| | |||
| |||
| "John A. Weeks III" john[at]johnweeks.com, you responded: << <i> <Why does it seem people are so obsessed with a 30 yr. fixed rate? - quote - > What's so wrong with a variable rate . . . just the fact that it can or will go up at some point? Mortgage rates are at historic lows right now. The only way that a variable rate can go is up. Most people borrow right up to the limit of what they are allowed to buy, and having the payment go up by any ammount will cause any number of home loans to blow up. It is far less risky to lock in a good fixed rate right now, and not have to worry about rates for the next 30 years.</i> > Hmmmm??? So, you're suggesting that paying something like an additional 150 basis points each year over 30 years is a good buy? I would suggest the issue is not this simplistic. Yes, we're at historic lows and yes, rates are likely to rise. But how much are they going to rise and how quickly? The fear seems to be that the rates will rise quickly over a short period as they did when most ARMs were tied to the prime rate. Given how ARMs are structured today, that kind of volatility is not necessarily present any longer. Certainly, if people are borrowing up to the limit they can borrow under an ARM, there's substantial risk as you've pointed out. But if they can qualify for a 30 yr. fixed on 80% of the value, they're not putting themselves at that kind of risk using an ARM and can use the difference more effectively elsewhere. When looking at 30 years or the long term however you want to measure that term, essentially we're dealing with interest rates that move inversely to the stock market. . . .and what do you expect the stock market to do over the long term? Also, given how long people are so mobile today and don't live in one place for much more than 7years or less on the average, not having to worry for the next 30 yrs just doesn't seem logical. Yes, there are many expectations to the rule. But over all, I'm suggesting that 30 yr. fixed rates are oversold and not much thought is going into deciding just what kind of mortgage is really the better financial decision. Note too that a lot of this also has to do with people's feelings rather than the logic. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| In article <20040331100546.17857.00000414[at]mb-m21.aol.com> , TTRoberts <ttroberts[at]aol.com> wrote: - quote - > Why does it seem people are so obsessed with a 30 yr. fixed rate?
Mortgage rates are at historic lows right now. The only way that> What's so wrong with a variable rate . . . just the fact that it can or will > go > up at some point? a variable rate can go is up. Most people borrow right up to the limit of what they are allowed to buy, and having the payment go up by any ammount will cause any number of home loans to blow up. It is far less risky to lock in a good fixed rate right now, and not have to worry about rates for the next 30 years. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
| Tags |
| lock, mortgage, rate |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Can you call a rental a 1st home for a lower rate on a mortgage? Arco: Is it legal to say that I may be buying a home to call it my first home? Can I simply say that I lived in the house for 2 days, then decided to... | Taxes | 2 | 04-16-2006 08:33 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |