|
#3
| |||
| |||
| c wong wrote: - quote - > My mom is 75 years old and is slowing down quite a bit. I moved her
You've got a mix of capital-gains tax questions and estate-gift tax> out of her house in SF about 1 year ago to be closer to me in > Sunnyvale, and her house in SF has been vacant. My brother and I need > to decide what to do with it, rent it or sell it (SF has rent control > so any advice on this would help as well). Her total estate is > probably worth $1.5M. > As I understand it, if she passes this year, the first $1M of her > estate are tax free. If she passes 2004 or later, the first $1.5M of > her estate are tax free. So I believe these are the options: > 1) Mom gives the property to us - If she passes this year, the $1M is > considered a one time exclusion for gifts and inheritance (basically a > lifetime of up to $1M can be gifted while she is alive without any tax > consequence). She can gift up to $11k per year, per person without > having to report anything. > So say the SF house is $650 and she gives it to us. She would have to > file a gift tax return of $628 ($22k is exempt meaning $11k for my > brother, $11k for me) and if she would have $372 left to gift. (I > wonder if this would be capital gains for us and therefore taxed? If > we turned around and sold it, would we would get capital gains since > we cannot claim the $250k capital gains exclusion since it is not our > primary residence? > 2) Wait until she dies - If we waited until she died and then > inherited the property, we would get the stepped up basis. Which > means the market value becomes the basis and if we sold it the next > day, we wouldn't get any capital gains. > 3) Mom sells herself, then gives to us - Say mom and dad purchased it > for about $30k. When dad died, say the house was worth $300k (we > would need an retroactive appraisal??). So the basis became $300k. > If mom sells it for $650, she has $350 in capital gains. Everyone has > a $250k exclusion, so she would get taxed on $100k. We could bring > that number down with repairs or remodels (anything else to reduce > this gain??). > The other gotcha is that the exclusion is only if it is her primary > residence, I think for 2 out of the past 5 years because it has to be > considered her primary residence. Is this right? I think her living > in the apartment is fine because it doesn't have to be reported. If > we rented her house, it would have to be reported to the IRS. > After she sells it and gives us the proceeds, do my brother and I have > tax consequences or does that follow the same gift tax rules in option > 1? > Summary?? Option 1 would be the best if she were not to live to 2004 > to bring her under the $1M exclusion. She most likely will be fine. > My brother and I would have a tax consequence if we sold the property. > Option 3 will have a $100k capital gain tax for her. My brother and I > might have a tax consequence if we received the proceeds. > Option 2 sounds the cleanest, since we not in desparate needs to the > funds. If we rented it in the meantime, what are the SF rent control > issues? > Any validation of this would be greatly appreciated! questions, none of which can be answered here because they're sufficiently complex (and the dollar amounts are big enough) that you need to get an estate-planning attorney involved. Generally: you're more or less on track regarding gains on sale of the home...residence required for 2 of the past 5 years, $250k gains exclusion, basis was probably stepped-up based on CA rules. The harder questions regard the estate & the reasons to gift (if there are any). Gifting away appreciated assets gives up one of the tax benefits of inheritance, step-up of the basis of the property. And of course at this point the $1.5M estate isn't an estate, so there are elder-care kinds of issues to consider (perhaps planning for an extended infirmity?). Not to mention, why exactly would she gift 2/3 of her wealth to you & your brother right now, is it her idea? There's always the question of other relatives, capacity, "undue influence", etc. Not to mention Medicaid issues. So bottom line is I'd recommend asking around for a good estate planning attorney in your area. As for SF rent control...lots of rules to consider, try here for a start: http://www.sfgov.org/site/rentboard_index.asp Basically, if it's covered by the rent control ordinance, annual increases are limited to the rent control rate (usually a couple-few percent per year). As big a concern - probably bigger - are the general landlord-tenant rules that apply in SF. At the moment the rental market is a bit soft so if you think it's going to be a short-term rental, you might not want to bother with the potential hassles. Could someone in the family use it for awhile? -Tad |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| On Sun, 9 Nov 2003 15:13:57 CST, "BMS" <mcfared[at]comcast.net> wrote: - quote - > Go get an estate planning lawyer. If you put the house in your names now
True - yet another reminder that everything has a price.> you will inherit a tax bill. Nevertheless, all things considered, I usually go with the bird in the hand. <grin -HW "Skip" Weldon Columbia, SC |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Go get an estate planning lawyer. If you put the house in your names now you will inherit a tax bill. "c wong" <cwongc2002[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:b39a0282.0311090733.40f2f2c0[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > My mom is 75 years old and is slowing down quite a bit. I moved her > out of her house in SF about 1 year ago to be closer to me in > Sunnyvale, and her house in SF has been vacant. My brother and I need > to decide what to do with it, rent it or sell it (SF has rent control > so any advice on this would help as well). Her total estate is > probably worth $1.5M. > As I understand it, if she passes this year, the first $1M of her > estate are tax free. If she passes 2004 or later, the first $1.5M of > her estate are tax free. So I believe these are the options: > 1) Mom gives the property to us - If she passes this year, the $1M is > considered a one time exclusion for gifts and inheritance (basically a > lifetime of up to $1M can be gifted while she is alive without any tax > consequence). She can gift up to $11k per year, per person without > having to report anything. > So say the SF house is $650 and she gives it to us. She would have to > file a gift tax return of $628 ($22k is exempt meaning $11k for my > brother, $11k for me) and if she would have $372 left to gift. (I > wonder if this would be capital gains for us and therefore taxed? If > we turned around and sold it, would we would get capital gains since > we cannot claim the $250k capital gains exclusion since it is not our > primary residence? > 2) Wait until she dies - If we waited until she died and then > inherited the property, we would get the stepped up basis. Which > means the market value becomes the basis and if we sold it the next > day, we wouldn't get any capital gains. > 3) Mom sells herself, then gives to us - Say mom and dad purchased it > for about $30k. When dad died, say the house was worth $300k (we > would need an retroactive appraisal??). So the basis became $300k. > If mom sells it for $650, she has $350 in capital gains. Everyone has > a $250k exclusion, so she would get taxed on $100k. We could bring > that number down with repairs or remodels (anything else to reduce > this gain??). > The other gotcha is that the exclusion is only if it is her primary > residence, I think for 2 out of the past 5 years because it has to be > considered her primary residence. Is this right? I think her living > in the apartment is fine because it doesn't have to be reported. If > we rented her house, it would have to be reported to the IRS. > After she sells it and gives us the proceeds, do my brother and I have > tax consequences or does that follow the same gift tax rules in option > 1? > Summary?? Option 1 would be the best if she were not to live to 2004 > to bring her under the $1M exclusion. She most likely will be fine. > My brother and I would have a tax consequence if we sold the property. > Option 3 will have a $100k capital gain tax for her. My brother and I > might have a tax consequence if we received the proceeds. > Option 2 sounds the cleanest, since we not in desparate needs to the > funds. If we rented it in the meantime, what are the SF rent control > issues? > Any validation of this would be greatly appreciated! > Thanks, > Carol |
| | |||
| |||
| "c wong" <cwongc2002[at]yahoo.com> wrote in message news:b39a0282.0311090733.40f2f2c0[at]posting.google.com... - quote - > My mom is 75 years old and is slowing down quite a bit. I moved her
You need to go see a local attorney specializing in estate planning> out of her house in SF about 1 year ago to be closer to me in > Sunnyvale, and her house in SF has been vacant. My brother and I need > to decide what to do with it, rent it or sell it (SF has rent control > so any advice on this would help as well). Her total estate is > probably worth $1.5M. > As I understand it, if she passes this year, the first $1M of her > estate are tax free. If she passes 2004 or later, the first $1.5M of > her estate are tax free. So I believe these are the options: > 1) Mom gives the property to us - If she passes this year, the $1M is > considered a one time exclusion for gifts and inheritance (basically a > lifetime of up to $1M can be gifted while she is alive without any tax > consequence). She can gift up to $11k per year, per person without > having to report anything. > So say the SF house is $650 and she gives it to us. She would have to > file a gift tax return of $628 ($22k is exempt meaning $11k for my > brother, $11k for me) and if she would have $372 left to gift. (I > wonder if this would be capital gains for us and therefore taxed? If > we turned around and sold it, would we would get capital gains since > we cannot claim the $250k capital gains exclusion since it is not our > primary residence? > 2) Wait until she dies - If we waited until she died and then > inherited the property, we would get the stepped up basis. Which > means the market value becomes the basis and if we sold it the next > day, we wouldn't get any capital gains. > 3) Mom sells herself, then gives to us - Say mom and dad purchased it > for about $30k. When dad died, say the house was worth $300k (we > would need an retroactive appraisal??). So the basis became $300k. > If mom sells it for $650, she has $350 in capital gains. Everyone has > a $250k exclusion, so she would get taxed on $100k. We could bring > that number down with repairs or remodels (anything else to reduce > this gain??). > The other gotcha is that the exclusion is only if it is her primary > residence, I think for 2 out of the past 5 years because it has to be > considered her primary residence. Is this right? I think her living > in the apartment is fine because it doesn't have to be reported. If > we rented her house, it would have to be reported to the IRS. > After she sells it and gives us the proceeds, do my brother and I have > tax consequences or does that follow the same gift tax rules in option > 1? > Summary?? Option 1 would be the best if she were not to live to 2004 > to bring her under the $1M exclusion. She most likely will be fine. > My brother and I would have a tax consequence if we sold the property. > Option 3 will have a $100k capital gain tax for her. My brother and I > might have a tax consequence if we received the proceeds. > Option 2 sounds the cleanest, since we not in desparate needs to the > funds. If we rented it in the meantime, what are the SF rent control > issues? > Any validation of this would be greatly appreciated! > Thanks, > Carol IMMEDIATELY. The money spent on proper legal help is pennies on the dollar compared to what Uncle Sam is going to charge the estate is you try to do it yourself. Brent D. Gardner, ChFC Chartered Financial Consultant http://members.cox.net/brentdgardner1378/ "Be ever questioning. Ignorance is not bliss. It is oblivion. You don't go to heaven if you die dumb. Become better informed. Learn from other's mistakes. You could not live long enough to make them all yourself." - Hyman George Rickover (1900-86), Admiral, US Navy, advocated development of nuclear subs & ships |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| My mom is 75 years old and is slowing down quite a bit. I moved her out of her house in SF about 1 year ago to be closer to me in Sunnyvale, and her house in SF has been vacant. My brother and I need to decide what to do with it, rent it or sell it (SF has rent control so any advice on this would help as well). Her total estate is probably worth $1.5M. As I understand it, if she passes this year, the first $1M of her estate are tax free. If she passes 2004 or later, the first $1.5M of her estate are tax free. So I believe these are the options: 1) Mom gives the property to us - If she passes this year, the $1M is considered a one time exclusion for gifts and inheritance (basically a lifetime of up to $1M can be gifted while she is alive without any tax consequence). She can gift up to $11k per year, per person without having to report anything. So say the SF house is $650 and she gives it to us. She would have to file a gift tax return of $628 ($22k is exempt meaning $11k for my brother, $11k for me) and if she would have $372 left to gift. (I wonder if this would be capital gains for us and therefore taxed? If we turned around and sold it, would we would get capital gains since we cannot claim the $250k capital gains exclusion since it is not our primary residence? 2) Wait until she dies - If we waited until she died and then inherited the property, we would get the stepped up basis. Which means the market value becomes the basis and if we sold it the next day, we wouldn't get any capital gains. 3) Mom sells herself, then gives to us - Say mom and dad purchased it for about $30k. When dad died, say the house was worth $300k (we would need an retroactive appraisal??). So the basis became $300k. If mom sells it for $650, she has $350 in capital gains. Everyone has a $250k exclusion, so she would get taxed on $100k. We could bring that number down with repairs or remodels (anything else to reduce this gain??). The other gotcha is that the exclusion is only if it is her primary residence, I think for 2 out of the past 5 years because it has to be considered her primary residence. Is this right? I think her living in the apartment is fine because it doesn't have to be reported. If we rented her house, it would have to be reported to the IRS. After she sells it and gives us the proceeds, do my brother and I have tax consequences or does that follow the same gift tax rules in option 1? Summary?? Option 1 would be the best if she were not to live to 2004 to bring her under the $1M exclusion. She most likely will be fine. My brother and I would have a tax consequence if we sold the property. Option 3 will have a $100k capital gain tax for her. My brother and I might have a tax consequence if we received the proceeds. Option 2 sounds the cleanest, since we not in desparate needs to the funds. If we rented it in the meantime, what are the SF rent control issues? Any validation of this would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, Carol |
| Tags |
| ailing, california, mother, property |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| California property tax: when is it *really* due? Scott S.: My county tax collector's web site says this of property tax payments: The first installment is due and payable on November 1. However, you have... | Taxes | 7 | 12-16-2005 07:30 AM | |
| California Property Taxes, Upgrades ct kid: I bought a San Jose CA property in 2004, as an investment. It has definitely appreciated since then. I have had prior renters occupying the place... | Taxes | 6 | 08-28-2005 09:39 AM | |
| California property tax basis amynathan: If I do a 1031 property exchange and acquire my parents home what will assessed property value for the purposed of determining property taxes be? ... | Taxes | 14 | 11-01-2004 07:14 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |