|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Heh. Actually I almosted lived in Pflugerville. My kids would be attending Pflugerville schools had we stayed. Officially, we were in Austin, though. It was a new (at the time) subdivision called Harris Glenn that is just off of Parmer right near the Dell campus there. We live in Gatesville now (about 40 miles from Waco). -- Mickey Chandler http://www.my-debt-reduction-plan.com/ Reply |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Mickey Chandler wrote: - quote - > Our business got started when I got laid off from a tech job and found > a flooded market in Austin, Tx. So, we cut out just about everything > we could, moved to a smaller town where the cost of living isn't as > great (managing to save around $1000 on our mortgage while we were at > it), and have been happily working for ourselves since. Plus, we just > like living in a small town. Pflugerville? (I like saying that) Best regards, Bob |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| John A. Weeks III wrote: - quote - > Set up a program called a "SEP". For every
We've actually looked at SEPs before. But, our little, home-based web> dollar you put in, up to certain very high limits, the > government will put in about 30 cents (in the form of a > reduction in taxes owed). development company needs to become a bit more profitable before we have money to devote to retirement instead of incidentals like food and electricity. Our current priority is paying off the debts we incurred in getting the business to the point of paying us back some. We're there (not shoving more money we don't really have at the business), but we have terrible monthly minimums now and we want to pay those off so that income is a better match for outflow, create a bit of a buffer and maybe even an emergency fund. Our business got started when I got laid off from a tech job and found a flooded market in Austin, Tx. So, we cut out just about everything we could, moved to a smaller town where the cost of living isn't as great (managing to save around $1000 on our mortgage while we were at it), and have been happily working for ourselves since. Plus, we just like living in a small town. -- Mickey Chandler http://www.my-debt-reduction-plan.com/ |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| In article <1125956628.066794.210830[at]g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> , "Mickey Chandler" <micklc[at]gmail.com> wrote: - quote - > John A. Weeks III wrote:
You need to talk to a financial planner ASAP. You do have> > The exception to that would be if you get an employer match > > or a tax break. If your employer matches the first 4% that > > you save, that is like getting 100% rate of return, and > > even credit card interest isn't that high yet. > And there's the rub for me. Right now I'm self-employed. I honestly > love working for myself but I don't have an employer to match my > retirement contributions. someone willing to give you a match, and it is one of the best matches you will ever find. It is from the Federal Government. Set up a program called a "SEP". For every dollar you put in, up to certain very high limits, the government will put in about 30 cents (in the form of a reduction in taxes owed). You don't want to miss this program since it is one of the greatest tax savers that exists (at least for the average person). -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| John A. Weeks III wrote: - quote - > The exception to that would be if you get an employer match
And there's the rub for me. Right now I'm self-employed. I honestly> or a tax break. If your employer matches the first 4% that > you save, that is like getting 100% rate of return, and > even credit card interest isn't that high yet. love working for myself but I don't have an employer to match my retirement contributions. Much of my debt problems center around my own irresponsibility when I was 22 and fresh out of college. Most of my current debt problems center around using credit to keep my family afloat while getting the business off of the ground. Thankfully the business is paying for itself now, but it's still not generating enough income that we can live off of it alone just yet. Back when the problem was irresponsibility, I was working hourly for a large, well-known bookstore chain for a whopping $8.50 an hour and it didn't/doesn't do retirement for hourly employees. So I think you're completely correct to characterize this as "the exception". At least in my working life it hasn't been the rule. -- Mickey Chandler http://www.my-debt-reduction-plan.com/ |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| In article <1125511728.206052.32750[at]g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> , micklc[at]gmail.com wrote: - quote - > Part of the answer here, I think, is to be honest about what you
The exception to that would be if you get an employer match> actually can do. In my case, in the long run, I think I'm better off > paying my debts off as quickly as I can and then pouring more money > into retirement at that point. or a tax break. If your employer matches the first 4% that you save, that is like getting 100% rate of return, and even credit card interest isn't that high yet. -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Part of the answer here, I think, is to be honest about what you actually can do. In my case, in the long run, I think I'm better off paying my debts off as quickly as I can and then pouring more money into retirement at that point. Sure, I'll lose some in interest payments, but interest payments on debt in most cases seem to exceed the interest payments made by retirement accounts. And I would think that you would have to be a really active trader to make it work out better for you by investing the money. If it hasn't already happened, the bankruptcy system is about to change and you'll be usually be required to pay things back over the next few years anyway, instead of discharging them forever like people do so often now. So, bankruptcy may actually be less of an option than you might hope. For me then, the best strategy seems to be Andy's: reduce spending and pay as much as you can. -- Mickey Chandler http://www.my-debt-reduction-plan.com/ |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "rockio" <rockio3[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1124825205.570165.222910[at]o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... - quote - > with 2 vehicle repossession in the last
[snip]- quote - > About 15,000
So, let me get this straight -- you owe $30,000> is owed to each of the car companies. And .... - quote - > At this point I don't know if filing for Bankruptcy for the $30K in
You have another 10K in "bad debt".> repo costs plus another $10K in misc bad debt. So ... You owe $40,000 - quote - > and investing the
And you expect to be able to make it all just> $900.00. is the way to go. disappear and invest $900.00 a month? Not to be an asshole or anything, but WTF are you smoking?!??! Under what ethical framework were you raised? This is absolutely wrong, no matter how you look at it. You want others to effectively "eat" 40K of your bad debt and be left with $900.00 a month to invest for your own selfishness? Is that what you're asking? How about you step up to the plate and deal with the situation you've created. Take the 900 a month and pay what you owe. It's the right thing to do. - quote - > Financially speaking, A year or two years or three years from now which
As if that really matters anyway -- you're not planning> will I be better off. > One last thing, either way it goes other than a student loan for $8k > that I still owe on and have been paying and will continue to pay on, I > have nothing that is accruing interest. on paying the interest anyway. And since you're planning on cheating the system for 40K, why not figure out a way to lose the 8K on the student loans too. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| rockio wrote: - quote - > First off thanks to everyone for your replies. However I'd like to get
I am not that familiar with the bankruptcy laws, so I am not sure how> passed the amount owed discussion. My question is in a few years from > now, assuming I'm still making payments on the 30K, am I better off > paying for the 2 repos or filing for bankruptcy. If paying the cars off > is the way to go, does anyone know what I should settle for monthly > payment amounts. My fear is that they would want a payment close to > what I was paying when I had the car. That would be crazy since > obviously I couldn't afford that or the car would not have gotten > repossessed. Plus the fact that I still need find a vehicle to work > and live. your bankruptcy end up if you decided to go that route. If I was in your shoes I would see if you can get a free consult from a bankruptcy attorney and find out what to expect. That being said, if I was in your shoes I personally would cut expenses quite a bit (Eliminate cable TV, cellphones, eating out, broadband), get some extra income like you are doing, and then pay as much as possible every month on the car debts. Remember that they are still accruing interest at a high rate, and every extra month you take to pay them off will cost you quite a bit. The problem here is your underlying spending habits, and bankruptcy will not fix your habits, it will just buy you some time before the next financial crisis the your spending habits get you into. If you modify your spending habits to pay off your car loans quickly you will be establishing new habits that will allow you to save lots of money in the future once the loans are paid off. Bankruptcy is like using liposuction to get rid of unwanted weight instead of going on a diet: After a few years you will be right back where you started. Andy |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| First off thanks to everyone for your replies. However I'd like to get passed the amount owed discussion. My question is in a few years from now, assuming I'm still making payments on the 30K, am I better off paying for the 2 repos or filing for bankruptcy. If paying the cars off is the way to go, does anyone know what I should settle for monthly payment amounts. My fear is that they would want a payment close to what I was paying when I had the car. That would be crazy since obviously I couldn't afford that or the car would not have gotten repossessed. Plus the fact that I still need find a vehicle to work and live. John A. Weeks III wrote: - quote - > In article <3n283uF1990ckU1[at]individual.net> , > zxcvbob <zxcvbob[at]charter.net> wrote: > > > > The vehicle loans were (obviously) secured loans, and the lender > > > > has the surety back. IMHO, you *have* paid those debts back > > > > already when you surrendered the vehicles. Tell the collection > > > > agency to get F!'ed (that's the language they generally > > > > understand). > > > If there is a shortage, the creditor is allowed to come after the > > > debtor to collect the difference. They may very well sue him to get > > > a judgement. That will allow them to potentially garnish his wages. > > But a $15000 shortage on each vehicle??? Rocky didn't give a lot of > > details, but it sounds like the lenders are trying to collect the entire > > loan balance rather than just a shortage. > Yes, that sounds high, but we would have to know the full > details before passing judgement. For example, the poster > could have rolled previous car loans into each of these > cars. Or he could have had huge over-mileage fees on the > last cars, and had that written into these loans. > When a car is re-po'ed, it normally goes to an auto auction. > Cars selling at auction sell at wholesale, not at retail. > It could be that these were SUV's, and there is a big glut > of them in the use car pipeline, which really hurts the > wholesale value. The poster might have been far better off > to sell these vehicles locally before they were re-po'ed, > and then obtained a loan to cover the much smaller > difference. But that is harder to do than it sounds. > -john- > -- > ================================================== ==================== > John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com > Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com > ================================================== ==================== |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| In article <3n283uF1990ckU1[at]individual.net> , zxcvbob <zxcvbob[at]charter.net> wrote: - quote - > > > The vehicle loans were (obviously) secured loans, and the lender
Yes, that sounds high, but we would have to know the full> > > has the surety back. IMHO, you *have* paid those debts back > > > already when you surrendered the vehicles. Tell the collection > > > agency to get F!'ed (that's the language they generally > > > understand). > > If there is a shortage, the creditor is allowed to come after the > > debtor to collect the difference. They may very well sue him to get > > a judgement. That will allow them to potentially garnish his wages. > But a $15000 shortage on each vehicle??? Rocky didn't give a lot of > details, but it sounds like the lenders are trying to collect the entire > loan balance rather than just a shortage. details before passing judgement. For example, the poster could have rolled previous car loans into each of these cars. Or he could have had huge over-mileage fees on the last cars, and had that written into these loans. When a car is re-po'ed, it normally goes to an auto auction. Cars selling at auction sell at wholesale, not at retail. It could be that these were SUV's, and there is a big glut of them in the use car pipeline, which really hurts the wholesale value. The poster might have been far better off to sell these vehicles locally before they were re-po'ed, and then obtained a loan to cover the much smaller difference. But that is harder to do than it sounds. -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| John A. Weeks III wrote: - quote - > In article <3n1c90F1997hnU1[at]individual.net> , zxcvbob
But a $15000 shortage on each vehicle??? Rocky didn't give a lot of> <zxcvbob[at]charter.net> wrote: > > rockio wrote: > > > About 15,000 is owed to each of the car companies. > > > > > The vehicle loans were (obviously) secured loans, and the lender > > has the surety back. IMHO, you *have* paid those debts back > > already when you surrendered the vehicles. Tell the collection > > agency to get F!'ed (that's the language they generally > > understand). > If there is a shortage, the creditor is allowed to come after the > debtor to collect the difference. They may very well sue him to get > a judgement. That will allow them to potentially garnish his wages. > -john- details, but it sounds like the lenders are trying to collect the entire loan balance rather than just a shortage. -Bob |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| In article <3n1c90F1997hnU1[at]individual.net> , zxcvbob <zxcvbob[at]charter.net> wrote: - quote - > rockio wrote:
If there is a shortage, the creditor is allowed to come> > with 2 vehicle repossession in the last year due to a very unwise > > decision (yeah yeah hindsight is 20/20). I am contemplating whether > > paying the debt off is the best strategy for my family and I. I now > > have about $500.00 left at the end of the month and will be getting a > > part time early morning job for an extra $400.00-500.00. If this is the > > way to go how much should I agree to pay on both vehicles. About 15,000 > > is owed to each of the car companies. > > The vehicle loans were (obviously) secured loans, and the lender has the > surety back. IMHO, you *have* paid those debts back already when you > surrendered the vehicles. Tell the collection agency to get F!'ed > (that's the language they generally understand). after the debtor to collect the difference. They may very well sue him to get a judgement. That will allow them to potentially garnish his wages. The strategy that I have heard for this situation is to save money, as much as you can. Then, when the creditor comes after you, try to make an offer. Maybe like 25 cents on the dollar. If it is accepted, get it in writing, and then pay by cashier check. You need two things to make this work...the creditor has to think you are never going to pay, and you have to be able to pay off the deal in one shot once the deal is made. -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
| | |||
| |||
| rockio wrote: - quote - > with 2 vehicle repossession in the last year due to a very unwise
The vehicle loans were (obviously) secured loans, and the lender has the> decision (yeah yeah hindsight is 20/20). I am contemplating whether > paying the debt off is the best strategy for my family and I. I now > have about $500.00 left at the end of the month and will be getting a > part time early morning job for an extra $400.00-500.00. If this is the > way to go how much should I agree to pay on both vehicles. About 15,000 > is owed to each of the car companies. surety back. IMHO, you *have* paid those debts back already when you surrendered the vehicles. Tell the collection agency to get F!'ed (that's the language they generally understand). If you were talking about unsecured loans, like a credit card, I would say you were morally obligated to pay. Best regards, Bob |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| with 2 vehicle repossession in the last year due to a very unwise decision (yeah yeah hindsight is 20/20). I am contemplating whether paying the debt off is the best strategy for my family and I. I now have about $500.00 left at the end of the month and will be getting a part time early morning job for an extra $400.00-500.00. If this is the way to go how much should I agree to pay on both vehicles. About 15,000 is owed to each of the car companies. At this point I don't know if filing for Bankruptcy for the $30K in repo costs plus another $10K in misc bad debt. and investing the $900.00. is the way to go. Financially speaking, A year or two years or three years from now which will I be better off. One last thing, either way it goes other than a student loan for $8k that I still owe on and have been paying and will continue to pay on, I have nothing that is accruing interest. |
| Tags |
| debt, paying, strategy |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Best strategy for dealing with student debt reccoso@gmail.com: << NOT CROSSPOSTED > What are the best ways people have either heard of or actually used to deal with student debt in excess of $100,000. ... | Taxes | 2 | 08-25-2005 11:41 AM | |
| Doubts about financial advices about saving and investing, paying off debt - from Dave Ramsey's book VStennis: well, I read Dave Ramsey's book Total Money Makeover and constantly read threads here about how great it is to not have any debt, pay everything... | Financial Planning | 13 | 04-03-2005 10:25 AM | |
| DRP Paying Debt Off Too Quickly The Merg: I am using Money 2004 Deluxe. I currenlty have the Debt Reduction Planner set up and have included my loans and mortgage. I specified that I want to... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 12-31-2004 08:41 PM | |
| Paying less than set in debt reduction planner DJ Chiro: I have my debt reducton planner set to pay $800/mo towards my CC's. I paid $400 this paycheck and will pay the other 400 on my next paycheck; the... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-04-2004 05:20 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |