|
#18
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > The spread on 6 month CDs between the high rate banks and the average
Thanks for that advice Andy> banks is around 1% these days. $10,000 * 0.01 * 0.5 (6 months) = $50, > which works out to about $25/hour for the effort it takes to get the > higher rates, assuming you switch banks every 6 months. To me its worth > it. I've been thinking abt buying some iBonds..... will be my first time ever doing so. I didn't know what "length" to get. Sounds like 6 months is it, right? Also...any advice on what face amts to get? |
|
#17
| |||
| |||
| Elle wrote: - quote - > And when the 6-month CD comes due and another institution offers a better
I wouldn't even go out to 5 year bonds, or even one year bonds. The> rate, do you also find it easy to close your account with the holder and > move on? > Aside re long-term bonds: The following web site on bond yield curves over > the last few decades (cited here by Rich C. some time ago) pretty much > persuaded me never to buy long-term bonds for my bond/CD ladder, but rather > go out only about 5 years: > http://www.smartmoney.com/oneb*ond/i...ory=yieldcurve . spread between the 6 month T-bill and a 10 year Treasury bond is now less than 1%! To answer your first question, I can't say for sure since we haven't yet had to pull any of our CDs out and switch to a higher-rate institution, but we will next month since Ascensia has dropped out of the high rate game. However, I am sure the hassle will be pretty minimal, maybe 2 hours total to collect the money from one bank and then open a new CD with another bank. The spread on 6 month CDs between the high rate banks and the average banks is around 1% these days. $10,000 * 0.01 * 0.5 (6 months) = $50, which works out to about $25/hour for the effort it takes to get the higher rates, assuming you switch banks every 6 months. To me its worth it. Andy |
|
#16
| |||
| |||
| "Andy" <ineverevercheckthismailbox[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > My wife and I make it a regular practice to put our medium term money
And when the 6-month CD comes due and another institution offers a better> (which is being saved up for either investing in real estate after the > real estate bubble deflates or in long term bonds once long term bond > rates get back to decent levels) in the highest rate 6 month CDs > available nationwide. We currently have CDs at Ascencia (which has > apparently recently dropped out of the high rate business) and IndyMac. > There have been no fees, and the hassle has been minimal; each one has > only taken an hour or two to do everything needed to set up the CD. rate, do you also find it easy to close your account with the holder and move on? I just want to check on the process from end to finish. I don't mean to pick on your strategy; rather, it's something I am considering. I am hesitant to deal with all the paperwork, though. Potentially I could have accounts at more than a half-dozen institutions, I figure. Aside re long-term bonds: The following web site on bond yield curves over the last few decades (cited here by Rich C. some time ago) pretty much persuaded me never to buy long-term bonds for my bond/CD ladder, but rather go out only about 5 years: http://www.smartmoney.com/oneb*ond/i...ory=yieldcurve . |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Elle wrote: - quote - > Still, I am curious: People who have tried to shop for and obtain the
My wife and I make it a regular practice to put our medium term money> absolute best CD rate in the nation, do you typically fnd that the bank that > has the best rate will not be suitable for you because of fees, long > distance hassles, moving money between accounts (which definitely seems to > be getting easier every year, granted), whatever? (which is being saved up for either investing in real estate after the real estate bubble deflates or in long term bonds once long term bond rates get back to decent levels) in the highest rate 6 month CDs available nationwide. We currently have CDs at Ascencia (which has apparently recently dropped out of the high rate business) and IndyMac. There have been no fees, and the hassle has been minimal; each one has only taken an hour or two to do everything needed to set up the CD. Andy |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Will Trice wrote: - quote - > How is the OP to know when the right opportunity arises? It seems that
I don't think I am recommending that anyone "time the market." The> you are asking a relative newcomer to successfully time the market. > Nevertheless, I agree that the OP should not be in a hurry. stock market is not always a good place to be parking money; just ask Warren Buffett, he has been hoarding cash, and not buying many, if any, stocks in the last few years, because he doesn't think there are any good values available. All I am recommending is being patient and taking ones time and making investing decisions based on a sound understanding of what one is doing, and not just reflexively imitating what you see everyone else doing. Andy |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| shinypenny wrote: - quote - > Additionally, I have about $10K in another non-IRA short-term bond fund
What kind of return are you seeing with the short-term bond fund?> that provides check-writing capabilities. This fund is for unforseeable > emergencies (short of losing my job) like suddenly needing a new roof > before I'd planned, or major car repairs that hadn't been budgeted. With interest rates on the rise, I couldn't seem to find a short-term bond fund with returns better than a money market account like Emigrant Direct's, given the risk I would be taking. Anoop |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| <me[at]privacy.net> wrote - quote - > > It just seems like you folks are missing the point of a bond ladder: Its
I would compare what they're yielding now to whatever CDs are yielding now,> > yield does grow (albeit in a step-wise fashion and not on a day-to-day > > basis) as interest rates rise. It takes advantage of the typically higher > > yields associated with longer maturities. > What abt using iBonds? sure. I imagine they're at least somewhat competitive. But there is the drawback, if I recall correctly, of the interest penalty if not held for at least five years. Also, the rules on EE savings bond interest changed recently, such that I no longer will buy them. I don't know what's going on with I bonds, but I'd read the detail carefully. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| "SD" <siddharthgdalal[at]COLDmail.com> wrote - quote - > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 14:56 -0600, Elle wrote:
I do not feel they're close enough to warrant rejection of one-year CDs. The> > "SD" <siddharthgdalal[at]COLDmail.com> wrote > > Andy wrote > > > > If you shop around you can get 6 month CDs for around 3.8% right now. > > > > > With the ability to get > =3% from savings accounts such as emigrant > > > direct and ING, it is pointless to get 6 month CDs at 3.8%. > > > It just seems like you folks are missing the point of a bond ladder: Its > > yield does grow (albeit in a step-wise fashion and not on a day-to-day > > basis) as interest rates rise. It takes advantage of the typically higher > > yields associated with longer maturities. > > But there is no point starting a 1yr CD ladder when rates are comparable > to savings rates. average rate for one-year CDs is currently 3.34%, with many over this rate. I figure the OP could easily find a one-year CD yielding 3.75%, increasing his/her yield 0.5% (at least initially). I don't sneeze at this difference. And I think the laddering the OP proposed has sufficient flexibility for his needs built into it. To be more precise, in the city where I live, 3 out of 13 banks have a one-year CD rate over 3.8% with a small minimum ($500 or $1000). I guess you feel the difference is small enough to not care? - quote - > Maybe a ladder of 5yr CDs makes sense but then, I'd
I am going to stick with the original posters' interest in one-year CDs, so> not be a happy camper if rates went up a lot. as to try to be of help him/her. Thus I'm only comparing Emigrant Direct's 3.25% rate to one-year CD rates. |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > It just seems like you folks are missing the point of a bond ladder: Its
What abt using iBonds?> yield does grow (albeit in a step-wise fashion and not on a day-to-day > basis) as interest rates rise. It takes advantage of the typically higher > yields associated with longer maturities. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 14:56 -0600, Elle wrote: - quote - > "SD" <siddharthgdalal[at]COLDmail.com> wrote
But there is no point starting a 1yr CD ladder when rates are comparable> Andy wrote > > > If you shop around you can get 6 month CDs for around 3.8% right now. > > > With the ability to get > =3% from savings accounts such as emigrant > > direct and ING, it is pointless to get 6 month CDs at 3.8%. > It just seems like you folks are missing the point of a bond ladder: Its > yield does grow (albeit in a step-wise fashion and not on a day-to-day > basis) as interest rates rise. It takes advantage of the typically higher > yields associated with longer maturities. to savings rates. Maybe a ladder of 5yr CDs makes sense but then, I'd not be a happy camper if rates went up a lot. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I think it's helpful to think through various emergency scenarios and
or at least rent part of it out, like a friend of mine does.> have plans set in place should you get laid off. For example, if you're > renting now, switching to a lower rent or getting a roommate might help > get through a layoff without needing to plow into savings and > investments. And if you decide to buy a house, consider buying one that > you can afford on your unemployment check. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| "shinypenny" <shinypenny0001[at]yahoo.com> wrote snip - quote - > I have my emergency fund tucked away in a short-term investment grade
Is this a Roth or Traditional IRA?> bond fund IRA and not in CDs. Do you ever think about the fact that, in addition to the tax penalty, withdrawing from one's IRA prematurely means there is that much less money you have growing tax-deferred (if a Traditional IRA) or tax exempt (if a Roth IRA)? - quote - > If laid off I'll be in a lower tax
IIRC, the penalty is a flat 10% of whatever you withdraw prematurely from> bracket so dipping into it and facing the tax penalty isn't quite so > unpalatable for me. the Traditional IRA. Your tax bracket is irrelevant to the penalty amount. (Roth IRA contributions, but not earnings, may be withdrawn without penalty pretty much at any time, but like I say above, the catch is replacing the money subsequently. Generally, you cannot.) |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "SD" <siddharthgdalal[at]COLDmail.com> wrote Andy wrote - quote - > > If you shop around you can get 6 month CDs for around 3.8% right now.
Seems like you folks are kinda just pushing down the yield further and> With the ability to get > =3% from savings accounts such as emigrant > direct and ING, it is pointless to get 6 month CDs at 3.8%. further, on the guess that interest rates are going up and so, say a year from now, whatever an investor loses in yield for the next year (by not going a little longer right now) will be made up by the higher rates after a year... But really that's just a guess, right? You might be right, but there's not much certainty you will be, right? Andy, I was looking for 6-month CDs at bankrate.com today. Yes, there are exactly three banks offering about 3.8%, but two of those have min deposits of $10k and $5k, respectively. Also, I think one should mention that the national average for 6-month CDs right now is a little under 2.7% Still, I am curious: People who have tried to shop for and obtain the absolute best CD rate in the nation, do you typically fnd that the bank that has the best rate will not be suitable for you because of fees, long distance hassles, moving money between accounts (which definitely seems to be getting easier every year, granted), whatever? As for Emigrant Direct et al.: I have seen this suggestion before, and it appears to be on the up-and-up, with no strings attached other than I presume these banks can change its fee structure at any time. But so can any bank. So there is indeed a nice yield of 3.25% right now at Emigrant Direct. How long does this person wait before buying into higher-yielding one-year CDs? The longer he waits, the more income he may lose, right? Key word being "may,"... It just seems like you folks are missing the point of a bond ladder: Its yield does grow (albeit in a step-wise fashion and not on a day-to-day basis) as interest rates rise. It takes advantage of the typically higher yields associated with longer maturities. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| SD wrote: - quote - > 41k is a lot of money to need for the short to medium term. And atleast
I agree with this. $41K seems like an awful lot of money to park in CDs> some of it if not all should go to the stock market because the earlier > you start getting higher returns the better. Also, in your young age, > you can afford to take on more risk. As you grow older, you should > reduce your risk. at his age, unless he's saving up to buy a house. If that amount is purely for emergencies, it's probably too much at this age and stage of the game. That's how much *I* have in my emergency fund, and I'm 40 with two kids, a mortgage, and a salary range that means it will likely take me a long time to find a comparable job if I should lose mine. I think it's helpful to think through various emergency scenarios and have plans set in place should you get laid off. For example, if you're renting now, switching to a lower rent or getting a roommate might help get through a layoff without needing to plow into savings and investments. And if you decide to buy a house, consider buying one that you can afford on your unemployment check. jen |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Since this 41K is your short to medium term money (as opposed to your
I disagree with this. I recommend you get a book - e.g Get a Financial> retirement money) I would urge you to not put any of it in stocks. > Stocks are good for money you will not need for 20 plus years so that > the ups and downs of the market are smoothed out. Money you might want > to use in the next 10 years should be in something more conservative. Life - Personal Finance in your 20s and 30s. Read the pros and cons of all the types of investments you can make and decide what to do yourself. If you do feel queasy investing in individual stocks, try mutual funds. - quote - > I would not recommend being in a hurry to put any of your money into
Everyday the money sits around doing nothing for you is a lost> something risky just because you feel like you should be doing > something more aggressive with it. Be patient and wait for the right > opportunity to arise. opportunity. - quote - > I personally would put the whole 41K in CDs or treasury bills until you
41k is a lot of money to need for the short to medium term. And atleast> find something really worthwhile to do with it. You will get a decent > rate of return with no risk for now, and when you come across a better > use for the money it will all still be there. some of it if not all should go to the stock market because the earlier you start getting higher returns the better. Also, in your young age, you can afford to take on more risk. As you grow older, you should reduce your risk. - quote - > I would recommend going with 6 month CDs or T-bills, and not with 1
With the ability to get > =3% from savings accounts such as emigrant> year ones. The interest rate premium on one year CDs as compared to 6 > month CDs is just not enough to justify the reduced liquidity. > If you shop around you can get 6 month CDs for around 3.8% right now. direct and ING, it is pointless to get 6 month CDs at 3.8%. - quote - > I wouldn't keep a total of $10,000 in checking/savings. Instead, keep
This cushion is enough for the short to medium term. Start investing the> maybe 3,000 in checking/savings and have the rest in laddered 6 month > CDs so that you have a $6,000 CD coming due every month. That should > be more than enough cushion. rest - buy a house, buy some funds/stocks. you may lose some money, but it is a starting point. - quote - > Andy
I am in a similar position as you, except I am married.SD |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| ayabech[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > 25 years old. Have about $6k in a 401k (with the money distributed
I assume you mean stocks, right? I've been doing this, too, for years.> wholly among "high risk" items, I just learned from my financial planner that I could've been doing better: I had no value funds in my retirement portfolio. So just because you're in stocks, take a hard look and make sure you have a mix that includes not just large cap & market index funds, but also value funds, and perhaps small caps, emerging markets, and some international depending on your plan's options. - quote - > and from here on I'm contributing 12%
Oftentimes companies are restricted to a range of 401K funds from one> of my income to the 401k.) financial firm that are not always the best ones you could pick. So you might want to consider only contributing up to the percentage your company matches, then automtically siphon off the rest into other investments - you'll have more choice than just what your plan offers. - quote - > Then I have about $41k sitting in various
When determining how much rainy day fund you need, you need to sit down> savings and checking accounts. I was figuring on putting $15k into six > 1-year CD's that would be closing every other month (so I'm never more > than 2 months away from $2500 + interest.) That would be my rainy day > fund. I'd keep $5000 in my checking account (cuz, you know, I need > money to live) and maybe another $5000 in a savings account (just in > case?) What should I do with the rest? Are the CD's a bad idea to begin > with? > I figure (hope) my 401k will, over the next 30+ years have me set for > "the future" (retirement.) I want a relatively liquid rainy day fund (I > got fired once, so I know shit can happen) on hand. and calculate out how much you'd need to pay your bills if you got laid off again. Calculate in unemployment income you'd receive, and any severance. Figure that you will be at a lower tax bracket, won't need to drive your car to work, no lunches out, etc. Since you've been through a layoff before, you probably already have a fairly realistic idea of how much you really need to survive another one. Pad the amount a little so you can still enjoy the occasional movie and restaurant meal to perk you up when you're down. Then take that monthly "emergency" amount, and multiply it by the number of months you expect to be out of work. Usually the standard advice is 3-6 months. However, I've found that a good general guideline that has proved valid throughout my working career is one month for every $10K of salary you were making. For example, if you are making $50K and get laid off, it's probably going to take you 5 months to find an equivalent job. The more you were making, the longer it tends to take, unless you're willing to take a substantial pay cut, but most of us aren't, and employers are loathe to hire someone on at a lower salary & position because they figure when something better comes along, you're gone. Once you arrive on the appropriate amount (which should be re-evaluated every so often, as your salary and expenses increase), this is the emergency fund you need to set aside. But it doesn't *necessarily* have to be in something all that liquid, like CDs and saving accounts. Depends on your stomach, your other resources, and your optimism, I guess. :-) In my situation this is what I do, since I have a small amount of options I could cash in a pinch, another income coming into our household, and confidence that I can survive a long time on unemployment since I have in the past. I was once laid off for 9 months, and between severance, unemployment, prudent use of credit, careful cost cutting measures, and the ability to pick up some consulting work, I managed not to dip into my emergency fund at all. My ability to do that was in large part due to the fact that while employed, I deliberately kept my fixed expenses lower than I *technically* can afford. IOW, I live fairly frugally even when I have a steady income. I have my emergency fund tucked away in a short-term investment grade bond fund IRA and not in CDs. If laid off I'll be in a lower tax bracket so dipping into it and facing the tax penalty isn't quite so unpalatable for me. I view this is "true" emergency money, not something I would be tempted to draw on unless a real disaster struck, like both of us getting laid off the same time, the local economy completely busting, a major long-term health crisis, or becoming disabled and running out of disability insurance, etc. In which case I figure the 10% penalty isn't going to bother me. Additionally, I have about $10K in another non-IRA short-term bond fund that provides check-writing capabilities. This fund is for unforseeable emergencies (short of losing my job) like suddenly needing a new roof before I'd planned, or major car repairs that hadn't been budgeted. - quote - > It's just that
Diversification is typically a good strategy, especially if the market> whole time frame in the middle I don't know how to plan for. All I know > is that having so much money earning almost nothing in savings accounts > ISN'T wise. Invest in stocks? I guess I'd rather use a broker (if so, > any reccomendations for one)? I'm not the type who wants to be > constantly checking the market to make progress. I'd rather someone > with more experience and "knowledge," along with a full time devotion > to the task, handle that. ups and downs put you on an emotional rollercoaster and make you feel like a gambler. With the assistance of a financial planner, I've now got my money spread over 10 different asset allocation classes, including large & small cap funds, value funds, international, emerging markets, real estate and energy. Yep some people may say it's not wise to put the money into things like bonds, real estate and energy at this point in time, but the idea here is long-term investing and how the portfolio does overall, not how one class is performing at any given time. Such a mix takes out the volatility factor, and at any given point in time, should I need to draw on my investments, I won't have to wait it out because I put it all in something that's sucking wind at the moment. Now that it's set up, I'll review and tweak it every year but keep it in the same general proportions and classes. You're doing really great for a 25 year old! jen |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Andy wrote: - quote - > ayabech[at]yahoo.com wrote:
Andy,> I would not recommend being in a hurry to put any of your money into > something risky just because you feel like you should be doing > something more aggressive with it. Be patient and wait for the right > opportunity to arise. How is the OP to know when the right opportunity arises? It seems that you are asking a relative newcomer to successfully time the market. Nevertheless, I agree that the OP should not be in a hurry. -Will |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| ayabech[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > Then I have about $41k sitting in various
I think you are on the right track with your savings! I wish I had that> savings and checking accounts. I was figuring on putting $15k into six > 1-year CD's that would be closing every other month (so I'm never more > than 2 months away from $2500 + interest.) That would be my rainy day > fund. I'd keep $5000 in my checking account (cuz, you know, I need > money to live) and maybe another $5000 in a savings account (just in > case?) What should I do with the rest? Are the CD's a bad idea to begin > with? > I figure (hope) my 401k will, over the next 30+ years have me set for > "the future" (retirement.) much saved up when I was 25! Here are my thoughts on your situation. Since this 41K is your short to medium term money (as opposed to your retirement money) I would urge you to not put any of it in stocks. Stocks are good for money you will not need for 20 plus years so that the ups and downs of the market are smoothed out. Money you might want to use in the next 10 years should be in something more conservative. I would not recommend being in a hurry to put any of your money into something risky just because you feel like you should be doing something more aggressive with it. Be patient and wait for the right opportunity to arise. I personally would put the whole 41K in CDs or treasury bills until you find something really worthwhile to do with it. You will get a decent rate of return with no risk for now, and when you come across a better use for the money it will all still be there. I would recommend going with 6 month CDs or T-bills, and not with 1 year ones. The interest rate premium on one year CDs as compared to 6 month CDs is just not enough to justify the reduced liquidity. If you shop around you can get 6 month CDs for around 3.8% right now. I wouldn't keep a total of $10,000 in checking/savings. Instead, keep maybe 3,000 in checking/savings and have the rest in laddered 6 month CDs so that you have a $6,000 CD coming due every month. That should be more than enough cushion. Andy |
| | |||
| |||
| Just to get the ball rolling, some queries from a do-it-yourselfer who reads a lot: How much of your contribution to your 401k does your employer match? Have you considered contributing to a Roth IRA in addition to your 401k? So you have about $47k in savings right now. If you lose your job again, how long do you think you'll be unemployed, and so how much money will you need to support yourself? Create your rainy-day fund built around this figure. Typically sites say to stash away 3-months to a year's worth of expenses, but it really should depend on one's own knowledge of one's own job stability. Laddered one-year CDs, like you described, are probably as good an idea as any. Do you plan to buy a house or condo in which to live? Plan to marry and have kids? Answer these questions, then maybe start learning about portfolio allocation, which most likely will tell you that a person your age should put more into stocks than CDs. A couple of free, nice, easy sites that will give you quick and dirty suggested portfolio allocations: http://www.smartmoney.com/oneasset/ (scroll over many of the words to get explanations, or experiment with different figures until you understand what the site is doing) http://www.fincalc.com/ , click on "How should I allocate my assets?" on the lower right. You can then use a financial planner, if you wish, and you'll go in prepared. Or keep asking questions here, and do some combination of DIY-er with some help from a planner. Good for you for saving so carefully! <ayabech[at]yahoo.com> wrote - quote - > 25 years old. Have about $6k in a 401k (with the money distributed > wholly among "high risk" items, and from here on I'm contributing 12% > of my income to the 401k.) Then I have about $41k sitting in various > savings and checking accounts. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| 25 years old. Have about $6k in a 401k (with the money distributed wholly among "high risk" items, and from here on I'm contributing 12% of my income to the 401k.) Then I have about $41k sitting in various savings and checking accounts. I was figuring on putting $15k into six 1-year CD's that would be closing every other month (so I'm never more than 2 months away from $2500 + interest.) That would be my rainy day fund. I'd keep $5000 in my checking account (cuz, you know, I need money to live) and maybe another $5000 in a savings account (just in case?) What should I do with the rest? Are the CD's a bad idea to begin with? I figure (hope) my 401k will, over the next 30+ years have me set for "the future" (retirement.) I want a relatively liquid rainy day fund (I got fired once, so I know shit can happen) on hand. It's just that whole time frame in the middle I don't know how to plan for. All I know is that having so much money earning almost nothing in savings accounts ISN'T wise. Invest in stocks? I guess I'd rather use a broker (if so, any reccomendations for one)? I'm not the type who wants to be constantly checking the market to make progress. I'd rather someone with more experience and "knowledge," along with a full time devotion to the task, handle that. |
| Tags |
| advice, seek |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Seek Tax pro help or DIY? Duke of Hazard: My financial situation has changed to where I now own a home, invest in rental property, and have a part-time home business (which has no income,... | Taxes | 36 | 10-08-2004 03:04 PM | |
| Looking for advice Abid Khan: Hello, Me and my sibblings will be receiving a sum of 100K from my father in next few weeks, I am looking for a less risky investment advice,... | Financial Planning | 2 | 08-12-2004 04:30 PM | |
| Need advice Russ: I'm trying to find my wife and I a financial planner, and am not sure where to look or what to ask. I've always heard that it's a good idea not to... | Financial Planning | 5 | 10-17-2003 09:20 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |