|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Would money coming from a Roth IRA be part of the $80,000? Roth is
I dont they've are worked out the details yet.> exempt from taxes, but it is exempt from income calculations for this > purpose? Its phased-in over several several years, not really noticeable until the current president leaves office. But watch out by 2020! |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| rick Looking over some tables on the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) site, I noticed some macro numbers Table 3.6 - Contributions to "Hospital insurance" total $162.2 billion Table 3.12 - Transfers to persons for "Hospital and supplementary medical insurance" total $647.7 billion I added lines from each table to come up with totals that include both federal and state accounts. I am not sure that the lines as presented cover exactly the same accounts. But assuming there is some direct relationship intended, in presenting the numbers the way they do, there is a large deficit there between what is taken in and what is paid out. (About $485.5 billion.) According to Bureau of Labor Statistics tables, the top two quintiles of "consumer units" begin to fall into the $80,000 dollar and above income range. So let's say hypothetically 40% pay 3 times more (per the 2003 Medicare Drug Act provision you cite) = about $90 billion added to the $162 billion. There is still a deficit of $395 billion. |
| | |||
| |||
| rick++ wrote: - quote - > A little publicized feature of the 2003 Medicare Drug Act is in a
Would money coming from a Roth IRA be part of the $80,000? Roth is> few years medicare premiums will be allowed to grow 300% > for "well-off" seniors. (Technically the government pays > 75% of a so-called monthly premium, and this subsidy would be > eliminated.) This change was intended to help pay for the > new drug part of medicare. > Well-off is defind as over $80,000 a year, a number specifically > exempted from > COLA indexing. > In 2006 the subsized medicare premium is $89 a month and non-subsidized > $354 a month. This is a 50% increase since 2003. If these rates of > increase exempt from taxes, but it is exempt from income calculations for this purpose? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| A little publicized feature of the 2003 Medicare Drug Act is in a few years medicare premiums will be allowed to grow 300% for "well-off" seniors. (Technically the government pays 75% of a so-called monthly premium, and this subsidy would be eliminated.) This change was intended to help pay for the new drug part of medicare. Well-off is defind as over $80,000 a year, a number specifically exempted from COLA indexing. That sounds like a generous number now, but this will be the median national income in the late 2010s at the rate income is increasing. People with deferred retirement accounts are forced to withdraw a minimum each year, when combined with SS and other income could very well be paying extra medicare in the not too distant future. In 2006 the subsized medicare premium is $89 a month and non-subsidized $354 a month. This is a 50% increase since 2003. If these rates of increase keep up, along with the phase-out of the subsidy, seniors will be looking at very substantial monthly medicare premiums. And you thought your health insurance problems would be solved qualifying for medicare :-) |
| Tags |
| means, medicare, plan, testing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Means-testing Medicare Part B premiums lyelowitz@yahoo.com: I understand that premiums for Medicare Part B will be means-tested starting in 2007. For a single person with income between $80 to $100K, he/she... | Taxes | 7 | 12-17-2006 10:40 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |