|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Thank you! I guess there's no short-cut in this part of the market. (In so many areas, there are comparison tables, reliable sources for rating the vendors, etc.) Regarding the risk that earthquake insurers would go under. I wonder whether the government would step in to make sure the insurers wouldn't go under. Because if the insurers went under, then other people would be less willing to buy earthquake insurance. Also, I was told that the insurers "reinsure"--basically, they somehow spread the risk by sharing the insurance premiums and risks with other insurance companies, I wonder if that would happen with earthquake insurance. State Farm told me they're not writing new policies--except on replacement exceptions or the like. I wonder if any insurers other than Allstate are promoting the market--the only radio ads I've heard have been from Allstate, telling people that Allstate stands ready to help. I'm sure every legitimate company is standing ready to help and that the customers already have called the insurance companies, so my guess is that the purpose of the ads is to encourage people to consider shifting to Allstate. Did you (or anyone else reading this, of course) find any ratings info about which insurance co.s are the most helpful, how secure their money is, etc.? Thanks again! "Avrum Lapin" <avrum113NOSPAM[at]earthlink.net> wrote in message news:avrum113NOSPAM-DF8276.17533003112003[at]news03.west.earthlink.net... - quote - > In article <Hlzpb.96998$Fm2.79954[at]attbi_s04> , > "Howard J" <bikepathlesstaken[at]yahoo.com> wrote: > > We are wanting to evaluate and perhaps solicit additional quotes for > > insuring our property. On the several quotes we've received, we received > > very little info that seems to help us compare the quotes, and nothing along > > the lines of addressing whether expenses would be covered during rebuilding, > > whether it would cover the costs of making the house current to whatever > > codes are present then, etc. > > > We might be able to transfer an existing policy, but as highlighted by the > > fires, we want to choose wisely as regards the mix of features, deductibles, > > and pricing. > > > We'd also appreciate feedback re how to evaluate insurance co.s > > > One "feature" question is whether to get earthqualke insurance. In the > > event of a large earthquake, is it likely that the fund will be solvent, and > > is it likely that parties that had purchased insurance will be better off > > than those who didn't (or in other words, why aren't more people buying > > earthquake insurance)? Thanks! > > When you go out for a quote the insurer will determine a cost to rebuild > using a model which uses as inputs such factors as square footage, > #baths, heating and cooling, # corners, construction methods roof > material, distance from hydrant, disatnce from Fire Station etc. You > will find wildly different values between the various insurers(I did). > Find out what typical construction costs are. > The policy/quote will tell you that they will pay up to 120 (or 150%) > percent of that calculated value. The quote will also detail coverage > for contents, out buildings liability, living costs during > reconstruction as well as a ton of exclusions. I found that the biggest > differentiator was how they covered water damage and mold. > There may be discounts for being retired, non smokers, dogless etc > The pricing depends on what deductable you accept. > Spend the time and go into to see a few insurance agents and understand > what you are buying before you solicit quotes from the web. > As far as earthquake insurance goes it is very expensive, has high > deductables (typically 15% of the face value), little coverage for > contents or replacement living. expenses. If you have little equity go > naked - when the house falls down quit claim the house to the bank. In > the Northridge earthquake 21st Century Insc nearly went under. Guys like > State Farm etc have separate comapnies for Ca and they may also go > under. > Make sure that your insurer is licensed in California. > I don't sell insurance, I just buy it > -- > Avrum Lapin avrum113[at]earthlink.net > Upland CA Remove NOSPAM from address |
| | |||
| |||
| In article <Hlzpb.96998$Fm2.79954[at]attbi_s04> , "Howard J" <bikepathlesstaken[at]yahoo.com> wrote: - quote - > We are wanting to evaluate and perhaps solicit additional quotes for
When you go out for a quote the insurer will determine a cost to rebuild> insuring our property. On the several quotes we've received, we received > very little info that seems to help us compare the quotes, and nothing along > the lines of addressing whether expenses would be covered during rebuilding, > whether it would cover the costs of making the house current to whatever > codes are present then, etc. > We might be able to transfer an existing policy, but as highlighted by the > fires, we want to choose wisely as regards the mix of features, deductibles, > and pricing. > We'd also appreciate feedback re how to evaluate insurance co.s > One "feature" question is whether to get earthqualke insurance. In the > event of a large earthquake, is it likely that the fund will be solvent, and > is it likely that parties that had purchased insurance will be better off > than those who didn't (or in other words, why aren't more people buying > earthquake insurance)? Thanks! using a model which uses as inputs such factors as square footage, #baths, heating and cooling, # corners, construction methods roof material, distance from hydrant, disatnce from Fire Station etc. You will find wildly different values between the various insurers(I did). Find out what typical construction costs are. The policy/quote will tell you that they will pay up to 120 (or 150%) percent of that calculated value. The quote will also detail coverage for contents, out buildings liability, living costs during reconstruction as well as a ton of exclusions. I found that the biggest differentiator was how they covered water damage and mold. There may be discounts for being retired, non smokers, dogless etc The pricing depends on what deductable you accept. Spend the time and go into to see a few insurance agents and understand what you are buying before you solicit quotes from the web. As far as earthquake insurance goes it is very expensive, has high deductables (typically 15% of the face value), little coverage for contents or replacement living. expenses. If you have little equity go naked - when the house falls down quit claim the house to the bank. In the Northridge earthquake 21st Century Insc nearly went under. Guys like State Farm etc have separate comapnies for Ca and they may also go under. Make sure that your insurer is licensed in California. I don't sell insurance, I just buy it -- Avrum Lapin avrum113[at]earthlink.net Upland CA Remove NOSPAM from address |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| We are wanting to evaluate and perhaps solicit additional quotes for insuring our property. On the several quotes we've received, we received very little info that seems to help us compare the quotes, and nothing along the lines of addressing whether expenses would be covered during rebuilding, whether it would cover the costs of making the house current to whatever codes are present then, etc. We might be able to transfer an existing policy, but as highlighted by the fires, we want to choose wisely as regards the mix of features, deductibles, and pricing. We'd also appreciate feedback re how to evaluate insurance co.s One "feature" question is whether to get earthqualke insurance. In the event of a large earthquake, is it likely that the fund will be solvent, and is it likely that parties that had purchased insurance will be better off than those who didn't (or in other words, why aren't more people buying earthquake insurance)? Thanks! |
| Tags |
| calif, ins, property |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Calif SM LLC filing requirements Gary Goodman: A client formed a single member LLC during 2005. Does California have a filing requirement for it? IOW, do we just use the loss from the Federal... | Taxes | 5 | 01-05-2006 04:12 AM | |
| Confirm: Calif Form DE-4 is wrong(!) Joe User: It seems quite obvious that Calif Form DE-4 is wrong. So obviously wrong for so long that I doubt my own conclusion. So I want to vet it here... | Taxes | 6 | 06-22-2004 03:18 AM | |
| Calif. LLC; domestic or foreign The Rainmaker: My partner and I have settled on an LLC (vs. S Corp.) to buy and sell income property in several states, including California. We both live in... | Taxes | 3 | 04-27-2004 06:11 PM | |
| Estate Issue in Calif. bobby: I inherited my grandmother's estate (the only thing left in her estate is her house) as she passed away a few weeks ago. She has a living trust. ... | Taxes | 6 | 02-04-2004 03:13 AM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |