|
#3
| |||
| |||
| One of the most interesting etfs is PWC which charges 60bp. It skirts the archaic SEC prohibition of an etf (non-closed) from being actively managed,by following an index that itself is somewhat actively managed. It usually beats the sp500, although it's sister etf PWO seems to match, not beat nasdaq. As for index mutual funds, Vanguard is no longer the low cost king for at least the most basic indexes. Fidelity spartan funds and Etrade native funds now halve V* costs at 10bp. V*'s decreasing user friendliness and increasing fees just make less and less sense, and lately hear rumours they'll chop fees. - quote - > Which ETFs are those? SPY, for instance, only charges 10bp. > Since it was mentioned in the subject line, DIA charges 18bp. > IWM charges 20bp and IWN charges 25bp. IWV charges 20bp. > IYY is 20bp. I wouldn't personally use it, but QQQ is 20bp. > That covers most of the major indexes and (a) none is close to > 40bp, and (b) they are comparable and in some cases beat Vanguard. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| pmb[at]his.com (Paul Michael Brown) writes: - quote - > upfront fee. Also, the annual fees for most ETFs I've looked at average
Which ETFs are those? SPY, for instance, only charges 10bp.> about 40 basis points per year. Since it was mentioned in the subject line, DIA charges 18bp. IWM charges 20bp and IWN charges 25bp. IWV charges 20bp. IYY is 20bp. I wouldn't personally use it, but QQQ is 20bp. That covers most of the major indexes and (a) none is close to 40bp, and (b) they are comparable and in some cases beat Vanguard. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > Are there other financial dangers beyond ordinary market risk when holding
Defining "risk" broadly, I don't like exchange-traded funds (ETFs) because> SPDRs (SPY) or Diamonds (DIA)? I understand the price of the underlying > stocks can fall and as a result I could lose money, but are their other > risks specifically connected to the investment vehicle? of the high transaction costs. First, you have to pay a brokerage commission every time you buy shares in the ETF. Suppose you pay a $10 commission on a $500 purchase. That's two percent right off the top. You can buy shares in a mutual fund that tracks the same index for zero upfront fee. Also, the annual fees for most ETFs I've looked at average about 40 basis points per year. Again, you can do better if you purchase shares in an index fund. At Vanguard, for example, I pay only about 20 basis points per year on my S&P 500 index fund. Granted, these amounts don't sound like much. But over time the increased transaction costs of ETFs will lower your total return. In summary, for most buy-and-hold retail investors who are dollar cost averaging into an investment in equities, ETFs just don't make sense. These people will almost always be better off purchasing shares in an index fund. |
| | |||
| |||
| Jimmy Smith wrote: - quote - > Are there other financial dangers beyond ordinary market risk when holding > SPDRs (SPY) or Diamonds (DIA)? I understand the price of the underlying > stocks can fall and as a result I could lose money, but are their other > risks specifically connected to the investment vehicle? For example, can > the SPY parent company fail and then my investment is destroyed? Can the > trust itself somehow screw up big time and my resulting lose has little or > nothing to do with market moves? Jimmy, You should download & read the prospectus for each if you're concerned about that kind of thing. There are links for both from www.amex.com in the ETF section. In general I think these come with very minor management/structural risk factors. There are some risks associated with the "creation unit" structure but they're probably more of interest for someone investing a very large amount of money (like a pension fund manager). -Tad |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Are there other financial dangers beyond ordinary market risk when holding SPDRs (SPY) or Diamonds (DIA)? I understand the price of the underlying stocks can fall and as a result I could lose money, but are their other risks specifically connected to the investment vehicle? For example, can the SPY parent company fail and then my investment is destroyed? Can the trust itself somehow screw up big time and my resulting lose has little or nothing to do with market moves? Jimmy |
| Tags |
| danger, dia, holding, spy |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Holding a mortgage makemp: I have recently funded a mortgage loan. I was hopeful that Money would be able to handle this transaction reasonably easily when, on trying to set... | Microsoft Money | 9 | 03-23-2007 12:14 AM | |
| Schedule K-1 for IRA holding? nearly_blind@yahoo.com: I owned the exchange traded oil fund USO in my traditional IRA last year (2006). Apparently its really a L.P. or publically traded partnership... | Taxes | 10 | 03-20-2007 06:24 PM | |
| Any danger in amending old returns? toller: Doing this year's returns (Federal and NYS) I realized I forgot to include deduction in last year's return. Since it is on TaxCut it was easy... | Taxes | 4 | 04-07-2005 06:17 AM | |
| Any cases holding in our favor? Corwin: Before I research the issue perhaps one of you smart fellows can help me. Because of the year end crunch the application just slipped past us... | Financial Planning | 1 | 12-12-2003 03:36 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |