|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Sgt.Sausage wrote: - quote - > "Will Trice" <wwtrice[at]paragondynamics.com> wrote in message
I could be wrong, but based on Chris's phrasing, "pre-tax vs. post-tax> news:447FB0E9.6070702[at]paragondynamics.com... > > > Chris Cowles wrote: > > > > > They're in their mid-50s. Dad's already part-time. Nothing was written > > > about when they intend to retire completely. Does their current income > > > level, and lack of information about a time horizon, influence the > > > relative value of pre-tax vs. post-tax contribution? If their retirement > > > horizon is short, it may be difficult to recover cost of the taxes. > > > Er? Either they pay taxes up front, or they pay taxes in the end. > It's a little more complicated than that. > (a) Pay taxes up front on investment cash and earnings/gains are taxed > at current (low) cap gains rate (15% ?). > (b) Pay taxes in the end and everything is paid at income tax > rates. > May or may not make a difference depending on a lot of > factors, but it's not quite so simple. contribution," I assumed he was speaking of a deductible IRA/401(k) vs. a Roth IRA/401(k). If this is the case, then you either pay income taxes now or income taxes later. Capital gains tax does not figure into the picture. Even if he is speaking of a taxable account for the "post-tax contribution", one still must pay income tax on the amount contributed. If one's tax rate is the same now as in retirement, the deductible IRA/401(k) still always wins (unless you manage to pay negative taxes on the gains in the taxable account). -Will |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| "Will Trice" <wwtrice[at]paragondynamics.com> wrote in message news:447FB0E9.6070702[at]paragondynamics.com... - quote - > Chris Cowles wrote:
It's a little more complicated than that.> > They're in their mid-50s. Dad's already part-time. Nothing was written > > about when they intend to retire completely. Does their current income > > level, and lack of information about a time horizon, influence the > > relative value of pre-tax vs. post-tax contribution? If their retirement > > horizon is short, it may be difficult to recover cost of the taxes. > Er? Either they pay taxes up front, or they pay taxes in the end. (a) Pay taxes up front on investment cash and earnings/gains are taxed at current (low) cap gains rate (15% ?). (b) Pay taxes in the end and everything is paid at income tax rates. May or may not make a difference depending on a lot of factors, but it's not quite so simple. |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Chris Cowles wrote: - quote - > They're in their mid-50s. Dad's already part-time. Nothing was written about
Er? Either they pay taxes up front, or they pay taxes in the end.> when they intend to retire completely. Does their current income level, and > lack of information about a time horizon, influence the relative value of > pre-tax vs. post-tax contribution? If their retirement horizon is short, it > may be difficult to recover cost of the taxes. There is no amount of time required to make up the taxes. -Will |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "Elizabeth Richardson" <erichktn[at]worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:taJOf.508814$qk4.482298[at]bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > Just out of curiosity, why would people in their mid-50s be asking one of
Education? Financial knowledge? Comfort with the source? He certainly seems> their children for financial advice? to have developed a good plan. -- Chris Cowles Gainesville, FL |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| "Elle" <honda.lioness[at]nospam.earthlink.net> wrote in message news:dxFOf.3019$6I.718[at]newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net... - quote - > The guideline for retirement savings is, in order of priority:
They're in their mid-50s. Dad's already part-time. Nothing was written about> 1. Max out 401(k)s //up to the employer's match//. > 2. Max out Roth IRAs > 3. Resume contributions to the 401(k) > <snip> Make sure your parents use the Roth IRA catchup provision, designed for > people 50 and over. For 2005, they can contribute (up until April 15, > 2006) $4500 each. For 2006, $5000 each. when they intend to retire completely. Does their current income level, and lack of information about a time horizon, influence the relative value of pre-tax vs. post-tax contribution? If their retirement horizon is short, it may be difficult to recover cost of the taxes. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Bobby_M" <rmierzej[at]telcordia.com> writes: - quote - > Both my younger sisters are earning great livings (nurse and dental
Encourage them gently. As long as they are spendin no more than they> hygienist) but they don't have much to show for it either so I may be > the exception unfortunately. The act of becoming wealthy feels really earn, they're on the right path. Ramp up the easiest, most painless savings - payroll deductions - money never seen is money not spent. You're young, they're younger, this is the best time to get a good start. But be gentle and positive and encouraging, not negative or disparaging. There are some fun and positive and encouraging book out there, too. Your parents aren't in a place for it, but your sisters may be prepared for The Wealthy Barber, for example. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Elle wrote: - quote - > Good luck. Let us know if some of that cash in the safe deposit box > is actually old currency having serious value among collectors. > (Interesting how many coin collectors seem to be coming out of the > closet for that thread, if I'm understanding it correctly.) Even if there's not any old bills that are worth a premium for their numismatic value, it's certainly worthwhile to look through them and see what you've got -- it's part of your heritage. And it is pretty cool when you find a silver certificate or an Indian penny or a war nickel, or an old series $2 bill. (You are very unlikely to find a gold certificate; I believe they were all destroyed in 1934. The few that escaped were illegal to own from about 1934 to 1964) I used to spend buffalo nickel occasionally (ones with the dates worn off so all they were worth was 5 cents) just so someone could find it in their change. I should check my safe deposit box and see if I still have a roll or two of buffalo nickels... Best regards, Bob |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "Bobby_M" <rmierzej[at]telcordia.com> wrote snip; Newbies to the thread, please look back. - quote - > The act of becoming wealthy feels really
Yes. Little is sweeter than being able to support one's self> good to me, through one's own industry and do it well. - quote - > moreso than the fleeting joy of overspending. Sorry I
I think that's a great explanation. To me, it suggests how> can't > explain it any better than that. easy it is for a cycle of low income earnings to perpetuate itself through generations of a family. Though I understand from what you say (and the numbers) that your parents have broken into the middle class. They're not low income anymore. IMO that's really a great achievement. They have come a much further way than, say, Donald Trump, who, while he has done well actually started with great advantages. So the distance Trump has traveled is arguably not as far as that your parents have traveled. (Don't anyone try to do a linear model of this, please. Linear models are overrated. Think exponentially...) I say this despite your parents not being in the best financial shape at the moment for retirement. But it sounds like that can be turned around, if they want it to be. Maybe your parents are the way they are because they didn't have opportunities to learn about investing. That you are doing really well but that your siblings haven't come as far (yet?) suggests, again, how hard it is to break into the upper middle class or so as a permanent family situation. Note: It would seem you're actually way beyond middle class and bordering on the filthy rich, but you're also not being cavalier about this. Hurrah for you! IMO the motivation to scramble to find a way to pay for college (for one thing)--as I suspect you did--doesn't just happen. I don't think anyone gets well-off all by themselves. What's involved mostly is luck--having parents who emphasize education and/or budgeting and/or investing. If one is not so lucky to have such parents, the chances of success are much lower. You might enjoy the book _The Millionaire Next Door_ to help reinforce some of your ideas. Its studies are eminently digestible and its anecdotes of real-life family situations (from blue collar to while collar medical doctors) involving personal saving, thought provoking. Plus, the little guy often seems to win in the end. Or at least he sure as heck does not always lose. Good luck. Let us know if some of that cash in the safe deposit box is actually old currency having serious value among collectors. (Interesting how many coin collectors seem to be coming out of the closet for that thread, if I'm understanding it correctly.) |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Elle, I received a full scholarship for my associates, then my employer picked up the tab for BS. My two younger sisters also received academic scholarships, but not full rides so my parents helped them the rest of the way. This really wasn't the full cause of their previous debt. I think they just fell into the typical trap of earning more and more money and looking for ways to spend it (and then some). My parents were also the first in a long family history to earn middle-class wages so they went overboard to provide us kids with everything they never had. My mother was usually disappointed with me through grade school with anything less than an A, but it's because I set the precedence early on. There was no beating :-) Making my parents proud was enough incentive. Both my younger sisters are earning great livings (nurse and dental hygienist) but they don't have much to show for it either so I may be the exception unfortunately. The act of becoming wealthy feels really good to me, moreso than the fleeting joy of overspending. Sorry I can't explain it any better than that. Bobby |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "Bobby_M" <rmierzej[at]telcordia.com> wrote - quote - > I've never claimed to be an authority but they look at
They must have done something right given all your success,> how much better off I am at 30 than they are at 55 and I > suppose they > value my opinion because of it. Example: They have $100k > in 401k and > have very little other savings prior to the inheritance. I > have $129k > in 401k and another $150k in various investments. I do > realize they > were the ones that were supposed to give ME advice. no? Like did they do anything to help you to get through elementary and high school with good enough grades and /motivation/ to go to college. (Or did they beat you nightly to do your homework?;-) ) What's the secret to raising a child this bright who is also savvy about keeping his financial house in apparent good order? I noticed you said they helped a sibling of yours through college, which AFAIC certainly can be admirable and a good investment. Did they help you, financially, through college, too? How much dinero was that? How many siblings? :-) This topic (raising kids to be financially responsible) is actually treated fairly extensively in a popular book (often mentioned here) on personal saving called _The Millionaire Next Door_. So I'd be interested in your responses, if you have the time. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| ****Just out of curiosity, why would people in their mid-50s be asking one of their children for financial advice? *** Because I'm college educated and have my financial house in good order and they don't. I've never claimed to be an authority but they look at how much better off I am at 30 than they are at 55 and I suppose they value my opinion because of it. Example: They have $100k in 401k and have very little other savings prior to the inheritance. I have $129k in 401k and another $150k in various investments. I do realize they were the ones that were supposed to give ME advice. Bobby |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Bobby_M" <rmierzej[at]telcordia.com> wrote in message news:1141571660.604436.212900[at]z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... - quote - > My parents, in their mid-50's, have just come upon inheritance due to
Just out of curiosity, why would people in their mid-50s be asking one of> the death of my grandmother. their children for financial advice? Elizabeth Richardson |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| ********************** I'd be curious about why they want to sell their current house and buy another. ********************** The house they're in now was bought when 3 kids lived with them. It was a compromise, more bedrooms, less of everything else they want. Now that all the kids are out, they want better location/kitchen/dining room to be able to have all the kids (and our families) over for holidays. I think this sounds like a good reason to move. ********************* If the $100k is all your parents have for retirement savings, and they're expecting retirement in about ten years at an income not far from they're current income, they are in bad shape. ********************** I'm fully aware of their bad retirement positioning which is why I'm getting involved. They do have other savings here and there, but as far as tax-defered retirement investments, that $100k is it right now. They had a LOT more debt in the last 5 years or so due to helping my sisters out with college and yes, other bad spending habits as well. They consolidated that debt into a mortgage refi. I'm going to strongly recommend they do not take on a house any higher in value because it would cut off any posibility of increased retirment savings. Thanks for your suggestions! Bobby |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I don't see any major holes in your plan. A possible addition is a realistic estimate of how long your folks plan to live in their new home, and what they may want as their age encroaches upon them. If your folks are planning on moving within 6 - 12 months, make sure you don't have any pre-payment costs associated with the existing mortgage. I know little about that area. As far as paying cash for the new home, run a spreadsheet on their income and expenses to confirm your estimates on tax consequences (tax prep software is helpful). As far as I know, you would save 1%-2% on points and loan origination fees, up-front, paying cash for the new house. Check with a mortgage lender on terms of a possible - even if unlikely - home equity loan or other means of accessing the equity value of the house, just so you have that information and avoid any surprises later. |
| | |||
| |||
| "Bobby_M" <rmierzej[at]telcordia.com> wrote Snip. Interested readers, please look back. - quote - > Are the any major holes in this plan?
I think you have things pretty straight. Based on thenumbers, here are a few very important caveats. I agree with paying off the credit card debt and the current mortgage. I'd be curious about why they want to sell their current house and buy another. Based on the whole picture here, I think the only justification for that is if they intend to buy a house much lower in value, or that somehow results in much lower monthly home expenses (lower property taxes, less maintenance?). The guideline for retirement savings is, in order of priority: 1. Max out 401(k)s //up to the employer's match//. 2. Max out Roth IRAs 3. Resume contributions to the 401(k) If the $100k is all your parents have for retirement savings, and they're expecting retirement in about ten years at an income not far from they're current income, they are in bad shape. This uses the assumptions of calculators like that at http://www.fincalc.com/ (click on "Consumer Calcs" on the left; go to the Retirement section; then click on the two "how much" links and run some numbers). This calculator includes Social Security (estimated), assumes retirement at 75% of current income, and a life expectancy of 85 years. Your parents have to save around $9,000 a year starting now to be in good shape. Make sure your parents use the Roth IRA catchup provision, designed for people 50 and over. For 2005, they can contribute (up until April 15, 2006) $4500 each. For 2006, $5000 each. How did your parents accumulate $6k of credit card debt? If they pull stuff like this, that's even more of an argument to pay off the house so they don't otherwise have an opportunity to squander their retirement savings. IMO your best bet is to get them to start looking at these numbers and compel them to drastically re-make their monthly budgets. Remember we're not really factoring in the cost of long-term care here. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My parents, in their mid-50's, have just come upon inheritance due to the death of my grandmother. Combined income of about $75k per year (dad is part time now). 401k savings at about $100k. Primary residence, single family home worth about $350k, carrying a $125k mortgage at 5% (13 years of a 15 yr mortgage left). $6000 credit card balance at 7%. The inheritance consisted of $200k in the form of bank account balances and another $70k in cash (yes, that's cash in a safe deposit box ugh!) They plan on selling this house and moving to a similarly valued home within 6-12 months from now. My initial ideas have been to immediatly pay off credit cards and the mortgage. I figure that even though the mortgage rate is so low, it's a pretty good short term investment that would be similar to a high-yield money manager account (4.5% APR). Their effective tax rate over the last 5 years has averaged about 10% so I don't think the interest deduction is that substantial. I also think buying the next house in cash, no mortgage, is a good idea for them because money typically burns a hole in their pocket. My goal is to get them setup for a comfortable retirement without any debt. I plan to also suggest maxing out 401k contribution and add an IRA if their monthly expenses permit. Are the any major holes in this plan? Bobby |
| Tags |
| advice, inheritance, needed, parent, recent |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Re: Advice needed Tom [Pepper] Willett: Symantec says that there are 1,980 threats on that site: http://safeweb.norton.com/report/show?name=quicksoftupdate.com "Anrey Terkin "... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 10-03-2008 09:43 PM | |
| Investment Advice Needed Patrick Holzer: I would like to open a general account through Vanguard to begin investing in some index funds. Unfortunately for me, the initial investment cost... | Financial Planning | 9 | 10-15-2005 08:58 AM | |
| Advice needed Terry: A friend who uses MSMoney has asked me to help him. When he opened his Money file recently, he found that the data in his accounts only goes to a... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 09-28-2005 11:09 PM | |
| Advice needed Dannie: Was just given 7 years of taxes (1997-2003) which were not filed. Person is separated from wife with one under 18 year old daughter. Pays support... | Taxes | 3 | 02-10-2004 07:46 PM | |
| Advice Needed Jack: I have not filed any returns for 5 years (more or less, I'm not even sure). My guess would be that I owe for 4 of those years, and may be due a... | Taxes | 9 | 11-13-2003 07:50 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |