|
#5
| |||
| |||
| John Richards wrote: - quote - > You can have a free fraud alert flag put on your credit bureau files:
Yes, and I have done that in the past. Previously, once a fraud alert> http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/flag.html was placed in your file it was in effect for a number of years (the exact time varied with the credit bureau). Now, they are only in effect for 90 days. Considering the hassle to contact these bureaus, the fact that there are three of them and also that you and your spouse might want to have the fraud alert done, it becomes a big pain. Currently, to have the alert stick for a 7-year period, you have to prove that you are already a victim of fraud. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> writes: - quote - > What exactly is meant by "freeze" here?
It's nearly impossible to "avoid the need for personal credit".> Instead of spending this money on credit security systems > and this so-called "freeze," I suggest avoiding the need for > personal credit. Even if you don't actually borrow any (more?) money yourself (ie. your mortgage is paid off, you don't use credit cards, etc), your credit still gets checked when you apply for jobs, when you turn on utilities, etc. Moreover, the "freeze" isn't about your own use of your credit, but, rather, about protecting your credit record from being abused by someone *else*. - quote - > The NY Times the other week ran quite an article purporting
And the credit industry strongly opposes governments forcing> that the credit industry is more out to make buck with all them to allow these freezes. They are the single most powerful tool a consumer has at protecting his credit, identity and privacy - all of which the credit bureaus and others want to be as open (and, sadly, as easily abused) as possible. - quote - > these alleged protection plans than it is interested in
This is not one of those plans. Google on "credit report freeze"> actually protecting. The article even suggested it does not > pay them to provide too much protection. and read. Some 16 states have passed laws which allow individuals to freeze their credit reports with the various bureaus so that the information can only be accessed in strictly limited circumstances. Usually, a freeze may only be put on for an individual who has *already* been a victim of identity theft free of charge, but in many states, one may pre-emptively freeze one's credit for a fee. I'd sure prefer if my mortgage (hell, even my property title) weren't openly accessible to the public. I'm really sick of all the "refinance with us!" crappola mail - most of which hasn't involved anyone doing a credit check first. If we ever did have any privacy (and really, did we?), that horse has long since left the barn. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message news:epBoh.8726$yx6.2508[at]newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net... - quote - > What exactly is meant by "freeze" here?
And what about your nosy neighbors sending in your pre-approved credit card> Instead of spending this money on credit security systems and this > so-called "freeze," I suggest avoiding the need for personal credit. forms? Freezing your credit score may prevent this. I'm not one to use credit score either. I use credit cards but have them paid off in 7 days, buy cars with cash etc. The only debt I will prolly apply for in my life will be a mortgage at this point. Of course landlords do credit checks now. in fact what reputable landlord outside of family or personal reference does not do a credit check? And so insurance companies. When did you sign a new policy with a credit bureau check? And so do some employers...... Do you pay alimony to a former spouse or child benefits? credit bureau checks........ And of course anyone who wants a margin account or to short term borrow money to top up tax deferred investments.. Again to me personally I could care less about credit score except for potentially insurance and most certainly a mortgage. But to others I can understand the need to protect their credit bureau score. And yes the credit bureau are making a fast buck "protecting" you but what is the alternative? |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| You can have a free fraud alert flag put on your credit bureau files: http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/flag.html Credit grantors are supposed to honor the fraud alert flag by making it much more difficult to open a new account in your name. -- John Richards "pixel_a_ted" <pixel_a_ted[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1168301605.395878.74230[at]s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > My state (PA) has recently passed a law allowing consumers to put a > freeze on their credit bureau files. I initially welcomed this law, but > now that I look into it I am not sure it was implemented in the best > possible way. > The law allows a credit bureau to charge a fee up to $10 to put the > freeze in place. So if you do this with each of the three major bureaus > for yourself and your spouse, that's $60. If you want to remove the > freeze temporarily, a bureau can charge up to $10 to do that. When you > reinstate the freeze, that's another $60, and even if you never ask to > have the freeze removed, it has a lifetime of seven years. > So I am wondering, for purposes of avoiding identity theft - in > particular someone else applying for credit in your name - whether it > is better to do the freeze or just to subscribe to a credit monitoring > service. I don't plan to apply for credit any time soon, but it's > possible I might want a different credit card some time in the future, > and credit reports are checked for other things like applying for a new > cell phone service, insurance, etc. Another option is just getting a > free credit report once a year from each bureau. > Also, does anyone in another state know how the credit bureaus are > actually handling the freezes, i.e., what are the actual fees and how > convenient is it to do (web site, letter, etc.). |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "pixel_a_ted" <pixel_a_ted[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1168301605.395878.74230[at]s80g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > My state (PA) has recently passed a law
That seems to be typical (except the 7 year limit). See> [...] > The law allows a credit bureau to charge a fee up to $10 to put the > freeze in place. So if you do this with each of the three major bureaus > for yourself and your spouse, that's $60. If you want to remove the > freeze temporarily, a bureau can charge up to $10 to do that. When you > reinstate the freeze, that's another $60, and even if you never ask to > have the freeze removed, it has a lifetime of seven years. http://www.consumersunion.org/campai...3484indiv.html The good news is that you only have to wait until you're 65, and then it's free (in Pa. :-) - quote - > Also, does anyone in another state know how the credit bureaus are
I recently checked into this for a relative in NY. Here's the NY page:> actually handling the freezes, i.e., what are the actual fees and how > convenient is it to do (web site, letter, etc.). http://www.consumer.state.ny.us/security_freeze.htm Essentially (in NY) you have to write to each of the credit reporting agencies separately. Of course, each one has different info that it wants. The NY page gives links at the bottom to "freeze" pages at each agency. These pages in turn give pretty complete info for every state. Mark Freeland BnetOnewsX[at]sbcglobal.net |
| | |||
| |||
| What exactly is meant by "freeze" here? Instead of spending this money on credit security systems and this so-called "freeze," I suggest avoiding the need for personal credit. The NY Times the other week ran quite an article purporting that the credit industry is more out to make buck with all these alleged protection plans than it is interested in actually protecting. The article even suggested it does not pay them to provide too much protection. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My state (PA) has recently passed a law allowing consumers to put a freeze on their credit bureau files. I initially welcomed this law, but now that I look into it I am not sure it was implemented in the best possible way. The law allows a credit bureau to charge a fee up to $10 to put the freeze in place. So if you do this with each of the three major bureaus for yourself and your spouse, that's $60. If you want to remove the freeze temporarily, a bureau can charge up to $10 to do that. When you reinstate the freeze, that's another $60, and even if you never ask to have the freeze removed, it has a lifetime of seven years. So I am wondering, for purposes of avoiding identity theft - in particular someone else applying for credit in your name - whether it is better to do the freeze or just to subscribe to a credit monitoring service. I don't plan to apply for credit any time soon, but it's possible I might want a different credit card some time in the future, and credit reports are checked for other things like applying for a new cell phone service, insurance, etc. Another option is just getting a free credit report once a year from each bureau. Also, does anyone in another state know how the credit bureaus are actually handling the freezes, i.e., what are the actual fees and how convenient is it to do (web site, letter, etc.). Thanks. |
| Tags |
| bureau, credit, files, freezing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Microsoft Money Plus 2008 Freezing sten.sellier@gmail.com: I am having an issue where Money will freeze up inexplicably when I am trying to merge transactions in my Bank of America (CA) account. When... | Microsoft Money | 15 | 10-06-2008 11:16 PM | |
| sudden and rapid drop in credit score at 1 particular bureau rwilson290@hotmail.com: Has anyone seen an instance where a credit score would suddenly, and literally drop 50 points from 690 to 640 for no apparant reason overnight,... | Financial Planning | 1 | 04-13-2005 05:54 PM | |
| Freezing/lock up in 2005 Mike: Hi all. First time here. Got frustrated with two hours of phone support with no solution and figured I'd have more luck here!! Have used Money... | Microsoft Money | 8 | 12-06-2004 04:45 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |