|
#7
| |||
| |||
| <<Loan Interest Rate 8%> > Ouch! Depending on the specifics, normally NML policies still pay dividends on the borrowed portion. Currently around 7.4%. That helps to take a lot of the sting away from the "ouch". Ya need to get all the facts before deciding to go ouch, or ahhhhh .... but ya did get the bottom line right on the money .. it's recommended to talk to a qualified agent. John Radgosky Ft Lauderdale, Florida |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > Still not sure what to do - but it feels better knowing the picture is somewhat rosier in terms of the cash values, etc. No one knows NML policies better than NML agents. If you want to know your best options, go to the source. You said your friend WAS with NML. That suggests you do not have an NML agent assigned to work with you any longer. I recommend you contact your nearest NML general agency where your policies are housed, and ask them to put you in touch with a qualified agent who can talk to you and provide options. I'm a great believer in going straight to the top. So, ask for the General Agent him/herself, tell him/her your dilema, and ask him/her to handpick the best available person in the network who can help you with expert guidance. You have the advantage of young age and strong dividends on your side so you don't want to forsake those without hearing from the ones who actually know the products inside out and can help you understand fully the options available to you. That's what I would do if I were you, and that's the answer I would give to my best friend or a family member if they asked me. Hope that helps. John Radgosky Northwestern Mutual Financial Network Fort Lauderdale, Florida design the products you bought from your friend. Ask the NM GA to put you in touch with a seasoned agent with designations such as CLU and possibly either CFP or ChFC also. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| "bo peep" <cowartmisc1[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1140473779.827207.18560[at]g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > <<Loan Interest Rate 8%> > Ouch! > <<would it make more sense to just close them out and buy term > insurance> > Talk to your agent and see if you can *convert* them to term insurance, > so that you don't have to requalify. > John Cowart Generaly speaking, one can NOT "convert" a Permanent Policy to a TERM Policy. However, there is a provison in most contracts to EXCHANGE the contract for a "PAID UP TERM CONTRACT". This will provide a FULLY Paid Up Term policy, for the current Face Value, for a specific period of time. At the END of that period, the contract be completed. IF you DIE during that "period of time", the Face amount will be paid. HOWEVER if you live one day MORE than that specific time period there is no coverage. Once that election is made, there are NO Premiums due, and the contract generally can no longer be changed to anything else. Also generally speaking, once that election is made, there is no longer any cash value available to the insured. Cal Lester CLU |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| <<Loan Interest Rate 8%> Ouch! <<would it make more sense to just close them out and buy term insurance> Talk to your agent and see if you can *convert* them to term insurance, so that you don't have to requalify. John Cowart |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "jayrems" <jeffrems1[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1140318940.939167.191710[at]f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... - quote - > thanks for the responses......!
That IS correct. When you FAILED to pay the REQUIRED premium,> the smaller policy, with premium loan balance of roughly $5000 has a > "Net Cash Value" of over $2000 - so based on what you seem to be saying > Cal, the "Net Cash Value" is in fact the cash value AFTER deducting the > premium loan. a LOAN was made AGAINST the Cash Value Account, to pay THAT premium. Since neither the premium nor the Loan was repaid, that LOAN earns Interest, which is then ADDED to the existing Loan, etc. etc. In the event that the contract is Surrendered, the CURRENT outstanding LOAN is deducted from the TOTAL Cash Value Account, and the NET amount is then paid out, from THAT POLICY. - quote - > I had managed to get it into my head that if I surrendered both > policies, the insurance company would deduct the premium loan from the > cash value of the bigger policy. That was really bothering me. But > evidently the smaller policy's cash value is even greater than the > premium loan amount...so the bigger policy actually wouldn't be > impacted. That is completely wrong. The policies are INDEPENDENT, and their respective Cash Value Accounts are inviolate. That is NOT a problem for the company, as the Policy LOAN can NEVER Exceed the C/V of the contract. The decision still remains as to YOUR perception of the NEED for one or both contracts. Based on the earlier post, my recommendation still stands. Cal Lester CLU |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| thanks for the responses......! the smaller policy, with premium loan balance of roughly $5000 has a "Net Cash Value" of over $2000 - so based on what you seem to be saying Cal, the "Net Cash Value" is in fact the cash value AFTER deducting the premium loan. I had managed to get it into my head that if I surrendered both policies, the insurance company would deduct the premium loan from the cash value of the bigger policy. That was really bothering me. But evidently the smaller policy's cash value is even greater than the premium loan amount...so the bigger policy actually wouldn't be impacted. Don't know why I was so off base - seems obvious now. Still not sure what to do - but it feels better knowing the picture is somewhat rosier in terms of the cash values, etc. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "jayrems" <jeffrems1[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1140293325.359340.279280[at]o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I have life insurance purchase some time ago and foolishly neglected to > pay one of the policies for a number of years, thereby building up a > substantial premium loan balance. I bought the policies from a friend > who was a Northwestern Mutual agent at the time. I was living with my > girlfriend at the time and there was a possibility that we would be > marrying - so life insurance didn't seem like a bad idea. Long story > short - the relationship didn't work out and I remain single. However, > I continued to maintain the policies. I am a single 44 y. o. male in > good health with net assets of roughly $200,000 (stocks, mutual funds, > money market & savings, no real estate and not counting the insurance > policies). I am determined to get my financial house in order and want > to figure out the best course to take with respect to these insurance > policies. Should I keep the insurance and pay down the premium loan on > the one policy? or would it make more sense to just close them out and > buy term insurance if i ever end up really needing life insurance > coverage? (i am not currently in a relationship). Thanks for any > advice you may be able to offer. > Status as of 2/18/06: > Policy Number: 23459*** > Plan: Extra Ordinary Life > Policy Date: 03/09/1995 > Net Death Benefit $59,960 > Net Cash Value $2,705.90 > Total Loans $5,136.42 > Available for Loan $1,885.48 > Loan Interest Rate 8% > Policy Number: 28465** > Plan: Adjustable CompLife > Policy Date: 03/23/1997 > Net Death Benefit $123,745 > Net Cash Value $8,567.16 > Total Loans $0.00 > Available for Loan $7,786.76 > Loan Interest Rate 8% Please do NOT jump to surrender the policies with the express intent of possibly purchasing Term Insurance If and when you need it. The contracts that you currently have "In Force" are first of all IN FORCE. Second, they are probably standard issue or better. If you did surrnder BOTH contract, and find (for whatever reason) that you do NEED Life Insurance at some future date, you would then first "have to qualify". It would appear to me that the second policy, Adjustable CompLife being NINE years old, and having NO Loans outstanding, should in all probability be showing a profit. IF you are contributing MORE than the minimum required, then the ANNUAL INCREASE in the Cash Value should be almost as much or even possibly MORE than the premium being paid. Therefore, the Death Benefit COST should be either negligible, or at most very inexpensive. CERTAINLY less expensive than ANY Term Insurance That you might buy today. As to the other contract, since the information that you provide suggest a nominal NEED for more than $123,000 of Death Benefit, (again with out sufficient additional information) appears to be superfluous. Therefore, It would appear that the best course of action might be to surrender THAT contract for it's Net C/V. If you require any additional info, do not hesitate to write. Cal Cal-Lester[at]comcast.net |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <1140293325.359340.279280[at]o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com> , "jayrems" <jeffrems1[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Should I keep the insurance and pay down the premium loan on
I'd suggest cashing them out. You don't need life insurance. If> the one policy? or would it make more sense to just close them out and > buy term insurance if i ever end up really needing life insurance > coverage? (i am not currently in a relationship). Thanks for any > advice you may be able to offer. you die, you have enough cash to bury yourself, and no one would be financially hurt. If you have a reason for life insurance, then buying term would be the most cost effective. As far as an investment goes, I think you could do better investing on your own without the help of the insurance company. -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have life insurance purchase some time ago and foolishly neglected to pay one of the policies for a number of years, thereby building up a substantial premium loan balance. I bought the policies from a friend who was a Northwestern Mutual agent at the time. I was living with my girlfriend at the time and there was a possibility that we would be marrying - so life insurance didn't seem like a bad idea. Long story short - the relationship didn't work out and I remain single. However, I continued to maintain the policies. I am a single 44 y. o. male in good health with net assets of roughly $200,000 (stocks, mutual funds, money market & savings, no real estate and not counting the insurance policies). I am determined to get my financial house in order and want to figure out the best course to take with respect to these insurance policies. Should I keep the insurance and pay down the premium loan on the one policy? or would it make more sense to just close them out and buy term insurance if i ever end up really needing life insurance coverage? (i am not currently in a relationship). Thanks for any advice you may be able to offer. Status as of 2/18/06: Policy Number: 23459*** Plan: Extra Ordinary Life Policy Date: 03/09/1995 Net Death Benefit $59,960 Net Cash Value $2,705.90 Total Loans $5,136.42 Available for Loan $1,885.48 Loan Interest Rate 8% Policy Number: 28465** Plan: Adjustable CompLife Policy Date: 03/23/1997 Net Death Benefit $123,745 Net Cash Value $8,567.16 Total Loans $0.00 Available for Loan $7,786.76 Loan Interest Rate 8% |
| Tags |
| insurance, life, question |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| tax on life insurance My interest: Does life insurance have any inheritance tax associated with it? ... especiallly if the beneficiary is not a US citizen or even not a US resident?... | Taxes | 13 | 01-09-2007 02:17 AM | |
| Question about a life insurance annuity Dog Face: I am the beneficiary on a variable life insurance annuity in the U.S. and the insured person (not my spouse) died recently. The death benefit on... | Taxes | 1 | 04-18-2005 03:53 PM | |
| whole life versus term life insurance Greg Frey: Hi Is there a tutorial somewhere on the net that can give me the pros and cons of whole life versus term life insurance? Maybe someone here can... | Financial Planning | 3 | 01-20-2004 08:30 PM | |
| Life insurance or credit insurance ? Tman: Hi, 30 yrs. old, married, both professionals, no kids (yet), just bought a house. DINK's. If one of us croaked, the other could _barely_ support... | Financial Planning | 4 | 07-01-2003 11:10 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |