|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:59:56 -0500, po.ning[at]gmail.com > <po.ning[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > I have a 401K plan. I need to designate beneficiaries. Should I > > name my revocable trust, or name my wife specifically. This quickly becomes a complicated question depending upon many facotrs including, among others, the terms of the trust, the types and ages of trust beneficiaries, etc, etc. Pay the money to get the right answer from someone well versed. For example, some of the information provided to you in this thread is changing due to this year's tax bill. John |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| David Efflandt wrote: - quote - > On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:59:56 -0500, po.ning[at]gmail.com <po.ning[at]gmail.com> wrote:
thanks.> > I have a 401K plan. I need to designate beneficiaries. Should I name > > my revocable trust, or name my wife specifically. > If you name your spouse as beneficiary, she can transfer it directly into > her own IRA and will not be taxed until she takes distributions. > A non-spouse beneficiary can transfer it, but has to remain in (name of > the deceased) for benefit of (the beneficiary) to maintain its tax > deferred status. If a non-spouse transfers it to an account in their own > name, it is immediately taxable. > I believe I read that there is no benefit to leaving a retirement account > to a trust. Maybe it is considered an immediately taxable event, because > a trust is a non-person not eligible for such an account. The tax on such > a lump sum could take a bite out of it (at higher tax bracket) and future > earnings would be taxable. |
| | |||
| |||
| On Thu, 31 Aug 2006 14:59:56 -0500, po.ning[at]gmail.com <po.ning[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > I have a 401K plan. I need to designate beneficiaries. Should I name
If you name your spouse as beneficiary, she can transfer it directly into> my revocable trust, or name my wife specifically. her own IRA and will not be taxed until she takes distributions. A non-spouse beneficiary can transfer it, but has to remain in (name of the deceased) for benefit of (the beneficiary) to maintain its tax deferred status. If a non-spouse transfers it to an account in their own name, it is immediately taxable. I believe I read that there is no benefit to leaving a retirement account to a trust. Maybe it is considered an immediately taxable event, because a trust is a non-person not eligible for such an account. The tax on such a lump sum could take a bite out of it (at higher tax bracket) and future earnings would be taxable. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a 401K plan. I need to designate beneficiaries. Should I name my revocable trust, or name my wife specifically. |
| Tags |
| beneficiary, designation |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Beneficiary IRA CFox759: I recently inherited several Beneficiary IRA's from my mom, who passed away several months ago. My brother and I went to the different banks that... | Taxes | 5 | 08-13-2006 10:17 AM | |
| IRA beneficiary of a beneficiary johnny dough: This is a second posting. The first did not appear (at least, in my feed) I apologize if I have made a mistake. I am the sole beneficiary of an... | Financial Planning | 6 | 02-06-2004 05:14 PM | |
| Beneficiary IRA John: I recently inherited an IRA from my father. According to IRS regulations, I need to take distributions from this money. There is no penelty in... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-23-2004 02:38 PM | |
| cash transactions designation SB: Is there a real reason to have the cash transaction section in investment accounts? It seems all it does is confuse things in my downloads. Would... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-09-2003 12:12 AM | |
| QPSC Designation? Beep Beep: I am a 50% owner and employee of an S-corporation that provides on-site computer & network repairs, maintenance and administration. Over 95% of... | Taxes | 11 | 07-18-2003 07:43 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |