|
#4
| |||
| |||
| pixel_a_ted wrote: - quote - > My bank has slowly been increasing the fee for returning canceled
You mean you have to pay $10/month to get cancelled checks?!! I'd> checks with the checking account statement. It's now up to $10 a month, switch banks immediately! - quote - > If you don't get the canceled
I'd go with this option. But if you really insist on keeping physical> checks back, you can order a specific check image for a small fee. I > would not mind that, but the catch is that you can only do this for > checks cashed within the past 5 years. copies, there are still banks that return physical checks for no additional fees. Or at least electronic copies for free. Shop around. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "dapperdobbs" <GeorgeCFL[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1142595581.846569.91570[at]u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Good question. The IRS as far as I know requires that you keep record
Take a column from msnMoney FWIW:> for up to three years. http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Banking/P50242.asp "The IRS agent could demand actual canceled checks ... "Under normal circumstances, the IRS has three years from the day you file your return to audit you. If the agency suspects you've underreported income, that statute of limitations grows to six years. If fraud is involved or you don't file a return, there is no time limit on when the IRS can come after you." I'm pretty sure the time line is correct, though I won't vouch for whether the IRS really wants the physical checks. -- Mark Freeland nNeEwTs[at]sonic.net |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| dapperdobbs wrote: - quote - > I have not looked at banks' 10K's (annual report filed with the
That is absolutely true. Banks used to be in the boring business of> SEC) recently, but have heard that banks are moving towards making > money from fees. I have noticed many fees have significantly increased. borrowing money at X% and loaning it out at something higher than X%. They still do that, of course, but fee income has been creeping up every year at the major banks. Especially as short- and long-term interest rates get so close - the margins have gone out of lending so they nickel and dime you instead. Citibank charges a fee to deposit coin money...think of that! So far they seem to get away with it without losing customers. But I think it's going to backlash eventually. It's similar to Blockbuster where the annoying late fees represented a sizable part of their profitability. Then along came Netflix and poof, that's the end of that. I guess that makes the high-service, low-fee regional banks, or the credit unions, the Netflix of the banking industry. Best thing to do is take your money out the door, and look for a local/regional bank (or a credit union) that doesn't charge these fees. They don't make bad investments either =) -Tad |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Good Morning, I belong to local credit union here in Middle Georgia. We have access to our account electronically as well as a walk-in. If I go to my on-line account I can electronically see the canceled checks,front & back, and print if needed. You may want to see if your bank offers this. cil "pixel_a_ted" <pixel_a_ted[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1142555726.769542.92620[at]j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > My bank has slowly been increasing the fee for returning canceled > checks with the checking account statement. It's now up to $10 a month, > which is definitely getting my attention. If you don't get the canceled > checks back, you can order a specific check image for a small fee. I > would not mind that, but the catch is that you can only do this for > checks cashed within the past 5 years. > Since I think most people at this bank are not paying to get their > canceled checks back, I am wondering if I am being too cautious. I'm > just concerned that if for some reason something came up where I had to > prove a payment from more than 5 years back, I would have no way of > doing it (the checking account statment just lists the check number and > the amount, not the payee). > Is there some law that governs how many years back one would be > required to prove payment? How about the I.R.S. and the payment of > taxes? > Thanks. |
| | |||
| |||
| Good question. The IRS as far as I know requires that you keep record for up to three years. Other payment questions would probably depend on the statutes of limitation applying, if a legal action were initiated. I have had the same question, and solved it by maintaining a minimum balance at the bank - in exchange for which they return checks free of charge, with the exception that only facsimilies of business-process checks are returned. The logic behind all this no-more-cancelled-checks routine is that it is cheaper to destroy them, and the technology exists to provide copies. I have not looked at banks' 10K's (annual report filed with the SEC) recently, but have heard that banks are moving towards making money from fees. I have noticed many fees have significantly increased. If you're married and run into a divorce, the time frame covered is the entire marriage. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My bank has slowly been increasing the fee for returning canceled checks with the checking account statement. It's now up to $10 a month, which is definitely getting my attention. If you don't get the canceled checks back, you can order a specific check image for a small fee. I would not mind that, but the catch is that you can only do this for checks cashed within the past 5 years. Since I think most people at this bank are not paying to get their canceled checks back, I am wondering if I am being too cautious. I'm just concerned that if for some reason something came up where I had to prove a payment from more than 5 years back, I would have no way of doing it (the checking account statment just lists the check number and the amount, not the payee). Is there some law that governs how many years back one would be required to prove payment? How about the I.R.S. and the payment of taxes? Thanks. |
| Tags |
| canceled, checks |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Checks Frank: Is there a way in Money to see what the number is of a check I printed? I can only get it to say Print. Can it track the checks and numbers it... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 02-11-2004 09:46 PM | |
| Money 2004-Print Checks message appears but no checks to print brandy96: Hello. Hope someone can help with this. I am getting the "Print Checks" reminder in Money 2004 but I have no checks to print. How can I get rid of... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 01-28-2004 02:51 AM | |
| flagging duplicate checks and skipped checks tom: Is there any way to get money to flag duplicate checks and skipped check numbers? I can't find anything about this anywhere. Why wouldn't it do... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 01-12-2004 07:12 PM | |
| Printing Checks - Different style checks for different accounts Mark Savage: I'm having a problem printing checks from Money 2003. I have three accounts that come up in one .mny file. Two of the accounts use 3-on-a-page... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 10-06-2003 12:00 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |