|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "John A. Weeks III" <john[at]johnweeks.com> wrote in message news:<220720040011267049%john[at]johnweeks.com> ... - quote - > In article <BgELc.13392$WP1.3168[at]fe1.texas.rr.com> , msmap
The contribution limits to IRAs are much lower than for 401(k)s.> <msmap[at]houston.rr.com> wrote: > > Does make more sense to put money "after tax" into a 401(k) as opposed to a > > non tax sheltered account if a person can't contribute to a Roth IRA? > I don't like giving up direct control of my money by putting it in > a 401K (other than what you can do as a payroll deduction). There > is no reason that you cannot open up a traditional IRA. I think the government ought to create a unified cap so that individuals could contribute a total of $X annually to IRAs and 401(k)s, but that is a public policy question. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| The general rule of thumb is to put as much as possible in tax defered accounts. However I believe it is possible to earn a higher after tax return in an after tax account. For example if you invested in an index fund or a fixed portfolio of blue chip growth stocks, the annual dividend and capital gains would be small. When you sold the investment, it would be taxed as capital gains rather than ordinary income. Frank "msmap" <msmap[at]houston.rr.com> wrote in message news:<BgELc.13392$WP1.3168[at]fe1.texas.rr.com> ... - quote - > Does make more sense to put money "after tax" into a 401(k) as opposed to a > non tax sheltered account if a person can't contribute to a Roth IRA? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 20:10:59 CST, "msmap" <msmap[at]houston.rr.comwrote: - quote - > Does make more sense to put money "after tax" into a 401(k) as opposed to a
It depends on what type of investment category you wish to use. If it> non tax sheltered account if a person can't contribute to a Roth IRA? is something that produces ordinary income - CDs, taxable bonds, etc. - you can make a case for a tax-sheltered arrangement like non-deductible 401k or IRA. Also, remember these plans are mostly illiquid until 59.5. But if you're going to invest in stocks for long-term growth (capital gains), you could make a case for staying away from retirement plans. That's provided you pick a fund or stocks that are tax-efficient. -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <BgELc.13392$WP1.3168[at]fe1.texas.rr.com> , msmap <msmap[at]houston.rr.com> wrote: - quote - > Does make more sense to put money "after tax" into a 401(k) as opposed to a
I don't like giving up direct control of my money by putting it in> non tax sheltered account if a person can't contribute to a Roth IRA? a 401K (other than what you can do as a payroll deduction). There is no reason that you cannot open up a traditional IRA. You may not be able to deduct it, but at least it grows sheltered. There are other ways to invest money that avoids some taxes, such as munis and government bonds. Finally, if you have a lot of after-tax money to shelter, the insurance folks in this group might have a group of tools that can help you. If you have an agent, check with them. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Does make more sense to put money "after tax" into a 401(k) as opposed to a non tax sheltered account if a person can't contribute to a Roth IRA? |