|
#12
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 3 May 2006 19:27:28 -0500, Will Trice <wwtrice[at]paragondynamics.com> wrote: - quote - > > does it
Looks like another job for consumption smoothing. <g> > make sense to convert her IRA to Roth IRA now so that she can withdraw > > the $ tax-free after retirement and have minimum penalty on her this > > year's return because of her income level? > This probably only makes sense if her marginal tax rate in retirement > will be more than it is now, and if she uses money outside the IRA to > pay the tax on the conversion (i.e. she doesn't withdraw from her IRA to > pay these taxes). -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| xiongnu[at]my-deja.com wrote: - quote - > now she's going to retire in a few years (five to be exact). does it
This probably only makes sense if her marginal tax rate in retirement> make sense to convert her IRA to Roth IRA now so that she can withdraw > the $ tax-free after retirement and have minimum penalty on her this > year's return because of her income level? will be more than it is now, and if she uses money outside the IRA to pay the tax on the conversion (i.e. she doesn't withdraw from her IRA to pay these taxes). -Will |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| hi, i got a similar question. my mom made less than $30k last year and the year before because of extended unemployment period. she has a traditional IRA account with about $20k. she didn't make any contribution towards IRA for the past years because of her job situation for the past two years. now she's going to retire in a few years (five to be exact). does it make sense to convert her IRA to Roth IRA now so that she can withdraw the $ tax-free after retirement and have minimum penalty on her this year's return because of her income level? |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Mon, 24 Apr 2006 20:44:57 -0500, "John" <john.corey[at]gmail.com - quote - > 1. There is an implied message that you are expecting to not be working
I don't expect to be not working (or underemployed) in the near term.> in the near term. Doesn't mean they couldn't decide to replace me with a chimp tomorrow but I don't forsee it. - quote - > 2. There is also the issue of the funds growing so that there is more
True, and someone who knows what they're doing should watch for> to tax when you do the switch. this, but that wasn't the point of the original message. - quote - > There was also the comment from someone else that you should
I don't disagree with this, but again it wasn't the point of the> use after tax dollars to pay the taxes so you move the full amount > (sort of like an extra contribution). Hence the conversion should be > when you have surplus cash original message. If someone is in the 28% bracket and pays surplus cash on the conversion, they would pay more than if they were in the 15% bracket paying surplus cash on the same conversion, right? If someone is in the type of profession where they may be fully employed one year and underemployed the next year why should they do the conversion in the years they are taxed the most? But since we don't know what tax bracket the original poster is in, this may be a moot point. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Glenn, I sense that we do not have the full picture here. 1. There is an implied message that you are expecting to not be working in the near term. 2. There is also the issue of the funds growing so that there is more to tax when you do the switch. I think someone else was more astute (compared to the message from the accountant). Look to convert when ever possible without jumping tax brackets. There was also the comment from someone else that you should use after tax dollars to pay the taxes so you move the full amount (sort of like an extra contribution). Hence the conversion should be when you have surplus cash Also take a view as to what ones tax bracket might be in the near future (job and impact of tax law changes from Congress). John B. Corey Jr. Chelsea Private Equity, LLC +1 (503) 906 7840 x1108 +1 (503) 210 0227 (efax) john.corey[at]ChelseaPrivateEquity.com Looking for hard money for you latest real estate deal? Visit www.ChelseaPrivateEquity.com Glenn W. wrote: - quote - > On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:23:41 -0500, "Russ" <russ.rimmerman[at]gmail.com> wrote: > > Would it make sense for me to convert the 22K in Traditional IRA over > > to my Roth? > I don't know what tax bracket you're currently in, but I was advised > by my accountant to wait until I had a year where I wasn't working > so that I'd be in a lower bracket than where I am now before > I did the conversion. Since the appreciation is counted as current > income then I'd pay less taxes on the conversion. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > "Russ" <russ.rimmerman[at]gmail.com> wrote
Your tax bracket at retirement is also subject to the whims of Congress. This> > One other question - when you retire, your income in > > theory goes to > > $0/yr from your employer. Wouldn't this mean you would be > > in a lower > > tax bracket when you retire rather than a higher tax > > bracket? factor is so large and so random that I wouldn't be basing many decisions on my expected retirement tax bracket under current law. -- Doug |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "Russ" <russ.rimmerman[at]gmail.com> wrote - quote - > One other question - when you retire, your income in
Many folks try to achieve an income from their retirement> theory goes to > $0/yr from your employer. Wouldn't this mean you would be > in a lower > tax bracket when you retire rather than a higher tax > bracket? portfolio identical, or near so, to that they had pre-retirement. In addition, the point often is that young people start at a low income job, and so are then in a low tax bracket. Great time to contribute to a Roth, because their W-2 income will grow in the coming years, generally speaking, putting them in a higher tax bracket. In addition to what others have said, the internet has a lot of free online Trad-to-Roth IRA calculators, with commentary, for guidance. See for example: http://moneycentral.msn.com/investor..._roth/main.asp Or google for {convert Roth traditional IRA calculator}. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 14:23:41 -0500, "Russ" <russ.rimmerman[at]gmail.comwrote: - quote - > Would it make sense for me to convert the 22K in Traditional IRA over
I don't know what tax bracket you're currently in, but I was advised> to my Roth? by my accountant to wait until I had a year where I wasn't working so that I'd be in a lower bracket than where I am now before I did the conversion. Since the appreciation is counted as current income then I'd pay less taxes on the conversion. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Russ wrote: - quote - > I have around 22K in a Traditional IRA and recently started a Roth that
As other posters stated, all pre-tax money is taxed when withdrawn, so> now has around 6K. I can only assume I will be in a higher tax bracket > when I retire, since I'm currently only 34 years old, and get usual 3% > raises every year. > I have a good amount of emergency cash in savings (earning 4.8% > interest). > Would it make sense for me to convert the 22K in Traditional IRA over > to my Roth? Would I likely benefit from this conversion? I have > enough to pay the taxes in my emergency fund (and still have enough > left over for emergencies). > One other question - when you retire, your income in theory goes to > $0/yr from your employer. Wouldn't this mean you would be in a lower > tax bracket when you retire rather than a higher tax bracket? Or do > you have to include all your retirement income in this tax bracket > figure? you can retire in a much higher bracket. My advice is to figure out exactly where you fall, see http://www.fairmark.com/refrence/index.htm to help. say your taxable income (after deductions/exemptions) is $25,000. You could convert 5650 and that would keep you in the 15% bracket. The very next dollar is subject to 25% tax. (which starts at $30,650 in '06 for a single person). This strategy would let you convert over time and save you quite the tax hit in 30 years. JOE |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Sandra Loosemore" <sandra[at]frogsonice.com> wrote in message news:m3vet0yrsz.fsf[at]localhost.localdomain... - quote - > "Russ" <russ.rimmerman[at]gmail.com> writes: > > Would it make sense for me to convert the 22K in Traditional IRA over > > to my Roth? Would I likely benefit from this conversion? I have > > enough to pay the taxes in my emergency fund (and still have enough > > left over for emergencies). > Yup; as long as you have the money to pay the taxes without dipping > into your IRA assets, Roth conversion is usually a good deal. You are > effectively shifting assets to tax-sheltered status, since you get to > convert the entire amount of pre-tax money in the IRA to post-tax > money. Another slight benefit is that the fewer investment accounts > you have to keep track of, the easier life is. > -Sandra the cynic And don't forget that IF your are fortunate enough NOT to have to use the ROTH to live on, you are NOT required to take out any M R D ........... Cal |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Sandra Loosemore" <sandra[at]frogsonice.com> wrote in message news:m3vet0yrsz.fsf[at]localhost.localdomain... - quote - > "Russ" <russ.rimmerman[at]gmail.com> writes: > > Would it make sense for me to convert the 22K in Traditional IRA over > > to my Roth? Would I likely benefit from this conversion? I have > > enough to pay the taxes in my emergency fund (and still have enough > > left over for emergencies). > Yup; as long as you have the money to pay the taxes without dipping > into your IRA assets, Roth conversion is usually a good deal. You are > effectively shifting assets to tax-sheltered status, since you get to > convert the entire amount of pre-tax money in the IRA to post-tax > money. Another slight benefit is that the fewer investment accounts > you have to keep track of, the easier life is. > -Sandra the cynic |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Russ" <russ.rimmerman[at]gmail.com> writes: - quote - > Would it make sense for me to convert the 22K in Traditional IRA over
Yup; as long as you have the money to pay the taxes without dipping> to my Roth? Would I likely benefit from this conversion? I have > enough to pay the taxes in my emergency fund (and still have enough > left over for emergencies). into your IRA assets, Roth conversion is usually a good deal. You are effectively shifting assets to tax-sheltered status, since you get to convert the entire amount of pre-tax money in the IRA to post-tax money. Another slight benefit is that the fewer investment accounts you have to keep track of, the easier life is. -Sandra the cynic |
| | |||
| |||
| Any distributions you take from an ordinary IRA or a 401(k) are taxed as ordinary income. Furthermore, under current law, up to 85% of your Social Security benefits (if they still exist when you reach retirement age) could be subject to income taxes. Of course, Roth IRA distributions are not taxed. Dave |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have around 22K in a Traditional IRA and recently started a Roth that now has around 6K. I can only assume I will be in a higher tax bracket when I retire, since I'm currently only 34 years old, and get usual 3% raises every year. I have a good amount of emergency cash in savings (earning 4.8% interest). Would it make sense for me to convert the 22K in Traditional IRA over to my Roth? Would I likely benefit from this conversion? I have enough to pay the taxes in my emergency fund (and still have enough left over for emergencies). One other question - when you retire, your income in theory goes to $0/yr from your employer. Wouldn't this mean you would be in a lower tax bracket when you retire rather than a higher tax bracket? Or do you have to include all your retirement income in this tax bracket figure? |
| Tags |
| convert, questions, roth, traditional |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Traditional vs. Roth IRA Victor Roberts: I've been thinking about the value of a traditional vs. Roth IRA for my sons, who are just starting out. In the process I came to the conclusion... | Taxes | 11 | 04-14-2007 04:07 AM | |
| Should a 60 yr-old guy convert a traditional IRA to Roth IRA? Mel: I am semi-retired. USAF pension (28,000 yearly). Part-time employment (15,000 yearly) 800,000 in mutual funds of which 160,000 is in a... | Taxes | 4 | 01-20-2007 12:44 AM | |
| Traditional to Roth with loss? Joanne: Can I do the following: Roll a Traditional IRA into a Roth 1. in January 2004 for the year 2003? 2. and recognize the loss if the... | Taxes | 17 | 01-20-2004 08:06 AM | |
| Traditional, Roth, or both Elizabeth Richardson: "MB" <beltmt@deadspam.com> wrote in message news:bg1i2h$jb0vb$1@ID-137391.news.uni-berlin.de... > Group > I was hoping to hear some of your... | Financial Planning | 6 | 08-25-2003 04:50 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |