|
#1
| |||
| |||
| john1jz[at]yahoo.com (John Pak) writes: - quote - > (1) "You need to save ... (that much of money) so you can live in
That's a rough estimate. It's always been a rough estimate.> retirement in 80% of your current income". But if I am doing so -- These days, with folks living longer and retiring healthier, if anything, it's probably an _under_estimate. - quote - > i.e. saving that much money -- I would have already been living in 80%
It can't be "false". It can be a poor estimate. If anything,> of my income (even) before retirement. Therefore, "80% percent figure" > is false. Basically, 50% to 60% is enough. since it's likely to be too low an estimate, your estimate is likely even worse. Far worse. - quote - > (2) "You need to save $1m to retirement ..." That is incorrect. The
That's simply dangerous drivel. You need assets relative> reality is, you need to have money more than average people's asset, > that will be sufficient. If average person's asset is $10,000, your > retirement account of $15,000 will get you live comfortably. Likewise, > if everyone has $2m asset, your $1m account will have you live > miserably. It is relativity. to the prices of the goods and services you want, not relative to your neighbors. That's why when folk estimate how much one needs in retirement, they usually try to estimate the rate of inflation, too. I'm not sure where you're trying to go with your posting, and have answered honestly, but it could sure be some trolling. Your ideas are not just wrong, but dangerous if anyone follows them without learning more. -- Plain Bread alone for e-mail, thanks. The rest gets trashed. No HTML in E-Mail! -- http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Are you posting responses that are easy for others to follow? http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/2000/06/14/quoting |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <52d02f69.0404051153.7a33fcb8[at]posting.google.com> , John Pak <john1jz[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > Some points are simply wrong, yet being repeated again and again:
You have forgotten to include the impact of inflation. By the> (1) "You need to save ... (that much of money) so you can live in > retirement in 80% of your current income". But if I am doing so -- > i.e. saving that much money -- I would have already been living in 80% > of my income (even) before retirement. Therefore, "80% percent figure" > is false. Basically, 50% to 60% is enough. time that you retire, it is going to cost 120% of your current income to live at the 50% to 60% level of the future. - quote - > (2) "You need to save $1m to retirement ..." That is incorrect. The
Having a retirement account of $15,000 is not going to feed you> reality is, you need to have money more than average people's asset, > that will be sufficient. If average person's asset is $10,000, your > retirement account of $15,000 will get you live comfortably. Likewise, > if everyone has $2m asset, your $1m account will have you live > miserably. It is relativity. very long. You might be comfortable depending on social security, but even if it still does exist, it will only maintain one at the bare poverty level. The average person has food, shelter, medical, and entertainment needs that far excede what social security will cover, and when the $15K runs out, you are done. As people live longer and longer these days, the risk of outliving your money is very real. And lets not even consider what would happen if something bad does happen, like needing long term care. - quote - > (3) The axiom is that - in any culture and in any era - majority of
I don't think anyone thinks that equity in a home will make you> people are always poor, relatively. It is impossible to have everyone > rich, or in other word, to live comfortably all together. If most > people have $1m a year to spend, the bread will probably cost $100k > and gasoline $1000/gallon. You are therefore still relatively poor. > > From that perspective, if everyone thinks real estate will make > him/her rich, it must be false. Same to the equity, where nowadays > everyone owns. It will not get you rich in the future. No more. rich. But it is a very nice basic savings account that will likely be the biggest single asset that most folks ever own. They kind of get it for free since they need to pay for shelter anyway. If you want to pay rent during retirement, that is OK with me, but I'd rather have no house payment to worry about once my income stream comes to a stop and I have limited monthly funds to live on. A paid for home is also a housing insurance policy. If you have a home that will be paid for when you retire, you know that you will always have a home to live in, and you cannot get kicked out. But if you rent, rent can (and will) keep going up and up in price, and you run the risk of getting priced out of the place that you may have lived in for years, and maybe even priced out of the market. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Some points are simply wrong, yet being repeated again and again: (1) "You need to save ... (that much of money) so you can live in retirement in 80% of your current income". But if I am doing so -- i.e. saving that much money -- I would have already been living in 80% of my income (even) before retirement. Therefore, "80% percent figure" is false. Basically, 50% to 60% is enough. (2) "You need to save $1m to retirement ..." That is incorrect. The reality is, you need to have money more than average people's asset, that will be sufficient. If average person's asset is $10,000, your retirement account of $15,000 will get you live comfortably. Likewise, if everyone has $2m asset, your $1m account will have you live miserably. It is relativity. (3) The axiom is that - in any culture and in any era - majority of people are always poor, relatively. It is impossible to have everyone rich, or in other word, to live comfortably all together. If most people have $1m a year to spend, the bread will probably cost $100k and gasoline $1000/gallon. You are therefore still relatively poor. - quote - > From that perspective, if everyone thinks real estate will make
everyone owns. It will not get you rich in the future. No more.him/her rich, it must be false. Same to the equity, where nowadays |
| Tags |
| financial, points, wrong |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Deducting Points udayr21@gmail.com: I purchased a home in 2006 and paid 2.125 points for the loan. 1.125 points to the lender which appear on 1098 from the lender. 1 point I paid to... | Taxes | 3 | 03-06-2007 09:25 AM | |
| Points Ed Durall: Let's say you close on a new principal residence late in the year, and you pay some points. The points meet all the conditions to be deducted in... | Taxes | 11 | 10-26-2004 09:19 PM | |
| These are the points we have for this decision !! gajaya1@netscape.net: Last year 300K home now is 350K here. If I save 60K in 2 years I will not be able buy the same house for at least 450K if I dont buy it now. ... | Financial Planning | 1 | 10-06-2003 03:13 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |