|
#10
| |||
| |||
| Brent D. Gardner, ChFC wrote: - quote - > "Arnie Goetchius" <arnie.goetchius[at]att.net> wrote in message
Can you not tell me what happened in the past, 1988 to 1992?> news:G2Qnd.41737$7i4.27452[at]bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... > > For example, Long term interest rates (30 Year Treasury > > Note)in 1988-1992 were around 8%. What kind of guaranteed interest rates > > were being offered by the carriers at that time? > If we could predict the future, do you think we'd tell you for free? =) |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| "Arnie Goetchius" <arnie.goetchius[at]att.net> wrote in message news:G2Qnd.41737$7i4.27452[at]bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > I am not asking about "Most Immediate Annuities available today". I am
If we could predict the future, do you think we'd tell you for free? =)> asking about what annuities might be available in the future and what > Guaranteed Interest rate would be if the long term interest rate at that > time was 7%. For example, Long term interest rates (30 Year Treasury > Note)in 1988-1992 were around 8%. What kind of guaranteed interest rates > were being offered by the carriers at that time? Nobody knows what interest rates will be in the future, much less what mortality and expenses will be, and how product innovations will change the annuity landscape. Brent D. Gardner, ChFC Chartered Financial Consultant http://members.cox.net/brentdgardner1378/ Si vis pacem para bellum! "Be ever questioning. Ignorance is not bliss. It is oblivion. You don't go to heaven if you die dumb. Become better informed. Learn from other's mistakes. You could not live long enough to make them all yourself." - Hyman George Rickover (1900-86), Admiral, US Navy, advocated development of nuclear subs & ships The Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) and Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC), designations owned and exclusively offered by The American College, signify the highest standards of academic study and professional excellence in the financial services industry. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I too understand your basic question, but you seem to overlook the fact that
I am not asking any company to provide an annuity based on a 7% Interest> YOU are utilizing a 7% Interest Rate. There are not too many companies > around today that would be willing to offer such a contract. Rate when today's interest rate is only 4.85% - quote - > In the event that you were to anuitize in 2007 at age 65, you are asking a carrier
I am definitely not asking a carrier to commit to 7% for the balance of> to committ to 7% for the balance of your life............................ my life when today's rate is much lower. What I'm trying to find out is what the carriers would commit to if interest rates were substantially higher then they are today. - quote - > Most Immediate Annuities available today, offer a much LOWER Guarranteed
I am not asking about "Most Immediate Annuities available today". I am> Interest rate, along with a possible additional "Current Interest Rate", which > only applies to the then "current year". > Cal Lester CLU asking about what annuities might be available in the future and what Guaranteed Interest rate would be if the long term interest rate at that time was 7%. For example, Long term interest rates (30 Year Treasury Note)in 1988-1992 were around 8%. What kind of guaranteed interest rates were being offered by the carriers at that time? |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I don't need a great deal of precison here. I'm basically trying to
I too understand your basic question, but you seem to overlook the fact that> get a rough estimate of what an immediate annuity would pay based on > $100,000 single pay premium in the year 2007 at age 65 and a long term > interest rate of 7% at that time. About $850 seems to be the answer. > ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: > Please trim the post to which you are responding. YOU are utilizing a 7% Interest Rate. There are not too many companies around today that would be willing to offer such a contract. In the event that you were to anuitize in 2007 at age 65, you are asking a carrier to committ to 7% for the balance of your life............................ Most Immediate Annuities available today, offer a much LOWER Guarranteed Interest rate, along with a possible additional "Current Interest Rate", which only applies to the then "current year". Cal Lester CLU |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| beliavsky[at]aol.com wrote: - quote - > Arnie Goetchius <arnie.goetchius[at]att.net> wrote in message news:<cNpnd.936000$Gx4.807757[at]bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> ...
Okay, that makes sense. The OP said that the impact would be such that> > If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at > > > http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ > > > and enter > > > age 65 > > gender male > > single premium 100,000 > > > I get a result that says $654 monthly income. > > > I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% > > for long term interest rates in part of its calculation. > > > If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, can > > I assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar > > amount, ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead of > > $654? > The monthly payments on NEW annuity policies that you would receive on > a lump sum would rise if interest rates rose, but LESS than > proportionally. This is because the payments an annuitant receives > effectively come from > (1) return of capital > (2) investment income > and component (1) depends largely on the longevity tables. > Suppose interest rates were zero. There could still exist immediate > annuities with positive payouts on a lump sum, because people don't > live forever. > The lower the life expectancy of the prospective annuitant, the less > sensitive annuity payments are to interest rates, on a proportional > basis. instead of 954, it would more likely 654 + 200 = $854. This would represent an 30% increase in the monthly payment, not the 44% implied by the interest rate increase alone. The implied formula appears to be for age 65, multiply the change in interest rate by 70% and apply the result to what the calculator says for today's long term interest rate. I don't need a great deal of precison here. I'm basically trying to get a rough estimate of what an immediate annuity would pay based on $100,000 single pay premium in the year 2007 at age 65 and a long term interest rate of 7% at that time. About $850 seems to be the answer. ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Please trim the post to which you are responding. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Arnie Goetchius <arnie.goetchius[at]att.net> wrote in message news:<cNpnd.936000$Gx4.807757[at]bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net> ... - quote - > If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at
The monthly payments on NEW annuity policies that you would receive on> http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ > and enter > age 65 > gender male > single premium 100,000 > I get a result that says $654 monthly income. > I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% > for long term interest rates in part of its calculation. > If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, can > I assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar > amount, ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead of > $654? a lump sum would rise if interest rates rose, but LESS than proportionally. This is because the payments an annuitant receives effectively come from (1) return of capital (2) investment income and component (1) depends largely on the longevity tables. Suppose interest rates were zero. There could still exist immediate annuities with positive payouts on a lump sum, because people don't live forever. The lower the life expectancy of the prospective annuitant, the less sensitive annuity payments are to interest rates, on a proportional basis. |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Arnie Goetchius <arnie.goetchius[at]att.net> wrote: - quote - > If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at
The annuity consumes capital each year, so a 2% higher interest would> http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ > and enter > age 65 > gender male > single premium 100,000 > I get a result that says $654 monthly income. > I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% > for long term interest rates in part of its calculation. > If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, can > I assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar > amount, ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead of > $654? > Or am I missing something? add about $200 per month. -- Ron |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Arnie Goetchius" <arnie.goetchius[at]att.net> wrote in message news:cNpnd.936000$Gx4.807757[at]bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... - quote - > If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at
Every company's quotes will be based on their expected mortality, expected> http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ > and enter > age 65 > gender male > single premium 100,000 > I get a result that says $654 monthly income. > I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% for > long term interest rates in part of its calculation. > If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, can I > assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar amount, > ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead of $654? > Or am I missing something? expenses, and expected return (often current). There are immediate variable annuities where the payments can increase (or decrease) as the markets fluctuate over time. Brent D. Gardner, ChFC Chartered Financial Consultant http://members.cox.net/brentdgardner1378/ Si vis pacem para bellum! "Be ever questioning. Ignorance is not bliss. It is oblivion. You don't go to heaven if you die dumb. Become better informed. Learn from other's mistakes. You could not live long enough to make them all yourself." - Hyman George Rickover (1900-86), Admiral, US Navy, advocated development of nuclear subs & ships The Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) and Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC), designations owned and exclusively offered by The American College, signify the highest standards of academic study and professional excellence in the financial services industry. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| A calculator is a calculator, NOTHING more. What ever numbers are put into it, will produce the desired result. G.I.G.O. If your question is will my INCOME go up IF the interest rates go up, then the answer to that riddle would only be found IN the contract. In most cases, the answer would be NO. The income that you would normally receive is based upon "projections" made by the actuarial staff. They normally would take into consideration fluctuations in rates in their calculations. Cal Lester CLU Arnie Goetchius wrote: - quote - > If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at > http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ > and enter > age 65 > gender male > single premium 100,000 > I get a result that says $654 monthly income. > I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% > for long term interest rates in part of its calculation. > If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, > can I assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar > amount, ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead > of $654? > Or am I missing something? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Tad Borek wrote: - quote - > Arnie Goetchius wrote:
That's what I'm interested in - newly issued contracts.> > If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at > > > http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ > > > I get a result that says $654 monthly income. > > > I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% > > for long term interest rates in part of its calculation. > > > If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, > > can I assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar > > amount, ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead > > of $654? > Arnie, > You've essentially reverse-engineered an immediate (fixed) annuity. > Nothing magic to it really...an IA is secured with fixed income > investments purchased by the company issuing the contract. So you'll see > a correlation between the effective rate of the annuity and the current > interest rates. > Should interest rates rise then the payout would rise for newly-issued > contracts (and vice versa). But not for an existing fixed annuity, - quote - > that's why they're called "fixed" annuities.
Right. Understood.- quote - > -Tad
Thanks for responding. |
| | |||
| |||
| Arnie Goetchius wrote: - quote - > If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at
Arnie,> http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ > I get a result that says $654 monthly income. > I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% > for long term interest rates in part of its calculation. > If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, can > I assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar > amount, ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead of > $654? You've essentially reverse-engineered an immediate (fixed) annuity. Nothing magic to it really...an IA is secured with fixed income investments purchased by the company issuing the contract. So you'll see a correlation between the effective rate of the annuity and the current interest rates. Should interest rates rise then the payout would rise for newly-issued contracts (and vice versa). But not for an existing fixed annuity, that's why they're called "fixed" annuities. -Tad |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| If I go to an immediate annuity calculator such as the one at http://www.totalreturnannuities.com/ and enter age 65 gender male single premium 100,000 I get a result that says $654 monthly income. I assume that the calculator is using the current rate of about 4.85% for long term interest rates in part of its calculation. If in the future, the long term interest went up to, for example 7%, can I assume that the calculator's result would increase by a similar amount, ie. 44% and the monthly payment would show about $942 instead of $654? Or am I missing something? |
| Tags |
| annuity, income, interest, long, rates, relation, term |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Long Term Gain -- Determining Base Price (May not be the correct term) Patrick: Greetings, (1) In 6/2003, my daughter bought 2 acres or rural land thinking she was going to build on it-- and then sold it in 6/2005 for a... | Taxes | 2 | 02-15-2006 03:38 PM | |
| short-term or long-term, gain or loss? NetComm888: Suppose I bought 100 shares of stock ABC on 8/1/03 (@ $16/shr) and then later I bought another 100 shares on 3/1/04 (@ $12/shr). Now I decide to... | Financial Planning | 1 | 11-19-2004 01:25 PM | |
| Will Long-term stock loss lower AMT income? Lovefreak: Does anyone know if a long-term capital loss (from stock) is accepted as a deduction when calculating your income for AMT purposes? I think I'm... | Taxes | 2 | 12-29-2003 12:56 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |