Go Back   CDN Business Directory > Main Category > Financial Planning

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-15-2005, 08:42 PM
Chris Smolinski
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: settlement on a house

In article <1118853144.884161.276770[at]g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> ,
beliavsky[at]aol.com wrote:

- quote -

> I signed a contract to buy a house.
> In shopping for a mortgage, some mortgage lenders say that an advantage
> of going through them is that they will attend the settlement. How
> important is this? What kinds of things go wrong at a settlement, and
> in what cases would having the mortgage lender present be helpful?


I can't see how having the lender attend the settlement is helpful. What
are they going to do, give you more money? When I settled on my house,
way back in 1996, the lender sent the check to the settlement company
(which was part of one big vertical corporation that the home builder
had, I believe). I signed the check over to them at the settlement.
Actually, funny story there. We got through signing all the various
paperwork, zillions of pages, and I left. In the parking lot, the
builder's representative came running after me, we had neglected to have
me sign the check over to them! I'm sure in the oodles of pages I
signed, there was something that would have prevented me from keeping
both the house and the check, so I signed it over to her ;-)

You'll get an estimate of the total closing costs prior to settlement.
Typically, you bring a cashiers/certified check to settlement for that,
along with another check of your own, to cover the small fees the
invariably forget to add to the estimate. It is amazing how many $45
courier fees they can come up with :-(

- quote -

> In general, besides cost (rate, points, origination fees), how does one
> judge a mortgage lender? I do a Google search on mortage lenders
> looking for customer complaints, and I have avoided one lender because
> there were complaints that the lender promised a low mortgage rate but
> did not deliver.


I'd consider those the only factors. Chances are good your mortgage is
going to get sold to someone else anyway (not always, my original one
was with a lender that had a habit of keeping their mortgages). If the
lender doesn't deliver, move on to lender #2, obviously avoiding any
lenders you've heard really bad things about (bearing in mind that
you're probably only hearing one side of the story).

--
---
Chris Smolinski
Black Cat Systems
http://www.blackcatsystems.com

 
Old 06-15-2005, 08:42 PM
herlihyboy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: settlement on a house



beliavsky[at]aol.com wrote:
- quote -

> In shopping for a mortgage, some mortgage lenders say that an advantage
> of going through them is that they will attend the settlement.


You mean the closing? In my experience, the broker (never had the
lender attend) has attended the closing. All he has really ever done
is to make sure, with the title attorney, that the paperwork was in
order and answer any final questions I had.

- quote -

> In general, besides cost (rate, points, origination fees), how does one
> judge a mortgage lender? I do a Google search on mortage lenders
> looking for customer complaints, and I have avoided one lender because
> there were complaints that the lender promised a low mortgage rate but
> did not deliver.


Besides cost? Referral? Professionalism? Ability to explain the
process to you in terms you can understand? I'm sure there are others,
but this is what came to mind.

Ryan

  #-1  
Old 06-15-2005, 05:32 PM
beliavsky@aol.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default settlement on a house

I signed a contract to buy a house.

In shopping for a mortgage, some mortgage lenders say that an advantage
of going through them is that they will attend the settlement. How
important is this? What kinds of things go wrong at a settlement, and
in what cases would having the mortgage lender present be helpful?

In general, besides cost (rate, points, origination fees), how does one
judge a mortgage lender? I do a Google search on mortage lenders
looking for customer complaints, and I have avoided one lender because
there were complaints that the lender promised a low mortgage rate but
did not deliver.

 

Tags
house, settlement
Similar Threads
Thread Forum Replies Last Post
Lump settlement from business contract settlement
curt@redingercpa.com: If a company receives a large lump sum settlement from a lawsuit against a customer is it all includable in income in the year recieved?(assuming...
Taxes 2 12-15-2006 02:05 PM
Insurance settlement
Avrum Lapin: Tax-Aide clientıs adult daughter slips and falls, sues store in pro-per, and accepts settlement equal to her medical expenses. Noithing for pain...
Taxes 3 01-02-2005 10:00 PM
Settlement against brokerage house
Helen P. OPlanick EA: Taxpayer has won a lawsuit against a large brokerage house for 120K. Right now, she is carrying a capital loss of 34K. I want to apply the lawsuit...
Taxes 13 11-23-2003 10:52 PM
Settlement
Jannis: Almost one year ago, I have bought a house in California from a developer, but his general contractor has not finished yet the pick-up work, which...
Taxes 1 11-05-2003 08:48 PM



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:06 AM.