutual funds. cap value funds with a 5-yr average rate of return of at least 15% (that's about the long-term rate of return of small cap value stocks), you get 5 funds. Some of them may be closed to new investors, though (the last figure is the 5-yr average rate of return of the fund, for instance, 18.9% for DFA U.S. Small Cap Value ): DFSVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value Small Value 16 521.13 M 18.90 DFAVX DFA U.S. Small Cap Value II Small Value 15 521.13 M 19.21 FRMCX Franklin MicroCap Value A Small Value 7 237.52 M 17.25 HRTVX Heartland Value Small Value 6 414.95 M 16.50 SCMVX Schneider Small Cap Value Small Value 3 914.89 M 24.31 |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Here's how it breaks down amongst the accounts:
My suggestion would be to outline which funds are where. Because some> Taxable account: 56% > 401k: 37% > Roth IRA: 7% > ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: > Please trim the post to which you are responding. "Trim" means that except for a FEW lines to add context, the previous post is deleted.- Hide quoted text - of suggestions made would give tax implications (for anything you sell in a taxable account). |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 1, 1:40 pm, "dan" <dan.gos...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > he can still find relatively cheap small caps
What funds/stocks do you currently own (which make up your current> > value funds, with a higher-than-average long-term rate of return, as > > shown by the data. In the long term, that makes a lot of difference. > Do you have any funds you'd recommend? I'm a bit uneducated on how to > properly research and compare stocks/mutual funds. allocation)? Are the funds stocks held in taxable accounts or IRA/ 401k/ tax advantaged accounts? |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 1, 1:40 pm, "dan" <dan.gos...[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > he can still find relatively cheap small caps
What funds/stocks do you currently own (which make up your current> > value funds, with a higher-than-average long-term rate of return, as > > shown by the data. In the long term, that makes a lot of difference. > Do you have any funds you'd recommend? I'm a bit uneducated on how to > properly research and compare stocks/mutual funds. allocation)? Are the funds stocks held in taxable accounts or IRA/ 401k/ tax advantaged accounts? |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| On Feb 1, 1:53 pm, "jIM" <noreplysoc...[at]hotmail.com> wrote: - quote - > > > The risk changes once the item being purchased is obtained, therefore
Here's how it breaks down amongst the accounts:> > > cash allocation could decrease once a house is purchased. > > > The short term need (for a house downpayment) temporarily would skew > > > risk. This is why I suggested cash for the house down payment be > > > outside the typical allocation model for retirement. For example, > > > once the house was purchased with a downpayment of $50,000, then there > > > would be little need for a $50,000 cash position after the purchase of > > > the house. > > Right, this makes perfect sense. But it sounds like you're suggesting > > that the $50,000 should not be counted toward the OP's cash allocation. > > For example, let's say that the OP determines that he needs a 10% cash > > allocation and this amounts to $10,000. Should the OP hold only the > > $50,000 for the downpayment in cash, or should the OP hold $50,000 + > > $10,000 = $60,000 to satisfy the OP's cash allocation? I would think > > that just holding the $50,000 and then rebalancing when that $50,000 is > > consumed would be the right choice. > I do not think $50,000 is part of "cash allocation" for a short term > need. If someone needs a $10k cash allocation, then another $50k cash > for a short term/ immediate need, I would not count the 50k as part of > the allocation model. > primary reason- if all assets for retirement are in a 401k/Roth/IRA > and the short term cash is in another account type (taxable), I would > not want to mix apples with rocks. The need is short term and the 10k > being discussed is part of 401k and not the taxable account. > If more retirement assets were in taxable accounts, then the point > above holds less merit.- Hide quoted text - > - Show quoted text - Taxable account: 56% 401k: 37% Roth IRA: 7% ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Please trim the post to which you are responding. "Trim" means that except for a FEW lines to add context, the previous post is deleted. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Domestic Stocks 50.76% (50.4 large cap / 34.5mid cap / 15.2 small > > cap) > > Foreign Stocks 31.86% > > Bonds 2.03% > > Short-term 14.48% > > Other 0.87% - quote - > I would fill your 401k with equities although I don't think that is
Why do you think OP is overweight in small and mid caps? 50% large> particularly tax efficient. Your asset allocation, for the long run > is probably not too far out of whack. You are effectively overweight > small and mid cap stocks-- in a downturn, this is likely to hurt > (medium and small cap stocks are no longer 'cheap' on a PE basis v. > large stocks) so you either might want to go to a total market index > fund, or increase the weighting of large cap towards 60%. cap, 35% mid cap and 15% small cap for an equity allocation looks good to me. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > The risk changes once the item being purchased is obtained, therefore
I do not think $50,000 is part of "cash allocation" for a short term> > cash allocation could decrease once a house is purchased. > > The short term need (for a house downpayment) temporarily would skew > > risk. This is why I suggested cash for the house down payment be > > outside the typical allocation model for retirement. For example, > > once the house was purchased with a downpayment of $50,000, then there > > would be little need for a $50,000 cash position after the purchase of > > the house. > Right, this makes perfect sense. But it sounds like you're suggesting > that the $50,000 should not be counted toward the OP's cash allocation. > For example, let's say that the OP determines that he needs a 10% cash > allocation and this amounts to $10,000. Should the OP hold only the > $50,000 for the downpayment in cash, or should the OP hold $50,000 + > $10,000 = $60,000 to satisfy the OP's cash allocation? I would think > that just holding the $50,000 and then rebalancing when that $50,000 is > consumed would be the right choice. need. If someone needs a $10k cash allocation, then another $50k cash for a short term/ immediate need, I would not count the 50k as part of the allocation model. primary reason- if all assets for retirement are in a 401k/Roth/IRA and the short term cash is in another account type (taxable), I would not want to mix apples with rocks. The need is short term and the 10k being discussed is part of 401k and not the taxable account. If more retirement assets were in taxable accounts, then the point above holds less merit. |
| Tags |
| allocations, asset, thoughts |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Allocations by account fwvagabond: I have Money 2004. I have more than one account, each with several mutual funds. When displaying thesse funds, there is a "% Portfolio" column... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 03-06-2008 10:24 PM | |
| "quant" funds - place in asset allocations? Rohan: hey guys, just wondering what your opinion of these "quant" funds that are gaining steam is. i have been caught in the lines between passive and... | Financial Planning | 1 | 04-25-2006 11:19 PM | |
| How to get proper asset allocations Dave: It seems that money is not capable of providing accurate asset allocations for mutual fund portfolios. OK.. I can accept that. Now, is their a way... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-10-2006 11:11 PM | |
| Budget Allocations Bill: Problem: Two accounts both load into budget report generator. I want to eliminate one of the two accounts from loading into monthly budget... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-06-2003 02:46 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |