|
#4
| |||
| |||
| SD wrote: - quote - > Well it is a reasonable bet that one earns more in the future than now.
I personally would not structure my real estate investments in a waythat if I fail to earn more money in the future I will be forced to sell or let it go to foreclosure. To me it seems to be setting yourself up for a cascade of negative financial consequences if you, for whatever reason, earn the same or less in the future. Andy |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| I'm actually choosing this option for a new primary home I'm buying. If it's the same option as what I chose, during the first 10 years you can pay interest only or any amount of principal. So it gives you the flexibility to pay a little less during the first 10 years, but if you want to get a head start on paying down your principal, you can. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I did some calculations on a spreadsheet, and oddly enough your total
Well in case of this new mortgage, a bigger chunk of the money is paid> interest payments are going to be almost exactly the same when > comparing between your existing mortgage and this weird alternative > mortgage you are describing. So in terms of interest expense looks like > its a wash. What I would worry about is your assumption that you will in the future when the same amount of money is worth less. So in theory it should be better. (Disclaimer - I have a similar mortgage myself) - quote - > have more cash 10 years from now; what if that turns out not to be the
Well it is a reasonable bet that one earns more in the future than now.> case? - quote - > Andy |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| hanson wrote: - quote - > The loan is 10 years interest only at 5.75%. Then the loan changes
I did some calculations on a spreadsheet, and oddly enough your total> into a fixed rate mortgage for the rest of the term (20 more years at > 5.75%, but you are paying principle as well). There were no closing > costs for the loan. > I have an investment property that I might like to refinance into this > loan arrangement. I do not plan to sell the property for at least 30 > years. I am more in need of cash now then I will be in 10 years, when > the loan changes to a fixed rate. > My investment property is currently in a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at > 6.5% with 29 years to go. > What are your thoughts on this mortgage? I know that "interest only" > is usually frowned upon for various reasons, but what your your > thoughts on this situation? interest payments are going to be almost exactly the same when comparing between your existing mortgage and this weird alternative mortgage you are describing. So in terms of interest expense looks like its a wash. What I would worry about is your assumption that you will have more cash 10 years from now; what if that turns out not to be the case? Andy |
| | |||
| |||
| Say, care to mention in what part of the country you're contemplating buying? I'm just curious but might have a little more to add, depending on the approx. location. We had a long thread about bubbles, with some mention of interest only morgages, here last week. Sure, they can make sense. Depends on the numbers. So have you run all the numbers? E.g. cost of maintenance, insurance, property taxes, and estimated the expected appreciation of the property? Is this a rental property or a piece of land or what all (if I may ask)? |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| One of my co-workers just refinanace into a Loan product that I had not heard of before. The loan is 10 years interest only at 5.75%. Then the loan changes into a fixed rate mortgage for the rest of the term (20 more years at 5.75%, but you are paying principle as well). There were no closing costs for the loan. I have an investment property that I might like to refinance into this loan arrangement. I do not plan to sell the property for at least 30 years. I am more in need of cash now then I will be in 10 years, when the loan changes to a fixed rate. My investment property is currently in a 30 year fixed rate mortgage at 6.5% with 29 years to go. What are your thoughts on this mortgage? I know that "interest only" is usually frowned upon for various reasons, but what your your thoughts on this situation? Thanks. |
| Tags |
| fixed, interest, mortgage |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Rental Property - Can you deduct mortgage interest if not on mortgage? chan.gene@gmail.com: I have a rental proprety that I am on the deed for but not the mortgage. I have made mortgage payments directly to the lender, so am I able to... | Taxes | 4 | 08-29-2006 05:38 AM | |
| Mortgage Interest Brad: Hi there, I was wondering about how much you get back on tax day from your mortgage interest payments and property taxes. I'm a first time home... | Taxes | 5 | 12-25-2005 04:01 AM | |
| how to do recurring for fixed deposit monthly interest marcus: How do i do a auto deposit of interest into my account , let say 3% interest p.a.,how do i have the deposit of monthly interest recurring, thanks | Microsoft Money | 2 | 09-18-2005 06:11 PM | |
| Pay down mortgage principal using fixed low-interest credit card? Ram Samudrala: This is an academic question, since I don't advocate taking on monetary debt. I, and people I know, routinely get offers for credit cards with a... | Financial Planning | 18 | 06-30-2005 08:52 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |