|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Third Approach: Your large cap is taken care of by the employer match. Unless you want something else specific in large cap, you can take your contribution and put it in the remaining categories in the ratio that you had them 2:1 Bonds:Other Stock 2000$ Bonds : 1000$ other stock. This would make your total 50% Large Cap: 33.33% Bonds : 16.67% other stock Bucky wrote: - quote - > Let's say that my ideal 401K allocation is 50% bonds, 25% large cap > stock, and 25% other stock (small cap, international, etc). Let's say > that I contribute $3000 and my employer matches that. This seems simple > enough: > bonds = $3000, large cap = $1500, other stock = $1500. > But here's the problem, my employer's match does not go into the same > 401K account, it goes into a special account that can only be invested > in a S&P500 index. I've thought of two approaches, care to comment or > suggest another approach? > 1. Priority is to maintain stock to bond ratio. Forget about > diversifying with other stocks (small caps, international, etc). > bonds = $3000, large cap = $3000, other stock = $0 > 2. Priority is to maintain allocation targets and diversification. > Treat excess employer match as "bonus" outside of my allocation > targets. > bonds = $2000, large cap = $1000, other stock = $1000 (50/25/25 ratio) > bonus large cap = $2000 |
| | |||
| |||
| What do you want to acomplish? "Bucky" <uw_badgers[at]mail.com> wrote in message news:1108414519.206391.289510[at]l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Let's say that my ideal 401K allocation is 50% bonds, 25% large cap > stock, and 25% other stock (small cap, international, etc). Let's say > that I contribute $3000 and my employer matches that. This seems simple > enough: > bonds = $3000, large cap = $1500, other stock = $1500. > But here's the problem, my employer's match does not go into the same > 401K account, it goes into a special account that can only be invested > in a S&P500 index. I've thought of two approaches, care to comment or > suggest another approach? > 1. Priority is to maintain stock to bond ratio. Forget about > diversifying with other stocks (small caps, international, etc). > bonds = $3000, large cap = $3000, other stock = $0 > 2. Priority is to maintain allocation targets and diversification. > Treat excess employer match as "bonus" outside of my allocation > targets. > bonds = $2000, large cap = $1000, other stock = $1000 (50/25/25 ratio) > bonus large cap = $2000 ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Please trim the post to which you are responding. "Trim" means that except for a few lines to add context, the previous post is deleted. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Let's say that my ideal 401K allocation is 50% bonds, 25% large cap stock, and 25% other stock (small cap, international, etc). Let's say that I contribute $3000 and my employer matches that. This seems simple enough: bonds = $3000, large cap = $1500, other stock = $1500. But here's the problem, my employer's match does not go into the same 401K account, it goes into a special account that can only be invested in a S&P500 index. I've thought of two approaches, care to comment or suggest another approach? 1. Priority is to maintain stock to bond ratio. Forget about diversifying with other stocks (small caps, international, etc). bonds = $3000, large cap = $3000, other stock = $0 2. Priority is to maintain allocation targets and diversification. Treat excess employer match as "bonus" outside of my allocation targets. bonds = $2000, large cap = $1000, other stock = $1000 (50/25/25 ratio) bonus large cap = $2000 |
| Tags |
| 401k, allocation, dilemma |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| State Tax Dilemma William Brenner: My son, the PhD candidate, has a state tax problem, which translates to a $$ problem for me. In the summer of 2004, he taught a summer course in... | Taxes | 4 | 04-19-2007 08:30 AM | |
| Multi State Dilemma Mark Wiley: I was hoping to get a little feedback on a tax situation. I have a client who works for UPS, he worked totally within NYS for 2004. Unfortunately... | Taxes | 2 | 03-07-2005 07:34 AM | |
| Ethical Dilemma Phoebe Roberts, EA: We have a situation involving 3 clients. A, a married individual, had a successful sole proprietorship for many years. She incorporated it as a... | Taxes | 14 | 07-14-2004 12:04 AM | |
| Limited partner tax dilemma Vlad: I have an investment in a hedge fund that is organized as a partnership. Form K-1 that I received shows the income before investment interest... | Taxes | 1 | 04-15-2004 06:17 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |