|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Mark Freeland wrote: - quote - > Tad Borek wrote:
Mark, that's a good point. IME most people up picking average cost -> > Unlike with mutual fund share sales, you can pick the method you want > > to use at each sale, and use a different one each time (regular FIFO or > > specific identification). > It is also true for mutual funds that "you can pick the method you want > to use at each sale, and use a different one each time (regular FIFO or > specific identification)." > So long as one stays within the list of choices given (FIFO and specific > identification), one may switch freely between them. It is only if one > uses an average cost method, available only for funds and not stocks, > that the rules change (there's no turning back once one switches to > average cost). it's the easiest, and it's what's listed on many account statements. But if you don't do that you can switch between FIFO & specific ID. -Tad |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Tad Borek wrote: - quote - > Unlike with mutual fund share sales, you can pick the method you want
It is also true for mutual funds that "you can pick the method you want> to use at each sale, and use a different one each time (regular FIFO or > specific identification). to use at each sale, and use a different one each time (regular FIFO or specific identification)." So long as one stays within the list of choices given (FIFO and specific identification), one may switch freely between them. It is only if one uses an average cost method, available only for funds and not stocks, that the rules change (there's no turning back once one switches to average cost). As with stocks, if you don't identify the method used, the IRS assumes FIFO. See IRS Pub 564 http://www.irs.gov/publications/p564/ar02.html#d0e1268 (To give a plug for Fidelity - they will let you identify specific shares of a fund online. http://www.kiplinger.com/basics/mana...xes/basis.html) -- Mark Freeland nBeOwXs[at]pacbell.net |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| mrchongo[at]hotmail.com wrote: - quote - > I acquired 3000 shares of XYZ over two years....each block at a lower
When selling stock the default rule is FIFO...unless you say otherwise,> price. I really chased it all the way down! Now I'm selling 1500 > shares at a loss. What acquistion price do I use to calculate the > loss? Is it FIFO? That is to say, do I calculate the loss based on the > highest-priced, earliest-acquired blocks of XYZ that I bought, and > work my way down in the same order in which they were bought? Thanks. the IRS assumes you sell the batches in the same order that you bought them. But you can also use "specific identification" and select the lot or lots that you're selling in a given transaction. The IRS says that you need to make the selection at the same time that you sell the stock (not weeks later or when preparing your taxes), inform your broker, and be provided a written acknowledgement from your brokerage firm. Even online brokers are equipped to do this, with some you can enter that info when you sell, with others you need to call them up and ask that it be added to your trade confirmation (be sure to keep a copy of that with your tax files). The confirmation will include a note something like this at the bottom: VS PURCHASE 2/3/1996 if that's the lot you told them to sell. Again, if you don't do that, the IRS assumes FIFO. Unlike with mutual fund share sales, you can pick the method you want to use at each sale, and use a different one each time (regular FIFO or specific identification). Sometimes you might want to sell your low-cost-basis shares, other times high-basis, it depends on your tax planning for a given year. -Tad |
| | |||
| |||
| mrchongo[at]hotmail.com writes: - quote - > I acquired 3000 shares of XYZ over two years....each block at a lower
If you don't make a valid, prior-to-sale specific ID of the shares> price. I really chased it all the way down! Now I'm selling 1500 > shares at a loss. What acquistion price do I use to calculate the > loss? Is it FIFO? you are selling, then yes, you have no choice but to use FIFO. See: http://www.fairmark.com/capgain/ident.htm for more details. -- Rich Carreiro rlcarr[at]animato.arlington.ma.us |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I acquired 3000 shares of XYZ over two years....each block at a lower price. I really chased it all the way down! Now I'm selling 1500 shares at a loss. What acquistion price do I use to calculate the loss? Is it FIFO? That is to say, do I calculate the loss based on the highest-priced, earliest-acquired blocks of XYZ that I bought, and work my way down in the same order in which they were bought? Thanks. |
| Tags |
| loss, rules, sale, stock, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Reporting sale of stock at a loss Dennis G. Rears: Forget about the economic issues. Is a person subject to US tax laws required to report the sale of US stcok securities? Does this include a sale... | Taxes | 7 | 06-21-2005 04:51 AM | |
| Sale of Residence - Exclusion Rules - Length of Ownership Ivan Erwin: I just saw/heard Grace Weinstein, "Personal Finance Expert." on CNNfn say that you must have owned the residence for at least five years as well as... | Taxes | 13 | 12-20-2004 08:31 AM | |
| When Should a Loss on Sale of Stock Be Taken? Al Smith: In October of 1987 I paid $3,850 for shares of a Canadian gold mining company. They never paid a dividend, and I had forgotten about the stock. ... | Taxes | 14 | 10-19-2004 02:49 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |