|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:57:33 CST, Trapper <Trapper[at]my-deja.nospamcomwrote: - quote - > Is there an advantage to rebalancing after Jan 1 as opposed to before
Somehow this cross-posted question got by the ever-vigilant moderators> that? Does it differ by 401k versus a non-retirement investment? <grin> . Readers wishing to comment on this thread should pay attention to the headers and reply only to MIFP - or to this particular post, which has corrected headers. Apologies to those who innocently responded to the post and had their comments returned. -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
| | |||
| |||
| Trapper wrote: - quote - > Is there an advantage to rebalancing after Jan 1 as opposed to before
There are no tax consequences for rebalancing a 401(k) -- if you need> that? Does it differ by 401k versus a non-retirement investment? to do it, you might as well do it now. In a taxable account, selling assets that have appreciated, before Jan 1, will trigger a capital gains tax, with the rate depending on the holding period and your overall income level. Conversely, selling assets that have fallen in price since you purchased them gives you a capital loss, which you can use to offset capital gains and then up to $3000 of ordinary (including wage) income. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Is there an advantage to rebalancing after Jan 1 as opposed to before that? Does it differ by 401k versus a non-retirement investment? |
| Tags |
| question, rebalancing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Rebalancing portfolio and bonds,REIT simon.fischer@gmail.com: Hello, I've been looking at rebalancing my portfolio, which is currently almost 100% in well diversified index mutual funds (including large and... | Financial Planning | 5 | 12-30-2004 07:02 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |