|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Wally, I would STILL want to discuss this matter with the Coomissioner of Insurance of YOUR State. What you received is what I would call "a form letter", which would not be good enough for me. Cal Lester CLU Wally wrote: - quote - > Cal: > I did provide this proof all to no avail. The letter I received back > stated: > " The termination of your account was processed under the 10 Day right > to review provision in your contract. The State of Illinois, where the > contract was purchased and signed requires us to return the Contract > Value of your account minus any fees at the time we received the > request." > See my additional comments to Sgt Sauage for more information > Thanks for your reply |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Prudential convinced me to authorize a transfer from my Prudential Account to Manulife based on both a sales brochure description of the annuity and the "10 day" free look policy. I signed a document but it surely wasn't the 50+ page contract I later received. Why would Manulife offer a "10 day" review period if the contract was available for review before one signs anything? I believe it is good practice to hold finanical planning agents accountable for verbal statements by having them put in writting what they tell there clients. When I'm told "10 day free look" it should mean free look! I don't need to be berated even if I made a foolish mistake! I'm trying to help others from making the same mistake . |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Cal: I did provide this proof all to no avail. The letter I received back stated: " The termination of your account was processed under the 10 Day right to review provision in your contract. The State of Illinois, where the contract was purchased and signed requires us to return the Contract Value of your account minus any fees at the time we received the request." See my additional comments to Sgt Sauage for more information Thanks for your reply |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Wally" <wallyxj2[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1107293014.458294.56820[at]c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... - quote - > ... Manulife sited additional provisions in the
You mean:> contract which I was not made aware of. .... Manulife cited additional provisions in the contract, that I voluntarily signed, but failed to either fully read and/or fully undersdand. You don't need to be "made aware of" any clauses or provisions in any contract. They're right there in black and white. Read and understand them before signing. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Wally" <wallyxj2[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1107293014.458294.56820[at]c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... - quote - > Prudential Financial convinced me to invest into an annuity product
In most states, the 10 day free look period is printed on the front of the> sold by Manulife Finanical. The Prudential agent told me I would have a > "10 day free look" at the contract. I sent the contract back within the > 10 days and my money was returned minus $1100 for fees. I complained to > both Prudential and Manulife but they would not refund the $1100. > Prudential referred me > back to Manulife and Manulife sited additional provisions in the > contract which I was not made aware of. > Based on my experience it would be advisable for clients of financial > advisors to get written statements from their agents detailing what "10 > day free look" or "10 day right to revoke" provisions actually means. > When one receives the contract for review it is already to late to > review the wording for those provisions in the contract. contract, so no additional paperwork is necessary. Replacements often get 20 or 30 days to examine the contract. The clock starts ticking the day you sign the policy delivery receipt. In my career, I've seen less than a handful of policies free looked, although over 25,000 policies have passed through my office doors and into their owner's hands. In every single case, the policy owner received 100 cent dollars. If you sent the policy via snail mail, that might be the problem, but even if it's a day or two late, I strongly suspect that if you called the company and made this an issue, the would refund your money. If you waited several weeks before actually getting a postmark, then I'd side with the company, as will most regulators. The reason why is that if the regulators don't honor the contractual provisions as required by law, then policy holders with evil intent would malinger at will and invest in high risk sub-accounts, only to demand a 100% refund when they lost money. Brent D. Gardner, ChFC Chartered Financial Consultant http://www.brentdgardner.com/ http://www.gardnerfinancialgroup.com/ http://www.topgunproducers.com/ http://www.creditfixinc.com/ Si vis pacem para bellum! "Be ever questioning. Ignorance is not bliss. It is oblivion. You don't go to heaven if you die dumb. Become better informed. Learn from other's mistakes. You could not live long enough to make them all yourself." - Hyman George Rickover (1900-86), Admiral, US Navy, advocated development of nuclear subs & ships The Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) and Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC), designations owned and exclusively offered by The American College, signify the highest standards of academic study and professional excellence in the financial services industry. The ISP source of this post is not monitored. If you want to email me, click on a link. |
| | |||
| |||
| Wally wrote: - quote - > Prudential Financial convinced me to invest into an annuity product
Wally, although I am not at all familiar with the procedures used by> sold by Manulife Finanical. The Prudential agent told me I would have > a "10 day free look" at the contract. I sent the contract back within > the 10 days and my money was returned minus $1100 for fees. I > complained to both Prudential and Manulife but they would not refund > the $1100. Prudential referred me > back to Manulife and Manulife sited additional provisions in the > contract which I was not made aware of. > Based on my experience it would be advisable for clients of financial > advisors to get written statements from their agents detailing what > "10 day free look" or "10 day right to revoke" provisions actually > means. When one receives the contract for review it is already to > late to review the wording for those provisions in the contract. either Manulife or Pru/Financial, it would seem to me that IF (and that is the key word) you can DOCUMENT the date of actual receipt, AND the date of return to a representative of Manulife, that you should be entitled to a complete refund. If you CAN document those dates, I would suggest that you contact theFlorida Insurance Commissioner with that information, and request thier help in regaining your money. Cal Lester CLU |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Prudential Financial convinced me to invest into an annuity product sold by Manulife Finanical. The Prudential agent told me I would have a "10 day free look" at the contract. I sent the contract back within the 10 days and my money was returned minus $1100 for fees. I complained to both Prudential and Manulife but they would not refund the $1100. Prudential referred me back to Manulife and Manulife sited additional provisions in the contract which I was not made aware of. Based on my experience it would be advisable for clients of financial advisors to get written statements from their agents detailing what "10 day free look" or "10 day right to revoke" provisions actually means. When one receives the contract for review it is already to late to review the wording for those provisions in the contract. |
| Tags |
| 10 day right to review, annuity, beware, contracts |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Probelems with "Review Your Current Budget Status" page Tracey: When I review my current budget status, some of the budgeted amounts are incorrect - in some cases more than double what they should be. I cannot... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 03-16-2007 02:22 AM | |
| Question on "items to review" message Christopher: I have an account with Capitol One and I downloaded my statements from them the other day; all went well. I was told that I have two (2) items to... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-05-2004 10:28 PM | |
| Variant form of charitable remainder trust with non-cash "annuity benefits"? AES/newspost: Some major universities, other nonprofits, offer packaged charitable remainder trust plans (or some variation of same) to donors: send us $XXXXX... | Taxes | 3 | 11-19-2003 11:56 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |