|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Tom B." <tbridgeport56[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1136262541.351384.160980[at]g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Cal,
In answer to your LAST request above, I am NOT qualified to discuss the> Thanks for the reply. I subsequently figured out why my friend has a > taxable gain in his annuity (despire the reported "premiums paid" being > greater than the value). It turns out he originally bought an annuity > in 1992 that was later exchanged into another annuity in 2000. The new > 2000 one has lost about 25% of its value, but its basis is based on the > original 1992 investment, not the 2000 exchange amount. > Anyway, I guess his best option is to do a 1035 exchange into a > low-cost annuity, such as the Vanguard Variable Annuity. > Can you think of any reason why the exchange would not make sense? The > current annuity charges 2.25% per year while Vanguard will charge .58%. > Tom costs of one V/A over another, BUT "There is NO Free Lunch". There are MANY costs related to any & all V/A's, that are NOT found in a FIXED Annuity. Most Fixed Annuities pay an Annual Interest as stated in the contract, PLUS an added "current Interest" on top of that. Whereas most V/A's do NOT pay interest, but are "invested" in one or more Mutual Funds (each usually incurring sales & other charges). Therefore, if you are suggesting above "a low cost annuity", then IMHO, you should look at a FIXED ANNUITY. Cal Lester CLU |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Cal, Thanks for the reply. I subsequently figured out why my friend has a taxable gain in his annuity (despire the reported "premiums paid" being greater than the value). It turns out he originally bought an annuity in 1992 that was later exchanged into another annuity in 2000. The new 2000 one has lost about 25% of its value, but its basis is based on the original 1992 investment, not the 2000 exchange amount. Anyway, I guess his best option is to do a 1035 exchange into a low-cost annuity, such as the Vanguard Variable Annuity. Can you think of any reason why the exchange would not make sense? The current annuity charges 2.25% per year while Vanguard will charge .58%. Tom |
| | |||
| |||
| "Tom B." <tbridgeport56[at]gmail.com> wrote in message news:1136184238.202155.120710[at]g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Hello!
Annuities themselves are NOT complex at all. However the variables involved> I have a friend who invested in a non-qualified variable annuity in > 2000, but now he wants to get out of it due to cost concerns. I'm > trying to help him. My question is will he have to pay taxes or the 10% > penalty if he surrenders the policy? The surrender charge period has > past, so I know he won't have to pay surrender charges. I'm just not > sure though about taxes. His contract is currently "underwater" > (premiums paid > current value), so I was thinking any distribution > would be totally tax free. However, the statement from the insurance > company says something about a large federally taxable gain. How can > that be? > These annuity product are sure complex! in the VARIABLE Annuity (similar to ANY investment vehicle) do tend to be complex. Generally speaking, the proceeds received from ANY N/Q Annuity are subject to Income Tax on the GAIN (Proceeds minus Investment). If the NET Proceeds are LESS than the Total Investment, then there should be No Gain, ergo No Income Tax. Unless there has been a change in the Federal Tax Law, the 10% Penalty is applied if the surrender is prior to age 59 1/2, TO THE INCOME TAX DUE. Therefore if the Income Tax Due were $1,000 the PENALTY would be another $100 = $1,100. Cal |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hello! I have a friend who invested in a non-qualified variable annuity in 2000, but now he wants to get out of it due to cost concerns. I'm trying to help him. My question is will he have to pay taxes or the 10% penalty if he surrenders the policy? The surrender charge period has past, so I know he won't have to pay surrender charges. I'm just not sure though about taxes. His contract is currently "underwater" (premiums paid > current value), so I was thinking any distribution would be totally tax free. However, the statement from the insurance company says something about a large federally taxable gain. How can that be? These annuity product are sure complex! Thanks, Tom |
| Tags |
| annuity, distribution, nonqualified, taxable |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Non-Qualified Variable Annuity D.D. Pallmer: Two years ago, my uncle was sold a fixed variable annuity. It paid some teaser interest rate (the bait that Uncle took) but now is paying a paltry... | Taxes | 3 | 06-23-2006 12:58 AM | |
| Non-qualified Annuity vs, taxable account Howard Kaikow: In a few months, the withdrawal penalty period for my sister's annuity will be over, and she will be 59.5 a few daze later. So the choices are: ... | Taxes | 2 | 04-02-2006 03:07 PM | |
| non-qualified annuity buckeye1: Say someone invested 50k into a NON-qaulified annuity. After being in the product 5 years the balance is now 43k. If the person is under 59 1/2,... | Financial Planning | 2 | 12-28-2005 06:20 PM | |
| non-qualified annuity buckeye1: Say someone invested 50k into a NON-qaulified annuity. After being in the product 5 years the balance is now 43k. If the person is under 59 1/2, but... | Financial Planning | 5 | 12-24-2005 05:06 AM | |
| Non-qualified annuity. Minimum required distribution rules. rob: My father became contract owner of his ex-wife's non-qualified annuity pursuant to divorce. He is 80. Do minimum required distribution rules... | Financial Planning | 1 | 07-28-2004 04:51 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |