|
#5
| |||
| |||
| On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:04:41 CST, "wannaberich" <eileenvanden[at]nospam.yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Yes, the 1.5% is in addition to the mutual fund expense ratios. There will
As you increase investment costs - you've just added fund fees of> be no commissions or brokerage fees. around .5% to 1% on top of the advisor's 1.5% fee - you begin to reduce the odds that the advisor will beat the market net of fees over the long-term. -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| If he holds himself out to be an Investment Advisor Representative, then NASD regs require him to deliver to you his ADV Part 2. The paperwork that describes his services and how he gets paid and you can ask for the part 1 as well , that lists the people involved. But that would answer the other questions as to how else he is getting paid. Your question is net of all expenses, what can he do for you. If assets grow, the fee, as a percentage should drop. 1.5% until they reach certain points, then dropping to 25 or 50 basis points. "BMS" <mcfarland[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:%Opfc.141840$w54.928248[at]attbi_s01... - quote - > If you like the methods he uses, the fee is not out of line for the > portfolio size. > Did you do all your homework, all the way to looking at his ADV-Part 2? > As the assets grow will the fee change? > "wannaberich" <eileenvanden[at]nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message news:64bc7531303a3ef246dfcfcf8e434d3e[at]localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com... > > Hello, > > I found a financial advisor I think I would like to work with (CFP). He > > will work with any commission stucture I'm comfortable with. I like the > > idea of AUM but the cost is 1.5% annual, adjusted quartly. Assets are less > > than 150k. Is this a reasonable fee? Thanks for your opinions. |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Yes, the 1.5% is in addition to the mutual fund expense ratios. There will be no commissions or brokerage fees. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| Guess I didn't do my homework! What is an ADV-Part 2? And, 2nd part, I pay the 1.5% portfolio value quarterly, gain or loss. There was no mention of a fee increase as the assets grow. I think my problem is, I'm going to have a hard time paying the fee if the portfolio is in a negative position. I know there are no guarantees. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:52:24 CST, "wannaberich" <eileenvanden[at]nospam.yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Hello,
Is that on top of mutual fund expense ratios, individual stock> I found a financial advisor I think I would like to work with (CFP). He > will work with any commission stucture I'm comfortable with. I like the > idea of AUM but the cost is 1.5% annual, adjusted quartly. Assets are less > than 150k. Is this a reasonable fee? Thanks for your opinions. commissions, brokerage account fee, etc.? -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
| | |||
| |||
| If you like the methods he uses, the fee is not out of line for the portfolio size. Did you do all your homework, all the way to looking at his ADV-Part 2? As the assets grow will the fee change? "wannaberich" <eileenvanden[at]nospam.yahoo.com> wrote in message news:64bc7531303a3ef246dfcfcf8e434d3e[at]localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com... - quote - > Hello, > I found a financial advisor I think I would like to work with (CFP). He > will work with any commission stucture I'm comfortable with. I like the > idea of AUM but the cost is 1.5% annual, adjusted quartly. Assets are less > than 150k. Is this a reasonable fee? Thanks for your opinions. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Hello, I found a financial advisor I think I would like to work with (CFP). He will work with any commission stucture I'm comfortable with. I like the idea of AUM but the cost is 1.5% annual, adjusted quartly. Assets are less than 150k. Is this a reasonable fee? Thanks for your opinions. |
| Tags |
| assets, feereasonable, management |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| What is a reasonable fee for 2006 tax prep in California? Debra McLaren: What is a reasonable fee for straightforward 2006 tax calculations in California? How does $1,350 fit in the cost spectrum? I just paid $1,350... | Taxes | 16 | 03-13-2007 12:13 AM | |
| Reasonable tax to income ratio andychicago1: I would appreciate your input, I think this also might be interesting to other people. I live in IL and make just over $100,000 on W-2. I also own... | Taxes | 2 | 01-28-2007 09:54 PM | |
| Assets referred to in "sale of all, or substantially all, assets" John: I know a definitive answer is probably too much to ask for, but I can hope... "Sales of all, or substantially all, assets" is a common phrase. ... | Taxes | 8 | 06-07-2005 06:33 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |