|
#6
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > I have $$$ in many different places, all of which would need to
It's been my experience that there are quite a few people approaching> be considered in arriving at an overall assessment of my situation. retirement who have been good about SAVING money, but clueless about INVESTING it. So over the years, they put money into all kinds of different products without ever stepping back and looking at the big picture. It amazes me how many people have a seven-figure net worth, but who don't know even the basics of their asset allocation. I suppose these people are better off than those who spend 125 percent of what they earn and borrow the difference. But when retirment approaches, these "clueless career savers" are susceptible to the blandishments of all manner of con artists who are just trying to make a buck off them. I STRONGLY urge the original poster to put together a spread sheet showing all of his liquid assets and to calculate his asset allocation. He should also figure out his non-liquid assets, such as life insurance, equity in real estate and defined-benefit plan payments. Unless he collects all this information, he won't be able to ask intelligent questions and he will be easy prey for less than scrupulous people in the financial services industry. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks to all for your comments. I dug a little farther into the website, and have come to the same conclusion as most of you have -- at least according to the sample report, it appears to not be very detailed. -- At least no more detailed than what I've already come up on my own. As for the suggestion to provide more information about my own situation here, I appreciate the offer for help, but asking for advice here on my detailed financial situation is a bit too much to ask. (I have $$$ in many different places, all of which would need to be considered in arriving at an overall assessment of my situation.) So, I'll try to narrow down my main questions to some critical specifics and will eventually post them in separate threads. Thanks to all for your thoughts on this. TB wrote: - quote - > BRH wrote: > > I've always done my own investing and retirement projections using > > various software products. However, as I'm now within about 3 years of > > retirement, I've been looking to have my projections "sanity-checked". > > All of the financial planners I've looked into either want to control my > > finances by pushing their own products or their fees have been higher > > than what I'm comfortable with. > > > Yesterday, I came across this website: http://www.retirement-4-u.com/ > > > Has anyone here had any experience with their services? I'm considering > > using their "Retirement Validation Plan" service. > BRH- > I just skimmed their site, hadn't heard of them. Somehow I got to a > sample 10-year plan which costs $299. > In its summary of the investments it shows as categories: "stocks, > bonds, 401k, mutual funds and savings," with a percentage by each one. > It then says "We would suggest a more aggressive portfolio to realize a > greater return for your investments. Your gain the first year alone > would be $5350" and then it shows a pie chart with different percentages > by each of those same categories. > I hope that has you smacking your forehead because yes it suggests there > may be some problems with the methodology of the black box. To me it's > enough to conclude that the plan is at least $299 overpriced. > Also: the firm isn't registered as an advisor and as such can't provide > investment recommendations, if that's what you're interested in. And I > don't know how you can analyze a retirement plan without making > investment recommendations (disclosure: I'm an advisor). > My suggestion is to either embrace the self-directed approach, as John > says, or to pry open your wallet and be willing to spend a little more > for a professional opinion. Or, try posting some more info, you'll get > some feedback here. > -Tad |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "BRH [at]comcast.net> " <"bhoenig<no-spam> wrote in message news:41863209.F7180D11[at]comcast.net... - quote - > I've always done my own investing and retirement projections using
I do suggest you see a tax agent and a accountant. Tax planning is crucial> various software products. However, as I'm now within about 3 years of > retirement, I've been looking to have my projections "sanity-checked". > All of the financial planners I've looked into either want to control my > finances by pushing their own products or their fees have been higher > than what I'm comfortable with. > Yesterday, I came across this website: http://www.retirement-4-u.com/ > Has anyone here had any experience with their services? I'm considering > using their "Retirement Validation Plan" service. > Thanks! in retirement. And with 3 years to go now is the time to make sure everything is in place. Just remember you will have a lot of good years left to enjoy retirement. So keep doing what you are doing and in three years you will have plenty of extra hours in the day to help you with your planning and investing. I would really love to say to see a financial planner (like you did) because they are supposed to be the expert in working this sort of problem out. Although I like you have never met one that I did not think was biased to plans that gave him the most commission. Never change to products they are pushing. After pull out fees and commissions and ongoing fees and joining fees, it is not worth the trouble and expense. For example one product a financial planner tried to get me to use. He suggested I pull out of the one I'm in now, as his one returned more the previous year. I worked out all the fees and it was going to take me over 2 years to break even. And over the last couple of years my product has out performed his suggestion by a minimum of 6% a year. I will suggest you start to take a low risk view of your investment and not have more than 10-20% of your retirement money in high risk areas. And try to get more income producing investments With a good yield. If you believe you have enough for retirement which will give you a income for the next 25 years or so. And taken the following into account, I don't think you have anything to worry about. For eg if you want to live on $20,000 a year do you have enough to give you this return a year? Have you thought about inflation? because in 20 years you will need $36,000 a year. Eg year 1 $400,000 x 5% return = $20,000 Living expenses Each year with expenses getting you will need more money to live, so $400,000 will not be enough and you will start cutting into your capital. So you will need to also be reinvesting some money so you may need at least another $30,000. If however your plan to draw on you capital have example draw $10,000 off your capital and use $10,000 investment income or pension. have you taken into account each year you will have to take more off the capital and you will receive less income every year. So you will need to make and reinvest at least have taken |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| BRH wrote: - quote - > I've always done my own investing and retirement projections using
BRH-> various software products. However, as I'm now within about 3 years of > retirement, I've been looking to have my projections "sanity-checked". > All of the financial planners I've looked into either want to control my > finances by pushing their own products or their fees have been higher > than what I'm comfortable with. > Yesterday, I came across this website: http://www.retirement-4-u.com/ > Has anyone here had any experience with their services? I'm considering > using their "Retirement Validation Plan" service. I just skimmed their site, hadn't heard of them. Somehow I got to a sample 10-year plan which costs $299. In its summary of the investments it shows as categories: "stocks, bonds, 401k, mutual funds and savings," with a percentage by each one. It then says "We would suggest a more aggressive portfolio to realize a greater return for your investments. Your gain the first year alone would be $5350" and then it shows a pie chart with different percentages by each of those same categories. I hope that has you smacking your forehead because yes it suggests there may be some problems with the methodology of the black box. To me it's enough to conclude that the plan is at least $299 overpriced. Also: the firm isn't registered as an advisor and as such can't provide investment recommendations, if that's what you're interested in. And I don't know how you can analyze a retirement plan without making investment recommendations (disclosure: I'm an advisor). My suggestion is to either embrace the self-directed approach, as John says, or to pry open your wallet and be willing to spend a little more for a professional opinion. Or, try posting some more info, you'll get some feedback here. -Tad |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "BRH [at]comcast.net> " <"bhoenig<no-spam> wrote in message news:41863209.F7180D11[at]comcast.net... - quote - > I've always done my own investing and retirement projections using
You need to do things like estimate what your net worth is, what kind of> various software products. However, as I'm now within about 3 years of > retirement, I've been looking to have my projections "sanity-checked". > All of the financial planners I've looked into either want to control my > finances by pushing their own products or their fees have been higher > than what I'm comfortable with. investments you want to be in, how many years you plan on being retired, and what you expect your expenses will be. Without that information it's hard for anyone here to give you a "sanity check." -- Robert J. Romano, CPA Arlington, MA |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "John A. Weeks III" wrote: - quote - > Why don't you take control of your own finances? Nobody cares as
I agree. That's why I've been doing my own investing and projecting.> much about your money as you do. - quote - > So, lets say you find out that you are doing everything possible
First, I don't expect that I've _everything_ wrong, but perhaps a few things.> wrong. How much can you fix with only 3 years left? Personally, > I'd save the money on the plan and buy a few books, and learn to > do it myself. Even the Suze Orman books are better than paying > hundreds or thousands on a plan, when the plan is most likely just > a sales tool to try to suck you into their next level of the program. (Hopefully not.) I just want to retire in 3 years and be sure that I haven't overlooked anything in my planning. Believe me, I've read LOTS of books about retirement -- both financial and non-financial. Unfortunately, not all are consistent with one another. (One that comes to mind that cast some doubt on me was "The Retirement Savings Time Bomb" by Ed Slott). Thanks for your thoughts. |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <41863209.F7180D11[at]comcast.net> , BRH <no-spam> "[at]comcast.netwrote: - quote - > I've always done my own investing and retirement projections using
Why don't you take control of your own finances? Nobody cares as> various software products. However, as I'm now within about 3 years of > retirement, I've been looking to have my projections "sanity-checked". > All of the financial planners I've looked into either want to control my > finances by pushing their own products or their fees have been higher > than what I'm comfortable with. much about your money as you do. - quote - > Has anyone here had any experience with their services? I'm considering
So, lets say you find out that you are doing everything possible> using their "Retirement Validation Plan" service. wrong. How much can you fix with only 3 years left? Personally, I'd save the money on the plan and buy a few books, and learn to do it myself. Even the Suze Orman books are better than paying hundreds or thousands on a plan, when the plan is most likely just a sales tool to try to suck you into their next level of the program. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I've always done my own investing and retirement projections using various software products. However, as I'm now within about 3 years of retirement, I've been looking to have my projections "sanity-checked". All of the financial planners I've looked into either want to control my finances by pushing their own products or their fees have been higher than what I'm comfortable with. Yesterday, I came across this website: http://www.retirement-4-u.com/ Has anyone here had any experience with their services? I'm considering using their "Retirement Validation Plan" service. Thanks! |
| Tags |
| advice, planning, retirement |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Financial planning advice needed Panache: Hi, I am a recent graduate and have got a job recently. Like most people, I am just entering a world from having no money to having some left at... | Financial Planning | 15 | 06-25-2004 04:40 PM | |
| Comments on retirement planning Dick Adams: No nursing home for me! I'm checking into the Holiday Inn. With the average daily cost for a nursing home reaching $188.00, there is a better... | Taxes | 4 | 03-06-2004 08:33 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |