|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Karen Younge wrote: - quote - > I've recently read a book called "Worry Free Investing" by Zvi Bodie and
Karen, yes that's right, there's a portion of the I-bond rate that's> Michael > Clowes. It's about investing using I-Bonds and/or TIPS. According to the book > I-Bonds have two interest rates, a fixed rate that applies for the entire life > of the bond, > and a rate derived from the CPI, to adjust for inflation. This latter rate is > the one that > is reset periodically (twice a year). > If the book is correct, it might at least theoretically be advantageous to cash > in old bonds > in order to buy new ones with a higher fixed rate. fixed and a portion that's variable - pegged to the inflation rate (change in the Consumer Price Index). If the fixed rate rises you might cash in/replace. From the OP's comment it sounded like he thought the entire rate on the bond was fixed, and that he'd need to change bonds whenever interest rates changed to get a benefit (not so). So far the fixed rate has been dropping since I-bonds were first issued and early ones are quite valuable as a low-risk investment. But of course the fixed rate could rebound in the future and as you said people would need to evaluate the rate difference vs. tax hit when contemplating a switch. [I think it's also possible savings bonds might someday go away, it's a costly way of raising money for the gov't.] BWS gave a pointer to the US gov site, that's a really good one that answers most questions about savings bonds. I've heard of but not read Bodie's book; he's a respected name in finance though that theory isn't exactly widely embraced. One thing I think the I/TIPS investor might Worry about is: "what if the government tells me inflation is 2% per year during a period that health care costs rise 10% a year and homes rise 12% a year, and proportionally more of my money goes into health care and housing than everything else combined?" To me CPI isn't necessarily relevant as a gauge of inflation; if your costs aren't distributed the way CPI assumes they are then relying on an investment pegged to it may not make sense. -Tad |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "Will Trice" <wwtrice[at]paragondynamics.com> wrote in message news:41D301A6.6040000[at]paragondynamics.com... - quote - > Tad Borek wrote:
Something like 97% of stable value business is in retirement accounts, which> > A money-market fund, or "stable value fund" or similar alternative > > offered through your 403b, would satisfy your requirement of zero > > fluctuation in value. [...] > Just as a side note, the Sunday paper here reported that most fund > companies will be shutting down their stable-value funds due to > increased scrutiny from regulators concerned with how the insurance > contract used by these funds affect the funds' net asset value. The > contracts can apparently mask price fluctuations. Of course, that's the > point, hence "stable-value fund". The article does not mention any > actual wrong-doing by fund companies, just that apparently the > regulatory hassle is not worth the amount of business generated. are not affected by the SEC inquiries, since they are already covered by other regulations. So I would not expect changes within the 403(b) plan. http://www.stablevalue.org/help/faq_mf.asp http://www.jordenburt.com/news-warchive-705.html -- Mark Freeland nBeOwXs[at]pacbell.net |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Tad Borek wrote: - quote - > A money-market fund, or "stable value fund" or similar alternative
Just as a side note, the Sunday paper here reported that most fund> offered through your 403b, would satisfy your requirement of zero > fluctuation in value. It'll pay interest at the current short-term > rates, resetting almost constantly. The earnings potential on that is > very limited, but you said you don't want the possibility of loss, so > you'd need to live with that. (You also that you don't want to discuss > that point, so I won't). companies will be shutting down their stable-value funds due to increased scrutiny from regulators concerned with how the insurance contract used by these funds affect the funds' net asset value. The contracts can apparently mask price fluctuations. Of course, that's the point, hence "stable-value fund". The article does not mention any actual wrong-doing by fund companies, just that apparently the regulatory hassle is not worth the amount of business generated. |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Karen Younge <karenyounge[at]earthlink.net> writes: - quote - > I've recently read a book called "Worry Free Investing" by Zvi Bodie
Yep. Better than the book, though, you might want to look> and Michael Clowes. It's about investing using I-Bonds and/or TIPS. > According to the book I-Bonds have two interest rates, a fixed rate > that applies for the entire life of the bond, and a rate derived > from the CPI, to adjust for inflation. This latter rate is the one > that is reset periodically (twice a year). at the treasury's own website about this, where they have actual and correct current numbers: http://www.savingsbonds.gov/indiv/pr...nds_glance.htm The combined current rate on iBonds issued today is 3.67%. That rate will be adjusted in April, when the new CPI is used to change the inflation-derived portion of the income. The fixed portion on iBonds issued today is a mere 1%. - quote - > If the book is correct, it might at least theoretically be
That's theoretically possible. At present, though, the> advantageous to cash in old bonds in order to buy new ones with a > higher fixed rate. fixed-portion is the lowest it's been since iBonds were first issued in 1998. The fixed-portion has been as high as 3.6% (wow - with 20-20 hindsight, what a deal! - toss in the inflation adjustment and those 2000-issued iBonds are a really attractive investment). Here's the history of the fixed rates: http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/sav/sbirate2.htm - quote - > However, since the taxes on the interest income are due the year you
As with so many things, it depends. It depends on how long> cash the bond, I'm guessing that by the time you pay the taxes and > forfeit three months of interest on any bonds less than 5 years old, > it would take a pretty big rise in the fixed rate to make cashing in > old bonds and buying new ones a profitable course of action. you've held the bonds (and, therefore, how much interest has accrued), it depends on your marginal tax rate and it depends on how much the fixed portion has increased. That all said, even at the current composite rate of 3.67%, if you buy them, hold for a year, cash them in and take the three-month penalty, you'll still have earned, after the penalty, approx. 2.8% with basically no risk, and exempt from state and local taxes. None of this, of course, helps out the original poster though. These cannot be bought in one's IRA, 401k, 403b or other retirement plan. OTOH, one advantage of most of those is the tax-deferral on the earnings and iBonds effectively get that *anyway*. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Tad Borek wrote: - quote - > (snip) ... you don't need to cash in I-bonds and buy new ones to benefit from
I've recently read a book called "Worry Free Investing" by Zvi Bodie and> the new rate; the rates on existing bonds reset periodically as rates change. Michael Clowes. It's about investing using I-Bonds and/or TIPS. According to the book I-Bonds have two interest rates, a fixed rate that applies for the entire life of the bond, and a rate derived from the CPI, to adjust for inflation. This latter rate is the one that is reset periodically (twice a year). If the book is correct, it might at least theoretically be advantageous to cash in old bonds in order to buy new ones with a higher fixed rate. However, since the taxes on the interest income are due the year you cash the bond, I'm guessing that by the time you pay the taxes and forfeit three months of interest on any bonds less than 5 years old, it would take a pretty big rise in the fixed rate to make cashing in old bonds and buying new ones a profitable course of action. Karen |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Brent D. Gardner, ChFC wrote: - quote - > <idontcheckthismailbox[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message
Thanks for the info. I called TIAA-CREF and from what they said it> news:1104256669.313196.234450[at]z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... > > I work for a non-profit, and my current employer's 403(b) plan only > > allows us to invest with either Fidelity or TIAA-CREF. For various > > reasons that I won't go into, I would like to get my 403(b) money out > > of mutual funds and into something paying fixed interest, like I-bonds. > > Is there any way to do this myself, or force my employer to offer > > I-bonds as an alternative option in the 403(b) plan? > TIAA-CREF has fixed accounts -- have you looked at those? Fido has them, > too, if they are making their TSA available to you. > I-bonds are not taxable at the state and local levels, so I doubt that you > can put them in a quailfied plan of any kind. Okay, I just looked, and I see > no QP/IRA ownership provisions from the Treasury Direct web site. > Fixed accounts in many competitive annuities are currently higher than I > bonds, although TIAA-CREF isn't one of the most competitive in this area (I > was suprised to see how low they are right now). No volatility, no fees, and > they are actually part of the law that created the very accounts you're > talking about. > Brent D. Gardner, ChFC sounds like their Supplemental Retirement Annuity may meet my needs. I will have to research the fine print to make sure. Andy ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Please trim the post to which you are responding. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Andy wrote: - quote - > See, thats the thing: I don't want to be in any mutual funds. I don't
Andy,> want to pay the fees/loads, and I don't want investments that > "fluctuate in value." The problem with bond mutual funds is that they > lose value if interest rates rise. > I want to put my 403(b) money in something that reliably grows in value > according to a mathematical formula, and to me I-bonds are ideal. If my > money is in I-bonds and interest rates go up I only lose 3 months > interest if I cash them in and buy new I-bonds at the new higher rate. > Andy I-bonds (and savings bonds generally) are somewhat unique that way, they aren't "tradeable," so they don't fluctuate in value. They just go up, as interest posts. So if that's really what you're looking for, your options are going to be limited, because not many investments are like that. A money-market fund, or "stable value fund" or similar alternative offered through your 403b, would satisfy your requirement of zero fluctuation in value. It'll pay interest at the current short-term rates, resetting almost constantly. The earnings potential on that is very limited, but you said you don't want the possibility of loss, so you'd need to live with that. (You also that you don't want to discuss that point, so I won't). You may be a candidate for a variable annuity, there may be some offered through your 403b. Many come with some sort of principal protection, which sets you whole if the fluctuation in value works against you. The net result would be similar. But you also said you don't want to pay fees/loads so I guess you might see some issues with that approach. If a 0.5% annual management fee on a mutual fund is a problem then VA costs are going to look too high to you. Couple random points...you're right that bonds lose value when interest rates rise, those are opposite sides of the same coin. But with short-term bonds and bond funds your potential losses are quite limited. A short-term bond fund might be "good enough" for you (in effect a money-market fund is a very, very, short term bond fund). Also: you don't need to cash in I-bonds and buy new ones to benefit from the new rate; the rates on existing bonds reset periodically as rates change. -Tad |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| <idontcheckthismailbox[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1104256669.313196.234450[at]z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... - quote - > I work for a non-profit, and my current employer's 403(b) plan only
TIAA-CREF has fixed accounts -- have you looked at those? Fido has them,> allows us to invest with either Fidelity or TIAA-CREF. For various > reasons that I won't go into, I would like to get my 403(b) money out > of mutual funds and into something paying fixed interest, like I-bonds. > Is there any way to do this myself, or force my employer to offer > I-bonds as an alternative option in the 403(b) plan? too, if they are making their TSA available to you. I-bonds are not taxable at the state and local levels, so I doubt that you can put them in a quailfied plan of any kind. Okay, I just looked, and I see no QP/IRA ownership provisions from the Treasury Direct web site. Fixed accounts in many competitive annuities are currently higher than I bonds, although TIAA-CREF isn't one of the most competitive in this area (I was suprised to see how low they are right now). No volatility, no fees, and they are actually part of the law that created the very accounts you're talking about. Brent D. Gardner, ChFC Chartered Financial Consultant http://members.cox.net/brentdgardner1378/ http://www.topgunproducers.com/ http://forum.topgunproducers.com/ Si vis pacem para bellum! "Be ever questioning. Ignorance is not bliss. It is oblivion. You don't go to heaven if you die dumb. Become better informed. Learn from other's mistakes. You could not live long enough to make them all yourself." - Hyman George Rickover (1900-86), Admiral, US Navy, advocated development of nuclear subs & ships The Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) and Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC), designations owned and exclusively offered by The American College, signify the highest standards of academic study and professional excellence in the financial services industry. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| TB wrote: - quote - > idontcheckthismailbox[at]yahoo.com wrote:
See, thats the thing: I don't want to be in any mutual funds. I don't> > I work for a non-profit, and my current employer's 403(b) plan only > > allows us to invest with either Fidelity or TIAA-CREF. For various > > reasons that I won't go into, I would like to get my 403(b) money out > > of mutual funds and into something paying fixed interest, like I-bonds. > > Is there any way to do this myself, or force my employer to offer > > I-bonds as an alternative option in the 403(b) plan? > Fidelity has a mutual fund that invests mostly in TIPS, can you buy that > in the 403b? TIPS are similar to I-bonds, though they fluctuate in value > (I-bonds don't). Ticker is FINPX, Fidelity Inflation Protected Bond > Fund. If inflation protection isn't what you're looking for then you > might consider a short-term bond fund or whatever similar alternative > you can get in the plan. > -Tad want to pay the fees/loads, and I don't want investments that "fluctuate in value." The problem with bond mutual funds is that they lose value if interest rates rise. I want to put my 403(b) money in something that reliably grows in value according to a mathematical formula, and to me I-bonds are ideal. If my money is in I-bonds and interest rates go up I only lose 3 months interest if I cash them in and buy new I-bonds at the new higher rate. Andy |
| | |||
| |||
| idontcheckthismailbox[at]yahoo.com wrote: - quote - > I work for a non-profit, and my current employer's 403(b) plan only
Fidelity has a mutual fund that invests mostly in TIPS, can you buy that> allows us to invest with either Fidelity or TIAA-CREF. For various > reasons that I won't go into, I would like to get my 403(b) money out > of mutual funds and into something paying fixed interest, like I-bonds. > Is there any way to do this myself, or force my employer to offer > I-bonds as an alternative option in the 403(b) plan? in the 403b? TIPS are similar to I-bonds, though they fluctuate in value (I-bonds don't). Ticker is FINPX, Fidelity Inflation Protected Bond Fund. If inflation protection isn't what you're looking for then you might consider a short-term bond fund or whatever similar alternative you can get in the plan. -Tad |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I work for a non-profit, and my current employer's 403(b) plan only allows us to invest with either Fidelity or TIAA-CREF. For various reasons that I won't go into, I would like to get my 403(b) money out of mutual funds and into something paying fixed interest, like I-bonds. Is there any way to do this myself, or force my employer to offer I-bonds as an alternative option in the 403(b) plan? Please don't write back about asset allocation principles, etc. I just want to know if what I want can be done. Thanks, Andy |
| Tags |
| 403b, ibonds, money, put |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| How to handle US Savings Bonds in MS Money? Matt: Hello, I recently purchased some I Series US Savings Bonds. What is the best way to account for them within MS Money 2005? I have a couple of... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 11-16-2005 12:21 PM | |
| MS Money and Savings Bonds Billy J: Ok Microsoft, People have been posting for YEARS that Money doesn't handle savings bonds well, or should I really say AT ALL... People have... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 11-13-2005 12:25 PM | |
| tracking bonds in money 2004 ms: When I put in the bonds, price, etc, it has market value of 1% of the real value, i.e, 25.00 bond, value is .25 pls help | Microsoft Money | 1 | 02-02-2004 02:53 AM | |
| Money 2002 Standard - inputting bonds Cynthia: I have about 65 bonds to enter, help says that after I name it bonds I should say I will add investments now and then a choice should come up that... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 10-13-2003 03:39 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |