|
#12
| |||
| |||
| "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> writes: - quote - > "Todd H." <t[at]toddh.net> wrote
:-) I hate commissions.> > "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> writes: > > > "Todd H." <t[at]toddh.net> wrote > > > > no financial planner working on commission is really interested > > > > in or educated to put the needs of the client first. The > > > > financial incentive is to sell product, regardless of its > > > > appropriateness. > > > > > Don't you think one could say the above about any profession or > > > job? > > > No. Lots of professions certainly, but not all. Believe me, I've > > spent a lot of time career planning such that I don't have to be > > in the position of advocating crap my customers don't need just to > > make a living. > Todd, I beg your pardon. I messed up, missing your qualifier > "working on commission." > I tend to agree with your original post on this matter. -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Todd H." <t[at]toddh.net> wrote - quote - > "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> writes:
Todd, I beg your pardon. I messed up, missing your qualifier> > "Todd H." <t[at]toddh.net> wrote > > > no financial planner working on commission is really > > > interested in > > > or educated to put the needs of the client first. The > > > financial > > > incentive is to sell product, regardless of its > > > appropriateness. > > > Don't you think one could say the above about any > > profession > > or job? > No. Lots of professions certainly, but not all. Believe > me, I've > spent a lot of time career planning such that I don't have > to be in > the position of advocating crap my customers don't need > just to make a > living. "working on commission." I tend to agree with your original post on this matter. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| I used to use a 'financial executive'. I 'acquired' him when the amount of money I had to invest reached a certain level. I then promptly was transferred to the brokerage side of my banking institution, and found myself aligned with a banking representative who had a VP after his name, and who had no shortage of investments for me to try. After a none too satisfactory result, I decided to do things the Right way.. First, I discovered Paul Merriman and the fabulous website: fundadvice.com. Next I discovered Morningstar, and I learned why Index Funds, used with a 'buy and hold' type of philosophy, made the most sense for me. I started lurking around the Vanguard Diehards forum, and other forums found on Morningstar. I bought the Nolo book entitled 'Plan your Estate', and a couple of others like 'The Boglehead's Guide to Investing', and you know what I found? I could do perfectly well in the market WITHOUT a financial planner!! If you follow a similar path to mine, I bet youll find you can do fine also! But first, I strongly suggest you get on over to fundadvice.com and just start reading... read, read, and read some more. Take all the financial planners you want; you will usually do better than they do just by investing in about 8 Vanguard Index funds covering the key asset categories. He lists several buy and hold portfolios including one I use for my IRA. Figure what percentage in stocks and what percentage in bonds is appropriate for you and then use the following percentages. Buy it and forget about it. In the end, youll find you will outperform the vast majority of socalled financial planners, and you will have done it all by yourself, saving yourself hefty percentages and fund fees in the process!! Good luck, have fun... % Equity Vanguard FUND 12.5 500 Index 12.5 Value Index 12.5 Small Cap Index 12.5 Small Cap Value Index 20.0 Developed Markets Index 20.0 International Value 10.0 Emerging Mkt. Stock Index bond % Bond Vanguard Fund 50.0 Short-term Investment Grade 50.0 Total Bond Index Paul "The Henchman" <heyhey[at]isforhorses.com.easynews.com> wrote in message news:1Rimh.177173$jO5.147444[at]fe06.news.easynews.com... - quote - > How many people here give a certain amount of money each and every month to > a financial planner. Why do you or don't you. > Or are people more likely to use them for lump sum investments..... |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "kastnna" <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> wrote in message news:1167771503.635675.274180[at]42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Don wrote:
That's what I thought about good planners. After oil prices tanked in April> > In the area where I live, the number of financial planners advertising > > their > > services in the local papers rises and falls along with the stock market > > itself. Many get into the action when the money is flowing freely and get > > out when investors become scarce. For an inexperienced person, this > > pattern > > should raise questions as to where the advice is going to be at the times > > it > > is most needed. > Interestingly, my firm draws in more investors when the market is > falling. Many people think they are investing geniuses when the market > is climbing and every stock out there is doing well (i.e. internet > startups before 2000). Its only after the crash that people realize > what their lack of investment knowledge has cost them. or may here in Canada too many silly people who invested at the high panicked and went running to planners. I was visiting mine over income tax discussions and he mentioned he was busy cause individual investors lost alot of money in resources in the spring. Apparently he was relieved I had complicated tax problems instead of lost money in foolish market hype. I do give a portion of my income to a financial planner each and every month but only a portion. Unfortunately the person I picked is retiring due to health reasons and I don't like his replacement. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> writes: - quote - > "Todd H." <t[at]toddh.net> wrote
No. Lots of professions certainly, but not all. Believe me, I've> > no financial planner working on commission is really interested in > > or educated to put the needs of the client first. The financial > > incentive is to sell product, regardless of its appropriateness. > Don't you think one could say the above about any profession > or job? spent a lot of time career planning such that I don't have to be in the position of advocating crap my customers don't need just to make a living. The temptation for impropriety is built into commission based systems, and I don't want to have to be worrying whether my advisor is recommending something to me because it's good for me above all other options 100%, or because 80% it's a pretty good fit for me, and 20% it'll put food on his table. I feel the same way about Realtors. Buyer's agency is a misnomer of course because we all know that a buyer's agent doesn't get paid unless you purchase something, and their return on their time is best if they get you to buy sooner rather than later. Mortgage brokers-- that's also commission based. The higher rate they can get someone to accept, or the more junk fees they can sneak into the respa, the more money they make. The ethical ones don't do this of course, but the frequency of finding unethical ones is alarming. Home inspectors and attorneys though, at least in teh real estate process are the only ones I like, honestly because they get paid whether I close on a given purchase or not, so they're most likely to keep my interests at heart because there's no financial element swaying them to do otherwise. - quote - > Yet I think plenty of financial planners as well as others working
The smart and ethical ones do this, I think. They have teh "long> for a living know they darn well better put the client first pretty > often, if not always, else word will get around and they will lose > business. haul" model that says if you don't screw your customers they'll be customers for life and you won't have to find new ones. The churn and burn model is held by others though. "I can make enough screwing clients that I can afford to find others, and the dumb clients may never find out." - quote - > In addition to your suggestion to seek a flat-fee planner, I
Good advice!> like rick++'s suggestion: Open an account at a big and old > brokerage or mutual fund company, like Fidelity, Vanguard, > Wells Fargo et al., and the reps there will give a lot of > good general guidance "free" (as long as you have an > account) as well as direct clients to good tools. Note that > the tools tend to be similar, which says something. Anyone working on commission raises my suspicion level I guess is all I'm saying, and that's why I choose to do my own investment decisions right now, but I'm on the cusp of getting flat fee help looking at where I am and what I may need to be doing differently. Then again, it probably is no surprise I'm also a "changes his own oil because the quick lube flunkies have managed to screw it up one too many times" type, as well as an engineer. Engineers can't stand dealing with anyone on commission! Best Regards, -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Todd H." <t[at]toddh.net> wrote - quote - > no financial planner working on
Don't you think one could say the above about any profession> commission is really interested in or educated to put the > needs of the > client first. The financial incentive is to sell product, > regardless > of its appropriateness. or job? Yet I think plenty of financial planners as well as others working for a living know they darn well better put the client first pretty often, if not always, else word will get around and they will lose business. I think I'm one of the more cynical ones here on this subject, to boot. Case in point: Not to flatter, but isn't Skip, one of the moderators, in this business? The only sense I get from him is that he's doing the work that someone else does not want to do, and he's not charging an arm and a leg for it. (Um, are you, Skip?) Guy touts buy-and-hold index funds, and more importantly, living within one's means, for goodness sake, right here in public. How much can he get away with in private with clients? Some people hate working with numbers. Combine this with the bone-headed culture we currently have that insists one always hire a "specialist" (high school diploma optional?) and sure you'll see people robbed blind. But not always. If one hates numbers, pay someone else to do the math. - quote - > The other thing is that the licensed financial planners
I have indeed seen a few of these. I agree a person has to> I've met all > seem to be the folks in the "get rich quick" camp who have > failed at > other ventures, and don't seem to have their own financial > house in > order. I've posted on this issue before...it's really odd > that of the > 3 CFP's I know, none of them seem to be "live within ones > means" types > and all have significant credit card debt. Maybe I'm > running with the > wrong crowd, I dunno. be careful. In addition to your suggestion to seek a flat-fee planner, I like rick++'s suggestion: Open an account at a big and old brokerage or mutual fund company, like Fidelity, Vanguard, Wells Fargo et al., and the reps there will give a lot of good general guidance "free" (as long as you have an account) as well as direct clients to good tools. Note that the tools tend to be similar, which says something. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "kastnna" <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> wrote - quote - > "Everybody talks about returns, but its the risk that will
Is that your firm's motto? It's very good.> break ya." |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "kastnna" <kastnna[at]auburnalum.org> wrote in message news:1167771503.635675.274180[at]42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Interestingly, my firm draws in more investors when the market is
That is interesting. Apparently your firm is stable and stays in business> falling. Many people think they are investing geniuses when the market > is climbing and every stock out there is doing well (i.e. internet > startups before 2000). Its only after the crash that people realize > what their lack of investment knowledge has cost them. through good times and bad. One thing special about the area where I live is the relatively large percentage of retired seniors in the population. When the market is climbing, more fly-by-night firms seem to be around offering advice, but when the market crashes fear sets in, and the seniors tend to move to conservative investments. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Don wrote: - quote - > In the area where I live, the number of financial planners advertising their
Interestingly, my firm draws in more investors when the market is> services in the local papers rises and falls along with the stock market > itself. Many get into the action when the money is flowing freely and get > out when investors become scarce. For an inexperienced person, this pattern > should raise questions as to where the advice is going to be at the times it > is most needed. falling. Many people think they are investing geniuses when the market is climbing and every stock out there is doing well (i.e. internet startups before 2000). Its only after the crash that people realize what their lack of investment knowledge has cost them. We gain fewer clients when they are making 20% on their own. Its when they lost 50% and we only lost 10% that they come pounding on the door. But that's just our personal experience, not a difinitive answer to the OP. ____ "Everybody talks about returns, but its the risk that will break ya." |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Todd H." <t[at]toddh.net> wrote in message news:8464bpsbmv.fsf[at]ripco.com... - quote - > The other thing is that the licensed financial planners I've met all
In the area where I live, the number of financial planners advertising their> seem to be the folks in the "get rich quick" camp who have failed at > other ventures, and don't seem to have their own financial house in > order. I've posted on this issue before...it's really odd that of the > 3 CFP's I know, none of them seem to be "live within ones means" types > and all have significant credit card debt. Maybe I'm running with the > wrong crowd, I dunno. services in the local papers rises and falls along with the stock market itself. Many get into the action when the money is flowing freely and get out when investors become scarce. For an inexperienced person, this pattern should raise questions as to where the advice is going to be at the times it is most needed. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| I'm too cheap to buy one. However my brokerage gives me one for free. I used all their extensive on-line planning packages, buit the in-person still had a couple of useful ideas. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "The Henchman" <heyhey[at]isforhorses.com.easynews.com> writes: - quote - > How many people here give a certain amount of money each and every month to
The only financial planner I would consider is a flat fee one. I> a financial planner. Why do you or don't you. > Or are people more likely to use them for lump sum investments..... haven't found one I like yet, but it's on the to do list for 2007. No more than a Realtor is structured by compensation to truly have the client's best interest in mind, no financial planner working on commission is really interested in or educated to put the needs of the client first. The financial incentive is to sell product, regardless of its appropriateness. The other thing is that the licensed financial planners I've met all seem to be the folks in the "get rich quick" camp who have failed at other ventures, and don't seem to have their own financial house in order. I've posted on this issue before...it's really odd that of the 3 CFP's I know, none of them seem to be "live within ones means" types and all have significant credit card debt. Maybe I'm running with the wrong crowd, I dunno. I'm sure there are some excellent professionals out there who could help my situation, but until I have occasion to meet one, I'm my own financial planner! Best Regards, -- Todd H. http://www.toddh.net/ |
| | |||
| |||
| On Tue, 2 Jan 2007 04:03:59 -0600, "The Henchman" <heyhey[at]isforhorses.com.easynews.com> wrote: - quote - > How many people here give a certain amount of money each and every month to > a financial planner. Why do you or don't you. > Or are people more likely to use them for lump sum investments..... I do not. I've tried two financial planners. Both were "certified" by one of the national organizations. I was dissatisfied, in the one case with personal follow-up; in the other with a lack of information about performance and expectations. So I chose to educate myself and do it myself. This may not be appropriate for everyone. --ron |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| How many people here give a certain amount of money each and every month to a financial planner. Why do you or don't you. Or are people more likely to use them for lump sum investments..... |
| Tags |
| financial, planners |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Looking for Feedback from working Financial Planners jessica.rucco@oregonmortgageplanning.com: Hello, I am doing some research, and I am looking for the top 5 challenges that face Fianancial Planners in their industry. The more specific the... | Financial Planning | 1 | 12-05-2006 09:00 AM | |
| Financial Aid help!!! melaniec032@comcast.net: I am now 30 and wondering where my twenties went. I am currently on disability and can not do the kind of work I did when I was younger. My last... | Financial Planning | 1 | 01-07-2005 10:36 AM | |
| Free advice vs. financial planners... Ram Samudrala: This is just my personal opinion and about what works for me. I've had discussions about this in the past in this newsgroup. I've found... | Financial Planning | 13 | 12-27-2004 09:19 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |