|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:17:50 CST, "MTW" <mtwingcpa[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > > #3 seems like a bad idea - I don't want him getting his hands
SS should be able to confirm this via a quick phone call. On the> > on $100,000 when he's 18. Any thoughts on whether 1 or 2 is > > likely to work out better? > Since it sounds like these benefits belong to your son and NOT to > you, I'm not sure what right you would have to place any > remaining amounts beyond his reach when he reaches the age of > majority. If you plan to do something along these lines, I think > you should seek legal advice FIRST. other hand, you could spend the child's SS money for the child now, and then place what you would have spent from your money into an investment of your choosing - including one that has restrictions. But Mike Wing is correct - the SS is not your money and you cannot place restrictions on it (beyond what the law provides already). -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Theron Mann wrote: - quote - > #3 seems like a bad idea - I don't want him getting his hands
Since it sounds like these benefits belong to your son and NOT to> on $100,000 when he's 18. Any thoughts on whether 1 or 2 is > likely to work out better? you, I'm not sure what right you would have to place any remaining amounts beyond his reach when he reaches the age of majority. If you plan to do something along these lines, I think you should seek legal advice FIRST. MTW |
| | |||
| |||
| "Theron Mann" <scary_penguin[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:6bd0585c.0406111248.26bd61a[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > Here's the story:
Why is he receiving benefits?> My son is receiving SSI benefits (about 10,000/year, indexed to > something) and will keep receiving them until he's 18. (He's 6 now). > Up to now, I've been using them mostly for his support, but we're in a > position now where I can invest them on his behalf. As I see it, my > main options are: > 1) Continue using them for his support, but invest a similar amount in > a 529 plan for his benefit, > 2) Invest them in a trust for his benefit with me as trustee, or > 3) Just invest them in his name. > #3 seems like a bad idea - I don't want him getting his hands on > $100,000 when he's 18. Any thoughts on whether 1 or 2 is likely to > work out better? SS Survivor benefits are paid to surviving spouses until the youngest child is 16, and to the children in name until age 18 (unless they are disabled, then age 22). SS benefits for disability are an entirely different matter. You can't accumulate them -- or they will cut/stop your benefits. Once they stop for cause, they will not restart (something many find out the hard way). Nobody on here can answer your question without a complete set of facts. A trust requires a lawyer that does that kind of work in YOUR jurisdiction. This really isn't the proper place for a fact-specific question in that area. Brent D. Gardner, ChFC Chartered Financial Consultant http://members.cox.net/brentdgardner1378/ "Be ever questioning. Ignorance is not bliss. It is oblivion. You don't go to heaven if you die dumb. Become better informed. Learn from other's mistakes. You could not live long enough to make them all yourself." - Hyman George Rickover (1900-86), Admiral, US Navy, advocated development of nuclear subs & ships The Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) and Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC), designations owned and exclusively offered by The American College, signify the highest standards of academic study and professional excellence in the financial services industry. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Here's the story: My son is receiving SSI benefits (about 10,000/year, indexed to something) and will keep receiving them until he's 18. (He's 6 now). Up to now, I've been using them mostly for his support, but we're in a position now where I can invest them on his behalf. As I see it, my main options are: 1) Continue using them for his support, but invest a similar amount in a 529 plan for his benefit, 2) Invest them in a trust for his benefit with me as trustee, or 3) Just invest them in his name. #3 seems like a bad idea - I don't want him getting his hands on $100,000 when he's 18. Any thoughts on whether 1 or 2 is likely to work out better? Thanks - T |
| Tags |
| 6year, child, investing |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Child Tax Credit for non dependent child SMF: Divorced couple with child. Mother has custody, father has child two nights a week. Mother earns $40,000 and gets $8000 in child support. Father... | Taxes | 4 | 02-23-2006 11:38 PM | |
| Investing Accounts Total Incorrect on the Investing home page of M05 William L. Oppenheim, M.D.: In M05 on the Investing home page are a list of accounts. The amount for each of my accounts is correct, but the total for the page is wrong. The... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-12-2004 11:57 PM | |
| Use of BOTH Child care flex accounts and child care tax credit... Tripp Knightly: Can somebody please summarize the rules for using BOTH a child care flex spending account in addition to seeking the child care tax credit? ... | Taxes | 4 | 06-14-2004 06:27 AM | |
| Child Tax Credit advance check for deceased child Matthew Seitz: My only child died in 2002. I received a 2003 Child Tax Credit advance check. What should I do with the check? <<... | Taxes | 8 | 08-17-2003 03:39 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |