|
#3
| |||
| |||
| michaelloll[at]hotmail.com (Mike) wrote in message news:<cba741c1.0309241203.33a07af6[at]posting.google.com> ... - quote - > > 1. $282,300 at 5.25% for 30 years
Yes, that makes sense. Thank you!> > 2. $35,200 at 5.875% for 15 years > To illustrate what Sandra means, consider this - say you pay > $500/month on each loan. So: > Loan #1: $500 > Loan #2: $500 > Extra Cash: $200 > You are spending $1000/month. You then add the extra $200 to Loan #2, > which gives you: > Loan #1: $500 > Loan #2: $700 ($500 + $200) > Extra Cash: $0 > Once you pay off Loan #2, you have: > Loan #1: $500 > Loan #2: $0 > Extra Cash: $700 (your Loan #2 payment, including the extra cash) > You can then do this: > Loan #1: $1200 ($500 + $500 + $200) > Extra Cash: $0 > It is a snowball effect...once you pay off a higher interest loan, you > roll the would be payment into the payment for the next highest loan > (in your case, Loan #1). |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| "Sgt. Sausage" <nobody[at]nowhere.com> wrote in message news:<3f705349$0$43875$a0465688[at]nnrp.fuse.net> ... - quote - > > I believe I would save much more in
Could you please demonstrate why it's better to pay off the higher> > the long run doing that. > You can *believe* anything you want, but that math > they tried to teach you back in high school will *prove* > that it's in your best interest (if your goal is to minimize > total payout over the life of the loans) to pay off the > highest interest first. > > Am I missing something here? > Yes > > What would you do? > Payoff the higher interest loan first. Once it's > paid off, apply that money to accelerate payment > on the lower interest loan. interest loan first by showing me the math, step by step? Here's what it seems to me (I'm doing this from memory so bear with me): if I apply $200 extra per month to the higher interest loan, I pay it off in about 8 years, and save almost $10,000 on that loan. I then apply the extra $200 to the lower interest loan (the only one I have left at this point) and pay it off in 18 years (so it only took me 8+18=26 years instead of 30 years to pay if off), and save around $35,000 on that loan. So a total savings of around $45,000 over the course of 26 years. But if I apply the extra $200 to the lower interest loan, I pay it off in about 23 years and save somewhere around $73,000 on that loan (and save nothing on the higher interest loan, which is paid off in 15 years). What's wrong with my thinking here? |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Randy Gordon wrote: - quote - > I just bought a house with an 80-10-10 plan so I now have two home
Maybe it would help to pretend you have 9 loans from different banks,> loans to pay off (I have no other debt). They are as follows: > 1. $282,300 at 5.25% for 30 years > 2. $35,200 at 5.875% for 15 years > As far as I know, everything else about them is the same regarding tax > deductions, etc. I can pay about $100-$200 a month extra. > I keep reading that you should pay off the higher interest rate loan > first, regardless of the balance, but it seems to me that I should > apply all the extra money toward the loan with the higher balance even > though its interest rate is lower. I believe I would save much more in > the long run doing that. Am I missing something here? each adding interest at the following rates: 1. $35,288 at 5.25% 2. $35,288 at 5.25% 3. $35,288 at 5.25% 4. $35,288 at 5.25% 5. $35,288 at 5.25% 6. $35,288 at 5.25% 7. $35,288 at 5.25% 8. $35,288 at 5.25% 9. $35,200 at 5.875% Now which would you pay off first? -Tad PS note that the term - 15/30 yr - doesn't really factor into the question you've posed...it just sets your minimum required monthly payment...you can turn your 30-year loan into a 15-year by simply paying more each month. |
| | |||
| |||
| - quote - > I believe I would save much more in
You can *believe* anything you want, but that math> the long run doing that. they tried to teach you back in high school will *prove* that it's in your best interest (if your goal is to minimize total payout over the life of the loans) to pay off the highest interest first. - quote - > Am I missing something here?
Yes- quote - > What would you do?
Payoff the higher interest loan first. Once it'spaid off, apply that money to accelerate payment on the lower interest loan. |
|
#-1
| |||
| |||
| I just bought a house with an 80-10-10 plan so I now have two home loans to pay off (I have no other debt). They are as follows: 1. $282,300 at 5.25% for 30 years 2. $35,200 at 5.875% for 15 years As far as I know, everything else about them is the same regarding tax deductions, etc. I can pay about $100-$200 a month extra. I keep reading that you should pay off the higher interest rate loan first, regardless of the balance, but it seems to me that I should apply all the extra money toward the loan with the higher balance even though its interest rate is lower. I believe I would save much more in the long run doing that. Am I missing something here? What would you do? |
| Tags |
| loan, pay |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | Last Post | |
| Sold Car / Paid Off Loan - Is it really an asset when car loan present? Justin: I'm deducting mileage on form 2106. I'm a traveling music teacher, I commute to an office and from there am sent to various places to teach. It... | Taxes | 19 | 02-18-2007 08:09 AM | |
| Refinancing home loan = new loan? Sam: When refinancing a home loan what would be the best way to handle that in Money? Would it be best to create a new loan account with the new... | Microsoft Money | 2 | 10-02-2005 03:25 PM | |
| Student loan Loan Disbursement and tax credit Mihir: I am in kind of weird situation right now. My wife was a full-time student last year and graduated in Aug-04. She was getting semester to... | Taxes | 3 | 04-16-2005 02:56 PM | |
| Scheduled bills from loan going past term of loan Bryan: Hope someone can help with this: I have an automobile loan in Money 2000 that I have set up as a monthly recurring bill. This loan will be paid... | Microsoft Money | 6 | 02-11-2004 02:13 PM | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |