|
#9
| |||
| |||
| zxcvbob wrote: - quote - > I have a 2001 Chevy pickup, 2WD with a small V8. It only has 34000
The big SUVs are capable of towing large boats or camping trailers> miles on it in 5.5 years (and 2500 of that was a long trip I took a few > years ago), so you see how much I drive it. I expected it to average > over 20 mpg but it only gets about 15 (a lot less than that in the > winter.) The poor fuel economy is a major irritation, but paying $100 > to fill up the tank is really not a big expense if you only have to fill > it a few times per year. It's more than offset by the utility of having > a truck available when I need to haul something. > I haven't figured out what the utility of most SUV's is versus a minivan > or big sedan, either of which would get almost double the MPG. which a minivan would find difficult. The crossover SUVs like the Ford Escape are based on a car body and can get better gas milage than a minivan especially if they have a hybrid drive train. But the crossover SUV's have limited towing capability. -- Ron |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Elle wrote: - quote - > "Tad Borek" <borekfm[at]pacbell.net> wrote > > Higher gas prices don't really add much to the cost an > > SUV. Let's say it gets 15 mpg vs. 30 and you drive the > > average 12,000 miles per year. The 15 mpg SUV uses 800 > > gallons a year, vs. 400. The 400 extra gallons cost > > maybe $800 awhile back, and buyers then were willing to > > pay for that. At > $3.50/gal it would be $1,400, or $600 > > more per year. > Interesting analysis. I think people would tend to focus > more on the $1400 "absolute" savings rather than the "$600" > relative savings. > Having an extra $1400 a year (or around $100 a month, > ballpark) means one could buy around $5k more car/truck, > assuming an 8%, five-year loan. > I could see a savvy salesperson making this point > successfully to a consumer: Buy this 30 mpg SUV at $25k, and > you get all these features, or, ma'am, buy this 15 mpg SUV > at $20k. I'd cringe at the 15 mpg, for one thing. Double the > fuel costs every couple of weeks or so? Plus more time > pulling into gas stations... I think even non-frugal people > roll their eyes at how much it's costing them to fill up > their cars these days, and many are taking pause. > Kinda close but I think a lot of folks would go for the 30 > mpg vehicle, especially since it keeps paying back around > $100 a month after the car is paid off. > I googled and did see some reports on gas guzzlers' prices > being cut as a result of slower demand. I would bet it's > reality. Plus Toyota's marketshare is now a record or near a > record, and I think gas price increases over the last couple > of years have a lot to do with this. The new fuel efficient > Toyota Yaris evidently is very hard to buy near invoice at > the moment, because it's in such high demand. (IIRC people > at the Honda newsgroups are saying similar about the new > Honda Fit.) So people appear to be paying a few thousand > dollars more for it vs. the Corolla (or Civic), and > presumably for the fuel savings. I have a 2001 Chevy pickup, 2WD with a small V8. It only has 34000 miles on it in 5.5 years (and 2500 of that was a long trip I took a few years ago), so you see how much I drive it. I expected it to average over 20 mpg but it only gets about 15 (a lot less than that in the winter.) The poor fuel economy is a major irritation, but paying $100 to fill up the tank is really not a big expense if you only have to fill it a few times per year. It's more than offset by the utility of having a truck available when I need to haul something. I haven't figured out what the utility of most SUV's is versus a minivan or big sedan, either of which would get almost double the MPG. Bob |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Tad Borek" <borekfm[at]pacbell.net> wrote - quote - > Higher gas prices don't really add much to the cost an
Interesting analysis. I think people would tend to focus> SUV. Let's say it gets 15 mpg vs. 30 and you drive the > average 12,000 miles per year. The 15 mpg SUV uses 800 > gallons a year, vs. 400. The 400 extra gallons cost > maybe $800 awhile back, and buyers then were willing to > pay for that. At > $3.50/gal it would be $1,400, or $600 > more per year. more on the $1400 "absolute" savings rather than the "$600" relative savings. Having an extra $1400 a year (or around $100 a month, ballpark) means one could buy around $5k more car/truck, assuming an 8%, five-year loan. I could see a savvy salesperson making this point successfully to a consumer: Buy this 30 mpg SUV at $25k, and you get all these features, or, ma'am, buy this 15 mpg SUV at $20k. I'd cringe at the 15 mpg, for one thing. Double the fuel costs every couple of weeks or so? Plus more time pulling into gas stations... I think even non-frugal people roll their eyes at how much it's costing them to fill up their cars these days, and many are taking pause. Kinda close but I think a lot of folks would go for the 30 mpg vehicle, especially since it keeps paying back around $100 a month after the car is paid off. I googled and did see some reports on gas guzzlers' prices being cut as a result of slower demand. I would bet it's reality. Plus Toyota's marketshare is now a record or near a record, and I think gas price increases over the last couple of years have a lot to do with this. The new fuel efficient Toyota Yaris evidently is very hard to buy near invoice at the moment, because it's in such high demand. (IIRC people at the Honda newsgroups are saying similar about the new Honda Fit.) So people appear to be paying a few thousand dollars more for it vs. the Corolla (or Civic), and presumably for the fuel savings. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| woessner[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > That being said, I've read several articles to the effect that this is > simply not the case. Despite high gas prices, the demand for > gas-guzzling SUVs has not gone down, just like the demand for > high-efficiency hybrids hasn't gone up. I think it's going to take a > lot more than $3 gas to make American's change their car-buying habits. I think you're right! Higher gas prices don't really add much to the cost an SUV. Let's say it gets 15 mpg vs. 30 and you drive the average 12,000 miles per year. The 15 mpg SUV uses 800 gallons a year, vs. 400. The 400 extra gallons cost maybe $800 awhile back, and buyers then were willing to pay for that. At $3.50/gal it would be $1,400, or $600 more per year. That's peanuts relative to purchase price differences. A quick google turned up an "edmunds price index" and in 2004 (couldn't find more recent #s) the average large SUV, after discounts, cost about $14,000 more than the average car. So what's an extra $600/year when an SUV buyer is willing to plunk down an extra $14,000 to buy? (and take on other costs as well - insurance, and tires, 4WD drivetrains, etc that wear out differently when driven on the 405 at 80 mph). Forget gas though, I just don't understand the fuss about driving, basically, a garbage barge down the river. Blech! I'll take an overpowered hatchback any day. Or for off-road, a Subaru. -Tad |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Although they're not buying SUVs, $3 gas may have an affect on fleet buyers. (I don't mean rentals where the owner doesn't bear the fuel cost.) When corporate buyers start requiring cars with better gas mileage, it may create enough critical mass for manufacturers to make more available. Just a thought... -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL <woessner[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1154816379.055880.275210[at]n13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > That being said, I've read several articles to the effect that this is > simply not the case. Despite high gas prices, the demand for > gas-guzzling SUVs has not gone down, just like the demand for > high-efficiency hybrids hasn't gone up. I think it's going to take a > lot more than $3 gas to make American's change their car-buying habits. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| I think it would be hard to find historical prices, but CarMax has no haggle prices posted on the web for the few new brands they sell. I think you say those are representative of market prices. I bought a Durango last year at their Orlando site. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL "HW "Skip" Weldon" <skip5700removethis[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:hb69d2hlhg88utn2euf233i5g3m28026rb[at]4ax.com... - quote - > I read elsewhere a suggestion that the prices of SUVs were slashed to > the extent that the savings would buy gas for several years. > I'm not sure about that, but am looking into it. Does anybody know > how I could find the cost of various vehicles as of 1/1/06? > -HW "Skip" Weldon > Columbia, SC |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| woessner[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > That being said, I've read several articles to the effect that this is
I've seen many news and articles that large SUV demand has plummeted> simply not the case. Despite high gas prices, the demand for > gas-guzzling SUVs has not gone down, just like the demand for > high-efficiency hybrids hasn't gone up. I think it's going to take a > lot more than $3 gas to make American's change their car-buying habits. and hybrid demand has surged in the past year. Where and when did you hear that the opposite was true? http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...toryId=4676689 http://www.google.com/search?&q=dema...ids+gas+prices |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Elle wrote: - quote - > Total cost of owning a car = initial purchase price + gas
Don't forget to subtract out the final selling price when you get rid> costs + insurance + maintenance and repairs. of the vehicle. Depreciation can be a very large portion of the cost of owning the vehicle. FWIW, I drove an SUV for 9 years, up until February of this year. This was one with a large V8 engine that got very mediocre gas mileage. Nevertheless, over that entire 9 year span that I drove it, depreciation cost me much more than the gas did. In the early years, when gas was ~$1/gal, even the insurance cost more than the gas. John Cowart |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| HW "Skip" Weldon wrote: - quote - > I read elsewhere a suggestion that the prices of SUVs were slashed to
This sort of makes sense, if you look at it from the perspective of> the extent that the savings would buy gas for several years. supply and demand. Gas prices go up, demand for gas-guzzling SUVs goes down, so the price of of said SUVs also goes down. That being said, I've read several articles to the effect that this is simply not the case. Despite high gas prices, the demand for gas-guzzling SUVs has not gone down, just like the demand for high-efficiency hybrids hasn't gone up. I think it's going to take a lot more than $3 gas to make American's change their car-buying habits. - quote - > I'm not sure about that, but am looking into it. Does anybody know
Edmunds. Edmunds also has a "True Cost to Own" feature, which may also> how I could find the cost of various vehicles as of 1/1/06? be useful to you. I'm fairly interested in this, so let me know what you find out. And if I can help. --Bill |
| | |||
| |||
| "HW "Skip" Weldon" <skip5700removethis[at]hotmail.com> wrote - quote - > I read elsewhere a suggestion that the prices of SUVs were
What's the goal of the hypothetical vehicle purchaser? To> slashed to > the extent that the savings would buy gas for several > years. save money? Or to weakly rationalize buying a fun but ultimately way more expensive vehicle? Total cost of owning a car = initial purchase price + gas costs + insurance + maintenance and repairs. Assume insurance and maintenance and repair are the same for all cars, then compare initial purchase price and gas costs. Sources like www.edmunds.com and the annual car buying issue of Consumer Reports (published in April) will, as you may be aware, give invoice prices for all new models. Edmunds starts new SUV invoice prices at about $15k. E.g. a Kia Sportage. It gets 22/27 mpg, city/highway. Plenty of compact sedans start at much lower prices and get much better mileage. Also, buying used is often even a better bargain. Gas guzzler prices are getting slashed across the board, SUV or not. The hypothetical vehicle purchaser here should settle on what s/he wants (fun or low costs), pick a model, and then shop around using various auto negotiating tactics well discussed on the net, to get the savings as possible. E.g. emailing dealers for their best price on X car with YZ options is now a popular device for getting a very good deal. - quote - > I'm not sure about that, but am looking into it. Does
If the above commentary does not change the direction of> anybody know > how I could find the cost of various vehicles as of > 1/1/06? this hypothetical consumer, then the question right above should be clarified: actual prices paid or invoice prices? For actual price paid, one would have to focus on a particular region, note that the outcome may vary by region, get enough data to have statistical significance, etc. Note that the data may reflect a wide variation in the final, negotiated price, etc. Dealerships have different goals. Invoice price changes for some models might be found using c. January issues of Consumer Reports and Edmunds.com , but I would not put much faith in this approach, either. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I read elsewhere a suggestion that the prices of SUVs were slashed to the extent that the savings would buy gas for several years. I'm not sure about that, but am looking into it. Does anybody know how I could find the cost of various vehicles as of 1/1/06? -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
| Tags |
| gas, guzzler, money, saving |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Money slow in saving data R. P.: I've seen a lot of complaints about slow reporting but my problem is the slowness of saving new billing or withdrawal entries. Recording deposits... | Microsoft Money | 15 | 07-26-2008 07:00 PM | |
| Money Plus not saving changes Scarlett: I have used Money for years. I bought a new computer with Vista a couple of months ago and downloaded Money Plus Deluxe. I've been using it with... | Microsoft Money | 14 | 06-30-2008 10:35 PM | |
| saving money 2000 cancan: How do you save my books on to a cd. There is no save to and I can't change it to save from a c drive to a d drive. Thanks for the help | Microsoft Money | 1 | 07-14-2003 03:25 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |