|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I'm no expert on 401K, I didn't know you could contribute to 401K after
The IRS allows an employer to offer after-tax contributions to a 401(k)> tax. Are you saying that you can contribute to 401K after tax, but then > you still have to pay tax on the earnings when you withdraw? That's > barely an advantage over just investing without a special account. If > this is the case, why would anyone contribute to 401K after tax? although I'm not sure that this practice is widespread. I have worked for a company that offered it, but I did not use it for the same reason you stated, there's not much advantage. For gross tax purposes this is the same as investing in a non-deductible traditional IRA. - quote - > I was assuming the the OP meant pre-tax Roth IRA or after tax 401K
You're absolutely correct, with this interpretation there is no> because he said "My monthly 401k plus ira contribution will total > around $800." Given that assumption, then it makes no difference as > long as the tax rate is the same. With the Roth IRA, you don't pay tax > on earnings. difference. I was working off of a different interpretation because the OP's first sentence was, "I need to decide whether I should contribute to my 401k on a pre-tax or after tax basis." But rereading the post, maybe your interpretation is correct. Sorry for the confusion, -Will |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Greg Hennessy wrote: - quote - > No, I wasn't trying to say that. I was trying to compare a pre tax
Greg, I wasn't referring to your post, I was referring to Will's. I was> Roth IRA situation with an after tax 401K situation, and did not do it > clearly. also assuming that the OP was comparing Roth IRA to 401K. By the way, to add to the confusion, Roth IRA is considered as "after tax" because you contribute to it "after tax" (it is confusing because you pay the taxes beforehand). And likewise, 401K is "pre tax" because you contribute "before taxes", even though you pay taxes "after" withdrawing. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| In article <1104366543.623302.227820[at]c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> , Bucky <uw_badgers[at]mail.com> wrote: - quote - > I'm no expert on 401K, I didn't know you could contribute to 401K after
No, I wasn't trying to say that. I was trying to compare a pre tax> tax. Are you saying that you can contribute to 401K after tax, but then > you still have to pay tax on the earnings when you withdraw? Roth IRA situation with an after tax 401K situation, and did not do it clearly. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Will Trice wrote: - quote - > Your first example missed the tax on the earnings withdrawn. So, you
I'm no expert on 401K, I didn't know you could contribute to 401K after> save $100, pay the 20% tax leaving $80 invested and it doubles after 20 > years to $160. Upon withdrawal, you then pay 20% on the earnings or > 0.2(160 - 80) = $16 leaving $144. This is less than the pre-tax amount > of $160 you showed in the second example. tax. Are you saying that you can contribute to 401K after tax, but then you still have to pay tax on the earnings when you withdraw? That's barely an advantage over just investing without a special account. If this is the case, why would anyone contribute to 401K after tax? I was assuming the the OP meant pre-tax Roth IRA or after tax 401K because he said "My monthly 401k plus ira contribution will total around $800." Given that assumption, then it makes no difference as long as the tax rate is the same. With the Roth IRA, you don't pay tax on earnings. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Greg Hennessy wrote: - quote - > In article <41D31791.1030306[at]paragondynamics.com> ,
Your first example missed the tax on the earnings withdrawn. So, you> Will Trice <wwtrice[at]paragondynamics.com> wrote: > > > Assuming your tax bracket stays the same, pre-tax and after-tax will be > > > the exact same. > > > For a 401(k) this isn't true. The pre-tax will end up with more money > > than the after-tax. This is because the amount you pay in tax up front > > does not get to grow in the after-tax account. > It is true, because in the after-tax situation you pay tax on the > growth as well. > Say you earn 100 bucks. You pay the tax 20%, invest in the 401K for 20 > years, doubling your money, so you have $160 bucks. > In the post tax situation you get the 100 bucks, invest it for 20 > years doubling your money (you now have 200), now you pay the 20% tax, > which leaves you with $160. save $100, pay the 20% tax leaving $80 invested and it doubles after 20 years to $160. Upon withdrawal, you then pay 20% on the earnings or 0.2(160 - 80) = $16 leaving $144. This is less than the pre-tax amount of $160 you showed in the second example. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| In article <41D31791.1030306[at]paragondynamics.com> , Will Trice <wwtrice[at]paragondynamics.com> wrote: - quote - > > Assuming your tax bracket stays the same, pre-tax and after-tax will be
It is true, because in the after-tax situation you pay tax on the> > the exact same. > For a 401(k) this isn't true. The pre-tax will end up with more money > than the after-tax. This is because the amount you pay in tax up front > does not get to grow in the after-tax account. growth as well. Say you earn 100 bucks. You pay the tax 20%, invest in the 401K for 20 years, doubling your money, so you have $160 bucks. In the post tax situation you get the 100 bucks, invest it for 20 years doubling your money (you now have 200), now you pay the 20% tax, which leaves you with $160. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Assuming your tax bracket stays the same, pre-tax and after-tax will be
For a 401(k) this isn't true. The pre-tax will end up with more money> the exact same. than the after-tax. This is because the amount you pay in tax up front does not get to grow in the after-tax account. -Will |
| | |||
| |||
| s o wrote: - quote - > If I withdraw
Assuming your tax bracket stays the same, pre-tax and after-tax will be> under careful planning in my retirement years as not to put me in a > higher bracket than I'm in now. In this case, pre-tax or after tax is > pretty much just a wash, am I right? unless I reinvest the tax savings > each year, otherwise might as well take the hit now? the exact same. However, the tax bracket after 30 years will most likely be different than it is now. Many experts predict that taxes will be higher in the next few decades. If you agree with them, then you should pay the tax now. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hi, I need to decide whether I should contribute to my 401k on a pre-tax or after tax basis. I'm 33 and in the 15% bracket now. I'm saving quitely aggresively. My monthly 401k plus ira contribution will total around $800. According to my spreadsheet, in 30 years with a return rate of 9% to 10%, I should have more than $1 million. If I withdraw under careful planning in my retirement years as not to put me in a higher bracket than I'm in now. In this case, pre-tax or after tax is pretty much just a wash, am I right? unless I reinvest the tax savings each year, otherwise might as well take the hit now? Can anyone tell me if I'm thinking in the right direction? what else should I consider when making this decision? Thanks. s o |
| Tags |
| 401k, contribution, pretax, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| 401k excess contribution refund HW \Skip\ Weldon: In early '05 my wife received a partial refund of '04 401k contributions because her company failed the anti-discrimination test. Per... | Taxes | 3 | 01-28-2006 03:40 AM | |
| 401k contribution file balance Tom: Ever since I upgraded to Money 2006 Deluxe from Money 2003. My 401k contributions are overdrawn each week after on-line updating, by $56.46. This... | Microsoft Money | 3 | 01-07-2006 09:30 PM | |
| 401K Married Contribution question Rob Use: Dumb question - can my wife and I BOTH contribute 13K to our 401K plans (26K total) this year, or can we only put in a combined 13K for maximum... | Taxes | 8 | 07-29-2004 09:06 AM | |
| 401k contribution limit-- does employer contribution count? Barney G: Does the matching contribution to my 401k by my employer count towards the $13,000 limit for 2004? I know it counts towards the 25% of salary... | Taxes | 4 | 02-24-2004 08:52 AM | |
| 401k contribution taxed at 10.69% sssmith: hi, I recently invested a lump sum payment from my employer into my 401k. This contribution was taxed 7.65% social security/medicare, plus... | Financial Planning | 6 | 12-24-2003 04:52 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |