|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "BMS" <mcfarland[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:2nDZc.102942$Fg5.102550[at]attbi_s53... - quote - > I like the indent. > Well thank you. At least one person agrees with me. Cal Lester CLU - quote - > "Cal Lester" <cal-lester[at]comcast.net> wrote in message > news:RnvZc.100819$Fg5.699[at]attbi_s53... > > > Cal, I really enjoy reading your messages in the newsgroup, > > but would you please please consider not doing all of that > > indenting? It's both non-standard and very distracting. > > > Thanks > > > --david > > > David, I appreciate your comment, however, I do it to be certain that MY > response can be easily differentiated from the original > > message. > > > I find that quite often a responder will simply type a response on the > next line of an existing message, so that it is almost > > impossible to tell where one leaves off, and the other begins. I would > have thought that it would be appreciated by most readers. > > Cal Lester CLU > |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Cal Lester" <cal-lester[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:RnvZc.100819$Fg5.699[at]attbi_s53... - quote - > "Cal Lester" <cal-lester[at]comcast.net> writes:
Are you taking a survey? It's horribly unreadable, and the only nonstandard> > that is OWNED (or in conjunction with a bank ! ! !). > > The property is valued at today's market, less any > Cal, I really enjoy reading your messages in the newsgroup, > but would you please please consider not doing all of that > indenting? It's both non-standard and very distracting. > Thanks > --david > David, I appreciate your comment, however, I do it to be certain that MY response can be easily differentiated from the original > message. > I find that quite often a responder will simply type a response on the next line of an existing message, so that it is almost > impossible to tell where one leaves off, and the other begins. I would have thought that it would be appreciated by most readers. > Cal Lester CLU replies I see are yours. Your formatting breaks the ability of newsreaders to properly display where one message drops and the reply begins. (Assuming you were wondering what "most readers" appreciate) -- -tom ======================================= MODERATOR'S COMMENT: Please use email for further comments on this thread. |
| | |||
| |||
| I like the indent. "Cal Lester" <cal-lester[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:RnvZc.100819$Fg5.699[at]attbi_s53... - quote - > "Cal Lester" <cal-lester[at]comcast.net> writes: > > that is OWNED (or in conjunction with a bank ! ! !). > > The property is valued at today's market, less any > Cal, I really enjoy reading your messages in the newsgroup, > but would you please please consider not doing all of that > indenting? It's both non-standard and very distracting. > Thanks > --david > David, I appreciate your comment, however, I do it to be certain that MY response can be easily differentiated from the original > message. > I find that quite often a responder will simply type a response on the next line of an existing message, so that it is almost > impossible to tell where one leaves off, and the other begins. I would have thought that it would be appreciated by most readers. > Cal Lester CLU |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| "Cal Lester" <cal-lester[at]comcast.net> writes: - quote - > that is OWNED (or in conjunction with a bank ! ! !).
Cal, I really enjoy reading your messages in the newsgroup,> The property is valued at today's market, less any but would you please please consider not doing all of that indenting? It's both non-standard and very distracting. Thanks --david David, I appreciate your comment, however, I do it to be certain that MY response can be easily differentiated from the original message. I find that quite often a responder will simply type a response on the next line of an existing message, so that it is almost impossible to tell where one leaves off, and the other begins. I would have thought that it would be appreciated by most readers. Cal Lester CLU |