| |||||||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| <sheellah[at]aol.com> wrote snip but concerns read; I agree with them, FWIW - quote - > What type of fund is Vanguard? Other than tax deferral, what iare the
Vanguard is an "investment management company" which offers mutual funds,> advantages of a variable annuity holding mutual funds, over buying a > mutual fund directly? stock brokerage, annuities, retirement planning services. It's one of the largest in the world. It started as a mutual fund company, and was the first such company to offer a mutual fund indexed to the S&P 500. For many years, this fund had one of the lowest, if not thee lowest expense ratio, for such a fund around (and no other significant or hidden costs). You may have heard of John Bogle. He ran Vanguard for decades and is a proponent of index funds. See https://flagship2.vanguard.com/VGApp...ard/AboutVangu ardWhoWeAreContent.jsp for an overview. Vanguard's site discusses its annuity offerings at http://flagship2.vanguard.com/VGApp/...tirement/ATSAn nuitiesOVContent.jsp Vanguard's sites are very user friendly, at least as an introduction to its products. As far as I know, tax deferral is the only advantage of holding mutual funds in an annuity vs. holding them outright. But again, I do not mean to hold myself out as an expert in annuities. I am a Do-It-Yourself-er. My impressions on annuities are only rough ones. So I encourage others to respond further. I also encourage studying Vanguard's site, and then maybe talking to a Vanguard rep (at their free 800 number), or maybe 800 reps at some other large investment companies and seeing if you think they have services to offer you to help in deciding between an annuity and/or perhaps construct a conservative, low risk fixed income portfolio that may satisfy your income needs but give you more control over your assets. Also, this is a good place to continue to ask specific questions about, say, portfolio construction, choosing a mix of mutual funds for retirement (or semiretirement), etc. There are other online sites that have free guidelines and calculators for constructing portfolios for retirement etc. (I have a list of these sites, so just ask some time if you're interested.) These are good education tools and, at a minimum, prepare the individual investor for meetings with future financial advisors. At a maximum, altogether, you could become well-prepared to manage your own mix of conservative, fixed income investments, which may or may not include another annuity. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| You don't have a financial advisor if he is working for the company. Be sure you are working with an independent planner. Pacific Life, John Hancock, ING, Jackson National, US Allianz, Security Benefit, Nationwide are all solid companies that have a variety of products that would seem to fit your needs. What may work best for you is to split your funds between 2 different annuities and get the advantages for your short term and long term needs. <sheellah[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:1128699540.549439.177690[at]g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... - quote - > There are so many annuities available and this is what my advisor is > recommending. I don't have the knowledge to know if there is anything > better out there. You always wonder if what they select is the best for > you or for them ;-). I also wonder when they recommend their own > products. I really would appreciate any feedback from someone who has > no vested interest. Thanks much! |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks once again for your help. I'm not happy with my advisor, nor am I happy with the whole way advisors are paid, as it creates a conflict of interest. One always has to wonder if what is being sold is the best deal for them or the best deal for the advisor. I think that all commissions should go to the firm, and then be divied up based on dollar amount sold, not on which product was sold. This would create more trust between advisor and client, and remove conflict of interest issues. I would feel more comfortable if it were done that way. What type of fund is Vanguard? Other than tax deferral, what iare the advantages of a variable annuity holding mutual funds, over buying a mutual fund directly? |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| <sheellah[at]aol.com> wrote snip but comments read - quote - > IS THE PROBLEM JUST WITH INDEXED ANNUITIES, OR ALL VARIABLE ANNUITIES?
I wouldn't say all variable annuities or all indexed annuites are bad. I amurging caution in general, though, based on general reading on the net. Hopefully someone very pro-annuity (as a product suitable and appropriate for certain people in certain situations) will comment, so you can hear more sides. Plus, my experience in annuities is minimal. I am bothered, though, that the sales literature on annuities is so often so bloody complex. I feel comfortable with stocks, bonds, and portfolio allocation. I understand the basic idea behind an annuity. But on what conditions each particular annuity rests seems to me to demand a lot of difficult reading. This makes the customer vulnerable to making a mistake or not getting what he/she thinks he/she is getting. Sure, one should be careful with any investment, but... An annuity salesperson can dismiss my comments as someone just not willing to dig in. Whence I can respond that's his product's fault as much as it is mine. A product that can't sell itself, all by its lonesome, and has to be explained and re-explained is highly suspect and demands a wary eye. It's the perfect product for sharks to sell little goldfish customers. - quote - > I WOULD FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THE HARTFORD FUND, KNOWING THAT I CAN
Can you explain what you mean by 'until I get my money back'?> TAKE 7% OUT UNTIL I GET MY MONEY BACK EVEN IF MY PRINCIPAL GOES REALLY > DOWN. Do you mean 'until I get the principal back'? So say you pay $100k for this annuity. The annuity thus pays $7k a year for about 100/7 = 14.3 years. Then what happens? Because you could store your $100k in, say, a very safe money market account or a ladder of CDs or a ladder of treasuries and take out $7k a year, and it will last longer than 14.3 years. Invested at 3% after taxes a year in a ladder of CDs (or a money market account averaging 3%), it will last about 18 years. I use little calculators like that at http://www.smartmoney.com/retirement...tory=moneylast to make quick comparisons like the above. I put in $100,000, an after-tax return of 3% and 0% inflation and played with the years number until about $7k a year came up. I'm sure I'm missing something, re the annuity you describe. Annuities are not necessarily easy to understand, but the above description approximates where I started having my doubts when I investigated annuities last year for myself. (Though again, there are annuities I might consider when I'm much older.) - quote - > I'M NOT REALLY WORRIED ABOUT THEM, I JUST WANTED TO AVOID THEM IF
Just my opinion, but I think you're taking another look at CDs is good. A> POSSIBLE. JUST FOUND OUT THERE'S NO TAXES EVEN IF DEFERRED, IF ONE > ANNUITY IS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER. I ALSO JUST FOUND OUT I CAN GET 4.1% > ON A CD, AND 3.1 ON A TAX DEFERRED ONE. ladder of CDs and some other conservative instruments might suit your needs for low risk, give you more control, and give you more money, too. www.bankrate.com is an excellent resource for checking CD rates. OTOH, I do not mean to dismiss annuities entirely with this statement. - quote - > Are you aware of the effects of inflation on one's retirement?
But they're not all in a fixed annuity. I don't know a person who wishes> I'VE JUST BEEN TOLD IT WAS AS MUCH AS 4% AT PRESENT. I WOULDN'T HAVE > TIED UP SO MANY FUNDS IN A FIXED ANNUITY HAD I REALIZED THAT. they hadn't done something a bit different with their money at some point. Four percent inflation for the long run is as good a figure as any. It's been a bit lower in the last ten years, and was higher in the 1970s, IIRC. - quote - > ARE YOU IMPLYING THAT I'M ALLOWED TO ASK MY ADVISOR HOW MUCH COMISSION
Sure you're allowed to ask. How he answers may say a lot.> HE RECEIVES, OR JUST HOW MUCH HE CHARGES ME FOR HIS SERVICES? SERVICES > ARE AT NO CHARGE TO ME, BUT WOULD LOVE TO KNOW HOW MUCH COMISSION HE > GETS. When I make this sort of inquiry (and I have, usually with the various brokerages I've had over the years, when one of the reps is trying to sell me something) I'm just very blunt and straightforward, but IMO reasoned, concise, and hopefully charming :-) . I tell the sales person/planner something like: "I want to understand the whole picture to help in my decision-making, because I want to feel good about my purchase. I'd like to know what sort of biases might be present such that I can be assured what you are trying to sell me is the best deal in town or very nearly so. How do you make your money on this deal?' It's not a crime to be paid on commission. A good salesman will say something like, "I am paid on commission for this particular product. So yes, it's true, selling this product pays me. On the other hand, if you are dissatisfied with this product and tell your friends not to consider it, then I won't get future commissions. Or you won't buy anything else using me. So it pays for me to be straightforward and thorough with you and get you what you truly desire." If the guy gets huffy or doesn't give you a straightforward answer or his answer is incomprehensible or he treats you with condescension or rudeness or otherwise makes you uncomfortable, find another sales person. I liked the suggestion from Joe about shopping around at Vanguard a little, 'cause they're kind of king of the fair deal in many ways. Maybe call them and say you want to compare this plan from X, Y, Z company to theirs. If they're not utterly charming and thorough and helpful, then call Fidelity. If Fidelity is a disappointment, ask here or try some other company. If you do try Vanguard, I'd love to hear an update about how it compared with your current salesperson and the plan he's offering. Disclosure: I have never had an account with Vanguard but would consider one, based on general reading and relatives' experience. I have been with Fidelity mutual funds for over 20 years; brokerage for around five. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Thanks much for your help. I'm using caps to make my replies more visible. Don't mean to shout. - quote - > I wanted to add that I wanted to purchase annuities to get a safe
I think the key words here are "as much as."> return on a considerable amount of money. I'm in my fifties. The banks > have a very low interest rate, CD's are taxable, and the stock market > scares me. I'm not a gambler, and have very little risk tolerance. I > have one fixed annuity and one that varies based on the interest rates. > I wanted to buy some where the principal is secure and they are > variable with only the interest at risk. These would be based on real > estate investments and an investment portfolio. I was told I could get > as much as an 11-12% return. WELL, HE DIDN'T EXACTLY PROMISE THAT TO ME, HE JUST TOLD ME IT WAS A POSSIBILITY IN A MORE AGGRESSIVE STANCE BASED ON PRIOR PERFORMANCE. One cannot get that kind of return for any notable period of time right now without gambling. And you say you're not a gambler. Maybe more annuities are right for your situation, and no doubt there is at least another fixed one that will suit your needs. But I suggest proceeding with great caution with this offer in particular and with annuities in general. - quote - > I'm just looking for a safe place to put
Ask the guy selling it to you. If he can't explain things so you> the money with a better rate than the banks. I will also have other > more liquid funds. The brokers commission is paid by the annuity > though, not me? understand and feel comfortable, find another financial advisor. There are warnings on the net about annuities, particularly variable ones. Google, or ask if you want some citations. The Securities and Exchange Commission has even recently leapt into the fray, strongly cautioning investors to carefully study and understand the terms of any annuity being offered them, since customers are being scammed (sometimes legally; sometimes not, apparently). IS THE PROBLEM JUST WITH INDEXED ANNUITIES, OR ALL VARIABLE ANNUITIES? I WOULD FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH THE HARTFORD FUND, KNOWING THAT I CAN TAKE 7% OUT UNTIL I GET MY MONEY BACK EVEN IF MY PRINCIPAL GOES REALLY DOWN. - quote - > I am also open to any other types of safe AAA investments. Thanks.
You say you're worried about the taxes on CD interest, and, again, yousay you don't want to gamble. Which brings you to annuities which do have tax advantages for some people. Mind elaborating a bit, as a double check on your reasoning? I'M NOT REALLY WORRIED ABOUT THEM, I JUST WANTED TO AVOID THEM IF POSSIBLE. JUST FOUND OUT THERE'S NO TAXES EVEN IF DEFERRED, IF ONE ANNUITY IS EXCHANGED FOR ANOTHER. I ALSO JUST FOUND OUT I CAN GET 4.1% ON A CD, AND 3.1 ON A TAX DEFERRED ONE. In what tax bracket are you? I'VE HAD TO TAKE CARE OF MY MOM, SO I HAVE VERY LITTLE INCOME COMING IN NOW. I'M IN A SITUATION THOUGH WHERE I DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT TYING UP FUNDS. Are you retired? SEMI Have you estimated how much you need each year in retirement? DOESN'T APPLY Are you aware of the effects of inflation on one's retirement? I'VE JUST BEEN TOLD IT WAS AS MUCH AS 4% AT PRESENT. I WOULDN'T HAVE TIED UP SO MANY FUNDS IN A FIXED ANNUITY HAD I REALIZED THAT. Can you tell the group the fee structure of your advisor? There is some routine advice given on this subject here that should help a person avoid being ripped off. ARE YOU IMPLYING THAT I'M ALLOWED TO ASK MY ADVISOR HOW MUCH COMISSION HE RECEIVES, OR JUST HOW MUCH HE CHARGES ME FOR HIS SERVICES? SERVICES ARE AT NO CHARGE TO ME, BUT WOULD LOVE TO KNOW HOW MUCH COMISSION HE GETS. I am a 40-something "do it yourself investor." I never had an annuity but researched getting one last year. I didn't like it because the setup was simply the company took my money, then gave it back to me slowly each year. I didn't like giving up that control. I thought I could do better investing and drawing down from it as needed, all on my own. On the other hand, were I in my 70s, I would consider an annuity. It's peace of mind, particularly when combined with some other investment strategies. THANKS SO MUCH FOR TAKING THE TIME TO HELP ;-). |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Good, that extra info helps. You are being played. Anyone who even hints that you can get anything like 11-12% on guaranteed principal is dishonest. The benchmark for AAA investments is the U.S. government bond, whose rates are around 4%. Anything promising much more *has* to involve more risk. Whoever runs an annuity must make the money they pay you by investing in the same market available to you (mostly), and there is no magic secret cache of 10% safe investments. How long an invesment horizon do you have for this money? If you really want an annuity, call Vanguard. They at least offer no-load, low-fee annuities so you're not being ripped off for the commissions and high fees that most other annuities contain. Joe |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| <sheellah[at]aol.com> wrote - quote - > I wanted to add that I wanted to purchase annuities to get a safe
I think the key words here are "as much as."> return on a considerable amount of money. I'm in my fifties. The banks > have a very low interest rate, CD's are taxable, and the stock market > scares me. I'm not a gambler, and have very little risk tolerance. I > have one fixed annuity and one that varies based on the interest rates. > I wanted to buy some where the principal is secure and they are > variable with only the interest at risk. These would be based on real > estate investments and an investment portfolio. I was told I could get > as much as an 11-12% return. One cannot get that kind of return for any notable period of time right now without gambling. And you say you're not a gambler. Maybe more annuities are right for your situation, and no doubt there is at least another fixed one that will suit your needs. But I suggest proceeding with great caution with this offer in particular and with annuities in general. - quote - > I'm just looking for a safe place to put
Ask the guy selling it to you. If he can't explain things so you understand> the money with a better rate than the banks. I will also have other > more liquid funds. The brokers commission is paid by the annuity > though, not me? and feel comfortable, find another financial advisor. There are warnings on the net about annuities, particularly variable ones. Google, or ask if you want some citations. The Securities and Exchange Commission has even recently leapt into the fray, strongly cautioning investors to carefully study and understand the terms of any annuity being offered them, since customers are being scammed (sometimes legally; sometimes not, apparently). - quote - > I am also open to any other types of safe AAA investments. Thanks.
You say you're worried about the taxes on CD interest, and, again, you sayyou don't want to gamble. Which brings you to annuities which do have tax advantages for some people. Mind elaborating a bit, as a double check on your reasoning? In what tax bracket are you? Are you retired? Have you estimated how much you need each year in retirement? Are you aware of the effects of inflation on one's retirement? Can you tell the group the fee structure of your advisor? There is some routine advice given on this subject here that should help a person avoid being ripped off. I am a 40-something "do it yourself investor." I never had an annuity but researched getting one last year. I didn't like it because the setup was simply the company took my money, then gave it back to me slowly each year. I didn't like giving up that control. I thought I could do better investing and drawing down from it as needed, all on my own. On the other hand, were I in my 70s, I would consider an annuity. It's peace of mind, particularly when combined with some other investment strategies. |
| | |||
| |||
| I wanted to add that I wanted to purchase annuities to get a safe return on a considerable amount of money. I'm in my fifties. The banks have a very low interest rate, CD's are taxable, and the stock market scares me. I'm not a gambler, and have very little risk tolerance. I have one fixed annuity and one that varies based on the interest rates. I wanted to buy some where the principal is secure and they are variable with only the interest at risk. These would be based on real estate investments and an investment portfolio. I was told I could get as much as an 11-12% return. I'm just looking for a safe place to put the money with a better rate than the banks. I will also have other more liquid funds. The brokers commission is paid by the annuity though, not me? I am also open to any other types of safe AAA investments. Thanks. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| There are so many annuities available and this is what my advisor is recommending. I don't have the knowledge to know if there is anything better out there. You always wonder if what they select is the best for you or for them ;-). I also wonder when they recommend their own products. I really would appreciate any feedback from someone who has no vested interest. Thanks much! |
| Tags |
| feedback, innovations, life, mass, mutual, pacific, select, transitions |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| feedback John D from Branson: is there a way to suggest Ideas to MS Employees about new features for MS Money? John D | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-03-2005 05:48 PM | |
| MSN Money feedback Robert G. Becnel: I'm seriously looking at an alternative to upgrading to MS Money 2005 due to this group's comments on the product. I started looking at MSN Money... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 01-03-2005 10:08 PM | |
| Personalized Feedback bug? lovellsj: I noticed a bug with the Personalized Feedback. It started in version 2003 and continues in version 2004. When you have Personalized Feedback... | Microsoft Money | 4 | 01-08-2004 11:57 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |