|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > One possible reason to load up your 401(k) instead of investing in a
In this case, this might be a very poor strategy. The OP has a 457, not a> taxable account is if you think it is likely that you won't be > sticking with the job in the long term. When you change jobs, you can > roll your old 401(k) money over into an IRA 401k, and there are favorable differences. One is the ability to withdraw funds WITHOUT PENALTY at any age as long as the contributor has separated from service. While the OP may not want to withdraw funds upon his early retirement, he should carefully consider that he may want to keep his options open and not throw this opportunity away by rolling the funds into an IRA. Elizabeth Richardson |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 1 May 2006 10:44:13 -0500, "iarwain" <iarwain_8[at]hotmail.comwrote: - quote - > I'm more concerned with rules of withdrawal from the 457, although I
Assuming the plan is a government 457 and the participant has> was just reading that unlike a 401k, you can withdraw from a 457 at any > age after you leave your job. But do you still have to take > "substantially equal" withdrawals to avoid a tax penalty? And what > does "substantially equal" mean exactly? terminated employment, there is no premature distribution penalty associated with 457 withdrawals. As for whether the plan will provide any type of withdrawal other than a complete withdrawal and whether there are any custodian imposed surrender charges, commissions, etc., see the plan document, ask the custodian, or, if you have a good HR group, ask them. -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| iarwain wrote: - quote - > I'm maxing out a Roth IRA, funding a 401k (well, it's a 457 actually), > and I have a pension due when I retire (hopefully early). I'm wanting > to also start investing in a taxable account, and live off of that and > the pension for as long as possible while letting the nontaxable > accounts compound (when I retire). > Do you think it's a good idea to invest in taxable accounts before > maxing out the 401k? You definitely don't want to do all of your saving in qualified accounts, that money is intended for retirement and can only be accessed in limited circumstances (and even then, with a tax hit). But there are plenty of cash needs well before then, that most people aren't able to pay for out of a regular paycheck (down payment on a home, home maintenance and improvement, automobile purchase & repair, perhaps education for children, vacations, recreational gear.....) Plus as you mentioned, you might want to leave the qualified dollars alone and live off other money - whether early in retirement, or simply during a year off at some point or something like that. I don't think there's any rule of thumb on how to allocate between the two, it's so specific to the individual. One thing you mentioned, the pension, suggests that you might not have as high a need for retirement savings as the typical employee. It's not a given that you max out qualified plan contributions - as a starting point you might take a look at your marginal tax bracket and see how much immediate tax savings that extra dollar is getting you. -Tad |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| iarwain wrote: - quote - > Original poster here.
Your benefit dept should spell out the withdrawal provisions, but the> To be honest, the diversification problem isn't really that much of an > issue with me. Between the 457 choices and the Roth IRA I think I can > get decent diversification. > I'm more concerned with rules of withdrawal from the 457, although I > was just reading that unlike a 401k, you can withdraw from a 457 at any > age after you leave your job. But do you still have to take > "substantially equal" withdrawals to avoid a tax penalty? And what > does "substantially equal" mean exactly? > See, the appealing thing about keeping a taxable account to me is that > I can do whatever I want with it, whenever I want, and withdraw as much > or as little as I may need. My plan has been to retire early > (hopefully) with a pension and use the taxable accounts to fill in any > needed income and stretch that out as long as I can before getting into > the 457. To answer someone's question, I plan on being in a lower tax > bracket when I retire. > By some of the responses here, I get the impression some people don't > see the value in a taxable account. Do you think then that outside of > an emergency fund all your investments should be in tax deferred > accounts? In a lot of ways this would be an easier thing to do, since > with the 457 I can save the money back while keeping more to spend now > at the same time. It's mostly just the withdrawal rules that put me > off, which I confess I'm not completely familiar with at this time. I > need to learn more. If anybody knows anything about withdrawal rules > for 457s I'm listening. 457 does not have a 10% withdrawal penalty for under 62 withdrawals. You can take thosewithdrawals as you wish once you retire. It's not that the post-tax account has no value, it cerainly does. Given a 15K/yr limit for 401 this year, it would take a high savings percentage for most people to max out and still have money to invest. Similarly, given the generally low savings rates, most people will retire to a lower bracket, and would be best off using the pre-tax savings to the fullest extent possible. Talk to your benefit dept about the 457 withdrawal rules. The information publicly available is far less than that for regular 401 or IRAs. Lastly, my best advice on the post retirement planning; look at your tax bracket and consider converting an amount into a Roth IRA to 'top off' that bracket. Over time, that Roth money will continue to grow, untaxed, and you will optimize the taxes paid on all withdrawals. For example, in 2006 the Joint rate of 15% ends at $61,300. Say in December, you dry run your taxes, and find that taxable income is $51,300. You convert $10,000, and pay 15% on that. This strategy is worth thinking about. Keep in mind, you cannot convert from 401/457 to Roth. It has to stop in a regular IRA first, even if for a day. JOE |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Original poster here. To be honest, the diversification problem isn't really that much of an issue with me. Between the 457 choices and the Roth IRA I think I can get decent diversification. I'm more concerned with rules of withdrawal from the 457, although I was just reading that unlike a 401k, you can withdraw from a 457 at any age after you leave your job. But do you still have to take "substantially equal" withdrawals to avoid a tax penalty? And what does "substantially equal" mean exactly? See, the appealing thing about keeping a taxable account to me is that I can do whatever I want with it, whenever I want, and withdraw as much or as little as I may need. My plan has been to retire early (hopefully) with a pension and use the taxable accounts to fill in any needed income and stretch that out as long as I can before getting into the 457. To answer someone's question, I plan on being in a lower tax bracket when I retire. By some of the responses here, I get the impression some people don't see the value in a taxable account. Do you think then that outside of an emergency fund all your investments should be in tax deferred accounts? In a lot of ways this would be an easier thing to do, since with the 457 I can save the money back while keeping more to spend now at the same time. It's mostly just the withdrawal rules that put me off, which I confess I'm not completely familiar with at this time. I need to learn more. If anybody knows anything about withdrawal rules for 457s I'm listening. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| joetaxpayer wrote: - quote - > iarwain wrote:
Good point. To go further, if you have some good choices in your> snip > > > Obviously, the disadvantage is the lack of tax deferral. But as long > > as I'm putting a substantial amount into the 401k, don't you think > > it's a good idea to have some taxable investments as well? Isn't it > > good to have your eggs in several different baskets? > > [...] > You may have a 401K, a Roth, and post tax accounts > all in the same investment (and no[t] be diversified) or all > your money in a 401 but with a good mix of end investments. To speak > of diversification, you should look at all investments as a total pie > chart. 401(k), but cannot construct a diversified portfolio with just those choices you are happy with, you can round out your portfolio by making complimentary investments in your IRAs and taxable accounts. For instance, if your 401(k) has only large cap choices that you like, you can allocate more of your other investments to small caps, international, bonds, etc., and have a well-rounded portfolio. So even if your 401(k) doesn't offer everything you want, it may still offer enough to make it worth contributing. -- Mark Freeland nNeEwTs[at]sonic.net |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "Sandra Loosemore" <sandra[at]frogsonice.com> wrote in message news:m3y7xmr869.fsf[at]localhost.localdomain... - quote - > When you change jobs, you can
Good point. Never thought of that strategy.> roll your old 401(k) money over into an IRA, and then do a Roth > conversion on it, paying the taxes out of your other savings -- > effectively allowing you to pour far more money into the Roth than the > limits otherwise permit. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| iarwain wrote: - quote - > Obviously, the disadvantage is the lack of tax deferral. But as long > as I'm putting a substantial amount into the 401k, don't you think it's > a good idea to have some taxable investments as well? Isn't it good to > have your eggs in several different baskets? You can get tax deferral in a taxable account -- just don't sell anything. Maybe you can't totally accomplish this, but you at least control when the taxable events occur. I kind of like that Bernanke (sp?) is talking about cutting the capital gains tax rate to zero. Shortly after that happens (if it happens) I'm selling everything that has a gain and shifting all the money in my daughter's college fund into a new fund to step-up the cost bases. Bob |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| iarwain wrote: snip - quote - > Obviously, the disadvantage is the lack of tax deferral. But as long
One of the questions someone advising you would ask (or would know from> as I'm putting a substantial amount into the 401k, don't you think it's > a good idea to have some taxable investments as well? Isn't it good to > have your eggs in several different baskets? your profile); What tax bracket are you in now? in what tax bracket will you be in when you retire? There are people who will retire in a higher bracket than are while working. For them, a 401K is a way to turn long term gains into ordinary income (not good). Others are in a high bracket now, but will have a modest income at retirement and are trading 35% tax rate now for 15% at retirement. So the pretax vs post tax decision is mostly based on that. I advised one 25 year old, very bright guy, likely to suceed, to put into the 401 only the amount his employer uses for matching, in his case, the first 5% is matched, dollar for dollar. Then, put the max into a Roth, then regular accounts. That is likely the best I could answer not knowing more about your situation. You used the expression 'eggs in several baskets'. This typically refers to choice of investments, i.e. stocks, bonds, etc, not to tax status of accounts. I'm not splitting hairs here. You may have a 401K, a Roth, and post tax accounts all in the same investment (and now be diversified) or all your money in a 401 but with a good mix of end investments. To speak of diversification, you should look at all investments as a total pie chart. JOE |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| One possible reason to load up your 401(k) instead of investing in a taxable account is if you think it is likely that you won't be sticking with the job in the long term. When you change jobs, you can roll your old 401(k) money over into an IRA, and then do a Roth conversion on it, paying the taxes out of your other savings -- effectively allowing you to pour far more money into the Roth than the limits otherwise permit. Of course, this assumes your other income is under the limit when you do the contribution and it doesn't push you into a higher tax bracket. This would be a good plan for somebody who's planning to go back to school or become a stay-at-home parent or otherwise take some extended time off work. -Sandra |
| | |||
| |||
| "iarwain" <iarwain_8[at]hotmail.com> wrote - quote - > There is only a limited amount of investment choices with
After contributing enough to get the employer's match, the> the 401k, so > more diversification can be acheived with the taxable > account. above is indeed an important reason for not continuing to contribute to their 401(k). - quote - > Obviously, the disadvantage is the lack of tax deferral.
Right, but it really depends on how bad the choices are.> But as long > as I'm putting a substantial amount into the 401k, don't > you think it's > a good idea to have some taxable investments as well? > Isn't it good to > have your eggs in several different baskets? Also, I wouldn't look down my nose at the tax break quite so quickly. You seem to see it as an inconvenience (e.g. "most of the taxes will already be paid in the taxable account") rather than an advantage. You might want to consider giving the group a more exact idea of what your 401(k) has and what in particular you wish it had. It's quite possible the choices are apalling (after getting the employer's match--can't beat a typically 50-100% immediate return like that). |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I'm maxing out a Roth IRA, funding a 401k (well, it's a 457 actually), and I have a pension due when I retire (hopefully early). I'm wanting to also start investing in a taxable account, and live off of that and the pension for as long as possible while letting the nontaxable accounts compound (when I retire). Do you think it's a good idea to invest in taxable accounts before maxing out the 401k? The advantages I see with the taxable account is this: You can only contribute a fairly limited amount to the Roth IRA. There is only a limited amount of investment choices with the 401k, so more diversification can be acheived with the taxable account. You don't have to deal with any rules of withdrawal with the taxable account, and withdrawals can be made at any time (or age). I also like the idea that most of the taxes will already be paid in the taxable accounts. Obviously, the disadvantage is the lack of tax deferral. But as long as I'm putting a substantial amount into the 401k, don't you think it's a good idea to have some taxable investments as well? Isn't it good to have your eggs in several different baskets? |
| Tags |
| accounts, taxable |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| IRA taxable vs. non taxable amounts Ignoramus25712: I am in a little bit of a quandary. I have two IRAs, one made before I got married, and one created after that. The problem is that the money... | Financial Planning | 14 | 04-11-2006 04:53 AM | |
| How to view a report to show gains in non-taxable accounts - Bobb -: I just came here looking to solve a problem related to gains in retirement accounts. The past few days I have done realignment of my portfolio:... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 07-11-2005 12:58 AM | |
| asset location in taxable and tax-deferred accounts beliavsky@aol.com: There is a paper in the June 2004 issue of Journal of Finance, "Optimal Asset Location and Allocation with Taxable and Tax-deferred Investing", by... | Financial Planning | 3 | 05-29-2004 06:10 PM | |
| 414H Taxable or Non Taxable MArk Ronald: Hi my wife is a buffalo public school teacher and i'm doing our taxes this year. I'm using the taxcut software and in box 14 there is an amount... | Taxes | 4 | 02-10-2004 03:30 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |