|
#4
| |||
| |||
| "HW \"Skip\" Weldon" <skip5700removethis[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ovpc00te215nr0lfkl8tq2e7dqbnp53cu8[at]4ax.com> ... - quote - > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:03:22 CST, jkitchar[at]yahoo.com (John Kitchar)
OK I asked and this is what the guy at Asia pacific wrote (emailed):> wrote: > > I live on Guam USA...I work for the Government of Guam and I can > > invest with Asia Pacific (Oppenheimer Funds) deducted from my > > paychecks in a 403B retirement plan. I checked the fees today, and > > discovered that they charge 5.75 percent up front.I believe this is my > > only 403B option for deduction from Gov Guam payroll...through Asia > > Pacific. Am I forced to use Asia Pacific for my 403B just because they > > say they are the "only game" in town? > > > That sounds high to me...is it? > It's unusual but not illegal. Usually, load funds waive their loads > when in an employer plan. So double check this with the local plan > administrator AND with Oppenheimer through their toll-free number. > > If it is too high, would I be better off just taking my after tax > > savings and funding something like a no-load Vanguard online account? > > Is a 403B with a 5.75 percent load better than simply investing > > savings into a no load fund? > It depends on the investments. Some will produce enough to offset the > load and some will not - but no one knows in advance how any > investment will turn out. If the investments (in the plan and > outside the plan) are identical except that the inside investments > have a load, the outside will outperform the inside by the compounded > value of the load. > Get back after you confirm a load, and ask for non-qualified > alternatives. At that time tell us what, if any, matching > contribution your employer makes to the plan. > -HW "Skip" Weldon > Columbia, SC "403b is not an employer plan, it is a supplemental retirement plan, established by yourself, DOE helps you by offering payroll deduction to make it easier to save for yourself. Your employer retirement plan is actually your Gov Guam retirement plan. Hope that answers your question. Talk to you later." He is referring to my defined benefit plan here. So the question remains: Would it be better to give these guys pre-tax deductions from my paycheck WITH 5.75 percent load OR simply invest my after tax savings into a no-load fund. Let's assume I buy basically an index fund in both cases. Which option is better? Thanks, JMK |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Look at the plan and see if it always partial rollovers while keeping the contributions on going. This way you can move the pretax money out into an IRA. "HW "Skip" Weldon" <skip5700removethis[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news vpc00te215nr0lfkl8tq2e7dqbnp53cu8[at]4ax.com...- quote - > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:03:22 CST, jkitchar[at]yahoo.com (John Kitchar) > wrote: > > I live on Guam USA...I work for the Government of Guam and I can > > invest with Asia Pacific (Oppenheimer Funds) deducted from my > > paychecks in a 403B retirement plan. I checked the fees today, and > > discovered that they charge 5.75 percent up front.I believe this is my > > only 403B option for deduction from Gov Guam payroll...through Asia > > Pacific. Am I forced to use Asia Pacific for my 403B just because they > > say they are the "only game" in town? > > > That sounds high to me...is it? > It's unusual but not illegal. Usually, load funds waive their loads > when in an employer plan. So double check this with the local plan > administrator AND with Oppenheimer through their toll-free number. > > If it is too high, would I be better off just taking my after tax > > savings and funding something like a no-load Vanguard online account? > > Is a 403B with a 5.75 percent load better than simply investing > > savings into a no load fund? > It depends on the investments. Some will produce enough to offset the > load and some will not - but no one knows in advance how any > investment will turn out. If the investments (in the plan and > outside the plan) are identical except that the inside investments > have a load, the outside will outperform the inside by the compounded > value of the load. > Get back after you confirm a load, and ask for non-qualified > alternatives. At that time tell us what, if any, matching > contribution your employer makes to the plan. > -HW "Skip" Weldon > Columbia, SC |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| - quote - > > If it is too high, would I be better off just taking my after tax
OK I understand you here but what about the advantage(?) of lowering> > savings and funding something like a no-load Vanguard online account? > > Is a 403B with a 5.75 percent load better than simply investing > > savings into a no load fund? > It depends on the investments. Some will produce enough to offset the > load and some will not - but no one knows in advance how any > investment will turn out. If the investments (in the plan and > outside the plan) are identical except that the inside investments > have a load, the outside will outperform the inside by the compounded > value of the load. my taxable income each year I deduct $ from my paychecks (before tax contributions) into the 403B. I'm a single guy with no dependents... I'm told, though I really don't understand exactly how or why, that this is SUCH a great advantage over simply taking one's after tax savings and funding a 403B. Can you help me understand what is the truth here? Again, thanks; JMK |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "HW \"Skip\" Weldon" <skip5700removethis[at]hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<ovpc00te215nr0lfkl8tq2e7dqbnp53cu8[at]4ax.com> ... - quote - > On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:03:22 CST, jkitchar[at]yahoo.com (John Kitchar)
I'm pretty darn sure the guy at Asia Pacific said the 403B has a 5.57> wrote: > Get back after you confirm a load, and ask for non-qualified > alternatives. At that time tell us what, if any, matching > contribution your employer makes to the plan. > -HW "Skip" Weldon > Columbia, SC percent load, but I've been wrong before so I'll check again tomorrow. I don't think Gov Guam matches anything for a 403B...I'm under the Government's "old" defined benefit plan. This has been replaced years back with a defined contribution plan. They of course want me to switch plans but I'm sticking to defined benefit. I'm keeping my defined contribution...I believe it is the best plan option. I was just thinking about adding another retirement plan...a 403B in addition to my defined benefit. My co-worker does this, he has the defined benefit plus a 403B deducted from his paycheck. I just worry that 5.75 percent load is too much to pay up front. Thankyou very much for your advice; I'll answer those questions asap. JMK |
| | |||
| |||
| On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:03:22 CST, jkitchar[at]yahoo.com (John Kitchar) wrote: - quote - > I live on Guam USA...I work for the Government of Guam and I can
It's unusual but not illegal. Usually, load funds waive their loads> invest with Asia Pacific (Oppenheimer Funds) deducted from my > paychecks in a 403B retirement plan. I checked the fees today, and > discovered that they charge 5.75 percent up front.I believe this is my > only 403B option for deduction from Gov Guam payroll...through Asia > Pacific. Am I forced to use Asia Pacific for my 403B just because they > say they are the "only game" in town? > That sounds high to me...is it? when in an employer plan. So double check this with the local plan administrator AND with Oppenheimer through their toll-free number. - quote - > If it is too high, would I be better off just taking my after tax > savings and funding something like a no-load Vanguard online account? > Is a 403B with a 5.75 percent load better than simply investing > savings into a no load fund? It depends on the investments. Some will produce enough to offset the load and some will not - but no one knows in advance how any investment will turn out. If the investments (in the plan and outside the plan) are identical except that the inside investments have a load, the outside will outperform the inside by the compounded value of the load. Get back after you confirm a load, and ask for non-qualified alternatives. At that time tell us what, if any, matching contribution your employer makes to the plan. -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| Here is my situation--I thank anyone with sound advice for me. I live on Guam USA...I work for the Government of Guam and I can invest with Asia Pacific (Oppenheimer Funds) deducted from my paychecks in a 403B retirement plan. I checked the fees today, and discovered that they charge 5.75 percent up front.I believe this is my only 403B option for deduction from Gov Guam payroll...through Asia Pacific. Am I forced to use Asia Pacific for my 403B just because they say they are the "only game" in town? That sounds high to me...is it? If it is too high, would I be better off just taking my after tax savings and funding something like a no-load Vanguard online account? Is a 403B with a 5.75 percent load better than simply investing savings into a no load fund? This would be additional income for me...I have 9 more years to go before I can retire with the Government of Guam's defined benefit plan. Thanks for your time, JMK |
| Tags |
| deferred, load, options, retirement, tax |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| SP2 UPDATE-DOES IT LOAD? Steve: Two or three days ago I got a message when I logged into Money Premium 2007 to upload SP2. I went thru the process and it didn't work. The upload... | Microsoft Money | 5 | 01-28-2007 02:13 AM | |
| Will not load Pat: When I attempt to open Money 2005 a box comes that say it is initializing Money 2003. This don't work and then the Money 2005 emblem just sits on... | Microsoft Money | 1 | 12-14-2005 09:54 PM | |
| 403B with 5.75% load or simply invest after tax into no load Vanguard fund? John Kitchar: Here is my situation--I thank anyone with sound advice for me. I live on Guam USA...I work for the Government of Guam and I can invest with Asia... | Financial Planning | 1 | 01-12-2004 03:39 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |