|
#8
| |||
| |||
| "xxxk" <test33[at]testicle.com> wrote - quote - > I just took ANOTHER look at ehealthinsurance.com (I examined it 6 months ago
I acknowledge the importance of your point (and am thankful public Internet> too) and it still does not list the 2 MAIN insurance companies in my > area: Fairfax county, VA, zip code 22042 (and I tried all the zip > codes in N. Va. which I know for sure are covered by the companies)....and I > know with 100% certainty that both companies > cover that area and all the zip codes that I tried. The two companies are > KAISER (mid-atlantic) and CareFirst BC BS. The only companies shown > on ehealthinsurance.com for the N.VA zipcodes are "Unicare" and "Golden Rule". forums like this newsgroup exist so all these "ideas" may compete against each other on a level playing field). Ehealthinsurance states it has "The Largest selection - More health insurance plans than any other agent." This is not in the fine print; it's pretty prominent when one goes through the steps of seeing what it offers for one's zip code. I read the statement to mean it does not offer assistance with all health insurance plans. So one definitely still has to shop around. Anyone doubting this should re-read xxk's post. Further-- Is an agent with whom one meets face-to-face going to offer one all plans available in your area? I think not. Again, one still has to shop around. Which is more convenient for a preliminary search, driving around to different agents or surfing the net's health insurance *commercial* search engines? I'd say trying a few online health insurance search engines is a good starting point. I can only see this helping, not hurting, the effort to find good health insurance. At least if one feels one must see someone face-to-face, one can compare what the face-to-face agent offers with what one saw on the net, and then investigate further. Aside: I emphasized "*commercial*" above because xxk's comments certainly indicate that there is bias online as well as offline. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| I just took ANOTHER look at ehealthinsurance.com (I examined it 6 months ago too) and it still does not list the 2 MAIN insurance companies in my area: Fairfax county, VA, zip code 22042 (and I tried all the zip codes in N. Va. which I know for sure are covered by the companies)....and I know with 100% certainty that both companies cover that area and all the zip codes that I tried. The two companies are KAISER (mid-atlantic) and CareFirst BC BS. The only companies shown on ehealthinsurance.com for the N.VA zipcodes are "Unicare" and "Golden Rule". |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| "TB" <borekfm[at]pacbell.net> wrote - quote - > Caroline wrote:
I think there are some miscommunications happening here.> > "Brent D. Gardner, ChFC" wrote > > > > Rule #1 -- When you have questions about health insurance, you need a local > > > agent. Period. Nobody else that responded yet fits that description. > > > > Health insurers do ask for one's state of residence, among other pertinent > > information, before providing a quote, if a quote can be provided online. For > > more complicated health insurance plans, obviously an online quote cannot always > > be done. > > > Getting the regulations right for each state is a matter of having access to a > > good database. This is absolutely no big deal. Good ol' fashioned healthy market > > competition has made it thus. > I gotta agree w/Brent on this one...there's no good reason not to use an > agent, and at least from my experience the net option was awful. I am recommending an online health insurance search engine only as a first step, to allow a client to see what's out there, very roughly. My experience began with an online health insurance search engine. It steered me to what I felt was a competitive rate (based on several rates and plans listed) and then, ultimately, a live agent. Except for the initial search, all subsequent transactions were done by phone. At the time of my first search, I had no idea who even offered short-term plans. Not all health insurers do. If I'd called an agent cold, I'd only know about his/her particular product. I wouldn't necessarily get any kind of unbiased cross-section. I think with these online search engines, the chance of a good, impartial, preliminary recommendation of insurers is better. - quote - > I used
You do realize requiring such history is not unique to online applications?> ehealthinsurance.com a couple years ago for my MSA-compatible plan. It > seemed an EZ way to do it because there were only 2 plans in CA at the > time and one had clearly better deductibles. > Unfortunately I also applied through the site, and they totally dropped > the ball. The insurer wanted clarification on something in the medical > history (who on earth can remember doctor visits 15 years ago!?) - quote - > but
Funny, I had the exact same experience with Blue Cross/Blue Shield a few years> somehow that didn't get back to me, and they couldn't seem to figure out > the status of my app week to week. Long story short, without an agent > involved in the process what should have taken a couple weeks took about > 3 months, letters, phone calls - and it was all avoidable. ago. Not online. With an agent. Also, you never spoke with a live person in this process? - quote - > Anectdotal I know, but w/health I think the net is OK for research but
I just don't see how there's much distinction at all. Pre-existing conditions> it's better to work w/an agent for picking & applying. > This isn't like > other types of insurance - eg auto, where it's a very straightforward > transaction that largely gets down to cost. With health there's a wide > range in coverage and the open question of which plans/insurers are best > (or even possible) given whatever set of preexisting conditions you > have, or ailments you're worried about in the future. I don't think > health agents have to worry about job security anytime soon! exist with auto insurance, too. E.g. how many speeding tickets one had. The variations seem entirely comparable with health insurance. What are you recommending, anyway? The client go to the Yellow Pages and pick out an insurance company, and call them cold? Can we say, "shark bait"? Kidding, but you know what I mean. And yes, just as car salesman loathe internet car deals, I imagine many financial agents loathe people who do internet research. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Caroline wrote: - quote - > "Brent D. Gardner, ChFC" wrote > > Rule #1 -- When you have questions about health insurance, you need a local > > agent. Period. Nobody else that responded yet fits that description. > > Health insurers do ask for one's state of residence, among other pertinent > information, before providing a quote, if a quote can be provided online. For > more complicated health insurance plans, obviously an online quote cannot always > be done. > Getting the regulations right for each state is a matter of having access to a > good database. This is absolutely no big deal. Good ol' fashioned healthy market > competition has made it thus. I gotta agree w/Brent on this one...there's no good reason not to use an agent, and at least from my experience the net option was awful. I used ehealthinsurance.com a couple years ago for my MSA-compatible plan. It seemed an EZ way to do it because there were only 2 plans in CA at the time and one had clearly better deductibles. Unfortunately I also applied through the site, and they totally dropped the ball. The insurer wanted clarification on something in the medical history (who on earth can remember doctor visits 15 years ago!?) but somehow that didn't get back to me, and they couldn't seem to figure out the status of my app week to week. Long story short, without an agent involved in the process what should have taken a couple weeks took about 3 months, letters, phone calls - and it was all avoidable. Anectdotal I know, but w/health I think the net is OK for research but it's better to work w/an agent for picking & applying. This isn't like other types of insurance - eg auto, where it's a very straightforward transaction that largely gets down to cost. With health there's a wide range in coverage and the open question of which plans/insurers are best (or even possible) given whatever set of preexisting conditions you have, or ailments you're worried about in the future. I don't think health agents have to worry about job security anytime soon! -Tad |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
| Thanks for all the feed backs! JS "Szaki" <szaki10[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:Wq7Qb.128447$I06.1108603[at]attbi_s01... - quote - > I got unemployed in last year September. I able to continue my health care > plane from my employer half-price for 2 months, than 32 months full price, > $517 for two persons, including dental, vision. > After talking to the provider, said they have to raise the rate to $628, > from January, because the group I'm belonging to, got more expansive. > November they canceled my insurance, because did not receive my payment, > which I mailed in. I didn't know what's going on, mailed another check, > certified, signature return, cost me $8. > My insurance got re-instated, than in December got my check back,(one they > never got, according to them) saying there is no group # on it, they didn't > know who it belongs to. I had my address and Tel# on the check, and mailed > with a note, what company I use to work for. > Are they trying to get rid of me? Why they raising my insurance, 25%? > Is there other cheaper alternative? > Thanks, JS |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| "Brent D. Gardner, ChFC" <bgardner20[at]cox.net> wrote - quote - > Rule #1 -- When you have questions about health insurance, you need a local
Rule #2> agent. Period. Nobody else that responded yet fits that description. > Health insurance -- rules, regulations, rates -- very WIDELY from state to > state, as well as by other geographic factors, such as zip code. Nobody > other than a local agent can help you with this problem. I suggest you avoid > anyone that is in another state, who does business across state lines. It is > virtually impossible to know ALL the state variations on one contract, much > less on different contracts with different companies, which makes virtually > ALL internet quote sites for health insurance inherently dangerous to your > financial health, unless they are local. Be leery of anyone who posts here who denigrates the Internet as a resource and at the same time advertises himself as an agent of some kind. After all, the Internet enhances market competition and tends to drive down the business prospects of many of these agents. Some are honest. Some are not. I have never lived in the same state as my auto insurer. I have never physically walked into one of its offices, as it has never had branches in any state where I lived. I have lived in several states since I first began insuring my car through this insurer over 20 years ago. I have done every minute of business with my insurer via 800 telephone calls, email, and U.S. mail for all this time. Never have I had any problem with them. Indeed, this insurer remains among the most highly rated in the country. Its system is set up to painlessly slog through the regulations for auto insurance in every state--in every community--in which I have lived efficiently and thoroughly. Health insurers do ask for one's state of residence, among other pertinent information, before providing a quote, if a quote can be provided online. For more complicated health insurance plans, obviously an online quote cannot always be done. Getting the regulations right for each state is a matter of having access to a good database. This is absolutely no big deal. Good ol' fashioned healthy market competition has made it thus. |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Szaki" <szaki10[at]comcast.net> wrote in message news:Wq7Qb.128447$I06.1108603[at]attbi_s01... - quote - > I got unemployed in last year September. I able to continue my health care
Rule #1 -- When you have questions about health insurance, you need a local> plane from my employer half-price for 2 months, than 32 months full price, > $517 for two persons, including dental, vision. > After talking to the provider, said they have to raise the rate to $628, > from January, because the group I'm belonging to, got more expansive. > November they canceled my insurance, because did not receive my payment, > which I mailed in. I didn't know what's going on, mailed another check, > certified, signature return, cost me $8. > My insurance got re-instated, than in December got my check back,(one they > never got, according to them) saying there is no group # on it, they didn't > know who it belongs to. I had my address and Tel# on the check, and mailed > with a note, what company I use to work for. > Are they trying to get rid of me? Why they raising my insurance, 25%? > Is there other cheaper alternative? agent. Period. Nobody else that responded yet fits that description. Health insurance -- rules, regulations, rates -- very WIDELY from state to state, as well as by other geographic factors, such as zip code. Nobody other than a local agent can help you with this problem. I suggest you avoid anyone that is in another state, who does business across state lines. It is virtually impossible to know ALL the state variations on one contract, much less on different contracts with different companies, which makes virtually ALL internet quote sites for health insurance inherently dangerous to your financial health, unless they are local. Brent D. Gardner, ChFC Chartered Financial Consultant http://members.cox.net/brentdgardner1378/ "Be ever questioning. Ignorance is not bliss. It is oblivion. You don't go to heaven if you die dumb. Become better informed. Learn from other's mistakes. You could not live long enough to make them all yourself." - Hyman George Rickover (1900-86), Admiral, US Navy, advocated development of nuclear subs & ships The Chartered Life Underwriter (CLU) and Chartered Financial Consultant (ChFC), designations owned and exclusively offered by The American College, signify the highest standards of academic study and professional excellence in the financial services industry. |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Szaki" <szaki10[at]comcast.net> wrote snip - quote - > Are they trying to get rid of me? Why they raising my insurance, 25%?
The best tool I've found for shopping for health insurance is> Is there other cheaper alternative? http://www.ehealthinsurance.com/ehi/index.html . (There are a number of such services on the net. I doubt they vary much from one to the other.) One option that might reduce your rates is to shop for a short-term insurance plan. Such a plan would offer you a certain maximum amount of coverage but last only six months to a year. So if you had a terrible accident during this time, you'd be covered up to the maximum of the plan for that time. After the six months to a year, you'd be on your own. Also, such plans reserve the option for the insurer *not* to renew. So if you can avoid a bad accident or illness for a short time, then it might be a great option. Also, as usual, the higher the deductible, the lower the premium. Fortis Insurance Company (800) 800-1212 (last I checked) is an insurer that might be able to help you with a short-term plan. (I don't work for Fortis. I have just used them in the past. Never made a claim with them, so I don't know how they are on this front.) Consider also a health savings account. This is a new option, put into law only a few weeks ago, that allows you to sock money into an account and let it build, tax-free. The catch is you must have a health insurance plan that has a certain deductible. Lots on the net on this. See for example http://www.healthsavingsaccount-hsa.com/ . As for why your rates went up, this is happening nationwide. If the insurer says it's nothing specific to you, then you can ask for more of an explanation, but short of hiring a lawyer, I think you're stuck with believing the insurer when it indicates this is what needs to make profit; health care costs are higher; malpractice is driving rates up; the decline in interest rates means they have to recover profits from customers; etc. Sorry about your unemployment. Good luck. |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <Wq7Qb.128447$I06.1108603[at]attbi_s01> , Szaki <szaki10[at]comcast.net> wrote: - quote - > I got unemployed in last year September. I able to continue my health care
Is this just for yourself, or do you have others on the policy.> plane from my employer half-price for 2 months, than 32 months full price, > $517 for two persons, including dental, vision. > After talking to the provider, said they have to raise the rate to $628, > from January, because the group I'm belonging to, got more expansive. > November they canceled my insurance, because did not receive my payment, > which I mailed in. I didn't know what's going on, mailed another check, > certified, signature return, cost me $8. > My insurance got re-instated, than in December got my check back,(one they > never got, according to them) saying there is no group # on it, they didn't > know who it belongs to. I had my address and Tel# on the check, and mailed > with a note, what company I use to work for. > Are they trying to get rid of me? Why they raising my insurance, 25%? > Is there other cheaper alternative? This isn't that bad for a family, especially if there are women and children on the policy. For a single male, this is about 3 times too expensive. I am in the very same situation at the moment. I am taking the cobra option from my last employer, and it costs a bit over $200 a month for HMO coverage. If you don't need full cough and sneeze service, check out State Farm. They have major medical policies. It has a $1000 deductable, so you pay for the day to day stuff and doctor visits, but they pay for anything major that comes up. For a single male, I paid less than $300 per year. This might work for you given that $500 a month will pay for a lot of doctor visits. -john- -- ================================================== ================== John A. Weeks III 952-432-2708 john[at]johnweeks.com Newave Communications http://www.johnweeks.com ================================================== ================== |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I got unemployed in last year September. I able to continue my health care plane from my employer half-price for 2 months, than 32 months full price, $517 for two persons, including dental, vision. After talking to the provider, said they have to raise the rate to $628, from January, because the group I'm belonging to, got more expansive. November they canceled my insurance, because did not receive my payment, which I mailed in. I didn't know what's going on, mailed another check, certified, signature return, cost me $8. My insurance got re-instated, than in December got my check back,(one they never got, according to them) saying there is no group # on it, they didn't know who it belongs to. I had my address and Tel# on the check, and mailed with a note, what company I use to work for. Are they trying to get rid of me? Why they raising my insurance, 25%? Is there other cheaper alternative? Thanks, JS |
| Tags |
| health, insurance, unemployed |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| SE Health insurance Drew Edmundson: IRS Headliner 163 discusses individual health policies and the self employed health deduction in the context of S Corporations. ... | Taxes | 3 | 06-02-2006 04:01 AM | |
| Health Insurance Deductions DolphinVJ: I am confused as to the tax treatment of Health Insurance Premiums that Businesses would pay on behalf of their owners. How to treat such premiums... | Taxes | 3 | 04-28-2006 05:07 AM | |
| Unreimbursed Medical Insurance Payments While Unemployed As Exception to Additional Tax on Early IRA Distribution Wally: Sorry for cross-posting. Time's running out! I was laid off in mid-November 2005 and started working again in late February 2006. I collected... | Taxes | 2 | 04-15-2006 06:28 AM | |
| Self Employed Health Insurance doniam: I file Schedule C and am over 65. May I deduct the Medicare premiums on page one of the 1040? No other earned income or insurance plans. Thanks... | Taxes | 9 | 02-10-2004 03:11 AM | |
| Health Insurance Brent D. Gardner, ChFC: Anyone who thinks that health insurance, and a discussion related to, isn't a financial planning issue, they aren't truly an active, successful... | Financial Planning | 3 | 01-12-2004 10:59 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |