|
#1
| |||
| |||
| "Glenn Sweet" <glenns00[at]pacbell.net> wrote in message news:<VwFkb.1565$sC4.361[at]newssvr25.news.prodigy.com> ... - quote - > I need help!! My father in-law just past away ( 86 years old ) and my
There are no federal taxes for inherited money. I don't believe that> mother in-law is a vital and active 79 year old. My wife and I just sat down > to go over her finances as she was always a 1950's wife and never concerned > herself with the money matters. Well... to make a long story short... she > has about 185,000.00 in simple savings, and a house worth approximatly > 450,000.00. ... all of which will be handed down to us. We are VERY > concerned about the tax issues that are raised by getting this sum all at > once at her passing. Is there a method of transfer that is tax friendly? We > are thinking that it should be transfered in parcels before her passing... > is this wise? should we leave the house in her name... or transfer that as > well ( California )? At the VERY least I believe we need to move the funds > to something that garners more interest than her simple passbook account ( > 2%.. ). Any help would be greatly appreciated!! California has a state tax either. Estates CAN be taxed, and although the federal law on taxing the estate is fluctuating over the next decade, definitely anything under 1 million won't be taxed at all. Taking possession of her house before her death would have negative impact for you. If you are gifted the house, you get her basis in the house. In other words, if she paid $200,000 and you sell it for $450,000, you'll pay taxes on the $250,000 profit (calculating your m-i-l's basis is actually a bit more complicated, but you get the idea). If you wait to inherit it at her death, you get a "step-up" in basis, so that you would pay no taxes if you sell the house for what it was worth when she died. California does have a reputation as having a difficult probate process, so it may be worthwhile to set things up so that her assets pass to you outside of probate. 2% is pretty good for a risk-free liquid investment right now. One needs to be careful to respect for m-i-l's needs for cash before committing the money to anything riskier. |
| | |||
| |||
| The house will be simple, if you don't panic. With it in her name at passing it will come to your family on a stepped up basis. In other words the capital gains tax goes to the grave with her. Though don't start counting the money just yet. The national average is that 1 in 5 people will need some sort of long term care. That costs about $75k per year. Working with a financial planner, you can find an income portfolio that would yield 5-6% "Glenn Sweet" <glenns00[at]pacbell.net> wrote in message news:VwFkb.1565$sC4.361[at]newssvr25.news.prodigy.com... - quote - > I need help!! My father in-law just past away ( 86 years old ) and my > mother in-law is a vital and active 79 year old. My wife and I just sat down > to go over her finances as she was always a 1950's wife and never concerned > herself with the money matters. Well... to make a long story short... she > has about 185,000.00 in simple savings, and a house worth approximatly > 450,000.00. ... all of which will be handed down to us. We are VERY > concerned about the tax issues that are raised by getting this sum all at > once at her passing. Is there a method of transfer that is tax friendly? We > are thinking that it should be transfered in parcels before her passing... > is this wise? should we leave the house in her name... or transfer that as > well ( California )? At the VERY least I believe we need to move the funds > to something that garners more interest than her simple passbook account ( > 2%.. ). Any help would be greatly appreciated!! |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I need help!! My father in-law just past away ( 86 years old ) and my mother in-law is a vital and active 79 year old. My wife and I just sat down to go over her finances as she was always a 1950's wife and never concerned herself with the money matters. Well... to make a long story short... she has about 185,000.00 in simple savings, and a house worth approximatly 450,000.00. ... all of which will be handed down to us. We are VERY concerned about the tax issues that are raised by getting this sum all at once at her passing. Is there a method of transfer that is tax friendly? We are thinking that it should be transfered in parcels before her passing... is this wise? should we leave the house in her name... or transfer that as well ( California )? At the VERY least I believe we need to move the funds to something that garners more interest than her simple passbook account ( 2%.. ). Any help would be greatly appreciated!! |
| Tags |
| inheritance, yikes |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Inheritance jtc: Mother died 9-26-06 in Minnesota; her will left everything in a 4 way split among the (adult) children. The estate includes a cooperative... | Taxes | 1 | 10-22-2006 09:36 AM | |
| Inheritance Tom: My wife's elderly mother has little assets except her house. She has 4 children in all and plans to will equal shares to them. Two of the... | Taxes | 7 | 11-18-2004 01:16 AM | |
| inheritance Lynn: I would like to know if anyone knows what the IRS's definition of inheritance is... I had a friend who's father died and my friend did not want... | Taxes | 5 | 04-30-2004 09:05 AM | |
| Pa Inheritance Tax Bigg-T: My Mother is 80 yrs old. She has approx. $ 50,000 in a joint account with me. (has been joint over 6 yrs.). She wishes to leave the money to me.... | Taxes | 3 | 12-15-2003 02:42 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |