|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "LKYPon" <lkypon[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:20041005204300.11769.00001866[at]mb-m29.aol.com... - quote - > Here's the fact pattern:
I must admit that I agree with many of the responses posted. You are better> Son is 50 years old and has lived with his parents his whole life. Both > parents are deceased and he is still living in the house. He can't hold onto a > job. He is actually a very smart guy, just can't keep a job. > He has mortgaged this house to cover his expenses and currently paying 14% > interest on the mortgage. > His sister is bailing him out and refinancing the house at a reasonable rate. > She wants to sell the house in 2 years, hoping the brother will clean up the > house so it can be sold. > I don't expect him to change. Therefore, in 2 years I expect this house will > still be a mess. > What would you advise? > Sell the house now and let the brother go homeless? The sister seems obligated > to help this guy out, but he's not doing anything to improve himself. > Believe it or not, I've seen this fact pattern a few times already. It's been > really tough. I don't know what to do. > Cheers, > Larry off staying out of this is if you can. If you can't I'd suggest you start with a written letter to the Sister about the obvious pitfalls she is setting herself up for, otherwise you may find yourself caught between a rock and a malpractice attorney because you assumed some level of liability by offering advice in an area you are not qualified in. And recommend - IN WRITING - that Sis talk to an attorney before you she do anything. There are some other issues here that I fear could come up and bite someone on the backside. You said Son owns the house but Sister is taking title. If no money is changing hands between Brother and Sister there may be a gift tax issue involved. Who will be making the new mortgage payments? I know who will be responsible (Sis) but if Brother can't work enough to pay his own expenses how will he pay his expenses AND make the mortgage payment? This is a recipe for disaster as it looks right now. Sister is setting herself up for big problems. She is going to be stuck with a house payment that she can't make, her brother for a tenant who can't pay his own bills, a possible gift tax issue, and a brother whose situation is not improving. Besides, if brother has to go into a facility someone will expect him to pay and if they find out that he transferred a house for no consideration to a family member don't be surprised if they go after the house and assert that the transfer was a sham. The only real way out of this I see is if Sister is RICH - literally rolling in the dough. If that is the case, by all means let her support her brother if that is what she wants to do - but I wouldn't let it pass without a writing from you advising her of the seriousness of her situation. And since you posted in this forum and said Sister is a client of yours I'm assuming you are an RR or IAR of some kind. If so, you may want to check with your compliance officer about this before you do much more. Good luck, Gene E. Utterback, EA |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| lkypon[at]aol.com (LKYPon) writes: - quote - > > Who actually owns the house?
If the son owns the house, the sister can't kick him> Currently the son has title to the house. > The sister is taking title to the house and refinancing to pay off > his debt and get a better rate than 14%. out either now or in two years. If he's giving the house to her, she can, even if he only gave it to her so that she could refinance it. If she owns it and is responsible for the mortgage, that's only reasonable. - quote - > The son got the house since he was living there and the daughter got
So he's screwed himself up pretty well. It seems> the rental property. They were pretty much equal in value. to me that he's going to lose the house either way - rather than play the game of transferring it to the sister and refinancing and then selling it in two years, he might consider selling now an dmoving into a place he can actually afford, perhaps a rental or a house which is cheap enough that it could be purchased outright with the proceeds of the sale of this house. I don't see why the sister is getting involved in anything but an advisory role and, frankly, can only see disaster coming of her financial involvement. - quote - > He's got some mental disorder, but refuses to get help. He's a
Sounds like he's got a real problem.> major pack rat. The house is full of junk, plus a storage locker > full of stuff. > He refuses to dump or sell his stuff. - quote - > Maybe the sister should let him be homeless since he blew his inheritance.
Maybe he will end up that way regardless of what shedoes. I'd hate to see her allow his problems start sucking away at her future and financial life. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| LKYPon wrote: - quote - > I fully agree with your comments. The sister is my client and the dad was my
Larry,> client before he passed away. > Unfortunately, we can't find an influential person to get the son in order. > He's a really bright guy that can't hold a job. He went to MIT and used to be > a computer programmer before he got off track. > I think he's going to have to be homeless to get his act together. Being homeless isn't generally regarded as one of the better cures for mental illness. And that really sounds like a possibility here. I've actually known a few people over the years that more or less match the description you've given...when they didn't have the right medications. When they did, they were brilliant, held down very good jobs, had normal relationships, etc. Bad brain chemistry, that's all it is sometimes. Rather than "curing him", sending him on the street could well doom him to a cardboard box. You might instead raise the issue with the sister and provide a list of local mental health resources. They might find out he's just a lazy bum, but until that point suggesting that he "be homeless to get his act together" is cruel. Pretend he's diabetic & it's insulin - would being homeless cure diabetes? -Tad |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Who actually owns the house?
Currently the son has title to the house.The sister is taking title to the house and refinancing to pay off his debt and get a better rate than 14%. - quote - > What were the arrangements the parents left in their estate planning?
The son got the house since he was living there and the daughter got the rentalproperty. They were pretty much equal in value. - quote - > Why can't he hold a job?
He is very smart, but can't hold a job. He claims he can only do one thing aday. He says he has sleep apnea. He's got some mental disorder, but refuses to get help. He's a major pack rat. The house is full of junk, plus a storage locker full of stuff. He refuses to dump or sell his stuff. I told him to take his stuff to Auction Drop (you can drop stuff off at the closes UPS Store) and let them sell the stuff on EBay. He's got some interesting collectibles. - quote - > What would substitute housing cost? Maybe a cardboard box downtown. Maybe the sister should let him be homeless since he blew his inheritance. Larry |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| John, I fully agree with your comments. The sister is my client and the dad was my client before he passed away. Unfortunately, we can't find an influential person to get the son in order. He's a really bright guy that can't hold a job. He went to MIT and used to be a computer programmer before he got off track. I think he's going to have to be homeless to get his act together. Larry |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| In article <20041005204300.11769.00001866[at]mb-m29.aol.com> , LKYPon <lkypon[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Son is 50 years old and has lived with his parents his whole life. Both
What is your role in this, Larry? Unless you are a brother, my> parents are deceased and he is still living in the house. He can't hold onto > a > job. He is actually a very smart guy, just can't keep a job. > He has mortgaged this house to cover his expenses and currently paying 14% > interest on the mortgage. > His sister is bailing him out and refinancing the house at a reasonable rate. > She wants to sell the house in 2 years, hoping the brother will clean up the > house so it can be sold. > I don't expect him to change. Therefore, in 2 years I expect this house will > still be a mess. > What would you advise? advice would be to butt-out. First off, the son is nutty. He has squandered his inheritance, and must have toasted his credit to have a 14% loan. Next, the sister is nutty. She is enabling this behavior by bailing out the nutty son. All this does is allow the bad behavior to continue. There is no role in this for you, Larry, so just keep your distance, and let the kids behave as they will. What should have happened is a formal probate and closing of the parents estate. As part of this estate process, the house should have been sold and money distributed to the kids. If one of the kids wanted to buy the house at that time, then a deal should have been formalized in writing and recorded at the county court house. Since they failed to do all of this, they now have a big mess. You don't need this mess, Larry, and all you are going to do is end up being the target of their anger when this thing blows up. You cannot change history, and you certainly cannot make these children grow up overnight. They need a priest or a psychologist, not a financial wizard. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
| | |||
| |||
| Who actually owns the house? What were the arrangements the parents left in their estate planning? Why can't he hold a job? What would substitute housing cost? "LKYPon" <lkypon[at]aol.com> wrote in message news:20041005204300.11769.00001866[at]mb-m29.aol.com... - quote - > Here's the fact pattern: > Son is 50 years old and has lived with his parents his whole life. Both > parents are deceased and he is still living in the house. He can't hold > onto a > job. He is actually a very smart guy, just can't keep a job. > He has mortgaged this house to cover his expenses and currently paying 14% > interest on the mortgage. > His sister is bailing him out and refinancing the house at a reasonable > rate. > She wants to sell the house in 2 years, hoping the brother will clean up > the > house so it can be sold. > I don't expect him to change. Therefore, in 2 years I expect this house > will > still be a mess. > What would you advise? > Sell the house now and let the brother go homeless? The sister seems > obligated > to help this guy out, but he's not doing anything to improve himself. > Believe it or not, I've seen this fact pattern a few times already. It's > been > really tough. I don't know what to do. > Cheers, > Larry |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Here's the fact pattern: Son is 50 years old and has lived with his parents his whole life. Both parents are deceased and he is still living in the house. He can't hold onto a job. He is actually a very smart guy, just can't keep a job. He has mortgaged this house to cover his expenses and currently paying 14% interest on the mortgage. His sister is bailing him out and refinancing the house at a reasonable rate. She wants to sell the house in 2 years, hoping the brother will clean up the house so it can be sold. I don't expect him to change. Therefore, in 2 years I expect this house will still be a mess. What would you advise? Sell the house now and let the brother go homeless? The sister seems obligated to help this guy out, but he's not doing anything to improve himself. Believe it or not, I've seen this fact pattern a few times already. It's been really tough. I don't know what to do. Cheers, Larry |