|
#13
| |||
| |||
| In article <d6gnk7$or9$1[at]gnus01.u.washington.edu> , Ram Samudrala <ram[at]sp1.compbio.washington.edu> wrote: - quote - > Historically, as an educator, I've found that only a small percentage
I agree that it is nice to get lots of education. People should> of people who enter the workforce and say they'll go back actually do > go back (which is sometimes depressing to me). I think education is a > huge factor in one's quality of life and overall long term financial > health. So I totally recommend the opposite: get as much formal > education as you can and keep learning the rest of your life. expect to be learning their entire life as technology continues to move forward at breakneck speed. However, at the current time, the good paying jobs are evaporating and moving overseas, leaving a huge glut of people that formerly were at the top end of the job market. At the same time, the education system is flooding the market with kids who have so much student loan and credit card debt that they will never, ever be able to pay it off. In the case of the original poster, there is a very good chance that after 3 years of law school, he will never see a job in the legal industry. Just like the computer industry in the 90's and the engineering field of the early 2000's, the law industry is rapidly going off shore and being staffed by JD's and PHD's in India who earn $9 an hour. At the same time, he is going to be sufficated by having well over $100K in debt. It is nothing short of insane to take on that kind of debt without having a pretty good chance of a positive outcome. This is not like a corporate money decision where you take a chance on a new product, and if it fails, you reorganize or file for bankruptcy. With student loan debt, you wear that for the rest of your life since bankruptcy doesn't get rid of it anymore. People can and do go back to school. It happens all the time. I am living proof. And I have found that those who go out in the real world for a few years are far more successful when they finally do go back to school. Why? They have real world experience on how to compete and survive that the fresh out of high school kids do not have. -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| The off-shoring of legal work is not a real threat. Certain types, such as estate planning specialists are in short supply. The point for the OP to consider is what kind of law he'll practice in. If tort reform ever happens, many personal injury specialists will be out. "John A. Weeks III" <john[at]johnweeks.com> wrote in message news:john-9BFEEE.06441819052005[at]ip-lcc.supernews.net... - quote - > In article <d6gnk7$or9$1[at]gnus01.u.washington.edu> , > Ram Samudrala <ram[at]sp1.compbio.washington.edu> wrote: > > Historically, as an educator, I've found that only a small percentage > > of people who enter the workforce and say they'll go back actually do > > go back (which is sometimes depressing to me). I think education is a > > huge factor in one's quality of life and overall long term financial > > health. So I totally recommend the opposite: get as much formal > > education as you can and keep learning the rest of your life. > I agree that it is nice to get lots of education. People should > expect to be learning their entire life as technology continues > to move forward at breakneck speed. > However, at the current time, the good paying jobs are evaporating > and moving overseas, leaving a huge glut of people that formerly > were at the top end of the job market. At the same time, the > education system is flooding the market with kids who have so > much student loan and credit card debt that they will never, ever > be able to pay it off. > In the case of the original poster, there is a very good chance > that after 3 years of law school, he will never see a job in > the legal industry. Just like the computer industry in the 90's > and the engineering field of the early 2000's, the law industry > is rapidly going off shore and being staffed by JD's and PHD's > in India who earn $9 an hour. At the same time, he is going to > be sufficated by having well over $100K in debt. It is nothing > short of insane to take on that kind of debt without having a > pretty good chance of a positive outcome. > This is not like a corporate money decision where you take a > chance on a new product, and if it fails, you reorganize or > file for bankruptcy. With student loan debt, you wear that > for the rest of your life since bankruptcy doesn't get rid > of it anymore. > People can and do go back to school. It happens all the time. > I am living proof. And I have found that those who go out in > the real world for a few years are far more successful when > they finally do go back to school. Why? They have real world > experience on how to compete and survive that the fresh out of > high school kids do not have. > -john- > -- > ================================================== ==================== > John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com > Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com > ================================================== ==================== |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| bc2 wrote: - quote - > I have a rather specific scenario that I would like some advice on...
I don't think it makes since to incure any more interest expense than> I am graduating from college this year and entering law school in the > fall. I currently have around 30k in various index funds/etfs. I have > around 22k in debt from undergrad (all was government interest subsidized) > that I will be consolidating at a fixed 3.875% very soon. I couldn't pass > up the low rates and subsidized interest. > The real question is about law school loans. I have determined that, after > all government loans, I will still need around 15k/year (for 3 years). > Government loans are 18.5k/year. Add that to the 22k I already have and I > am looking at over 80k in government loan debt when I graduate. The way I > see it, I have three options: you absolutely have to. If your investments were very likely to give you returns substantially higher than the interest rates on your loans then maybe it would be worth taking on more debt and leaving all of your savings invested. However, investments (both stocks and bonds) are not really generating a very exciting rate of return these days, and the fundamentals of the US economy are not particularly rosy (in my opinion). So if I was in your shoes I would keep enough savings to serve as an emergency fund (maybe just 5K since you have access to relatively low rate loans so you don't need a big emergency fund) and use the rest to finance as much of your education as possible. Actually, if I was really in your shoes I would restructure my expenses and plans in such a way that I could get through law school with a lot less debt; maybe go to the state school where you are a resident and live a very frugal lifestyle. Once you have been practicing 3 or 4 years and have established a track record no one is going to care very much on where you went to law school. They will just want to know how many hours you billed last year and whether you are willing to put in 14 hour days 6 days a week for them. Andy |
|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Historically, as an educator, I've found that only a small percentage of people who enter the workforce and say they'll go back actually do go back (which is sometimes depressing to me). I think education is a huge factor in one's quality of life and overall long term financial health. So I totally recommend the opposite: get as much formal education as you can and keep learning the rest of your life. --Ram John A. Weeks III <john[at]johnweeks.com> wrote: - quote - > In article > <f4e8a07e1a618a595f8f9e1fda330778[at]localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> , > "bc2" <hoppytoad11[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > Given my situation, what would you do? I have no debt other than education > > loans and really nothing else to pay for but school right now. Which of > > those three options is best? Or is there an option that I may have missed? > > Sorry for being so long-winded... > Skip law school and go get a job right now. Pay down your debt. > Return to school when you can afford it, and you are debt free. > The way you are set up now, you will never break even going to > law school since your increased income will never make up for > the lost years of work. > -john- > -- > ================================================== ==================== > John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com > Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com > ================================================== ==================== |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| John A. Weeks III wrote: - quote - > Skip law school and go get a job right now. Pay down your debt.
I think this is bad advice. The average starting salary for a new> Return to school when you can afford it, and you are debt free. > The way you are set up now, you will never break even going to > law school since your increased income will never make up for > the lost years of work. business grad this year is $38,254 (source: CollegeAmerica News April 2005). The average starting salary this year for a lawyer in my area is $83,002 (source: HotJobs.com). Ignoring salary increases in both cases, it will take less than 3.5 years to make up the lost years of salary, and a little over 2.5 additional years to make up the 118k in additional debt. Add a couple of years to make up the interest on his debt and your looking at well under 10 years to break even. Everything is gravy after that. Besides which, the OP may actually want to be a lawyer... -Will |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I am graduating from college this year and entering law school in the
You should only hold on to a stock market investment if you still> fall. I currently have around 30k in various index funds/etfs. I have > around 22k in debt from undergrad (all was government interest subsidized) > that I will be consolidating at a fixed 3.875% very soon. I couldn't pass > up the low rates and subsidized interest. perceive sufficient upside. Investing is balancing risk and rewards. Others will tempt you to make a common mistake -- just throw an investment aside and forget about it. Let's say your future loans cost you 5% per year. Do you really expect your stock investment to return better than that? That's the question you should ponder. Because by leaving your 'savings' (they're not savings really, they are risky investments) untouched you are saying you expect your investments to substantially outperform the interest you pay on your loan. Myself, I would lean towards selling investments that have already performed well and using that cash to pay down the total debt. I am a young guy in a professional field myself and am entirely debt free, it feels great to have income go to my pocket, rather than bank payments. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| bc2 wrote: - quote - > The 1099 idea is intriguing,
If you could find a summer job that lets you in their retirement plan> but I have no idea how to set anything like that up. The summer may be a > possibility for work of that kind, though. Do you know of any other ways > to get the rest of my savings into the Roth? from Day One that'd help - that's pretty rare though. You might find law firms willing to pay you as an independent contractor for short-term work, some might prefer it. And the placement offices sometimes post jobs that would fit, they pay a lump sum for doing some project. You might network around and dig these up yourself. [Hint: mentioning that you have a (free) Westlaw student account that you might need some practice with could make you appealing for doing research projects for a small firm or sole practitioner located close to school, on a contract basis. The Westlaw access alone could be worth more than they'd need to pay you. After 1L you'll know enough to do useful work.] Or heck, mow lawns, or paint houses, or teach swimming classes, or tutor students, or god knows what. It's not an awful idea to get a couple semi-fun jobs before facing the gauntlet of partner track... - quote - > So, your advice also seems to be to not utilize my current savings, but
If if if you understand and accept all the risks involved in doing this.> rather take on more debt. This is interesting because I think I was > expecting the opposite answer. This is focused on long-term tax planning with your investments, and involves RISKS. Otherwise, yeah: keep your debt to a minimum. -Tad |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| In article <f4e8a07e1a618a595f8f9e1fda330778[at]localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> , "bc2" <hoppytoad11[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Given my situation, what would you do? I have no debt other than education
Skip law school and go get a job right now. Pay down your debt.> loans and really nothing else to pay for but school right now. Which of > those three options is best? Or is there an option that I may have missed? > Sorry for being so long-winded... Return to school when you can afford it, and you are debt free. The way you are set up now, you will never break even going to law school since your increased income will never make up for the lost years of work. -john- -- ================================================== ==================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ==================== |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| when you are young- take risks. So yes, I advocate keeping money invested and racking up debt. Student loan debt is "good debt". Credit card debt is "bad debt". Just don't blow the 30k on a girlfriend or boyfriend, OK? Tad's idea takes this another level further and is something I wish I knew 10 years ago. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Thank you for taking my questions so seriously. Your response was very thorough and well thought out. To answer your question, I do intend to go the greedy lawyer way and do big firm work if I can get it. And I realize that my grades are most important. While I entertain no law review expectations, that certainly is the goal. As such, anything beyond my bit of weekend work seems out of the question. The 1099 idea is intriguing, but I have no idea how to set anything like that up. The summer may be a possibility for work of that kind, though. Do you know of any other ways to get the rest of my savings into the Roth? So, your advice also seems to be to not utilize my current savings, but rather take on more debt. This is interesting because I think I was expecting the opposite answer. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| bc2 wrote: - quote - > So, you are advocating maintaining my savings and coming out with around > 140k in total student debt? > I guess one of my chief concerns with the variable rate private loans is > that they are tied to Prime, which seems to be tied to the Federal Funds > rate, which looks to be increasing in the short-term. So, that 6% prime > rate could become 8% or 9% relatively quickly. And there is no rate cap. I should make clear: I'm not advocating anything, just throwing out an idea - it's up to you to decide. You of all people can come back and sue my ass in three years! If prime did skyrocket, what would your Roth and salary do? Would interest rates be coupled with wage inflation, so your earnings compensate for the higher loan carrying cost? Might not be much of an issue though wages of course can stagnate while interest rates rise. But remember you would have the Roth to tap back into in that scenario. Would you choose investments that do well, or that do poorly, alongside high interest rates? If the rate is enough of a concern you could perhaps put the Roth into short-term fixed income investments, somewhat hedging the risk of your loan. This reduces the advantages temporarily, but if prime goes up quickly while you're in school, or you have a cash crunch within the years after graduation, you could take your contributions back out of the Roth and pay down the debt that amount. You're probably not all that much worse off at that point, vs. if you hadn't put the dollars in the Roth. Essentially, you need to weigh the risks of the debt vs. the advantages of starting your career with a big Roth. There's no set answer to this because it's based on unknowable things. Money wise Roth dollars are hands down the most preferable to have on the personal balance sheet of a high-income, high-wealth individual. If you take tax in law school you'll see that there really isn't anything quite like a Roth. Sure there are other tax-exempt things out there, but none quite so flexible (and low-cost) as the Roth. Opened through a brokerage firm, it can hold an incredible variety of investments. Unlike a traditional IRA, distributions aren't taxable, and you aren't required to take distributions from the Roth when you retire. Roll $30k forward for 30 or 40 or 50 years and it's likely to become a lot of money, especially at a tax rate of 0%. Should your tax bracket rise to the top levels, all of these features are going to look very attractive. If you play your cards right your earnings are going to grow much faster than your debt even under some nasty prime-rate scenarios. And remember, that's one down side of the Roth currently...a lot of people who would like to use them can't because of income limits. If you plan to be one of those people in the future, you might decide to stuff the larder now, while you can. That is, of course, a big "if"...and the conservative thing to do would be to leave law school with as little debt as possible. Up to you... -Tad |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > think of the loans as an investment in your > > education. 80k in loans > > can be aggressively paid off in around 10 > > years (I did 80k in 7 years- > > and I wasn't making a lawyer's salary). > > I'd leave the 30k intact if possible- the > > earlier you start, the easier > > it is to save. So, you are advocating maintaining my savings and coming out with around 140k in total student debt? I guess one of my chief concerns with the variable rate private loans is that they are tied to Prime, which seems to be tied to the Federal Funds rate, which looks to be increasing in the short-term. So, that 6% prime rate could become 8% or 9% relatively quickly. And there is no rate cap. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| bc2 wrote: - quote - > I am graduating from college this year and entering law school in the
Very direct question: do you plan to make a lot of money after you> fall. I currently have around 30k in various index funds/etfs. I have > around 22k in debt from undergrad (all was government interest subsidized) > that I will be consolidating at a fixed 3.875% very soon. I couldn't pass > up the low rates and subsidized interest. > The real question is about law school loans.The way I > see it, I have three options: > 1 - Maintain my savings and take out private loans. This would leave > me with around 140k in debt at graduation, but with my present savings of > 30k intact. > 2 - Use my savings to cover the first two years and then take out private > loans for the third year. This would leave me with around 100k in debt at > graduation, and no savings. > 3 - Use my savings to cover the first year of private loans while putting > the rest into a Roth IRA over the next three years (yes, I will have just > enough "wage income" every year to accomplish this). This would leave me > with 120k in debt at graduation and 15k put into a Roth IRA, but no other > savings. graduate, or work, you know, legal aid? If you plan to make a lot of money you might have a mind-set and financial plan based on that. It's the riskier way to go and can blow up, of course, because it presumes future income that might not appear. If you're comfortable with that there's a tax benefit you should consider - you already mentioned it above. For someone who is planning a career that will land them in the top tax bracket my suggestion is: crank up that Roth. You might quickly be disqualified from using Roths much after you graduate, and a Roth is one of the very few ways to create truly tax-exempt investment dollars. Roth contributions are phased out at higher income levels, as are conversions of traditional IRAs. So if you have $30k sitting in taxable accounts, you might think of law school as a time to strategize how you are going to shift as much of that money as possible into the tax-exempt Roth. As you wrote, contributions can accomplish part of this, as long as you have some earned income each year. I would consider going one step further...during school, do work where you get 1099 income (i.e., you work as an independent contractor rather than an employee, reporting that income on Schedule C of your tax retrun). Set up a 401k for your business through a cheap provider, and defer as much of the income as possible into it (hypothetically this could be over $40k per year, but if you're making money at that rate, you'll be getting Fs in Torts). You could have this 401k even while making annual Roth contributions, as long as your earned income is high enough to allow them. Then terminate the business before the year in which you plan to graduate (and score a six figure job with a white shoe law firm). Use that tax year to roll the 401k into an IRA, then covert that IRA to a Roth, either in whole or in part. If the numbers work out it could very well be a tax-free conversion and look at where you end up. Let's say you're able to defer your other $15k in savings into the 401k, which is rolled over to an IRA and converted to a Roth (as I said, hypothetically it could be much larger than that). A student converting a $15k Rollover IRA to a Roth, with a little Schedule C income, isn't going to pay much if anything in taxes. So the end result is: you could end up with say $15k in Roth contributions and an equal amount in Roth conversion dollars. Factor in some gains an you might graduate with $35k that can forever be invested tax-free, next to - you predict - $140k in debt. And you got that $35k in there without paying any taxes - you shifted savings from a taxable to a tax-free account. The numbers could be a lot higher of course, it's not hard to earn more than $5k a year during law school. If you earn more you can defer more, or of course use that money to avoid taking on additional debt. This is a risky plan in that if you don't score a job, you have some whopping student loans to deal with. And god forbid you have a sickness or disability, or flunk out, or need to leave school to take care of a family member, or who knows what. This isn't the conservative route, it's more like "gaming the tax code while taking on some risks." If you're comfortable with those risks and the down sides don't materialize, this kind of thing will probably look good to you 10 or 15 years from now when you're paying someone a lot of money to figure out how to invest while avoiding taxes. Final comment: keep in mind that your primary investment at this point is in your own earning capacity - by far that's going to produce the biggest return. Don't work some crappy job if it at all compromises your law school experience. If you go the law firm route, fifteen years from now they'll still be asking for a copy of your transcript and asking if you were on law review. -Tad |
| | |||
| |||
| think of the loans as an investment in your education. 80k in loans can be aggressively paid off in around 10 years (I did 80k in 7 years- and I wasn't making a lawyer's salary). I'd leave the 30k intact if possible- the earlier you start, the easier it is to save. I am 32 years old and nearly debt free. My last student loans will be paid off before xmas of 2005. My credit card will also be paid off at that time. I have accumulated a small savings while paying down all my debt. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I have a rather specific scenario that I would like some advice on... I am graduating from college this year and entering law school in the fall. I currently have around 30k in various index funds/etfs. I have around 22k in debt from undergrad (all was government interest subsidized) that I will be consolidating at a fixed 3.875% very soon. I couldn't pass up the low rates and subsidized interest. The real question is about law school loans. I have determined that, after all government loans, I will still need around 15k/year (for 3 years). Government loans are 18.5k/year. Add that to the 22k I already have and I am looking at over 80k in government loan debt when I graduate. The way I see it, I have three options: 1 - Maintain my savings and take out private loans that are variable in interest rate and typically something like prime + .25%. This would leave me with around 140k in debt at graduation, but with my present savings of 30k intact. 2 - Use my savings to cover the first two years and then take out private loans for the third year. This would leave me with around 100k in debt at graduation, and no savings. 3 - Use my savings to cover the first year of private loans while putting the rest into a Roth IRA over the next three years (yes, I will have just enough "wage income" every year to accomplish this). This would leave me with 120k in debt at graduation and 15k put into a Roth IRA, but no other savings. Given my situation, what would you do? I have no debt other than education loans and really nothing else to pay for but school right now. Which of those three options is best? Or is there an option that I may have missed? Sorry for being so long-winded... |
| Tags |
| debt, savings |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How do you input savings transfers from checking to savings? Techlifter: I'll probably find out that this was somethgin simple all along but: How do you categorize transfers from Checking to Savings, if you automatically... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 11-15-2006 06:34 PM | |
| M'04 Savings Goals??? Chris Cowles: Are they improved? The savings planners in previous versions are, shall we say, weak? (I'm not talking about lifetime planner, I'm talking about... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 07-18-2003 02:34 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |